Fox Run Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 154 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 39.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.42 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.94 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.10 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.62 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread foodborne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 04/28/2026 at 9:15 AM during the kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM) I and Dietary Services Director (DSD) J observed in the walk-in cooler: two clear deep covered plastic containers of facility made tomato soup. The soup in each container was approximately 6 deep and was labeled as being prepared on 4/27. The temperature of the soup measured at the top of the product was in the range of 45 F-49 F. During this observation, when DM I was queried about the cooling of this product, it was confirmed that it had been cooked and cooled on the previous day more than 6 hours prior. DM I said cooling records are typically kept in the production logs binder referred to as the Red Book, but no monitoring records were logged for this item. Cooling practices described by DSD J were to use an ice wand for stirring product while cooling. DM I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review facility staff failed to report an allegation of sexual assault to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator and State Agency for one (R7) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of R7's clinical record revealed the resident was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: subdural hematoma, repeated falls and Parkinsons. A review of the Minimum Data Set (4/13/26) noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 13/15 (cognitively intact cognition).Continued review of R7's clinical record revealed the following:4/26/26: Nursing Note: .I was sexually assaulted by girls last night. (Authored by Nurse D)4/27/26: Physician Note: .On the 23rd reported wandering trying to leave the facility.later in the day he reported that some of the female aides helping him last night was messing with him. He said there were 3-4 of them and he was tied down and unable to defend himself as they were overpowering him.Seen today up in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for one resident, (R36) of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall requiring a transfer to the emergency room. Findings include: On 4/27/26 at 11:59 AM, an interview was conducted with R36's family member and they reported R36 had a fall from their bed during incontinence care because there was only one nurse aide present rendering care and R36 was supposed to have the care provided by two staff members. They further reported the fall from the bed required a transfer to the emergency room. On 4/27/26 at 2:04 PM, a review of R36's progress notes revealed a note dated 12/22/25 at 11:43 PM entered into the record by Nurse 'F' that read, Writer was called by staff saying resident just fell out of bed. When I went to resident's room saw {sic} resident laying on the floor on her back by the window side, the bed is on {sic} a waist height position .unable to assess her arms legs due to stiffness and contracted extremities, staffs {sic} got her off the floor with the use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices for residents on droplet precautions during an influenza outbreak, and implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) affecting multiple residents reviewed for infection control, including R93, R21 and R15. This deficient practice has the likelihood to result in cross-contamination and the continued development and spread of infection and disease. Findings include: R93 On 3/11/25 at 10:09 AM, R93's door was closed and the resident was heard coughing very loudly from the hallway. There were several signs taped to the outside of the door which included: a rehab treatment schedule, a sheet that read, STOP PLEASE SEE NURSE, a sheet that showed the sequence of putting on personal protective equipment (PPE) for a gown, mask or respirator, goggles or face shield, and gloves, and a sheet that showed the sequence of removing PPE. There was no signage to identify what type of precautions the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Nursing standards of practice were followed for medication administration for one resident (R5) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 03/11/25 at approximately 10:52 a.m., R5 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R5 was observed to have eye drops and a medication cup with three white pills in it without a Nurse in the room providing supervision. R5 was queried how they received their pills in the cup, and they reported the Nurse had given it to them to take and did not wait for them to take them all, left the room and never returned. At that time, R5 was observed to take their hand and grab the pills one by one out of the cup and swallow them. On 3/12/25 at approximately 9:29 a.m., during a medication administration observation, Nurse E was observed to administer a Cyancobalamin (vitamin B-12) 1,000 mcg tablet in a medication cup with multiple other medications in together in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide assistance with oral hygiene for one (R34) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: On 3/11/25 at 10:18 AM, R34 was observed lying in bed. When asked if they had any concerns with the facility's care R34 reported they had concerns with staff not always assisting them with brushing their teeth most of the time. R34 reported oral care had not been done yet today. On 3/11/25 at 12:39 PM, R34's call light was lit up in the hallway and the door was closed. Upon entering the room, the resident was observed lying in bed on their back with a lunch meal on an overbed tray in front of them. When asked if they had pressed their light for help, R34 reported their bed controller fell to the floor and they couldn't reach it. The bed remote controller was observed on the floor under the bed. When asked if they had received any oral care yet, R34 reported not yet. The resident further reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration for one resident (R143) of one resident reviewed for new admissions. Findings include: On 03/11/25 at approximately 11:17 a.m., R143 was observed to be in their room, laying in their bed. R143 was observed to have a catheter draining amber colored urine into a drainage bag. On 3/12/25 the medical record for R143 was reviewed and revealed the following: R143 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Retention of Urine and Encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device. A review of R143's March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed R143 was not administered the following medications on 3/11/25 (a day after being admitted on [DATE]): 1. doxycycline hyclate 100 mgcapsule (1) CAPSULE Oral Two Times Daily for Two Days Starting 03/10/2025 .(10:00 AM dose-med on order) .2. midodrine 5 mg tablet (1tab) (TABLET) Oral Three Times Daily Starting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician orders were in place and appropriate catheter care was provided for one resident (R143) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. Findings include: On 03/11/25 at approximately 11:17 a.m., R143 was observed to be in their room, laying in their bed. R143 was observed to have a catheter tube draining amber colored urine into a drainage bag. On 3/12/24 at approximately 2:44 p.m., R143 was observed in their room, walking around in their hospital gown, dragging their catheter tubing and urine collection bag on the floor without any privacy bag in it. R143's catheter tubing was not observed to be secured and was observed to be pulling away from their body as they were walking. On 3/12/25 the medical record for R143 was reviewed and revealed the following: R143 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Retention of Urine and Encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00144708 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services met professional standards for medication administration and documentation of controlled substances and medication documentation according to order changes for one resident (R901) of one reviewed for professional standards, resulting in R901 not receiving medication in accordance with the physician order. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency (SA) alleged a physician order for Morphine was ordered around 2:00 PM on 5/8/24 and the facility failed to administer for many hours later in the day resulting in R901 to .suffer for hours without ordered Morphine . A record review revealed that R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for physical therapy rehabilitation and aftercare for spinal surgery from a fractured vertebrae. A comprehensive assessment for R901 was not available due to the short-term stay. A clinical record review documented R901 was alert,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00144708. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate, and accurate assessment, investigation, and monitoring of a resident post fall with injury for two (R901 and R904) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R901 A complaint filed with the State Agency alleged concerns regarding R901's fall and post-fall investigation. Review of the clinical record revealed R901 was admitted into the facility for skilled therapy on [DATE] around 6:15 PM with diagnoses that included: wedge compression fracture and multiple fracture of ribs. R901 was signed onto hospice following a fall with injury within a few hours of admission on [DATE], which resulted in likely traumatic head injury per Physician evaluation, subsequent significant decline in overall status, and the resident died on [DATE]. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for death in facility dated [DATE], there were no details of the resident's cognition, or falls.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,350 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $7.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in MI