No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedar Crest/Mountainview Gardens

4 Cedar Crest Village Drive, Pompton Plains, NJ 07444 · Non profit - Corporation · 113 certified beds · (973) 831-3504 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation$49,960 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $49,960 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-07)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
45 Carey Ave Ste 250 · (973) 283-2700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
94 State RT 23 · (973) 850-2862 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Park
7 Clubhouse Rd · (973) 492-1370 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%8.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%4.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.8%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.4%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.6%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.9%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission11.2%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit1.4%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.442.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.251.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 195 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

71.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF71.8%CMS range 65.6–77.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.2–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge26.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 3.2–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.84
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
21.2%
Total nursing turnover
19.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 108.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ185754 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 9/18/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure to ensure all residents were protected from abuse when a Dining Associate (DA #1) alleged a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) physically abused a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) and did not immediately report the allegation and CNA #1 continued to provide resident care without a thorough investigation. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). On 4/19/2025 at approximately 4:45 PM, DA #1 alleged observing CNA #1 feed Resident #1 in the dining room. DA #1 alleged that Resident #1 was saying that the soup was too hot, and put their hands up, while CNA #1 pushed the resident's hands down, grabbed their arm, and manipulated the resident's arm to make a gripping motion. DA #1 did not report the incident until 4/22/2025, three days later, and CNA #1 continued to work three shifts, which gave her access to Resident #1 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # 2705112, 2704904 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 1/7/26, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a two -person assistant when transferring Resident #1 from bed to wheelchair in accordance with the resident's care plan. This contributed to the resident exhibiting signs of pain by grimacing, after the inappropriate transfer of the resident from bed to wheelchair by their Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1). Further facility assessment of Resident #1 through X-ray report, revealed that the resident sustained right femoral neck fracture (hip fracture). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident#1).The evident is as followed: On 1/7/26, a review of the Face Sheet (FS), revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses that included but not limited to; Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness and lack of coordination.On 1/7/26, a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-07-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of electronic medical record, as well as review of pertinent facility documents on [DATE] and [DATE], the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) used a sit to stand lift and a two-person assist transfer in 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents as determined necessary by the Resident's Holistic Care Plan (HCP). The failure to follow this intervention during the evening care transfer of Resident #1 by CNA #1 resulted in the Resident falling to the floor and became unresponsive subsequently requiring her/his immediate transfer to acute care hospital emergency room (ER) for further evaluation. In the ER, the Resident was found to have large bilateral subdural hematoma (a condition that indicates bleeding in the brain) and expired on [DATE]. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to Resident #1's Face Sheet (FS), Resident was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's Disease, Epilepsy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to keep the call bell soft pad within residents' reach. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #57 and #112), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 01/22/2026 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #57 in their room, with eyes closed, seated in a wheelchair in front of the sink. The surveyor observed that the call bell soft -touch pad (a device used to summon the staff for assistance) was on the bedside table, not within the resident's reach. On 1/23/26 at 9:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #57 in their room, with eyes closed, seated in a wheelchair in front of the sink. The surveyor observed that the call bell soft -touch pad was on the bedside table, not within Resident #57's reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #57. A review of the admission Record reflected that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene practices during dining observations in 1 of 3 dining rooms (2nd floor) and for 2 of 3 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)) and Registered Nurse (RN) during meal service. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 2/27/24, Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications:Immediately before touching a patient .After touching a patient or the patient's immediate environmentAfter contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfacesImmediately after glove removal. On 01/23/2026 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor observed meal service in the 2nd-floor dining room and observed the following: On 1/23/26 at 9:45 AM, the RN entered the dining room and assisted Resident #5 with their meal. The surveyor observed that the RN fed the resident and then, with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ184124 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on [DATE] and [DATE], it was determined that the facility failed to follow a resident's (Resident #2) wishes for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status who had a signed Physician's Order (PO) and a Practitioner Orders for Life- Sustainable Treatment (POLST) in their chart when the resident experienced a cardiac arrest on [DATE]. This deficient practice was identified for one resident (Resident #2), and is evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Dementia (memory loss), Hypertension (a condition in which blood in the artery wall is too high) and Muscle Weakness. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated [DATE], reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of 15, indicating that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ184124 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 03/11/2025 and 03/12/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to completely fill out a Medical Record (MR) which contained the New Jersey Universal Transfer Form (NJUTF) for a resident (Resident #2) who was sent out to the Hospital. This deficient practice was identified for one resident (Resident #2), and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Dementia (memory loss), Hypertension (a condition in which blood in the artery wall is too high) and Muscle Weakness. A review of the Resident #2's Progress Notes (PN) revealed that on 02/21/2025 at 4:01 P.M., the Registered Nurse (RN) documented that Resident #2 needed to be sent out to the emergency room (ER) for tachycardia, nauseous, and complain of weakness. A review of Resident #2's MR revealed the NJUTF for the 02/21/2025 transfer to the ER was not filled out completely. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 9/4/24 at 9:21 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Campus Executive Chef (CEC) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. On the preparatory table, the surveyor observed the can opener with a caked on black colored debris. The CEC stated, they were unsure when the can opener was cleaned last, but the can opener would be cleaned immediately. 2. In the cooking area of the kitchen, the surveyor observed the standing dual oven with a sticky yellowish substance and dust like particles on top of the oven. CEC not sure when the oven was last cleaned was last cleaned. 3. The deep fryer was observed with multiple food crumbs around the inside of the fryer. Per Chef #1 the fryer was not used today, unable to explain why food crumbs were present and not cleaned last night after use. 4. The standing combination oven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility polices it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) carry out medication orders for a hospice resident and b.) clarify an oxygen order. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 12 Residents (Resident #67 and #3) reviewed. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care of all residents, accurately for 1 of 25 residents reviewed (Resident # 113). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident # 113's records. The resident reviewed 1/23/24, was discharged from the facility and according to the Discharge Return Anticipated MDS, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 6/27/24, the Type of Discharge was indicated as unplanned. A review of Resident # 113's progress notes dated 6/18/24, revealed the resident had a planned discharged to an Assisted Living (AL) facility. On 9/9/24 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator, who stated that the MDS under section A Typer of Discharge for Resident # 113 should have indicated that the resident's discharge was planned. During an interview on 9/9/24 at 1:20 PM, the surveyor brought the above concerns to the attention of the Director of Nursing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene and appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 4 staff observed on 1 of 4 Nursing Units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 02/27/24 revealed: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient . Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient . After touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment After contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces Immediately after glove removal. On 9/5/24 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor observed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on the Terrace Unit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or the resident's representative in writing for a facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #103 and #111) reviewed for hospitalization discharge. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/17/23 at 1:31 PM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical records (paper and electronic) of Resident #103. The medical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 3/2/23. According to the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 3/2/23, reflected that Resident #103 was discharged to the hospital with a return anticipated to the facility. On 5/23/23 at 1:15 PM, the surveyor discussed the transfer of Resident #103 to the hospital with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding written notification of discharge. The Administrator stated that no written notification was sent to the family or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 1 of 26 residents, Resident # 17, system selected for MDS over 120 days and was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the MDS. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covered for the resident. The Quarterly assessment was considered timely if 1). The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the Quarterly MDS was within 92 days after the ARD of the previous MDS and; 2). the completion date was no later than 14 days after the ARD. On 5/24/23 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #17. A review of the MDS for Resident #17 revealed that a Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 1/9/23 was completed. The next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident under Hospice care (care for a terminally ill person who's expected to have six months or less to live). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for Hospice comprehensive person-centered care plans, Resident #21 and Resident #35 and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/18/23 at 12:10 PM, the surveyor observed a STOP sign posted right outside Resident #21's room door. There was also signage indicating please keep door closed at all times thank you. On 5/18/23 at 1:53 PM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical records for Resident #21. According to the resident's admission record, the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Kidney Disease, and active COVID 19 respiratory infection. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$49,960 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2026-01-07
  • $32,338 — penalty dated 2025-09-23
  • $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-07-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NATIONAL SENIOR COMMUNITIES, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/14/2021
BROWN, IANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
BROWN, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
CLUPPER, KATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2024
COLINS, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2019
ERSTAD, EILEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2018
GOODMAN, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/26/2026
JACQUE, ZINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2018
LEONARD, MONTYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2022
MOSCATO, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2024
PAULK, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
POMERANZ, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2025
REEL, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2018
ROSKIEWICZ, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2019
SHARP, RUSSELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2023
WALLICK, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2025
EMBLEY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/27/2021
HALL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2010
MERKERT, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2026
SAWICKI, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
STINER, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
TYLER, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2025
ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
BUTLER, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2014
ORLIC, PETERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2016
RANDAZZO, RENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/06/2022
SWEETSER, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
BISON, MICHAELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/08/2025
RIDLEY, FREDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/08/2025
SONES, RANDALLIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$10.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 16%Medicare 15%Other / private 69%

This home reported $10.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$2,375per resident / day
operating cost
$72,215per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$469per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315491. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next