No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Continuing Care At Maris Grove

500 Maris Grove Way, Glen Mills, PA 19342 · Non profit - Corporation · 66 certified beds · (610) 387-4700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$22,737 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,737 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-14)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
145 Brinton Lake Rd · (610) 459-1619 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
100 Maris Grove Way · (610) 387-4540 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Acme0.3 mi
101 Byers Dr · (610) 459-2759 · Call to confirm hours
Park
687 Smithbridge Rd · (610) 459-8911 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.5%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%6.2%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.7%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.2%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.7%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.5%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.2%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.731.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.541.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.8%CMS range 55.8–69.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.8–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.1–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.09
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
29.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 59.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.45 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.14 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.60 to 1.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-20)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of established guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the facility's policies, residents' clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that CPR was provided in accordance with established facility policy and procedure for Resident 207, creating a situation for one of six residents were placed in an Immediate Jeopardy situation related to failure to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Findings include: Review of guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA), dated 2020, revealed, the AHA urged all potential rescuers to initiate CPR unless a valid Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order was in place; if there were obvious clinical signs of irreversible death present, including rigor mortis (stiffness of the limbs and body that develops 2 to 4 hours after death and may take up to 12 hours to fully develop), dependent lividity (reddish-blue discoloration of the skin resulting from the gravitational pooling of blood in the lower lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of eight residents reviewed was provided with adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident 208) which resulted in actual harm when Resident 208 fell resulting in a fracture clavicle. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Fall Management, review date of April 2023, revealed a fall is any event resulting in the resident coming to unintentionally on the floor or other lower level but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. Each resident will be assessed using a Holistic Assessment for potential risk for falls on admission, readmission and quarterly for continuing services. Therapy will complete an evaluation/screening on new admission and readmission and as needed for residents identified as fall risks. Care/service plans will be developed using individualized approaches identified during the assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, clinical records review, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the care plan for one of the three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Care/Service Plans, last revised in May 2021, it revealed The interim care plan will reflect resident's goals and include interventions that address his or her current needs in a language and format that resident and /or representative, if applicable, understand. The policy also indicated The care plan will include healthcare information necessary to care for a resident including Services and treatments to be administered by the community or personnel acting on behalf of the community. A review of Resident 1's admission assessment revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM- a degenerative, inflammatory disease that causes slow, progressive muscle weakness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and Staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the minimum healthcare information to properly care for a resident for one out of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include:A review of facility policy Care/Service Plans, dated [DATE], indicates that each guest/resident will have an individualized Care/Service plan developed. Care/Service Plans will include guest/resident preferences, strengths, routines, personal and cultural preferences and choices as well as clinical needs.Review of Resident 45's PASRR Level I (Pennsylvania Preadmission Screening Resident Review, a screening tool to identify those with serious mental illness or intellectual and developmental disabilities to ensure they receive appropriate care) completed [DATE] revealed that Resident 45 had a positive screen for a PASRR Level II evaluation (an evaluation that ensures individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes and that their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were followed and bowel movement was appropriately monitored and addressed for two out of 15 residents reviewed (Residents 29 and 54).Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Bowel Monitoring Exception Report Tutorial Bowel Protocol, updated on March 2022 revealed the following: All residents upon admission will be reviewed by provider to determine appropriate bowel regimen; 11-7 shift nurse to pull bowel exception report for all residents on designated neighborhood from last 3 days (9 shifts); 11-7 nurse to hand off to 7-3 nurse those residents who have not had a BM (bowel movement) documented in the last 3 days/9shifts; PRN (as needed) bowel regimen is administered to resident; and Resident will continue to be monitored until effectiveness is achieved. Review of Resident 29's nursing progress notes dated January 9, 2026, at 11:32 a.m., revealed the resident was a new admit with a diagnosis of falls and right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Staff interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids in accordance with physician orders for one out of 15 resident reviewed (Resident 26).Findings include:Review of Resident 26's admission record revealed they were admitted on [DATE], from the hospital after oral surgery with a diagnosis of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (a bone infection that originates from bacteria traveling through the bloodstream) and sepsis (an illness that occurs when an infection triggers an extreme immune response in the body). Resident 26 was admitted with a double-lumen PICC (a peripherally inserted central catheter with two lines that allows the provider to deliver more than one therapy directly into the blood stream) to the right chest wall.Facility policy Central Vascular Access Device (CVAD) Dressing Change dated January 15, 2004, states: 1. Perform sterile dressing changes using Standard-ANTT (Aseptic Non Touch Technique, a standardized approach to procedures aimed at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan approaches to prevent accidents for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident 208) Findings include: Review of facility policy Care/Service Plans, review date May 2021, indicated each resident will have an individualized care/service plan developed. Care/service plans will include resident preferences, strengths, routines, personal and cultural preferences and choices as well as clinical needs. All interdisciplinary team members will document any updates/changes on care plan copy in the guest/resident suite/apartment/designated accessible location and review update with designated care associate. Review of Resident 208's admission record indicated he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 208's admission record indicated diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of the lower end of left femur (hip fracture), iron…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete discharge summary on the day of planned discharge for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include: Review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged to home on March 3, 2025. Review of Resident 45's clinical record failed to reveal a discharge summary completed on March 3, 2024, the day of a planned discharge. The above information was conveyed to the Nursing Home Administrator on March 14, 2025, at 1:38 p.m. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician's order regarding medication was followed for one of the 16 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: A review of Resident 12's physician order dated May 29, 2024, revealed an order for Lorazepam (A medication to treat anxiety) 2mg/ml Give 1 mg (0.5ml) every 2 hours as needed for Anxiety sublingually (Medication administered under the tongue). A review of Resident 12's November 2024, Medication Administration records and controlled substance declining sheet revealed that instead of 0.5 ml, Resident 12 was administered 0.25 ml of Lorazepam on the following dates: November 2, 2024, at 2:53 p.m., November 7, 2024, at 2:39 p.m., November 9, 2024, at 3:50 p.m., and November 14, 2024, at 1:00 a.m. An interview with the Director of Nursing conducted on March 14, 2025, at 10:40 a.m., confirmed Resident 12's physician's order for as-needed Lorazepam was not followed on the dates listed above. The facility failed to ensure Resident 12's as-needed Lorazepam order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a wound specialist's recommendation for wound treatment for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident 25). Findings include: Clinical records review revealed Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-A weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs). A review of the skin assessment revealed Resident 25 was admitted to the facility with a Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) to the sacrum (The triangular bone just below the lumbar vertebrae). Wound treatment was made and followed. A review of the wound consult dated February 3, 2025, revealed Resident 25's sacral wound progressed into an Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) measuring 1.5 x 0.7 cm with 100% slough (is non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green or brown tissue; usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate monitoring of weight and food intake was done and that significant weight change was timely addressed for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 20). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Weight Management, version June 2021, revealed residents would have their weight obtained on admission, re-admission, and monthly or at a frequency determined by the interdisciplinary team or provided. Residents with a weight variance equal to or greater than five pounds of five percent will be reweighed within 24 hours and weight will be entered into an EMR (Electronic Medical Record). The medical provider and responsible party will be notified of any significant change. Clinical records review revealed Resident 20's diagnosis list includes Prostate Cancer, Parkinson's Disease (A disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), and Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 20's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of their job descriptions it was determined that the Continuing Care Administrator (CCA), and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to ensure that CardioPulmonary Resuscitation was provided in accordance with the facility policy and procedures to residents that are a full code. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Continuing Care Administrator (CCA) revealed the essential function is responsible for ensuring compliance with all federal, state, local and facility regulations, and policies. Oversees and audits nursing services to ensure high quality nursing delivery systems. Review of the job description for the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the responsibility of the job position is to coordinate and implement the comprehensive delivery of nursing services to all Continuing Care residents (skilled nursing, long term care, assisted living and memory care) according to Erickson's Person-Centered Approach care model and standards, professionally recognized nursing practices and local, state, and federal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the dignity of residents in one of the three units observed (Cardinal 2). Findings include: Observations conducted during the environmental tour of the rooms on the Cardinal 2 unit was conducted on January 29, 2024. Observation conducted in Resident 39's room on January 29, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., revealed a white paper with a typewritten note After each meal, make sure [resident's name] mouth is clean. Check for any residue on the tongue let her/him take multiple sips of water, and if possible, brush their teeth following breakfast and dinner. Thank you, [staff name] The note was posted on the wall of the room near the door visible from the hallway outside the room. Observation conducted in Resident 11's room on January 29, 2024, at 12:17 p.m., revealed a white paper with a typewritten note Toileting Needs: Dear caregivers [resident's name] frequently has bowel movement after meals, please take [resident's name] to the toilet after each meal to give her/him the opportunity to have bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident 50) Findings Include: Review of resident's records revealed a progress note dated [DATE], at 2:36 am, noting the resident discharged to [NAME] Hospital at approximately 1:30 am. Resident noted to have shortness of breath, pulse ox was 56% on room air. Resident was put on O2 @ 5liters via nasal cannula. Pulse ox was up 82%. Resident was lethargic, sweaty and could not respond much when name was called. Blood sugar was 256, vital signs were unstable. Nursing supervisor called on-call doctor and resident was sent out via EMS. POA was made aware before resident was sent out to hospital. Further review of resident's record revealed a progress note dated [DATE], at 7:03 am, noting resident was being admitted to [NAME] Hospital with a diagnosis of pneumonia. It was further noted that Resident 50 never returned to the facility. Resident 50 expired in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician's order regarding blood sugar was followed for one of the 17 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: A review of Resident 19's diagnosis revealed malignant neoplasm of the connective and soft tissue of the pelvis, and Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar level). A review of the physician order dated December 19, 2023, revealed an order to check Resident 19's blood sugar every four hours when awake. Call a physician if blood sugar is less than 60 or greater than 350. A review of the January 2024, Treatment Record revealed that from January 1, 2024, until January 31. 2024, Resident 19 had a blood sugar below 60 on the following days: January 3, 2024, at 12:00 a.m., 38 mg/dl; January 7, 2024, at 12:00 p.m., 44 mg/dl; January 9, 2024, at 8:00 a.m., 38mg/dl; January 10, 2024, at 4:00 p.m., 44 mg/dl; January 14, 2024, at 8:00 a.m., 38 mg/dl; January 15, 2024, at 8:00 a.m., 55 mg/dl; January 15, 2024, at 12 noon, 48 mg/dl; January 16, 2024, at 8:00 a.m., 36 mg/dl;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy services provided medications timely for one of the 17 residents reviewed. (Resident 19). Findings include: Review of Resident 19's clinical records revealed the resident with a diagnosis of Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). Review of Resident 19's physician orders dated January 17, 2023, revealed an order for True plus Glucose 4 gram chewable four tablets every four hours for low blood sugar. Review of Resident 19's January 2024, Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident19's glucose tablet was not administered on the following day/time: January 18, 2024, at 2:00 a.m.; January 20, 2024, at 2:00 p.m.; January 27, 2024, at 6:00 a.m., and January 27, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. REview of Resident 19's clinical records and administration notes revealed that Resident 19's glucose tablet was not administered to the resident on the above-mentioned dates/time due to awaiting pharmacy delivery of the medication. Interview with the Director of Nursing conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,737 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-03-14
  • $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-02-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NATIONAL SENIOR COMMUNITIES, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 01/14/2021
BROWN, IANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
BROWN, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
CLUPPER, KATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
COLINS, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2019
ERSTAD, EILEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2018
JACQUE, ZINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2018
LEONARD, MONTYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
MOSCATO, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2024
PAULK, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
POMERANZ, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2025
REEL, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2018
ROSKIEWICZ, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2019
SHARP, RUSSELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
WALLICK, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2025
EMBLEY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/27/2021
GANTERT, NEALIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
HALL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2010
SAWICKI, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
STINER, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
TYLER, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2025
ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
BUTLER, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2014
CHANG, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
MCDERMOND, SHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/28/2024
SWEETSER, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
BISON, MICHAELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2025
RIDLEY, FREDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2025
SONES, RANDALLIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2025
ERICKSON LIVING HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2010
OAK INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
OAK INVESTMENT TRUST IIOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$9.6M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 14%Other / private 82%

This home reported $9.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396123. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next