Riderwood Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 356 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 140 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.54 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.66 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.74 to 1.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to treat resident with dignity and care for resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) /hygiene in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of resident's quality of life. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) out of 3 residents reviewed resident's dignity and ADLs/hygiene care during an annual survey.The findings include:Activities of Daily Livings (ADLs): Activities of daily living are activities related to personal care. They include bathing or showering, grooming, dressing, eating, using the toilet, getting in and out of bed or a chair and walking and more.On 09/15/2025 at 10:55 AM, Resident #69 was alert, and a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) earlier fed the resident. Surveyor observed this resident was in bed ungroomed; with disheveled hair, a dirty face, eye crust, and in a food-stained gown.On 09/16/2025 at 11:00 AM, The surveyor observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meaningful activities to meet the needs/interests of the residents and to provide consistent resident centered/personalized activities for the dependent, confined residents in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of residents' quality of life. This was evident for 2 (Resident #35 and Resident #69) out of 3 residents reviewed for ongoing resident centered activities program during an annual survey. The findings include-1) On 09/15/2025, at 10:09 AM, Resident #35 was observed in their room, awake and knee was contracted to chest. No TV, music or other activity was observed at these times. This resident was able to engage in a short conversation.Observation, on 09/16/2025 at 11:20 AM, Resident #35 was observed in bed, staff were in the room but not interacting with the resident at the time of the observation. This…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment of 1) resident's rooms and 2) a resident's shower chair was maintained in a manner that minimized the potential for the spread of infection. This was evident for 3 of 4 areas reviewed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 09/15/2025, at 11:40 AM, during an initial tour of Resident #7's bathroom and room, a grey fall mat was observed on the bathroom floor, touching the toilet. A clear plastic bag containing a black object was also seen on the bathroom floor. In Resident #7's room, a clear plastic bag was found on the floor under the medicine cabinet, containing a light green and grey chuck and a gown. On 09/15/ 2025, at 11:54 AM Staff #7, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was shown the fall mat and the plastic bags in both the bathroom and the room. Staff #7, LPN was asked about the policy/procedure for floor mats in bathrooms and linens on the floor. Staff #7 explained that aides typically bathe residents, change bed linens, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call system cord was accessible in the resident's bathroom. This was evident for 1 (Resident #57) of 1 resident's bathroom observed during the annual survey. The findings include:On 09/16/2025 11:40 AM, the surveyor visited room [ROOM NUMBER] to verify the call bell systems at the bed and the bathroom. The surveyor noted that the call bell cord was too short and tucked behind a trashcan that was placed directly next to the toilet. At 12:50 PM, a tour of room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 1 and ADON 2. They both confirmed the call bell cord was inaccessible to the residents due to its length and the placement of the call bell cord in the resident's bathroom. On 09/19/2025 at 4:13 PM, the Assistant Administrator, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 1 and ADON 2 were made aware of these findings.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0924 — isolated
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that handrails were on all walls in resident areas including both resident's rooms and all resident common areas. This was evident for 2 of 2 nursing units and all common areas observed during the survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors on the units. The findings include: On Tuesday, 09/16/2025 at 9:16 AM during a tour of the facility, it was noted that there were no handrails near the elevator, an activities room (Garden Room), the hallway near the dining area (Grace's Table). On 9/16/2025 at 11:35 AM, met with the Administrator and employee #8 from the [NAME] Corporation. Employee #8 stated that they thought handrails only needed to be in the areas where resident rooms were located. He was shown the regulation on the surveyors laptop and it was also emailed to him that stated that handrails had to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders and the resident's care plan for the administration of oxygen. This was evident for 1 (#56) of 1 resident reviewed for the administration of oxygen. The findings include. Resident #56 was observed in bed on 10/10/23 at 1:40 PM receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (a tube worn in the nostrils to administer oxygen) that was attached to an oxygen concentrator (a machine that concentrates oxygen from room air). The flow meter scale with a metal ball was observed between the 4 and 5 lines to show an oxygen flow rate of 4.5 liters per minute. At 1:52 PM the facility's infection preventionist (staff #6) entered Resident #56's room to observe the oxygen concentrator. An interview followed and she indicated that she was documenting when the oxygen tubing was replaced. She was asked about the current oxygen flow rate, and she went back into the resident's room and upon exit she indicated that the metal ball was above the 4 line. On 10/10/23 at 2:50 PM the director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure documentation of residents' Pneumococcal vaccination status in their medical records. This was evident for 1 (Resident #369) of 5 residents reviewed who were eligible for Pneumococcal vaccines during the survey. The findings include: Pneumococcal vaccine helps prevent Pneumococcal disease, any type of illness caused by streptococcus pneumonia bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends a Pneumococcal vaccine for those age [AGE] and older and adults 19 through 64 with certain medical conditions or risk factors. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- vaccines and preventable disease) On 10/18/23 at 9:49 AM, randomly selected five residents' (eligible for the Pneumococcal, Flu, and COVID vaccination) vaccination statuses were reviewed. Reviewing Resident #369's paper medical chart revealed blank vaccination consent forms (for Influenza, Pneumococcal, and COVID-19) without any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that residents' dignity was provided in 1) Providing personal grooming care, and 2) Long call light response times. This was evident for 2 out of 32 residents (R#63 and R#93) reviewed during the survey process. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The findings include: 1) On 01/30/19 at 2:13 P.M, during an interview with Resident # 93 in the resident's room the surveyor observed R#93 sitting in his/her wheel chair cluttered with food and fluid, wearing a soiled dirty shirt and pants, with long dirty fingernails and eyeglasses. Resident #93 asked this surveyor for help. The surveyor informed the Unit Clerk that R#93 needed care and assistance. 2) On 01/30/19 at 02:35 P.M. during an interview of Resident #63 and spouse, R#63 informed the surveyor (writer) that he/she must wait over 30 minutes for staff to respond to the call bells during the day, afternoon, night and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on the medical record and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide a Care Plan for Resident #69's continuing care, to the hospital where the resident was being sent. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents investigated for hospitalization during the survey process. The findings include: On 01/31/19, around 12:07 PM, while reviewing Resident #69's medical record for a recent hospitalization, it was noted that on 12/18/18 the resident was observed to be unresponsive with labored breathing. The doctor assessed the resident and ordered the resident to be transferred to the hospital for a questionable CVA (stroke). Review of the hospital transfer record and the resident's chart did not reveal the below required information: 1) A copy of Resident #69's Care Plan This information was discussed with staff #6 who acknowledged the omission.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on the medical record and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide necessary written notices for Resident #69, or the resident's responsible party, of a transfer out of the facility. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents investigated for hospitalization during the survey process. The findings include: On 01/31/19 around 12:07 PM while reviewing Resident #69's medical record for a recent hospitalization, it was noted that on 12/18/18 the resident was observed to be unresponsive with labored breathing. The doctor assessed the resident and ordered the resident to be transferred to the hospital for a questionable CVA (stroke). Review of the hospital transfer record and the resident's chart did not reveal the below required information: 1. The name of the location where the resident was being sent. 2. Written notice to the resident or the resident's responsible party. 3. Notification to the Ombudsman of the hospital visit. This information was discussed with staff #6 who acknowledged the omissions.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 47 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $12.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in MD