Kimwell Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 105.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who became unsteady during a transfer and was lowered to the floor by staff, the Facility failed to ensure staff provided quality of care consistent with professional standards of practice, when on 08/30/25, after Resident #1 was lowered to the floor, two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) transferred him/her up off the floor without informing and having the nurse assess him/her first for the potential for physical injury, Resident #1 exhibited a sudden change in his/her condition, with signs and symptoms of severe pain, was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and was diagnosed with a fracture of his/her left hip.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, dated as revised March 2018 indicated the following:-a fall is defined as: unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower level; an episode where a resident lost his/her balance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a homelike environment on three of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Repair water damaged ceiling tiles on the K3 unit; 2. Ensure Resident #18 had a bedroom with walls, blinds, and durable medical condition in good repair; and 3. Ensure residents' bedrooms were homelike and free from holes and damaged window treatments on the K1 and K2 units.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Homelike Environment, dated 2001, indicated but was not limited to the following:-the facility staff and management maximize to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These include a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment.-the maintenance director is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance service to assure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner.During an interview on 3/11/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive infection control program to include timely surveillance data and a comprehensive analysis which identified interventions when patterns and trends were identified. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure timely and accurate surveillance data for all infection types to identify a pattern of E-Coli Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) (bacterial infection, caused by E-Coli bacteria, typically originating from the gut, entering the urinary tract, and causing inflammation, often due to improper wiping/perineal care) and implement interventions to decrease the risk of residents developing E-Coli UTIs. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Surveillance for Infections, dated as last revised September 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The Infection Preventionist (IP) will conduct ongoing surveillance for healthcare associated infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcomes and that may…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included a system to monitor antibiotic use, including prophylactic antibiotic use, to ensure appropriate antibiotics were utilized to prevent antibiotic resistance. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #56, to document the rationale for antibiotic treatment of an infection not meeting the criteria of an infection;2. For Resident #2, to ensure he/she was prescribed an antibiotic susceptible to the organism growth and to document rationale for antibiotic treatment of an infection not meeting the criteria of an infection;3. For Resident #35, to ensure he/she was prescribed an antibiotic susceptible to the organism growth and not treated with a prophylactic antibiotic concurrently and to document rationale for antibiotic treatment of an infection not meeting the criteria of an infection;4. For Resident #21, to document the rationale for antibiotic treatment from a Hospice recommendation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided to maintain good personal hygiene for one Resident (#35), in a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure showers were offered and provided per his/her shower schedule. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Support, dated as last revised March 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.-Refusal of care and information are documented in the resident's clinical record.-Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident at with an alteration in skin integrity related to a wound, specifically chronic venous ulcers, received necessary treatment and services to promote healing for one Resident (#74), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to transcribe and implement wound care per the Hospital Discharge Summary for seven days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Orders, dated as last revised November 2014, indicated but was not limited to the following:-A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident.-Treatment Orders: When recording treatment orders, specify the treatment, frequency, and duration of the treatment. Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised July 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following:-All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care planned goals, or any changes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Properly monitor medication refrigeration temperatures in one of three medication storage rooms reviewed to ensure the safety and integrity of vaccines stored; and2. Provide a permanently affixed compartment and separate from all other medications for the storage of schedule IV (low potential for misuse and dependence) controlled substance in two of three medication room refrigerators reviewed. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated November 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations.-Controlled substances that require refrigeration are stored within a locked box within the refrigerator.-This box must be attached to the inside of the refrigerator.-The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record was maintained for two Residents (#74 and #35), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:1. For Resident #74, the Medical Orders for Life Saving Treatment (MOLST) in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) matched the active Do Not Resuscitate, Intubate, or Ventilate physician's order; and2. For Resident #35, with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), he/she did not have conflicting therapeutic diet orders of Regular texture versus Mechanical Soft/Ground texture in the active medical record. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Electronic Medical Record (EMR), dated 12/19/22, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The EMR's quality and integrity shall be maintained by adhering to identified standards in entering complete, concise, accurate and updated information that produces clear and useful medical record.-Staff making entry into the EMR are responsible for checking for contradictory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and maintenance record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards for two out of three units in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained at safe and comfortable levels in resident bathrooms and shower rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Water Temperatures, Safety of, dated 2001, included but was not limited to the following: -Policy Statement: Tap water in the facility shall be kept within a temperature range to prevent scalding of residents. -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 115 degrees Fahrenheit, or the maximum allowable temperature per state regulation. 2. Maintenance staff is responsible for checking thermostats and temperature controls in the facility and recording these checks in a maintenance log. 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Pneumococcal and Influenza immunizations as requested/consented for three Residents (#94, #90 and #11), out of a total sample of five residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Influenza Vaccine, dated as revised in September 2024, indicated the following: -between as early as August 1st through March 31st of the following year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized -residents admitted between August 1st (or when the vaccine is available) and March 31st of the following year shall be offered the vaccine within five (5) working days of the resident's admission to the facility Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated as revised in March 2023, indicated the following: -all residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections -prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Court Order of Appointment of Guardian for an Incapacitated Person was followed for one Resident (#77), in a sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for Resident #77 that the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form, which was signed by the previous Health Care Proxy (HCP), was voided with the appointment of a court designated guardian (a professional guardian who is unrelated to the incapacitated adult) who revoked the previous HCP and did not have authority to make advanced directive treatment decisions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Representative, dated as last revised February 2021, indicated the following: -If the resident is determined to be incompetent under the laws of the state by a court of competent jurisdiction, the rights of the resident devolve to and are exercised by the resident representative appointed to act on the resident's behalf. -The court-appointed resident representative will exercise the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-10-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEST CARE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA