No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adrian Bay Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

700 Lakeshire Trail, Adrian, MI 49221 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (517) 263-0781 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (517) 263-0781 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 actual-harm citations$201,851 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $201,851 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
715 Lakeshire Trl · (517) 263-4947 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1003 N Main St · (517) 265-1565 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Point0.8 mi
826 N Main St · (517) 265-8671 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
720 Riverside Ave · (517) 263-1162

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.5%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.0%4.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%12.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.3%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.4%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.6%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.3%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.651.841.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.751.641.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.4%CMS range 49.8–67.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 8.9–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.6–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
31.8%
Total nursing turnover
46.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 95.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-12)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #3030201.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their transfer status was accurately following resident's plan of care to prevent fall to occur for one resident (R#2) of 3 sampled residents sustaining a fall resulting in a hospital transfer and admitted for Right Rib Fractures 5-10, Right Forehead Hematoma, Right non-displaced Humeral Fracture, and Right Superior Pubic Rami Fracture and pain.Findings include: The facility incident report was reviewed on 6/22/26 at 1:30 PM. It revealed that Resident#2 (R#2) had a Fall on 5/26/26, while being assisted by CNA A to the bathroom. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA A) assisted R#2 to ambulate from the wheelchair to the bathroom using a walker without a gait belt. R#2 was at High Risk for falling, and the plan for R#2's transfer status is to use a lift. Meanwhile, during this transfer, CNA A stepped away from R#2 to put her gloves on for care, and CNA A heard R#2 saying I am falling and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00138570. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care planned interventions to maintain functional strength to prevent falls, in one of three reviewed for falls (Resident #1), resulting in multiple falls and injuries including a fracture. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) R1 was observed sitting in her wheelchair on 9/06/23 at 10:55 AM. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a brief performance-based cognitive screener, score of 04 (00-07 Severe Impairment). The same MDS indicated R1 required extensive assistance of one person for transfers. Incident Report dated 3/08/23 at 7:01 AM indicated R1 lowered herself to the floor from her wheelchair. Witness statements dated 3/07/23 indicated R1 fell on 3/07/23 at 11:00 PM when attempting to transfer self. Progress note dated 3/08/23 at 8:51 PM revealed R1's family stated R1 thought she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-05-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00131462. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions and treatments for two (Resident #28 and Resident #29) of three reviewed, resulting in the worsening of a pressure ulcer for Resident #29 and the potential of a worsening pressure ulcer for Resident #28. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer to the left heel, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of the MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/13/23 revealed R29 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, and was not on a turning/repositioning program. Review of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 3/6/23, revealed R29 scored 16 (15-18 is at risk). Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement effective interventions to prevent falls for four (Resident #11, #13, #20, and #464) of five reviewed for accidents, resulting in reoccurring falls (Resident #13), falls with the potential for major injury (Resident #464) and falls with major injury (Resident #11 and #20). Findings Include: Resident #13 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #13 (R13) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included bilateral hearing loss, anxiety, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, overactive bladder, delusional disorders, vascular dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/6/23, reflected R13 scored zero out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R13 did not walk and required extensive of two or more people for transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2807029.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for one (R1) of three reviewed.Findings include: Review of the complaint received by the State Agency revealed Family was not notified that he [R1] had not received Paxlovid for COVID after it was prescribed until after inquiring about it. Family was not informed that the medication was not covered by insurance, nor were they given the option to obtain it privately. No additional treatment was initiated until he developed worsening shortness of breath requiring oxygen therapy. At that point, he was prescribed prednisone and nebulizer treatments. Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, urinary tract infection, and cerebral infarction (a type of stroke). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/30/25 revealed R1 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2807029.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records for one (R1) of three reviewed. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, urinary tract infection, and cerebral infarction (a type of stroke). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/30/25 revealed R1 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R1 had a legal guardian. R1 transferred to another facility on 1/15/26. Review of the General Progress Note dated 12/30/25 revealed COVID-19 test obtained .result returned positive. Resident currently symptomatic, presenting with congestion. Resident notified of test results. Family notified via telephone. Provider notified; new orders received for Paxlovid [antiviral medication] 300 mg [milligrams]/100 mg BID [twice per day] for 5 days.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2677539 and 2677568.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate controlled substance and medication administration records for five residents (R1, R3, R4, R5, R6) of six reviewed and two medication carts of two reviewed. Findings include:During an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M, on 12/8/25 at 10:37 AM, it was noted that the controlled substance book indicated 45 controlled medications were in the medication cart. Upon count of the total number of medications, it was observed that 44 controlled medications were in the medication cart. LPN M counted the total amount of medications a second time and was initially unable to explain the discrepancy. LPN M then reported one medication had been removed from the medication cart, after the last dose was administered that morning. LPN M obtained the Controlled Drug Record from the facility's mail room, which noted the last dose of the controlled medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2677539 and 2677568.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for two (R3 and R7) of seven reviewed.Findings Include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of the medical record reflected R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included sepsis, osteoarthritis, low back pain and spinal stenosis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/2/25, reflected R3 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool).On 12/8/25 at 9:40 AM, R3 was observed in bed and reported taking Norco (opioid/controlled pain medication) as needed. R3 reported there had been a nurse that documented administering Norco to her two times in one day/shift, but she did not receive the medication either time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2677539 and 2677568.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications according to the physician's order for two (R4 and R5) of five reviewed.Findings include:Resident #4 (R4) Review of the medical record revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include polyneuropathy (disease affecting nerves) and low back pain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/28/25 revealed R4 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 12/8/25 at 11:02 AM, R4 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room. R4 reported she takes Norco (hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg)/controlled opioid pain medication) every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the Physician's Order dated 10/13/25 revealed an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg give one tablet every six hours as needed for pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 80 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, decreased illumination, and resident accidental falls and/or injury. Findings include: On 06/11/25 at 08:15 A.M., A common area environmental tour of the facility was conducted with Director of Maintenance (DM) E and Director of Environmental Services (DES) D. The following items were noted: Nursing Station: Five sections of Formica laminate surface were observed (etched, scored, particulate, missing), within the interior lower-level desk surface edge. The five damaged sections of Formica laminate measured approximately 2-inches-wide by 1-inch-long, 3-inches-long, 4-inches-long, 8-inches-long, and 18-inches-long respectively. A-Unit Beauty Shop: 2 of 3 upholstered chairs were observed severely stained and discolored. (DES) D stated; We have discussed purchasing a fabric upholstery extractor. B-Unit Occupational Therapy/Physical Therapy: 2 of 4 rubber end caps…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to preserve the dignity for 5 of 5 members of the Resident Council. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council minutes dated 3/19, 4/23 and 5/20/25 revealed residents had complaints about staff being on their phones. On 06/11/25 at 01:02 PM, during the confidential group meeting, 5 of the 5 resident participants reported staff were routinely on their cell phones including in their rooms while providing care. When queried how they felt when this occurred, one resident reported like I am left out and not important. another group participant reported it made them upset because their nurses aid gets distracted while on the phone then forgets a request made by the resident, leaving an unmet need. On 06/12/25 08:32 AM, during an interview with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) Ashe reported she was aware of issues brought forth by Resident Council members and was trying to correct the issue.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149511. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor code status wishes for one (R333) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R333 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart failure, atrial fibrillation, rheumatic mitral stenosis, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, presence of prosthetic heart valve and atherosclerotic heart disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], reflected R333 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was dependent for transfers. R333's medical record reflected they had a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR/no Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/CPR) order in place, dated [DATE]. A Progress Note for [DATE] at 11:36 AM reflected R333 became unresponsive during a transfer and was lowered to the floor. The nurse responded immediately and assessed for carotid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor a change in condition timely for one (R38) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R38 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy, type 2 diabetes and obstructive and reflux uropathy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/27/25, reflected R38 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and had an indwelling urinary catheter. R38 was transferred to the hospital on 6/5/25 and was not in the facility at the time of the survey. A Progress Note for 6/4/25 at 7:19 PM reflected R38 was refusing all meals and stated she was vomiting each time she ate. The note reflected the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) reported R38 had been having green foul smelling discharge. According to the note, the physician was notified. A Progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of smoking materials for one (R58) of one reviewed for smoking. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R58 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included saddle embolus of the pulmonary artery and tobacco use. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/4/25, reflected R58 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 06/10/25 at 10:51 AM, R58 was observed seated on the edge of their bed, eating a banana. They were observed to grab a pack of cigarettes from their overbed table and place them behind their body, on their bed. R58 reported there were designated smoking times at the facility, and they smoked out back, in the corner, independently. R58 reported they stored their cigarettes and lighter in a drawer, in their room. A Smoking Safety Screen, dated 3/17/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document blood sugars prior to holding or administering insulin for one (R10) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R10 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/21/25, reflected R10 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 06/10/25 at 1:56 PM, R10 was observed in their room. R10 reported their insulin had been adjusted, and they were receiving long-acting insulin if their blood sugar was above 90 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) in the morning. R10's May 2025 and June 2025 Medication Administration Records (MAR) reflected an order, which was started on 5/28/25, for 25 units of insulin glargine to be administered subcutaneously (under the skin) in the morning. The insulin was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During an observation on 6/11/25 at 11:28 am hall A medication cart was unlocked with no staff in area. One resident observed in area able to self propel in wheelchair. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 1:35 PM, Unit Manager (UM) M reported would expect medication carts to remain locked when staff not present and computer closed. Director of Nursing (DON) B joined interview and reported would expect medication carts to remain locked if nurse not present. UM M reported often monitors for secure medications carts and occasionally observes unlocked and performs education with staff. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medication for one residents (R60) of 18 sampled residents and one medication cart of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings Included: Resident #60 (R60) Review of the medical record demonstrated R60 was admitted to the facility 03/11/2025 with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (bone infection) of sacral and sacrococcygeal region, sepsis, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149511. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for one (R333) of 18 reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R333 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart failure, atrial fibrillation, rheumatic mitral stenosis, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, presence of prosthetic heart valve and atherosclerotic heart disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], reflected R333 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was dependent for transfers. R333's admission Record, dated [DATE] at 11:38 AM, reflected they were female, however, R333 was male. R333's medical record reflected they had a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR/no Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/CPR) order in place, dated [DATE]. A Progress Note for [DATE] at 11:36 AM reflected R333…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain use of personal protective equipment during resident care for three residents (#45, #60, #70) out of 80 residents at the facility. Findings Included: Resident #45 (R45) Review of the medical record demonstrated R45 was admitted to the facility 5/6/2025 with diagnoses that included hyperkalemia (high potassium levels), hypermagnesemia (high magnesium levels), acute kidney failure, altered mental status, cytomegaloviral disease (herpes virus), history of kidney transplant, type 2 diabetes mellitus, polyneuropathy (general term for peripheral nervous system disorder), immunodeficiency (weakened or compromised immune system), low back pain, muscle wasting, hypoxemia (low oxygen levels), hypertension, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), urinary retention, constipation, sleep apnea, anemia (low red blood cell count) gastro-esophageal reflux, gout (inflammatory arthritis caused from high amounts of uric acid), stage 4 kidney disease, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to install and maintain backflow protection devices and air gaps, resulting in the potential contamination of the facility potable water system, affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/17/24 at approximately 9:50 AM, during an inspection of the kitchen, the drain lines of the three-compartment sink, were observed to not be provided with an air gap to prevent backflow of gas, liquid, and solid contaminants into the sink basins if a backflow event were to occur. Additionally, the vegetable and fruit preparation sink was observed to not be provided with an air gap in the drain line. At this time, Dietary Manager D confirmed the finding. On 7/17/24 at approximately 9:55 AM, the steamer at the cookline was observed to not be provided with a backflow protection device to protect the potable water supply. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 5-203.14 Backflow Prevention Device, When Required. A PLUMBING SYSTEM shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services per standards of practice, facility policy, and per physician's orders for one resident (Resident #575) of one resident reviewed for respiratory services. This deficient practice resulted in respiratory distresss, increased anxiety, missed doses of physician orders nebulizer treatments, and the potential to result in hypoxia [below-normal level of blood oxygen], and respiratory/medical decline with the potential to effect a total of five residents who had nebulizer treatments in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility, Nebulizer (SVN) Policy, dated 7/11/18, reflected, It is the policy of this facility that Small Volume Nebulizer (SVN) treatments will be administered by licensed nurse and/or respiratory therapist, as ordered by a physician .Supplies: Oxygen delivery system or compressed air and connector tube-Nebulizer-Prescribed medication . Resident #575 (R575) Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve the appropriate food consistency for one (Resident 44) of three reviewed for therapeutic diets, resulting in the potential for aspiration and/or choking and continued weight loss. Findings include: Resident #44 (R44) Review of the admission Record reflected that Resident 44 (R44) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficultly swallowing) and cerebral infarction (stroke). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated for 6/24/24, reflected that R44 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a cognitive screening tool). The MDS also reflected that R44 received a soft, bite sized texture for meals. During an observation and interview on 07/16/24 01:58 PM, R44 was resting in bed and had a family member visiting. R44 explained that she had been experiencing some weight loss. R44 stated that she had a difficult time chewing her food and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00140043 and MI00139259. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals as planned and posted, in 2 of 11 residents reviewed for dining services (Resident #1 and #4), potentially affecting a census of 77 residents that received meal trays, resulting in decreased quality of life. Findings include: During a lunch meal observation on 10/23/23 at 11:30 AM, a posting in the dining room indicated lunch was at 11:30 AM, at 11:47 AM no trays had been passed and no beverages were being offered or served, some residents were noted to have brought soda and water cups from their rooms. Resident #1 (R1) R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] introduced a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 15 (13-15 Cognitively Intact). During an observation and interview on 10/23/23 at 12:50 PM, R1 stated meals were never ready at the scheduled times including the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00139259. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meals at scheduled times, in 3 of 11 residents reviewed for dining services (Resident #1, #3, & #5), potentially affecting 77 residents receiving meals from the kitchen (1 resident received nothing by mouth) , resulting in decreased quality of life, and the potential for weight loss and depression. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] introduced a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 15 (13-15 Cognitively Intact). During an observation and interview on 10/23/23 at 12:50 PM, R1 stated meals were never ready at the scheduled times including the day of interview. Resident #3 (R3) R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to MI00139259. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper label and dating of foods, documentation of food and beverage temperatures, and wearing of hair restraints with 77 residents receiving meals from the kitchen (1 resident receives nothing by mouth) resulting in increased the risk of contaminated foods and the risk of food borne illness. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 10/23/2023 at 9:45 AM, the following was observed in the refrigerator: Creamed corn in a pan, dated 10/18/2023 with no use by date Opened package of hot dogs wrapped in saran wrap with no label and date Opened block of cheese with no label and date Opened block of ham with no label and date Opened Sausage with no label and date Opened Salad bag with no label and date Opened sliced meat wrapped in saran wrap, dated 10/5/2023 with no label of what it was and no use by date Hot dogs in shallow pan, covered with foil with no label or date 3 evening (HS) snacks dated from the previous night (10/22/2023) were sitting on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promote dignity during meals in 5 of 11 residents reviewed for dietary services (Resident #3, #4, #5, #9 & #10), resulting in decreased quality of life and an unhomelike dining experience. Findings include: During a lunch meal observation on 10/23/23 at 11:30 AM, a posting in the dining room indicated lunch was at 11:30 AM. At 11:47 AM no meals had been passed and no beverages were being offered or served in the dining room; some residents were noted to have brought soda and water cups from their rooms. Residents were served meals on cafeteria like trays, the first resident was served their lunch at 11:56 AM. Resident #3 (R3) R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 06 (00-07 Severely Cognitively Impaired). R3's Nutrition risk/risk for dehydration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00140043. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences in 5 of 11 residents reviewed for food preferences (Resident #1, #3, #4, #5, & #8), resulting in resident dissatisfaction and the potential for weight loss. Findings include: During a lunch meal observation on 10/23/23 at 11:30 AM, a posting in the dining room indicated lunch was at 11:30 AM, the menu was posted in small print for entire week in the dining room. Lunch on 10/23/23 included spaghetti with meat sauce, Italian Blend Vegetables, Apple Crisp, Garlic Bread stick and beverage. At 11:47 AM no trays had been passed and no beverages were being offered or served, some residents were noted to have brought soda and water cups from their rooms. Residents were served meals on cafeteria like trays, the first resident was served their lunch at 11:56 AM. Resident #1 (R1) R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] introduced a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered in 2 of 11 residents reviewed for dietary services (Resident #8 & #11), resulting in risk of not meeting nutrition needs (Resident #11), and fluid overload (Resident #8). Findings include: Resident #8 (R8) R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener, score of 15 (13-15 Cognitively Intact). During an observation and interview on 10/24/23 at 7:40 AM, R8 was seated in her wheelchair and stated dining services have been a problem since she admitted to the facility in March 2023. R8 stated the food was always cold, she didn't receive what she ordered, dining times varied, and the always available menu was not always available. R8 stated she had diabetes, and she always received a regular diet. In review of R8's physician orders dated 9/25/23 a carbohydrate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 73 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 05/03/23 at 09:15 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with General Manager of Nutritional Services C and Registered Dietician (RD) D. The following items were noted: The Vulcan convection oven(s) interior and exterior surfaces were observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. The Vulcan conventional oven(s) interior and exterior surfaces were observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. The Vulcan conventional stove top backsplash was observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. The Vulcan griddle backsplash and side guards were observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. General Manager of Nutritional Services indicated she would have dietary staff thoroughly clean and sanitize the convection and conventional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 73 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased illumination. Findings include: On 05/04/23 at 08:45 A.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Director of Maintenance E and Environmental Services Director F. The following items were noted: Service Corridor Staff Break Room: The vinyl base coving was observed missing on 1 of 4 wall surfaces. The missing vinyl base coving measured approximately 16-feet-long. Director of Maintenance E indicated he would make necessary repairs as soon as possible. A-Hall Beauty Shop: Two 24-inch-long by 24-inch-wide acoustical ceiling tiles were observed stained from a previous moisture leak. B-Hall Soiled Utility Room: The two-door hand sink vanity base was observed etched, scored, bowed, and particulate. The vanity base lower shelf board was also observed severely warped and bent. Director of Maintenance E stated: We plan to replace the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) documents were accurately and completely filled out for three (Resident #11, #28 and #42) of three reviewed; and 2) ensure updated and accurate letters of Guardianship were in the medical record for one (Resident #42) of one reviewed, resulting in the potential for code status wishes not being followed in an emergency situation and medical decisions not to be made by the legal Guardian of record. Findings include: Review of the MICHIGAN DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE PROCEDURE ACT, Act 193 of 1996 reflected, .An order executed under this section shall be on a form described in section 4. The order shall be dated and executed voluntarily and signed by each of the following persons: (a) The declarant, the declarant's patient advocate, or another person who, at the time of the signing, is in the presence of the declarant and acting pursuant to the directions of the declarant. (b) The declarant's attending physician. (c) Two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two (Resident #28 and Resident #29) of 18 reviewed, resulting in inaccurate assessments and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #29 (R29) Review of the medical record revealed R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer to the left heel, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of the MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/13/23 revealed R29 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, was not on a turning/repositioning program, and had an unstageable pressure ulcer-suspected deep tissue injury present on admission. On 05/03/23 at 09:41 AM, R29 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. Both feet were wrapped with kerlix and boots were in place. R29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive Care Plans for two (Resident #11 and #27) of 18 reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and adverse events. Findings include: Resident #11 (R11): Review of the medical record reflected R11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, flaccid hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side and unspecified intellectual disabilities. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/24/23, reflected R11 scored nine out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R11 did not walk and required extensive assistance of one to two or more people for most activities of daily living. R11 was coded for fall with major injury. On 05/03/23 at 1:51 PM, R11 was observed in bed, with the head of the bed elevated and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident #13 and #34) out of 18 residents reviewed for care plans, had a comprehensive care plan that was revised for resident care needs, resulting in the potential for all care needs not being met. Findings Include: Resident #13 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #13 (R13) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included bilateral hearing loss, anxiety, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, overactive bladder, delusional disorders, vascular dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/6/23, reflected R13 scored zero out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R13 did not walk and required extensive of two or more people for transferring and toileting. In an observation on 05/03/23 at 09:58 AM, R13 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) follow their bowel management protocol for constipation; 2) ensure the accurate classification of a wound; 3) ensure comprehensive wound assessments were performed according to facility policy; and 4) ensure wound treatment and interventions were implemented timely and according to Physician recommendations for one (Resident #28) of 18 reviewed, resulting in constipation and the potential for delayed wound healing and/or worsening wounds. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, chronic kidney disease and diabetes. The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/15/23, reflected R28 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for contracture management for one (Resident #27) of one reviewed, resulting in the potential for worsening contractures and pain. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R27 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, cerebral vascular disease and diabetes. The Significant Change in Status MDS, with an ARD of 3/21/23, reflected R27 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the BIMS. The same MDS reflected R27 did not walk and required extensive to total assistance of two or more people for most activities of daily living. According to the MDS, R27 had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side that interfered with daily functions or placed her at risk for injury. R27 was not coded for receiving Restorative Nursing Programs for at least 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to justify rationale for clinically contraindicated gradual dose reductions (GDRs) of psychotropic medications for two (Resident #16 and #52) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #52 (R52): Review of the medical record reflected R52 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included stage four chronic kidney disease, diabetes, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/4/23, reflected R52 scored 15 out 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R52 was not coded for having behaviors and scored zero out of 27 on the PHQ-9 mood interview. On 05/03/23 at 2:10 PM, R52 was observed to sit herself up independently in bed. A bandage was observed on her left arm, which she reported was from dialysis that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when two medication errors were observed from a total of twenty-seven opportunities for one resident (Resident # 374) of six reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41% and the potential for reduced efficacy of medications and increased risk of adverse reactions/side effects. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident # 374 (R374) admitted to facility 4/20/23 with diagnoses including orthostatic hypotension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Active orders noted to include Insulin Glargine 30units daily and Metoprolol Succinate 25mg (milligrams), give 12.5mg daily, with a parameter to hold for blood pressure less than 100/60 or heart rate lower than 60. On 5/04/23 at 8:05 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) GG was observed to prepare multiple oral medications and an insulin pen for administration to Resident #374 (R374). LPN GG entered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene practices during wound care for one (Resident #28) and proper catheter tubing placement for one (Resident #34) of 18 reviewed for infection control practices, resulting in the potential for cross contamination, the spread of infection and delayed wound healing. Findings Include: Resident #34 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #34 (R34) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included acute cystitis with hematuria, disorder of the muscle, bradycardia (slow heart rate), hearing loss, syncope, and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/29/23, reflected R34 scored nine out of 15 (moderately cognitively impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R34 required extensive of one person for toileting, transferring, and bed mobility. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately track and document staff COVID-19 vaccination status and implement a process ensuring all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID-19, resulting in an inaccurate vaccination matrix, staff who were not vaccinated or partially vaccinated, and the potential for the transmission of COVID-19. Findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Control Manual: Chapter 10 Screening and Vaccinations revealed Both the annual influenza vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines are mandatory for employees unless the individual has an approved medical contraindications or an approved religious exemption. Review of the COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status for Providers provided by NHA A on 5/3/23 at 10:36 AM revealed the facility had 89 total staff of which 5 were partially vaccinated, 73 completely vaccinated, 0 pending exemptions, 8 granted exemptions, 9 were temporary delay/new hire, and 3 were not vaccinated without exemption/delay. Review of the COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status for Providers provided by NHA A on 5/4/23 at 3:49 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-06-12 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Survey Book was easily accessible and readily available, and that the book was maintained to include the facility plan of correction for identified deficiencies. Resulting in the potential for residents and visitors to be uninformed. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 6/12/25 at 10:00 AM, R8 reported had lived at the facility for six months. R8 reported was not aware the facility had a Survey Book that included prior Surveys available to residents and visitors and reported was unsure where it would be located. R8 reported attended outside appointments three times weekly and had never observed a binder labeled public records or survey results. During an observation on 6/12/25 at 10:28 AM observed binder at ground level, under another 6 inch binder at floor level in the facility lobby with most recent survey dated 5/2023. The binder was not easily accessible and was hidden and not labeled on spine side of binder for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to MI00140043. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have recipes available based on the current census of 78 residents upon entrance with 77 residents receiving meals from the kitchen (1 resident received nothing by mouth) which could potentially result in insufficient food, dissatisfaction with the meal experience, decreased food acceptance and weight loss. On 10/24/2023 at 7:40 AM, reviewed recipe book which revealed 3 columns, each for 75 servings of food. No other serving sizes were noted on the recipes. During an interview on 10/24/2023 at 10:50 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) H stated that she knows to increase the recipe from 75 in the book by at least 10 since some residents ask for extra servings of food and some residents get double portions. She said she knows how to increase the recipe since she was the normal morning cook. During an interview on 10/24/2023 at 10:52 AM, Area Manager (AM) C stated that's the way the recipes are printed in the system. AM C stated the census had been below 75 and was at 79 right now. Certified Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$201,851 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $201,851 — penalty dated 2023-09-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVON HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SPRINGS BAY OP HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/09/2025
FREUND, ELIYAHUIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2025
GOTTLIEB, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF48%since 01/09/2025
GUPTA, SOMILIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
GILBERT, CHRISTINAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/31/2023
HOEVEMEYER, AMANDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2025
AVON SPRINGS BAY MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2025
MONROE SPRINGS PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+49.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$517K
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 6%Other / private 21%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $517K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$155per resident / day
operating cost
$4,720per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$304per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235287. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next