Sarah S Brayton Center
4901 North Main Street, Fall River, MA 02720 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 183 certified beds · (508) 675-1001 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $151,920 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-18)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.8% | 16.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.2% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.0% | 15.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.0% | 19.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.1% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.7% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.0% | 21.4% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.3% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.2% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.57 | 1.88 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 1.50 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 247 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.6%CMS range 46.1–61.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.8–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 85.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 84.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.2%CMS range 3.1–8.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 183 beds and averages 166.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and accident prevention interventions to maintain the safety of one Resident (#76), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to maintain the Resident's safety and prevent falls, and/or injury, resulting in Resident #76 sustaining a total of 14 falls from the time of their admission [DATE]) to 8/27/23; 12 of which were unwitnessed, and one resulted in the Resident being transported to the emergency room for a head laceration that required three staples. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk Managing, revised March 2018, included but was not limited to: -The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. -If a systematic evaluation of a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, a resident group meeting, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances brought forward from the Resident Council were addressed and promptly resolved to ensure the residents felt their concerns were acted upon timely and included the facility response to the group.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council, dated 2001, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The purpose of the Resident Council is to provide a forum for: a. Residents to have input in the operation of the facility; b. Discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; c. Consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and d. Disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents.-A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern.-The Quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for five Residents (#81, #108, #12, #136 and #132), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Residents #81 and #108, to implement physician's orders for air mattress settings;2. For Residents #12 and #136, to implement physician's orders for oxygen; and 3. For Resident #132, to ensure physician's orders were in place upon admission for a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine (uses air pressure to hold the airway open while sleeping). Findings include:Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following:-The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice.Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated:-Nurse's Responsibility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two Residents (#12, #50), with unplanned gradual weight loss, and one Resident with significant weight gain (#95), in a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #12, to identify and develop interventions to prevent and address a 12.4% significant weight loss between 8/1/25 and 2/2/26;2. For Resident #50, to identify and develop interventions to prevent and address a 17.57% significant weight loss between 11/4/25 and 2/12/26; and3. For Resident (#95), to implement dietitian recommendations to address a weight gain and ensure the Resident's preference to lose weight was met.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: - Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. - Unless notified of significant weight change, the dietitian will review the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed as required for three Residents (#6, #13 and #7), out of a total of 33 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Services, revised 2/2021, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Physician orders and progress notes are maintained in accordance with current OBRA regulations and facility policy.-Physician visits, frequency of visits, emergency care of residents, etc., are provided in accordance with current OBRA regulations and facility policy. 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 and had diagnoses including polymyalgia rheumatica, congestive heart failure, major depression and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/8/26, indicated Resident #6 was cognitively intact evidenced by a score of 14 out of 15 on the Brief interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS) and had limited range of motion in both upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident #6's clinical record indicated that between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, test tray results, and interviews, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature, for two of two test trays on two different units. Findings include: During the initial tour of the facility on 2/17/26, the surveyors received multiple food complaints from the residents on four out of five units. Their major concerns were related to cold food temperatures and the taste of the food served. During the Resident Council Meeting on 2/18/26 at 1:45 P.M., 14 residents attended the meeting and complained about the food. They described the food as horrible, the cold beverages were warm when served and the hot foods were not always served hot.On 2/19/26 at 7:40 A.M., the surveyor observed the breakfast tray line. The [NAME] Unit food truck left the kitchen at 7:43 A.M. and arrived at the unit at 7:45 A.M. Nursing staff began passing trays at 7:53 A.M. and the last tray was passed at 7:58 A.M., 15 minutes after the trays arrived on the Unit. On 2/19/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#185), out of a total sample of 33 residents, was treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #185, to ensure a cholecystostomy tube drainage system (a drainage bag connected to a catheter inserted through the skin into the gallbladder to drain bile, or infected fluid) was consistently covered with a privacy cover. Findings Include:Review of the facility's policy titled Dignity, dated February 2021, indicated but was not limited to:-Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem-Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times-Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: helping the resident keep urinary catheter bags covered.Resident #185 was admitted to the facility in February 2026 and had diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and individualize a comprehensive care plan for one Resident (#132), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan related to Resident #132's obstructive sleep apnea (where throat muscles relax and block the airway) with use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine (uses air pressure to hold the airway open) was developed and implemented. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled CPAP/BiPAP Support, dated March 2015, indicated but was not limited to the following:-To provide the spontaneously breathing resident with continuous positive airway pressure with or without supplemental oxygen-To improve arterial oxygenation (PaO2) in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive/obstructive lung disease-To promote resident comfort and safetyResident #132 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea.Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#50) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure emergency supplies were kept with the Resident in accordance with the plan of care and the physician's orders in case of emergency.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hemodialysis Catheters - Access and Care of, dated as revised 2/2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Hemodialysis catheters are surgically placed in the jugular, subclavian, or femoral veins and end in the vena cava. Removal of the catheter is a surgical procedure.-Dialysis catheters should be marked for dialysis use only so they are not confused with central venous access devices.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and readily accessible for facility staff for three Residents (#6, #13 and #16), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, for Residents #6, #13 and #16, the facility failed to ensure the Physician's progress notes were available in the Residents' medical record.Findings include:1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 and had diagnoses including polymyalgia rheumatica, congestive heart failure, major depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/8/26, indicated Resident #6 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS) and had limited range of motion in both upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident #6's entire medical record indicated that the Physician examined the Resident on 12/27/24 and 12/17/25. Further review of the medical record failed to indicate any documentation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#74, #117, and #155) were offered or provided a summary of their baseline care plans, out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, dated as last revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission. -A comprehensive care plan may be used in place of the baseline care plan providing the comprehensive care plan is developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission and meets the requirements of a comprehensive assessment. -The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand) that includes, but is not limited to the following: the stated goals and objectives of the resident, a summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions, any services and treatments to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services to ensure that proper treatment to maintain hearing ability was provided for one Resident (#115), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the consultant provider to address Resident #115's non-functioning hearing aids for more than two months, resulting in a delay in the process of repairing them. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hearing Aid, Care of, last revised February 2018, indicated but was not limited to: -The purpose of this procedure is to maintain the resident's hearing at the highest attainable level. Care of the hearing aid: -Never clean or immerse any part of a hearing aid (other than the ear mold) in water. The device must be returned to the dealer or to an audiologist to be cleaned properly. Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: -The date and time the hearing aid was checked and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on four of four units. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. On the [NAME] Unit to date insulin pens with an open and discard date; 2. On the Sagamore Unit to date ophthalmic ointment with a discard date; 3. On the Pocasset Unit to maintain a medication cart free from loose pills; and 4. On the [NAME] Unit to date eye drops with an open and discard date. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, last revised November 2020, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy heading: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. - Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation area clean, safe, and sanitary manner. 4. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure environmental cleaning was maintained in the laundry room including flooring and surfaces and properly store linens; 2. For Resident #154, who has chronic wounds, putting him/her at increased risk for infection, to ensure that staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Findings include: 1. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Health Care Delivery in All Settings, last reviewed 11/29/22, indicated but was not limited to: Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection require…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were screened for eligibility to receive the recommended influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccinations, residents/residents' representatives were educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine, and were offered and administered (if applicable) the vaccine in a timely manner for one Resident (#117), out of a total sample size of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, dated October 2024, indicated the following: -Make sure your patients are up to date with pneumococcal vaccination. Adults >= [AGE] years old, Complete Pneumococcal Vaccine Schedules: -PPSV23 only at any age - give PCV20 or PCV21 >= 1 year later Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised March 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -All residents are offered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide education and/or offer the COVID-19 vaccination as required or appropriate per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for two Residents (#153 and #117), out of a total sample size of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Use of COVID-19 Vaccines in the U.S. revised October 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -People ages 5-64 years should receive 1 dose of an age appropriate 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. Ages 12-64 years (Previous COVID-19 vaccination before 2024-2025 vaccine): -Receive 1 dose of 2024-2025 vaccine -People ages 65 years and older, vaccinated under the routine schedule, are recommended to receive 2 doses of an 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine (i.e., Moderna, Novavax, or Pfizer-BioNTech) separated by 6 months (minimum interval 2 months) regardless of vaccination history, with one exception:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one sampled Resident (#7) with an indwelling nephrostomy tube (a catheter inserted through the skin into the kidney draining urine into a collection bag outside of the body), out of a total sample of 33 residents, that the Resident's dignity was maintained. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently place the Resident's nephrostomy tube drainage bag in a privacy bag. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, dated as revised February 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents. - Helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered. Resident #7 was re-admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis of obstructive nephropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract), hydronephrosis (back up of urine in one or more kidneys), and had a right nephrostomy tube. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner when one Resident (#30), out of a total sample of 33 residents, did not keep medical appointments with his/her consultant cardiologist and urologist as scheduled. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated February 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -Our facility notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in December 2021 and had diagnoses including sick sinus syndrome (a condition where the heart's natural pacemaker, known as the sinus node, does not function properly), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, presence of a cardiac pacemaker (a small, battery-powered implanted device used to correct a slower-than-normal heart rate), retention of urine, and a Foley catheter (a thin, flexible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one Resident (#413) from misappropriation of resident property, out of a total sample of 33 residents, when fifty dollars and a store credit card were taken from his/her personal bag. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, last revised April 2021, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy Statement: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. - Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone. 2. Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify: c. theft, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 8. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. 9. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for alleged misappropriation of resident property for one Resident (#413), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of misappropriation of Resident #413's fifty dollars and a store credit card. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, last revised April 2021, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy Statement: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. - Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone. 2. Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify: c. theft, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 8. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. 9.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of resident property was reported timely to the state agency and to the police as required, for one Resident (#413), of 33 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, last revised April 2021, indicated but was not limited to: 9. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, last revised September 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. -Reporting Allegations to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for two Residents (#30 and #72), out of 33 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #30, develop and implement an individualized plan of care for a pacemaker; and 2. For Resident #72, develop a person-centered, individualized care plan that was implemented for wandering and elopement risk. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and residents' conditions change -Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one Resident (#115), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for communication was updated to reflect the Resident's non-functioning bilateral hearing aids. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Resident #115 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 and had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one Resident (#30), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor for signs/symptoms for pacemaker complications and monitor the function of the pacemaker. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pacemaker, Care of a Resident With, last revised 12/2015, indicated but was not limited to: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide information about and guidance for the care of a resident with a pacemaker. -Pacemakers are electronic devices that artificially stimulate the heart muscle with electrical impulses when the heart rhythm is too slow. -Pacemakers are programmed to sense the heart and respiratory rate and to administer electrical pulses when the heart rate falls below a set threshold. -Permanent pacemakers are surgically implanted when the cause of the arrhythmia is chronic, and it has been determined that the cause is not transient. Complications -If the pulse generator or battery fails, or if the leads…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper care and treatment of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line device (inserted into a vein in the upper arm and is advanced until the internal tip of the catheter is in the superior vena cava to deliver medications and other treatments directly to the large central veins near your heart) was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66's PICC line dressing was secured to prevent infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, last revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: - Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter- related infections that are associated with contaminated, soiled, or wet dressings. - General Guidelines: 1. Perform site care and dressing change at established…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, observation, and meal test tray results, on one of four units, the facility failed to prepare and serve meals in a manner conserving flavor, were palatable, and served at safe and appetizing temperatures for one out of one test tray conducted. Findings include: During initial resident screening on 12/16/24 and 12/17/24, the residents expressed the following concerns about the food served at the facility: - Food has been cold lately, especially breakfast. - No variety, and it is always cold. - Food sucks, no flavor it is too bland. Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 8/14/24, indicated a resident was concerned about food temperatures and receiving cold food. On 12/18/24 at 9:57 A.M., the surveyor held a Resident Group meeting with 12 residents in attendance. The residents expressed concern with the temperature of the food served at the facility that included but was not limited to: - Food is cold for all meals. - Food is cold all days of the week and even worse on the weekends. - Staff are slow to distribute trays and leave the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain safe and clean equipment, in two of four kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised January 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-305.11 (A) Except as specified in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this section, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food (1) in a clean, dry location. 4-602.11 (D) Equipment is used for storage of packaged or unpackaged food such as a reach-in refrigerator and the equipment is cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. 4-602.13 Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. 6-501.12 (A) Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#30), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30's medical record included information about his/her cardiac pacemaker. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pacemaker, Care of a Resident With, last revised 12/2015, indicated but was not limited to: Documentation -For each resident with a pacemaker, document the following in the medical record and on a pacemaker identification card upon admission: a. The name, address, and telephone number of the cardiologist; b. Type of pacemaker; c. Type of leads; d. Manufacturer and model; e. Serial number; f. Date of implant; and g. Paced rate -When the resident's pacemaker is monitored by the Physician, document the date and results of the pacemaker surveillance, including: a. How the resident's pacemaker was monitored (phone, office, internet); b. Type of heart rhythm;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure the residents and/or their family members or legal representatives participated in the development and implementation of each of their person-centered care plans, which included conducting and inviting residents and/or their representatives to an interdisciplinary care plan meeting following the completion of their comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, undated, indicated that the Facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident, consistent with the residents' rights that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The Policy also indicated that to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s). An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure that nursing notified his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) of significant changes in his/her status, which included the development of additional pressure areas, testing positive for Covid-19 (a contagious respiratory infection caused by a particular virus), as well as the need to be transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) on multiple occasions, and the need for him/her to be admitted to the Hospital for treatment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Change in Resident's Condition or Status, dated as last revised 2/2021, indicated that the facility will promptly notifies the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the residents medical/mental condition and/or status. The Policy further indicates that unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when; -the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was admitted with multiple pressure injuries and significantly impaired skin, the Facility failed to ensure they provided care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, when upon admission nursing failed to adequately assess his/her skin condition, which included assessment and documentation related to pressure injuries and other skin conditions, and the need to be evaluated by a wound physician. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, dated as last revised 4/2018, indicated that the nursing staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers. The Policy also indicated following; -The Nursing Staff and Practitioner will examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of existing pressure ulcers or other skin conditions; and -Full assessment of pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean, comfortable, and homelike. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Residents in 2 of 5 dining areas had a comfortable and homelike dining experience, 2. The resident's main dining area was not used as an overflow storage area, and the carpet was clean and well maintained, and 3. Residents' rooms were maintained in good repair, and homelike, on 2 of 4 resident care units. Findings include: 1. During dining observations throughout survey on 9/12/23, 9/13/23, 9/14/23, and 9/15/23, the surveyor observed the following: On 9/12/23 at 11:57 A.M., the surveyor observed 11 residents seated in the back dining/activity area on the Sagamore Unit. The television was tuned to a movie. Staff were not observed to wash any residents' hands prior to the meal delivery. All residents were served their meal from the food truck to the table. All meal plates remained on the heating elements and several residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, documentation review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement resident-centered, meaningful, and engaging activity programming for all residents on one unit and failed to provide for two Residents (#127 and #623), out of 32 sampled residents, an activity program which engaged the residents and supported their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To provide resident-centered, meaningful, and engaging activities to residents on the Sagamore Unit; and 2. To ensure facility sponsored individualized and group activities were offered to support the psychosocial well-being of the residents, including Resident #127 and Resident #623. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Activity Programs, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - Activity programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. - The activities program is ongoing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to label medications in accordance with currently accepted professional principles to include the expiration dates when applicable, and ensure all drugs were stored in locked compartments to prevent unauthorized access. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure multi-dose containers of medication were appropriately labeled for 2 of 5 medication carts observed, on 2 of 3 units; and 2. Ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permitted only authorized personnel access. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The expiration/beyond use date of the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, dated as revised November 2022, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, observation, and meal test trays on 2 of 4 units, the facility failed to provide residents with meals that were prepared and served in a manner that conserved flavor, were palatable, and served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: On 9/11/23 and 9/12/23, during the resident's initial screening, the survey team identified 25 residents who expressed concerns about food palatability as follows: - Food is cold. - Food not good, doesn't taste good. - Horrible and overcooked. - If you don't get to the main dining room (Monday through Friday) you get cold food delivered to your room. - Food nasty, often cold. - I don't look forward to meals. - Soup is ice cold. - Food is Bland. - Food not hot when you get it. - Institutional. On 9/12/23 at 1:15 P.M., the surveyor conducted a Resident Group Meeting with 14 residents in attendance, who voiced concerns regarding the quality and palatability of the meals provided to them. Fourteen out of 14 residents complained about cold food, including the taste and temperature of the coffee. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and records reviewed, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were maintained for four Residents (#17, #601, #129, and #15). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Isolation - Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions, dated August 2019, indicated but was not limited to: -Transmission-based precautions are initiated when a resident develops signs and symptoms of a transmissible infection; arrives for admission with symptoms of an infection or has a laboratory confirmed infection; and is at risk of transmitting the infection to other residents. -Transmission-based precautions may include contact precautions, droplet precautions, or airborne precautions. -If a resident is suspected of, or identified as, having a communicable infectious disease, the charge nurse or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain essential gas and electrical equipment, located in the main kitchen, in safe operating condition. Findings include: On 9/11/23 at 12:18 P.M., the surveyor observed that the cook was not using the two ovens. During an interview on 9/11/23 at 12:20 P.M., the Food Manager said the two ovens have not been working since she arrived over a year ago. She also said the six gas burners, located on the top of the stove, had to be lit manually, and this had been going on for some time. During an interview on 9/12/23 at 2:30 P.M., the Food Manager said she communicates with the Maintenance Director via email or telephone if there are any maintenance needs. During an interview on 9/12/23 4:30 P.M., the Administrator said she was not aware of the nonfunctional (broken) ovens and gas burners. During an interview on 9/13/23 at 10:15 A.M., the Food Manager said she had concerns about the steam table not consistently maintaining temperature during the meal service and did notice the prior day that the middle plate holder of the plate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed for one Resident (#74), of 32 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #74, to develop a communication care plan. Findings include: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease and cognitive disorder with Lewy body dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/7/23, indicated Resident #74 was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15. Review of Resident #74's medical record indicated he/she was Portuguese speaking at baseline. On 9/11/23 at 9:47 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #74 speaking Portuguese with facility staff. Review of Resident #74's care plans indicated no care plan for communication. During an interview on 9/18/23 at 10:26 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said Resident #74 did not have a care plan for communication.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for one Resident (#114), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was weighed according to the physician's order, and if treatment refused, to notify the physician. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised March 2022, included the following: -Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021, included the following: -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a: Refusal of treatment or medication two (2) or more consecutive times. Resident #114 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses that included cirrhosis of the liver with ascites (abdominal swelling caused by the accumulation of fluid, most often related to liver disease), diabetes, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to ensure one Resident (#143), out of a total sample of 32 residents, was able to effectively communicate his/her needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Translation Language, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - The facility's language access program will ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility. - When encountering LEP individuals, staff members will conduct the initial language assessment and identify primary language and inform resident of interpretation services. - All LEP persons shall have access to medical interpretation line provided by the facility. Resident #143 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses which included hypothyroidism and traumatic brain injury. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/17/23, indicated Resident #143 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the proper care and management related to urinary catheter bags for three Residents (#52, #129, and #145), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #52, the drainage bag and tubing were positioned to lessen the likelihood of complications and maintained to prevent the possibility of infection, 2. For Resident #129, the catheter was maintained in a manner to prevent the possibility of infection, and 3. For Resident #145, the catheter was maintained in a manner to prevent the possibility of infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, dated September 2014, indicated but was not limited to: - Check the resident frequently to be sure he or she is not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks, and - The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for one Resident (#86), of seven receiving dialysis services, out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently document weights and vitals in a dialysis communication book pre-dialysis and failed to receive communication from the dialysis center with weights and vitals post-dialysis. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, revised September 2021, indicated the following: - Agreement between this facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed, including: how information will be exchanged between the facilities. - A communication log will be maintained for the facility and the ESRD facility including: - Facility to record vital signs prior to leaving the facility. - Facility to provide updated medication list and face sheet. - ESRD facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#27) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 32 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, revised March 2019, included but was not limited to: - Policy: To guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma, - This facility supports a culture of emotional well-being and physical safety for staff, residents and visitors, - Trauma-informed care is culturally sensitive and person-centered, - Caregivers are taught strategies to help eliminate, mitigate or sensitively address a resident's triggers, - Use trauma-informed principles in strategic planning, and - Implement universal screening of residents for trauma. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, and Post-Traumatic Stress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it remained free from a medication error rate of 5 percent (%) or greater. Specifically, two medication errors were observed, out of 30 total opportunities for error, which resulted in a medication error rate of 6.67% and affected one Resident (#601), out of seven total residents observed. Findings include: Resident #601 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses that included cirrhosis (disease of the liver) with ascites (accumulation of fluid in the stomach), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypokalemia (low potassium), and hypomagnesemia (low magnesium). Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, included but was not limited to: - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. - The individual administering the medication checks the label three (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for two Residents (#624 and #703) of 32 sampled residents and one Resident (#704), out of 11 randomly selected individual controlled substance records selected for inspection during medication storage review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete, accurate, and systemically organized within accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #624, to document the administration of parental nutrition; 2. For Resident #703, to document the accurate dosage of a narcotic administered on two identified occasions; and 3. For Resident #704, to document the accurate dosage of a narcotic administered on one identified occasion. Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated as revised July 2017, indicated but was not limited to: -The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: a. objective observations; b. medications administered; c. treatments or services performed; d. changes in the resident's condition;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-19 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observations, the facility failed to post a notice of availability of survey results and prominently post the Department of Public Health (DPH) Survey inspection results binder. Findings include: On 12/18/24 at 9:57 A.M., the surveyor held a Resident Group meeting with 12 residents in attendance. Twelve of 12 residents said they were not aware of the location of the DPH Survey inspection results and said they were not aware the survey results were available for review. On 12/18/24 and 12/19/24, the surveyor toured the four resident care units and front lobby of the facility and failed to observe any postings which indicated survey results were readily available and accessible for examination without having to ask to view them. On four of four units, the surveyor observed wall mounted document holders (positioned approximately five feet from the floor) across from the nursing stations. The document holders held a paper folder labeled grievance forms and behind that was a thin, three-ringed binder which had survey results printed on the spine (facing upward).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-12-19 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge assessment to ensure timely coding and transmitting of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one Resident (#60), out of one resident assessment reviewed, resulting in a 129-day delay in the encoding and transmission of a MDS post-discharge from the facility. Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, Version 3.0, indicated assessments must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the assessment reference date (ARD) and transmitted and encoded within 7 days of assessment completion. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 following a hospitalization for generalized weakness and frequent falls. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 indicated the Resident had been transferred to the hospital on 8/10/24 for possible sepsis and was later admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Review of the census for the facility indicated the facility had stopped billing for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-09-18 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure written notice for transfer or discharge was provided to Residents and/or Resident Representatives prior to hospital transfers for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised 3/2021, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents and/or representatives are notified in writing, and in a language and format they understand, at least thirty (30) days prior to a transfer or discharge. - Except as specified below, the resident and his or her representative are given a thirty (30) day advance written notice of an impending transfer or discharge from this facility. - Under the following circumstances, the notice is given as soon as it practicable but before the transfer or discharge: d. An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses which included neck fracture and metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-09-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notification of the bed hold policy to the Resident or Resident Representative prior to discharge to the hospital for four Residents (#66, #83, #114, and #127), in a total sample of 32 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Holds and Returns, revised 3/2022, indicated but was not limited to: - All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents are provided written information about these policies at least twice: a. well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and b. at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours) 1. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses which included neck fracture and metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by diseases or toxins which affect metabolism). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-09-18 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three Residents (#145, #27, and #74), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #145, to accurately reflect the use of opioid medication; 2. For Resident #27, to accurately reflect the election of hospice services; and 3. For Resident #74, to accurately reflect a fall resulting in injury. Findings include: 1. Resident #145 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including spinal cord dysfunction and hypertension. Review of Resident #145's current Physician's Orders indicated the following: - Tramadol HCl Oral Tablet (opioid pain medication), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for mod pain, Give 2 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for severe pain. Review of Resident #145's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2023 indicated the Resident received the Tramadol medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$151,920 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $151,920 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BEST CARE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| AL-MADI, SAMI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2022 |
| CHAPLER, YAAKOV | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2022 |
| SARZA, SANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| STEINBERG, MOSHE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2022 |
| BONADIO & CO LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| TWOMAGNETS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| TORRES, EFRAIN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225589. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.