No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Charlwell House Health And Rehabilitation

305 Walpole Street, Norwood, MA 02062 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (781) 762-7700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
269 Walpole Street, Boston Children's Physicians at Norwood · (617) 919-5323 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
469 Walpole St · (781) 769-5400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
434 Walpole St · (781) 769-0905 · Call to confirm hours
Park
24 Berwick St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased35.2%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.3%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.2%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.6%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.0%21.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.2%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.0%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.9%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.781.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.521.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.7%CMS range 23.6–50.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.3–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.8–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.63
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.60
RN hoursweekends
27.0%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 75.4 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-30)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2022-09-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Administration failed to 1. Initiate an appropriate response to an outbreak of COVID-19 when a staff member tested positive for COVID-19 on [DATE]; and 2. Implement the facility's infection prevention and control program, including testing of staff and residents, and cohorting and quarantine measures to protect vulnerable residents during a COVID-19 outbreak. The facility's COVID-19 outbreak began on [DATE]. As of [DATE], the facility identified 5 staff members and 18 residents had tested positive for COVID-19. Five of the positive residents were sent to the hospital and one unvaccinated resident died at the facility after being exposed to their COVID-19 positive roommate. It was determined the Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] and was identified on [DATE]. The Department of Public Health sent a Notice of Determination of Immediate Jeopardy and the Immediate Jeopardy templates to the Facility Administrator on [DATE]. On [DATE], the Department of Public…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to 1. Identify and respond to an outbreak of COVID-19 on [DATE]; 2. Ensure staff implemented infection prevention and control practices including: a. Cohorting residents during an outbreak, including those who were not up to date with the COVID-19 vaccine, and b. Utilizing the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) between the care of COVID-19 positive residents and COVID-19 negative residents, including those residents who were not up to date with the COVID-19 vaccine; and 3. Implement and utilize a system of surveillance for residents and staff positive for COVID-19. The facility COVID-19 outbreak began on [DATE]. As of [DATE], the facility identified 5 staff and 18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2022-09-01 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to conduct COVID-19 testing in accordance to 1. Initiating outbreak testing when a staff member tested positive on [DATE]; 2. Initiating testing for Resident #67 who was exposed to COVID-19 and presented with symptoms; 3. Determining if contact tracing or group level testing should be conducted, including following guidelines from the local health authority; 4. Following community transmission levels for routine testing of staff; and 5. Following infection control practices while testing staff. The facility's COVID-19 outbreak began on [DATE]. As of [DATE], the facility identified 5 staff members and 18 residents had tested positive for COVID-19. Five of the positive residents were sent to the hospital and one unvaccinated resident died at the facility after being exposed to their COVID-19 positive roommate. It was determined the Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] and was identified on [DATE]. The Department of Public Health sent a Notice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed for one Resident (#78), out of a total of 22 sampled residents, to a. Initiate treatment to the Resident's mid coccyx to promote wound healing, and b. Ensure the Resident was evaluated by the wound practitioner for multiple pressure ulcers (stage 2 and 3). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Assessment and Risk, dated November 2019, indicated assess existing pressure ulcers, obtain history of pressure ulcers, perform the risk assessment on admission along with the Braden or Norton Scale, obtain risk score, and evaluate its meaning based on resident's unique characteristics. The skin condition is recognized, evaluated, and reported to the practitioner, and addressed. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive and type 2 diabetes. Review of the Wound Evaluation and Progress Note from the Hospital Emergency Department (ED), dated 7/2022, indicated Resident #78 had multiple wounds: a.) a wound to the left anterior ankle as active.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#38, #19), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed, for Residents #38 and #19, to ensure pain medication was administered in accordance with the pain scale indicated in the Physician's order. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Standard of Practice Reference: Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of registered nurse and practical nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#27) received treatment to pressure areas on the bilateral heels in accordance with professional standards to promote healing, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to assess (including wound description, shape, measurements and condition), document and provide treatments as indicated to pressure ulcers on the bilateral heels. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Wound Care, dated October 2010, indicated the following was to be documented in the medical record during wound care treatments: all assessment data including wound bed color, size, drainage obtained when inspecting the wound; if the resident refused the treatment and the reasons why. Review of the facility's policy titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries, dated April 2020, indicated the following: -conduct a comprehensive skin assessment upon (or soon after) admission, with each risk assessment, as indicated according to the resident's risk factors -during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications in the refrigerator were stored under the proper temperature for 2 out of 2 medication rooms. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Medication Room Refrigerator Temperature Log indicated medications are to be stored between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit. The Log further indicated temperature below 36 degrees (F) are too cold and temperature above 46 degrees (F) are too high. The facility requires staff to document any out-of-range temperatures then call the state or local health department immediately. On 5/28/25 at 10:39 A.M., the surveyor along with Nurse #6 entered the medication room on Unit A to perform a review of the medication room. Upon opening the refrigerator, the thermostat temperature was observed to read 70 degrees. Review of the refrigerator contents included three Mounjaros injection pens stored in the lock box, two insulin kits, suppositories, as well as unopened individual insulin pens and vials. During an interview on 5/28/25 at 11:05 A.M., Nurse #6 said the refrigerator temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #57, to follow infection control standards while completing a dressing change; and 2. To maintain an infection prevention and control program which included a complete and accurate system of surveillance to identify any trends or potential infections. Findings include: 1.Review of the facility's policy titled Wound Care, revised October 2010, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. -Wash and dry your hands thoroughly -Position resident. Place disposable cloth next to resident (under the wound) to serve as a barrier to protect the bed linen and other body sites -Put on gloves, loosen tape and remove dressing -Pull glove over dressing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of changes to a wound for one Resident (#27), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to notify the physician of changes to a wound on the right lower extremity from a superficial wound (minor injury that affects only the outermost layer of skin) to a wound with slough (non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green or brown tissue; usually moist, can be soft, stringy and mucinous in texture) in the wound bed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Wound Care, dated October 2010, indicated the following was to be documented in the medical record during wound care treatments: all assessment data including wound bed color, size, drainage obtained when inspecting the wound; if the resident refused the treatment and the reasons why. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses of diabetes, a history of a left transmetatarsal amputation (TMA- a surgical procedure where the forefoot (including the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided the resident and/or representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for one Resident (#126), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #126 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses including interstitial pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic respiratory with hypercapnia and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies. Review of the medical record failed to indicate the Resident and/or representative were provided with a written summary of his/her baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission which included initial goals for the resident, current medications and dietary instructions, and services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility. During an interview on 5/28/25 at 10:42 A.M., Resident #126 said they had not had a care plan meeting yet and he/she'd been at the facility a few weeks. Resident #126 said he/she was their own person, and the facility did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and individualize a comprehensive care plan for one Resident (#58), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care was developed and implemented related to Resident #58's smoking status and preferences. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking Policy - Residents, dated 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices. - A resident's ability to smoke safely will be re-evaluated quarterly, upon a significant change (physical or cognitive) and as determined by the staff. - Any smoking-related privileges, restrictions, and concerns (for example, need for close monitoring) shall be noted on the care plan, and all personnel caring for the resident shall be alerted to these issues. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: - A comprehensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living (ADL) care was provided to maintain good personal grooming for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nail care was performed for Resident #66. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Fingernails/Toenails, Care of, revised February 2018, indicated but was not limited to: - The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infection. - Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. - If the resident refused the treatment, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken. - Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the care. - Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and depression. Review of Resident #66's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/25, indicated he/she was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#27) received treatment of a wound in accordance with professional standards for quality care, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered and failed to assess (including wound description, shape, measurements and condition) a wound to the right lower extremity for changes and identify that the wound changed from a superficial wound (minor injury that affects only the outermost layer of skin) to a wound with slough (non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green or brown tissue; usually moist, can be soft, stringy and mucinous in texture) in the wound bed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Wound Care, dated October 2010, indicated the following was to be documented in the medical record during wound care treatments: all assessment data including wound bed color, size, drainage obtained when inspecting the wound; if the resident refused the treatment and the reasons why. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to schedule a podiatry appointment and failed to ensure good foot health was maintained for one Resident (#27), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to schedule an appointment with a community podiatrist per physician's order and failed to provide diabetic foot care in accordance with hospital recommendations and professional standards for the Resident who was at risk for decline in his/her foot health related to a history of diabetes and bilateral amputations. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing Care of the Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus, dated as revised in November 2020, indicated the following for skin and foot care: -skin should be kept as dry and clean as possible, apply lotion to dry skin as needed -use aseptic technique in caring for any lacerations, abrasions or breaks in skin integrity, and report the condition immediately to supervisor -bathe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the monthly drug regimen review identified irregularities for one Resident (#34), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the Pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities (use of medications without adequate indication, without adequate monitoring, in excessive doses, and/or in the presence of adverse consequences, as well as the identification of conditions that may warrant initiation of medication therapy) related to the duration of an antibiotic medication (Flagyl) resulting in the Resident receiving an additional 37 doses. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR), dated as revised 5/2019, indicated but was not limited to: -The goal of the MRR is to promote positive outcomes while minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication -The MRR involves a thorough review of the resident's medical record to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen for one Resident (#34), out of 19 sampled residents, was free of unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic medication (Flagyl) was not given in excessive duration resulting in the Resident receiving an additional 37 doses. Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 and had diagnoses which included pyelonephritis (inflammation of the kidneys, typically caused by a bacterial infection), renal and perinephric abscess (result of infection involving the kidney and the surrounding fat and tissues). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/20/25, indicated Resident #34 was receiving antibiotics. Review of Resident #34's Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated he/she should receive Flagyl three times per day for 90 doses. Review of Resident #34's Physician's Orders indicated but was not limited to: -Flagyl oral tablet 500 milligrams (mg) give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, for one Resident (#69), of 19 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services, specifically physical and occupational therapy, as ordered. Findings include: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses which included right lower extremity tibia (one of the long bones located in the lower leg) fracture status post-surgical repair. Review of Resident #69's Physician's Orders for Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) indicated but was not limited to: -PT order for 5 times per week for 4 weeks to address therapeutic activities, therapeutic exercise, gait training, neuro re-education, manual therapy, wheelchair management, patient/caregiver education, and discharge planning per plan of care, order date 2/7/25 and end date 3/9/25 -PT updated plan of care as of 3/8/25 for 5 times per week for 4 weeks for continued care and management, order date 3/11/25 and end date 4/30/25 -PT updated plan of care 5 times per week for 4 weeks for therapeutic exercises, therapeutic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical records, related to Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Flow Sheets, when daily documentation by CNA's were not consistently completed, with ADL Flow Sheets often left completely blank. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy tilted Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised July 2017, indicated all services provided to the resident, progress towards care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The Policy further indicated documentation in the medical record will be complete and accurate. Review of the Facility's documentation for care and services provided by CNA's is recorded on the Facility's document titled Documentation Survey Report v2, going forward in this deficiency the document will be referred as the Resident's ADL Flow Sheet. 1) Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow professional standards for two Residents (#24 and #219), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #24, to reconcile the Resident's medications from the hospital discharge summary to restart Plavix (Clopidogrel- antiplatelet medication that prevents blood clots from forming) on 10/18/23, resulting in the Resident missing 65 doses of Plavix from 10/18/23 to 12/18/23; and 2. For Resident #219, to ensure the Resident's transparent semi-permeable membrane (TSM) dressing to the left upper extremity midline catheter was changed in accordance with the physician's order following readmission, and in accordance with the facility policy. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Reconciliation of Medications on Admission, revised July 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to ensure medication safety by accurately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain the recommended eye care services in a timely manner to maintain the highest psychosocial well-being of one Resident (#42), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure follow-up appointments were scheduled for an eye specialist for cataract surgery (indicated when clouding of the normally clear lens of the eye impairs vision and interferes with usual day-to-day activities), after the initial appointment was canceled due to lack of transportation resulting in a four-month delay. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Sensory Impairments-Clinical Protocol, revised March 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -As part of the initial assessment, the staff and physician will help identify individuals with sensory impairments including hearing, taste, vision, smell, and touch. -The physician will order appropriate consultations (for example ophthalmology or Podiatry evaluations) to help define causes and complications of sensory impairments. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with current accepted professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled with a shortened expiration date upon opening and the resident's name was on the medication in two of four medication carts in use by the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, dated as revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised [DATE], included but was not limited to the following: -The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed, for five of five sampled Residents (#219, #33, #8, #13, and #53), to ensure residents were offered the pneumonia vaccine, unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident had already been immunized. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised March 2023, included but was not limited to: -Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated/available, are offered the vaccine series within the facility unless medically contraindicated, awaiting shipments of vaccines, or the resident has already been vaccinated. -Assessment of pneumococcal vaccination status is conducted within thirty (30) days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. -Residents/representatives have the right to refuse vaccination. If refused, appropriate information is documented in the resident's medical record indicating the date of the refusal of the pneumococcal vaccination.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program, as evidenced by sanitation concerns, mice sightings, and mice droppings on two of two open resident units (A and B), on one closed resident unit (C), and the laundry room. Findings include: On 4/11/24 at 5:00 P.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said they do not have a policy for pest control. Review of Unit A's Pest Sighting/Evidence log indicated the last entry was on 2/13/24. Review of Unit B's Pest Sighting/Evidence log indicated the last entry was on 2/21/24. Review of the facility's Pest Binder indicated the last entry for a pest sighting was on 9/7/23. During a Resident Group Meeting with the surveyor on 4/10/24 at 2:00 P.M., the 21 residents in attendance raised the concern of continued observations of mice running in their rooms and running under closet doors to hide. During an interview with observation on 4/9/24 at 10:30 A.M., Resident #42 said there are problems with mice at nighttime and sees mice every night in the room. The surveyor, with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a [NAME] Treatment Plan (court approved treatment plan for the administration of antipsychotic medications) was obtained prior to the administration of an antipsychotic medication for one Resident (#8), in a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: In a [NAME] Guardianship Hearing, the court is being asked to authorize extraordinary treatment or care, such as administering anti-psychotic medications, admitting an adult to a nursing home facility, and other medical care. A guardian cannot make decisions about the use of antipsychotics because use of such medications is considered extraordinary treatment, but rather can monitor the implementation of the court-ordered treatment plan. This procedure was established by the Supreme Judicial Court in a decision entitled [NAME] v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, 390 Mass. 489 (1983) - Massachusetts Guardianship Association (massguardianshipassociation.org) Resident #8 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#60), out of a total sample of 20 residents, that care and treatment to the Resident's urinary drainage device was provided in accordance with the facility policy. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's suprapubic catheter bag was positioned in a method to avoid potential contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, revised September 2014, included but was not limited to: Infection Control section of the policy, -Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses which included paraplegia and urine retention. Record review indicated that the Resident had a #16 suprapubic catheter to gravity for urinary drainage. Review of the current Physician's Orders indicated: -Suprapubic tube, Foley #16 with a 10 cc balloon, Monitor S/P (suprapubic) site for pain, drainage, signs and symptom of infection, and verify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#40), out of 17 sampled residents, that oxygen delivery equipment was replaced in accordance with the physician's order. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted in March 2023 with diagnoses which included chronic lung disease. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #40 used Oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuously via an oxygen concentrator through a nasal cannula. Review of the current Physician's Order indicated that the Resident's oxygen tubing be changed every night shift on Sunday. During an observation with interview on 4/9/24 at 9:30 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #40 in his/her room, in bed, receiving Oxygen via a nasal cannula at 2 liters. The surveyor observed that the Resident's nasal cannula oxygen tubing had a piece of white tape affixed to it indicating that the tubing was last changed on 3/13/24. The Resident said that staff changed the oxygen tubing periodically but he/she did not know how often and did not know when it was changed last.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of employee education files, and policy review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure 5 out of 5 staff nurses had completed training and competencies for specialized respiratory care, specifically tracheostomy care; and 2. For Resident #401, provide competent nursing care for a Resident with a tracheostomy. Findings include: 1. According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR 9.00: Standards of Conduct, a competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a nurse licensed by the Board and for the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted standards of practice. Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. Review of the employee education files indicated the following: a. Unit Manager #1 was hired in August 2022. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen and 3 of 3 kitchenettes were clean and sanitary to ensure safe food storage and service and to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Findings include: On 8/18/22 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyors made the following observations in the main kitchen: -There were mouse droppings on the windowsills. -The walls had food splatter and were dirty. -The tile floors, especially at the coving base, had a buildup of a thick black, substance on and between the tiles. -The double doors as you enter the main kitchen were gouged and the paint was chipping. -The janitor's closet had debris and mops on the floor (serve as a breeding ground for pests). -Meal trays were badly scratched and cracked. Because the trays did not have a smooth, cleanable surface they posed an infection control concern. -The Food Service Director (FSD)'s office, which also served as the dry storage room, had debris on the floor. -Cutting boards and dishware were scratched. Because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Facility Assessment and interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility wide assessment that accurately reflected the resources necessary to care for its residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Complete a Facility Assessment which accurately reflected the average daily census; 2. Identify the utilization of agency/temporary staff; 3. Conduct staff training and competencies of nursing staff; 4. Ensure that the Facility Assessment identified the facility would accept residents with specialized respiratory care, specifically for the care and treatment of a tracheostomy and have competent staff to provide the care; 5. Include contracts, memorandums of understanding, or other agreements with third parties that provide services or equipment to the facility during both normal operations and emergencies; and 6. Include a facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. Findings include: The Facility Assessment should be reviewed and updated whenever there is, or the facility plans for, any change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-01 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan that describes their approach to improving the quality of life, care, and services to residents in the facility. Findings include: A review of the facility's QAPI policy, dated 9/2016, indicated the facility's QAPI plan serves to accomplish the following: -Assure care and services are provided in accordance with standards and regulations; -Identify and solve problems using a team-centered approach that includes input from all departments and stakeholders (resident, families, physicians, staff, Ombudsman and regulatory agencies) involved; -Enhance interdepartmental communication and teamwork by having leaders participate in cross-department Performance Improvement Project activities when analyzing problems, identifying solutions and assessing outcomes; -Continuously improve resident outcomes; -Establish a culture of resident safety; -Establish a culture of continual learning; and -Establish goals that are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to define, implement, and maintain a comprehensive quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) plan to address the full range of care and services provided by the facility, including infection control practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, dated September 2016, indicated the facility's QAPI program is a proactive approach to improving the quality of life, care, and services in the nursing home. The Administrator has to implement and maintain an ongoing QAPI Committee designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care/services, pursue methods to improve quality care, and to identify and resolve problems, issues, concerns through: -Designating one or more persons to be accountable for Performance Improvement (Committee Chair) -Ensuring adequate leadership and staff training; and -Establishing policies to sustain the program regardless of personnel changes and staff turnover. During interviews on 8/23/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-01 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee that included the required members at their meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, dated 9/2016, included, but was not limited to: -The facility's QAPI program is a proactive approach to improving the quality of life, care, and services in nursing home. -The QAPI Committee meets monthly and consists of the following individuals: -Administrator -Medical Director -Director of Nursing -Assistant Director of Nursing -1-2 front line staff (optional) -Dietician -Food Services Manager -Admissions Director -Staff Education/IC/Quality Assurance Nurse -Directors of Social Services, Activities, Rehabilitation, Environmental Services, Maintenance -Consultant Pharmacist (notify prior to meetings) Quarterly QAPI: -A quarterly QAPI will be held with the regional and/or divisional level to review and identify trends within the company. Review of QAPI attendance sign-in sheets indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a system to ensure that all mechanical and electrical kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) on 8/18/22 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyor observed the following: - The garbage disposal was not functioning. The FSD said it had been broken since he started in June due to silverware/foreign objects that had inadvertently fallen into it. - The steam table wells were noted to be rusted and, in some areas, corroded with numerous holes in the wells. -The oven hood was last inspected in April 2021. The FSD indicated it was overdue for inspection/cleaning. The FSD said there had been an issue with payment, which resulted in the hood not being cleaned/inspected. During an interview on 8/23/22 at 2:30 P.M., the FSD said that Administration was aware of the above issues.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program ensuring that the facility, including the main kitchen and three of three nutrition kitchenettes were free from pests, including mice and roaches. Findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 8/18/22 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyor observed: -Multiple mouse traps (glue traps and metal traps) located throughout the kitchen, close to the walls encompassing the entire perimeter of the kitchen. -The windowsill behind the food steamer in the main kitchen had numerous mouse droppings. Review of the Pest Control Logs from 6/1/22 to 8/18/22 indicated the facility had mice problems with light activity in the kitchen. On 8/23/22 at 8:56 A.M., during the inspection of the dry storage/emergency food storage room (located within Unit C) with the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed a glue trap with a dead mouse in the trap. On 8/23/22 from 11:45 A.M. to 12:30 P.M., the surveyor observed evidence of mouse activity in three of three kitchenettes as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0551 — pattern
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident representative had information in advance to exercise the resident's rights for four Residents (#13, #102, #301, and #44), out of sample of 22 residents and three closed records. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that for: 1. Resident #13, the legal guardian (a person who has been appointed by a court or otherwise has the legal authority to care for the personal and property interests of another person who is deemed incapacitated) signed consents for equipment, services, and treatment upon admission to the facility; 2. Resident #102, a valid, court approved [NAME] treatment plan was in place for the administration of antipsychotic medication and risk/benefits were identified for consent for the use of psychotropic medication; 3. Resident #301, the Health Care Proxy (health care agent designated by the resident when competent who has the authority to consent for health care decisions when a resident has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents had a safe, clean, homelike environment on one unit (C Unit) out of three units in the facility. Findings include: On 8/24/22 at 7:34 A.M., the surveyor observed: -room [ROOM NUMBER]: dust and debris underneath the A and B beds and along the perimeter of the room at the coving; -room [ROOM NUMBER]: multiple areas of dried feces on the floor next to resident A's bed; dust and debris underneath the A and B beds and along the perimeter of the room at the coving; -room [ROOM NUMBER]: dust and debris underneath the A and B beds and along the perimeter of the room at the coving; large wet substance underneath the A bed; -room [ROOM NUMBER]: multiple areas of dried feces on the floor next to resident A's bed; dust and debris underneath the A and B beds and along the perimeter of the room at the coving; -room [ROOM NUMBER]: dust and debris underneath the A and B beds and along the perimeter of the room at the coving; -room [ROOM NUMBER]:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for seven Residents (#13, #35, #49, #65, #93, and #76), out of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed 1. For Resident #13, to develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medications that identified target behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, and measurable goals of treatment; 2. For Resident #35, to develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medications that identified target behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, and measurable goals of treatment; 3. For Resident #49, to: a. develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medications that identified target behaviors and measurable goals of treatment; and b. implement non-pharmacological interventions for behaviors; 4. For Resident #65, to develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medications that included non-pharmacological interventions and measurable goals of treatment; 5. For Resident #93, to develop a care plan for the use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for five Residents (#13, #28, #103, #301, and #92), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed 1. For Resident #13, a. To ensure psychotropic medications were not administered without signed, informed consent from the legal Guardian; b. To ensure specialized compression wraps were obtained according to physician's orders; 2. For Resident #28, to ensure the Resident's pacemaker was monitored and evaluated as per the facility policy and standards of practice; 3. For Resident #103, to ensure psychotropic medications were not administered without signed, informed consent; 4. For Resident #301, to ensure psychotropic medications were not administered without signed, informed consent from the activated HCP; and 5. For Resident #92, to follow physician's orders for prescribed wound dressings. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the facility's policy titled Death of a Resident/Patient, dated 7/2016, included but was not limited to: -Assess the resident/patient for vital signs: apical pulse, respirations, blood pressure -Document the following in the Nurse's Note: -Time absence of vital signs was determined -Time and name of Physician notified -Time and name of family member notified -Name of designated funeral home and time notified -Name of funeral home representative and time body released -Status of deceased resident/patient's personal possessions and what was sent with the body (i.e., glasses, dentures, etc.) Resident #102 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including a history of a stroke, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record indicated a 7/2/22 Clinical Nurse's Note indicated: Resident found at 6:15 A.M. with no pulse, no respirations, lack of pupillary response at this time. Resident is a full code. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated immediately after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided residents an environment free from accident hazards on two units (Unit B and Unit C) of three units in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. ensure the clean utility room was securely locked and hazardous items were not easily accessible to wandering residents on the Unit C; and 2. ensure medication was properly disposed of and not accessible to wandering residents on Unit B. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11:25 A.M., the surveyor observed four residents wandering the hallways and attempting to open closed doors on Unit C. On [DATE] at 11:28 A.M. on Unit C (secured unit), the surveyor approached a closed door labeled clean utility. The door had a numerical combination lock on it, but the door was not pulled tight and secured and was easily pushed open. The surveyor observed the following items in the unlocked and unsecured clean utility room: -2 oxygen concentrators -12 filled portable oxygen tanks -a treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to safely provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the provision of emergency medications and accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of drugs to meet the needs of its residents on one (Unit B) of three units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Emergency Medications, revised April 2007, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The Pharmaceutical Services/Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee, with the input of the Consultant Pharmacist, Director of Nursing Services, and Medical Director, shall approve the contents of the emergency medication kit, and the dispensing pharmacy will stock it. -The emergency medication kit will include medications and biologicals that are essential in providing emergency treatment. - Required documentation after an emergency medication is the same as for any other medication. - Any medication that is removed from the emergency kit must be documented on the emergency medication administration log. -Medications and supplies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that for nine Residents (#1, #13, #28, #35, #49, #65, #93, #103, and #301), out of a total sample of 22 residents, that each Resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an appropriate diagnosis was identified, targeted behaviors/signs and symptoms were monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of psychotropic medication, and/or potential side effects were identified and monitored to promote or maintain the Residents' highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being, per the facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medications, dated as revised 7/2019, indicated Physicians and mid-level providers will use psychotropic medications appropriately working with the interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate use, evaluation, and monitoring. It further indicated but was not limited to the following: - the facility will make every effort to comply with state and federal regulations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were safely and securely stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Properly label all medications stored in 3 out of 6 medication carts; 2. Maintain consistent documentation of medication refrigerator temperatures for 1 out of 3 unit medication refrigerators and report temperatures out of range; 3. Ensure staff locked 2 out of 6 medication carts when unattended; and 4. Ensure safe and locked storage of 2 out of 3 unit treatment carts when unattended. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication-Storage, revised January 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -With the exception of Emergency Drug Kits, all medications will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart, or medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel, as defined by facility policy. -Medications requiring refrigeration will be stored in a refrigerator that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — pattern
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives/families were notified of each new COVID-19 positive staff member or resident case by 5:00 P.M. the following day. Findings include: During the entrance conference on 8/18/22 at 9:30 A.M., the Administrator said the facility had been experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19. The Administrator said the Activity Director was responsible for family and resident notifications of COVID-19 cases. Review of the facility cases indicated the following: 8/10/22- 1 staff tested positive for COVID-19 8/14/22- 4 residents tested positive for COVID-19 (total 4 residents and 1 staff) 8/15/22- 8 residents tested positive for COVID-19, one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) tested positive (total 12 residents and 2 staff) 8/19/22- 5 residents and 2 nurses tested positive for COVID-19 (total 17 residents and 4 staff) 8/20/22- 1 resident tested positive for COVID-19 (total 18 residents and 4 staff) 8/22/22- 1 CNA tested positive for COVID-19 (total 18 residents and 5 staff) During an interview on 8/19/22 at 1:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain education documentation regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine for four Residents (#32, #74, #352, and #7), out of five sampled unvaccinated residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled COVID Vaccine, revised 5/11/21, indicated the following: -residents or their representatives are able to accept or decline the vaccine after proper education -facility should offer COVID vaccination to all new admissions and readmission; the opportunity to receive the first dose or required next dose of COVID vaccine -facility to have proper documentation of resident's education and decision on COVID-19 vaccines -when a resident declines the COVID-19 vaccination, a COVID-19 vaccination declination form will be signed and placed in their medical record. During an interview on 8/24/22 at 10:00 A.M., the Infection Preventionist said new admissions were educated on the COVID-19 vaccines and were provided a form to accept vaccines or decline vaccines, which were then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an effective training program for newly hired staff, to include training on prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property and dementia management. Specifically, a review of employee education records indicated 7 out of 7 employees had not received education related to prohibition of abuse and dementia management. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as last update on 9/15/21, indicated staff were to have the following education upon hire and annually: -care/management for persons with dementia and resident abuse prevention Review of the education and employment files provided indicated the following: 1. Unit Manager #1 was hired in August 2022. Review of the education file for the nurse failed to include training in care/management for persons with dementia and resident abuse prevention. 2. Nurse #8 was hired in July 2022. Review of staff training and the education file for the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were given information necessary to make health care decisions, including the risks and benefits of a psychoactive medication and consent for its use, prior to administration, for one Resident (#103) of three closed records reviewed, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Resident #103 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including anxiety. The Resident was discharged from the facility in June 2022. Review of June 2022 Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to: -Venlafaxine HCl ER (antidepressant) 150 milligrams (mg) one time a day for depression (6/2/22) -Venlafaxine HCl ER 75 mg one time a day for depression (6/2/22) Review of the June 2022 Medication Administration Record indicated Resident #103 was administered Venlafaxine on 6/4/22 and 6/5/22. Review of the History and Physical note, dated 6/3/22, written by Resident #103's attending Physician indicated the Resident had decisional capacity and the only consent form discussed was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated each resident with respect and dignity including the right to use their own clothing for one Resident (#402), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Resident #402 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/18/22, indicated Resident #402 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which was unable to be completed due to the Resident being rarely understood. On 8/18/22 at 12:30 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #402 sitting in his/her wheelchair at a table in the Unit B dining room while staff was assisting him/her with lunch. Resident #402 was observed wearing an open back johnny (a long loose piece of clothing), not his/her own clothing. On 8/18/22 at 3:21 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #402 sitting in his/her wheelchair in the Unit B dining room wearing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified that treatments were not administered as ordered for one Resident (#58), out of a total sample of three residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner that treatment orders were not transcribed accurately resulting in the Resident receiving only 20 of 42 prescribed doses of antifungal treatments. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including dementia and diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record indicated a Weekly Skin Check document, dated 12/11/22, in which the Nurse identified redness under the Resident's left breast and left armpit. The Nurse indicated that the Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered Nystatin/Triamcinolone cream (antifungal) every shift for two weeks. Further review of the medical record indicated the following orders: -12/12/22 Nystatin-Triamcinolone Cream 100000-0.1 unit/GM (gram)-% Apply to left breast, left armpit topically every shift for fungal rash for two weeks. Apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident's representative was provided written notice of a transfer, appeal rights, and Ombudsman contact information, as required for three Residents (#35, #49, and #22), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies, Transfer-Notification (6/2017) and Discharge Planning and Rights (6/2017) included but was not limited to: -Emergency Transfers-When a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, notice of the transfer may be provided to the resident and resident representative as soon as practicable; -Written notice will include: -the reason for the transfer; -effective date of the transfer; -location to which the resident is transferred; -statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address, and telephone number of the entity which receives such request; -information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident's representative was provided a written notice of a bed hold transfer as required for three Residents (#35, #49, and #22), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer-Bed Hold (6/2017), included but was not limited to: -It is the policy of this facility to provide the resident, responsible party, or legal representative with notice of the facility's bed-hold policy upon admission and at the time of transfer or therapeutic leave from the facility to ensure continuity of care and residence post therapeutic leave or hospitalization. -Before a nursing facility transfers a resident to a hospital or the resident goes on therapeutic leave, the nursing facility must provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies: -the duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility; -the nursing facility's policies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff developed and provided to residents, a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission, that included but was not limited to the initial goals of the resident, summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions, and services and treatments to be administered by the facility, for two Residents (#76 and #103), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic pancreatitis, low back pain, and cervicalgia (neck pain). Review of the medical record indicated a care plan with one identified area as follows: -Focus: Resident is at risk for falls related to new an unfamiliar environment (6/3/22). -Interventions: Be sure that the call bell and personal items are in reach before leaving the room; encourage proper footwear, with proper fit and skid resistant soles. No other care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide two Residents (#402 and #13), out of a total sample of 22 residents, an activity program that engaged the Residents and supported their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Activity Programs, revised June 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The activities program is provided to support the well-being of residents and to encourage both independence and community interaction. -Activities are offered based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident. -The activities program is ongoing and includes independent individual activities and assisted individual activities. -Activities are not necessarily limited to formal activities being provided only by activities staff. Other facility staff may also provide the activities. Review of the facility's policy titled Individual Activities and Room Visit Program, revised June 2018, indicated but was not limited to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#81), out of a total sample of 22 residents, the Resident received proper care and treatment to maintain mobility and good foot health. Findings include: Resident #81 was admitted in May 2022 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. Record review indicated the Resident's Health Care Agent had given the facility's podiatry service permission in May 2022, to examine and/or administer treatment as necessary in the diagnosis and treatment related to Podiatry. On 8/25/22 at 10:47 A.M. on the C-Wing, the surveyor observed the Resident walking with one slipper sock on his/her left foot. The right foot was bare. The surveyor observed all toenails on the right foot to be long, curled over the end of the toes, and had a yellowish-brown color to them. On 8/30/22 at 7:20 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident seated in a chair in the hallway of the C-Wing. The Resident's feet were bare. The surveyor observed all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services for one Resident (#78), out of four residents with indwelling catheters (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the Resident's Foley catheter upon admission to the facility including Foley catheter care and failed to provide Foley catheter care and ongoing assessment in order to prevent catheter-related urinary tract infections. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including acute cystitis (inflammation of the bladder) with hematuria (blood in urine), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (prostate gland enlargement) with lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary tract infection (UTI), and a nodular prostate. Review of the Comprehensive Resident-centered Care Plans indicated a Foley catheter care plan related to a specified diagnosis, initiated 7/25/22. The goal was for Resident #78 to have potential complications of urinary catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that care and treatment of a tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the windpipe to keep it open) was provided in accordance with the facility policy/protocols and professional standards of practice for one of one Resident (#401) with a tracheostomy, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: a.) Obtain physician's orders to provide a person-centered care plan for care of tracheostomy and tracheostomy tube and speaking valve; b.) Implement the facility protocol for scheduled tracheostomy tube, inner cannula, tube ties/holder and mask changes, along with suctioning to prevent airway occlusion and respiratory infections; and c.) Provide emergency bedside tracheostomy equipment needed for accidental decannulation (the inadvertent removal of tracheostomy tube out of the stoma) or mucus plugging (buildup of thick mucus). Findings include: Review of The National Tracheostomy Safety Project manual dated 2013 indicated but was not limited to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one Resident (#39), of one resident receiving dialysis, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Management, revised May 2019, included but was not limited to the following: -Facility will establish open communication with the Resident's Dialysis Center utilizing a Dialysis Communication Book completing the Dialysis Communication Form -The nurse will establish pre-dialysis vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature, respirations), any pertinent resident information -On return from the Dialysis Center the nurse will review the communication returning from the Dialysis Center. The nurse should review specifically for pre- and post-vital signs, treatment tolerance, any medication given, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the skills necessary to meet the behavioral healthcare needs of one Resident (#49), out of a sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as reviewed on 9/15/21, indicated the following in-services and competencies would be provided upon hire, annually, and as needed to all staff: -communication -person-centered care -caring for people with dementia, Alzheimer's, and cognitive impairment -caring for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including psychosis and dementia with behaviors. On 8/19/22 at 8:42 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #49 lying in bed yelling out help repeatedly. On 8/19/22 at 2:08 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #49 reclined in a chair against the wall in the C unit hallway yelling out and trying to remove his/her clothing. Nurse #9 brought the Resident to his/her room, but the Resident continued to yell out unabatedly. At 2:50 P.M., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#302) remained free of significant medication errors, in a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, Resident #302 was administered a COVID-19 bivalent booster dose without having received a primary monovalent series of the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC): Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of COVID-19 Vaccines indicated the Primary Series Vaccination for Pfizer-BioNTech was a monovalent composition and the Booster Vaccine was a bivalent composition. For primary series vaccination, three monovalent COVID-19 vaccines (listed in alphabetical order by manufacturer), are recommended: Moderna, Novavax, and Pfizer-BioNTech. Bivalent mRNA vaccines are not authorized or approved at this time for primary series doses. Review of the CDC Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of COVID-19 Vaccines: Appendix D indicated the following: -A vaccine administration error is any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are complete, accurate, and systemically organized within accepted professional standards of practice for one Resident (#60), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in July 2022. Review of the medical record indicated on 8/1/22 the physician completed a Documentation of Resident Incapacity Pursuant to Massachusetts Health Care Proxy Act, which indicated Resident #60 was no longer able to make health care decisions and decisions would be made by the designated Health Care Proxy. Review of the paper and electronic medical record failed to include a Health Care Proxy. During an interview on 8/26/22 at 10:05 A.M., Nurse #1 said the brother of Resident #60 was the Health Care Proxy and the Health Care Proxy form was missing from the medical record. In addition, she said she had completed the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form with the brother who had requested Resident #60 not be resuscitated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that services were coordinated with the Hospice provider to implement the resident's plan of care as required in the provider contract agreement for one Resident (#93), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility and elected Hospice Care Services Agreements, signed April 26, 2022, indicated the Hospice provider shall develop, at the time of admission, a Nursing Facility Plan of Care. The Hospice Plan of Care is a document which will provide a detailed description of the scope and frequency of hospice services, and who will provide those services. The Hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) will document their care and services provided at each visit to the hospice patient. Documentation is placed in the Nursing Facility's patient chart; a copy shall be maintained in the Hospice medical record. Review of the facility's Hospice policy, dated 5/2016, included but was not limited to: -Communicate, establish, and agree upon a coordinated Interdisciplinary Plan of Care (IPOC) -Identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-09-01 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to make the most recent survey results of the facility available in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. Findings include: On 8/31/22 at 8:32 A.M., the surveyor observed an informational bulletin board located across from the receptionist's desk in the lobby. A sign posted on the bulletin board indicated the following: If you would like to review our State Survey results, they are in a binder across from the Receptionist. If you have any questions, please ask for the Administrator or Director of Nurses. On 8/31/22 at 8:28 A.M., the surveyors were unable to locate the survey results binder in the lobby. During an interview on 8/31/22 at 8:32 A.M., Receptionist #1 searched the reception desk drawers and surrounding area for the survey results binder and was unable to find them. The surveyors directed her to the posting on the bulletin board which identified the location of the survey results and she said she did not know where they were and had never seen the binder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-09-01 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Nurse staffing information posted was accurate and included the current date, total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed staff, Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), and the resident census as required. Findings include: On 8/18/22 at 7:35 A.M., the surveyors observed a Nurse staffing document posted in the lobby on a shelf across from the reception desk. The information on the document was as follows: Date: Thursday June 9, 2022 Census: 81 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. RN: blank, LPN: 4, CNA: 10 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. RN: 1, LPN: 4, CNA: 10 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. RN: blank, LPN: 2, CNA: 5 The inaccurate Nurse staffing document remained posted in the lobby across from the reception desk until 8/25/22. During an interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on 9/1/22 at 11:58 A.M., they said the Nurse staffing should be updated and posted daily.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEST CARE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CKSST HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2022
CHAPLER, YAAKOVIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
STEINBERG, MOSHEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
BONADIO & CO LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
RELIANT PRO REHAB, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/06/2025
TWOMAGNETS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
AL-MADI, SAMIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
CARR, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2024
PIELEANU, IRINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 11%Other / private 27%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$381per resident / day
operating cost
$11,587per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225208. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next