Ann's Choice

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 143 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 62.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.34 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.77 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.76 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.44 to 1.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0572 — isolated
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents/resident representatives were provided facility rules in writing related to private companions unable to provide direct care for residents while in the facility, one of two resident reviewed for falls (Resident R6). Findings incldue: Review of facility policy Resident Rights, dated 2023, revealed the facility will promote and protect the rights of each resident and places a strong emphasis on individual dignity and self-determination. A written description of a Resident's Rights will be provided to the resident upon admission to the facility and upon request. The facility will adhere to state and federal regulatory requirements pertaining to Resident Rights. Review of clinical record revealed Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required timeframe for one of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 47).Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to be completed no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. An admission MDS assessment for Resident 47, with an ARD of March 31, 2025, was completed on April 4, 2025. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 47, was due to be completed within 90 days from March 31, 2025. There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete a resident assessment for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident R33). Findings include:Review of Resident R33's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident care needs) dated April 29, 2025, revealed that the resident was discharged . Further review of the MDS revealed that the social security number for the resident was coded incorrectly in the MDS assessment. Interview with the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator, conducted on August 14, 2025, at 11:14 a.m. confirmed that social security number was coded incorrectly for Resident R33.28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) for three of three employees reviewed (Employees E4, E5 and E6).Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Health Services- Education and Training dated April 2023, revealed All health services employees will be required to complete a specific number of continuing education topics commensurate with their job classification, certification and license at the time of hire, annually, or more frequently per state/federal regulations for the service level/ department which they are assigned. Review of facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QA/PI) Committee dated April 2025, revealed Education regarding this policy and procedure will be completed with appropriate personnel as needed. Ongoing training and education will be provided on an as needed basis, as determined by the employee's direct supervisor/ manager. Employee E4, Certified Nursing Assistant, had a hire date of February…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of policy and procedure and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of initiated emergency transfers and dischargers for three of four residents reviewed (Residents R59, R111, R60) Findings include: A review of the policy titled skilled nursing initiated transfer/discharge date d June, 2021 revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility staff to send a timely copy of the notice of facility initiated resident transfers or discharges to the Ombudsman or other State required agencies. Clinical record review for Resident R60 revealed she was re-admitted to facility on August 19, 2024 status post hospitalization for hypotension (high blood pressure) and heart failure. Clinical record review for Resident R59 revealed he was hospitalized on [DATE] with septic shock. Clinical record review for Resident R111 revealed that this resident was atmitted to the hospital on August 1, 2024 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-center, comprehensive care plan related to respiratory care for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Care/Service Plans, undated 9/2012, revealed each guest/resident will have an individualized Care/Service plan developed. Care/Service Plans will included guest/resident preferences, strengths, routines, personal and cultural preferences and choices as well as clinical needs. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses hypertension (high blood pressure), stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (a condition where the heart's ability to pump blood efficiently is impaired due to weakened or damaged heart muscle, leading to a buildup of fluid in the lungs or other parts of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of closed clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision which resulting in an elopement for one of 4 residents reviewed (Resident R161). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Elopement Risk Assessment , undated June 2012, revealed The Elopement Risk Assessment assists in the identification of residents with a potential risk of elopement from the facility. The assessment is completed at the time of admission, re-admission, and every six-months and/or with any significant change in a resident's condition potentially impacting their risk of elopement. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including unspecified dementia, moderate with psychotic disturbance, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology as of April 13, 2022. Review of Resident R161's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain orders for urinary catherization for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident R45). Findings include: Review of facility policy Urinary Catheters, undated July 2012, revealed to provide urinary catheter care for a guest/resident in accordance with nursing standards of practice and minimize the spread of infection. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including tubule-interstitial nephritis (kidney disorder characterized by inflammation of the tubules and surrounding interstitial tissue), aftercare following joint replacement surgery, presence of left artificial knee join, sepsis, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, spinal stenosis , vascular dementia, retention of urine, urinary tract infection. Review of Resident R45's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated September 16, 2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen level in accordance with physician's orders for one of two residents (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses hypertension (high blood pressure), stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (a condition where the heart's ability to pump blood efficiently is impaired due to weakened or damaged heart muscle, leading to a buildup of fluid in the lungs or other parts of the body), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heart rhythm), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain. Review of Resident R1's current physician order dated, September 23, 2024 indicated oxygen L/min (2) intranasal administer @2L via NC (nasal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0572 — pattern
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility residents record, review of facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents of their rights, rules, regulations, and responsibilities prior to and/or upon the resident's admission for nine out of 34 residents reviewed. (R1, R2, R6, R7, R10, R18, R35, R36, R37) Findings Include: Review of facility documentation given to residents titled, Your Rights and Protections as a Nursing Home Resident undated revealed What are my rights in a nursing home? As a nursing home resident, you have certain rights and protections under Federal and state law that help ensure you get the care and services you need. You have the right to be informed, make your own decisions, and have your personal information kept private. The nursing home must tell you about these rights and explain them in writing in a language you understand. They must explain in writing how you should act and what you're responsible for while you're in a the nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $10.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in PA