Lakeland Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 201 beds and averages 136.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-09-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's nutrition needs were met for one of nine residents (Resident (R)103) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to reconcile discrepancies between facility weights, reflecting stable weight, and hospital weights, reflecting significant weight loss. R103 was weighed during the survey and weighed 126 pounds; the most recent facility weight two weeks earlier was 170.6 pounds. Due in part to the failure to obtain accurate weights, review the hospitalization documentation in the resident's record, and physically/clinically assess the resident, R103's tube feeding regimen was not increased to address weight loss, severe protein malnutrition, and a worsening sacral pressure ulcer. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated admission Record in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis, hypoglycemia (low blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT #NJ162233 Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident #70. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/22/24 at 11:02 AM, during initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #70 resting in their bed with their eyes closed. The surveyor also observed the Registered Nurse (RN) in the room who stated that she assessed the resident's vital signs. On 7/22/24 at 11:32 AM, the surveyor reviewed the form that was provided by the facility titled, Reportable Event Record/Report for a Facility Reported Event (FRE) dated 3/9/23 which included the following: Today's date: 3/9/23 Date of Event: 3/7/23 Was This a Significant Event: Yes Was Significant Event Called in? Yes Date: 3/8/23 Time: 2:30 PM Type of Incident: Other, specify: Resident had a tuft fracture (a break at the tip of the fingers or toes) of the left thumb. The surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT #NJ162233 Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident #70. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/22/24 at 11:02 AM, during initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #70 resting in their bed with their eyes closed. The surveyor also observed the Registered Nurse (RN) in the room who stated that she assessed the resident's vital signs. On 7/22/24 at 11:32 AM, the surveyor reviewed the form that was provided by the facility titled, Reportable Event Record/Report for a Facility Reported Event (FRE) dated 3/9/23 which included the following: Today's date: 3/9/23 Date of Event: 3/7/23 Was This a Significant Event: Yes Was Significant Event Called in? Yes Date: 3/8/23 Time: 2:30 PM Type of Incident: Other, specify: Resident had a tuft fracture (a break at the tip of the fingers or toes) of the left thumb. The surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00165369 Based on interviews, and record review, as well as review of pertinent facility documents on 9/13/23, 9/14/23, and 9/19/23, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of a resident-to-resident physical and verbal abuse to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) and to follow the facility policy Abuse Neglect Exploitation Mistreatment and missappropriatin of Property Prevention for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for grievance. This deficient practice is evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Dementia, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 9/7/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated his/her cognition was intact and the resident needed assistance with activities of daily living…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00165369 Based on interviews and review of medical records (MRs) and other facility documentation on 9/13/23, 9/14/23, and 9/19/23, it was determined that facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged staff-to-resident verbal abuse allegation and to follow facility policy titled Abuse Neglect Exploitation Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property Prevention for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2). This deficient practice is evidenced by the following: A review of the statement written by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) to the Facility's Regional Human Resources (RHR) via email, dated 9/11/23 at 12:51 a.m., revealed that CNA #1 heard and seen [CNA #2] abuse, scream, and disrespect patients and their Families on XX unit. The statement further revealed that CNA #1 reported the aforementioned incident to the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C #: NJ00160399 and NJ00167145 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 9/13/23, 9/14/23, and 9/19/23, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently document in the Documentation Survey Report (DSR) the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to the resident according to the facility protocol for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed for documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the facility admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, and Alzheimer's Disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 9/7/23, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired and the resident needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #2's DSR (ADL Record)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care directing measurable goals and interventions for five residents in a total sample of 25 (Resident (R) 3, R32, R43, R101, and R103). The facility failed to develop a care plan for pain for R3, resident choices for R101, side rails for R32, behaviors for R43, and nutrition for R103. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, stroke, and heart failure. Review of the current Order Summary located in the Orders tab of the EMR revealed R3 was prescribed Tramadol [a pain medication] 50 mg [milligram] every six hours for moderate-severe pain on 07/26/22. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident's (Resident (R) 101) right to make choices about his life that were important to him, were encouraged. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R101 could go out for walks into the community, interact with members of the community, and encouraged to promote the self determination of needs for resident. The facility also failed to ensure R101 was being included and updated in any discussions about his choice to go for walks in the community. By not promoting resident choices this resident was left feeling as though his needs were not being met to address his right to go into the community for walks. Findings include: 1. During observation and interview on 08/28/22 at 11:22 AM, R101 was observed walking independently from his room to look out a window on the first floor. R101 was well groomed, wearing shorts, t-shirt, and tennis shoes. During interview R101 stated, I want to go walking. I love going outside and getting fresh air. I used to go outside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advance directives and Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) information was completed and obtained for three of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 68, R62, and R105). The failure created the potential for residents to not have their wishes known should they suffer a health emergency. Findings include: 1. Review of R78's Census tab of R78's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R78's diagnoses, located under the Diagnosis tab of her EMR, revealed diagnoses which included chronic atrial fibrillation and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of R78's Physician's Orders, located in R78's EMR under the Orders tab, revealed the resident had a code status of ''DNR'' (do not resuscitate) resuscitation status. Review of R78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/11/22 revealed the facility assessed R78 to have a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to report to administration when one of two residents (Resident (R) 68) in a total sample of 25 experienced a resident-to-resident altercation. This failure placed the residents at risk for further altercations and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fragile X chromosome abnormality (an inherited condition characterized by an X chromosome abnormality which tends to have limited intellectual disabilities.) Review of the 05/13/20 Behavior Care Plan located in the Care Plan tab of the EMR revealed, .Behaviors: laughing/talking to self loudly, yelling out, vocal outbursts, kicking/hitting staff, scratching self, wandering into others' rooms and touching others belongings, looking for snacks, attempting to use bathroom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the need for a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a screening which looks for indicators that a person may have intellectual disability, related disability, or serious mental illness) when a resident had a new diagnosis of mental illness for one of three residents (Resident (R) 17) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed R17 at risk for not receiving necessary services for her mental health. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder. Review of the 06/18/18 Level I PASARR located in the Miscellaneous tab of the EMR revealed, R17 had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and did not require a Level II evaluation (an evaluation to identify specialized services required by the resident for conditions identified in a Level I). Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEST CARE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ