Springcreek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
130 Sand Creek Highway, Adrian, MI 49221 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 113 certified beds · (517) 265-6554 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.4% | 10.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.3% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.3% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.3% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 1.64 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 70.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.0%CMS range 40.7–63.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.7–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 70.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 74.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 84.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 2.5–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 90.7 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2803162 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall as well as conduct a thorough root-cause analysis investigation into falls for five residents (R3, R17, R71, R98, and R106), of six residents reviewed for falls resulting in transfer to hospital and major injuries including fractures and subdural hematoma. Findings include: R3 Review of the medical record reflected R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, vascular dementia, and displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/23/26, reflected R3 scored 3 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 3/26/25 at 9:12 AM, R3 was observed in a common area seated in a wheelchair. A fall mat was observed in R3's room. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY DPS B: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement ordered devices to prevent accidents/falls for 1 resident (Resident #31) of 2 reviewed for accidents, from a total sample of 19, resulting in the risk for falls and potential for injury. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #31 (R31) was readmitted to facility 4/18/2023 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, ataxia following cerebral infarction, repeated falls, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 8/18/23 reflected that R31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 (moderate cognitive impairment). Section G of the same MDS reflected that R31 required one-person extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a Quality Assistance and Process Improvement (QAPI) program which identified and prioritized quality deficiencies, systematically analyzed the underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies, and implemented effective corrective action or performance improvement activities to remedy those deficiencies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the safety and quality of life of all 93 residents at the facility.Findings Included: On 03/27/2026 at 01:01 p.m. an interview was conducted with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A regarding concerns identified during the current Recertification Survey. NHA A explained that during the last year the QAPI committee had identified areas of concerns as return to hospital, weight loss, falls, and dietary menus. NHA A was asked how QAPI projects were identified. NHA A explained that items are identified through communication with staff, through the grievance project, and resident council. NHA A explained that any staff or resident may bring items to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately address and make good faith effort to resolve grievances for 7 of 7 Resident Council members. Finding incleude:Review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated 9/30/25 the council members complained in part, they were not receiving certain menu items and had concerns regarding the quality of the food. The response signed off by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A was to print menus ahead of time. There was no response provided the concern related to the quality of food being served. The Resident council meeting minutes 10/27/25 reflected the quality of food was bad and food was cold and some meals were being served late and menu items that were requested were not provided. The grievance/resolution form dated 10/28/25 that was signed off by NHA A revealed residents should talk with the Dietary manager if they have an issue and Dietary Manager will check with residents randomly to see if there are any issues. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated 12/30/25 revealed complaints that residents were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 7 of 7 of the Resident Council members were informed of their right on how to file a grievance with the facility.Findings include:On 3/25/26 at 10:00 during the Resident Council meeting, 7 of 7 of the participants reported they collectively had chronic complaints about food palatability, menu items, food preferences not being honored, and noise levels. Individual participants then voiced individual concerns (late medications, call lights response times etc ) when queried if they had voiced their concerns or filed a grievance/concern form. None of the seven participants knew that was an option or how/where the forms were located. One of the Resident Council participants stated they thought they had to attend resident council in order to get their grievance/concern documented. Review of Resident Council minutes from September 2025 through February 2026 did not reflect resident rights were reviewed in their meetings pertaining to the facility grievance policy. On 03/27/2026 at 9:51 AM, during an interview Activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 7 of 7 of the resident council members food preferences were met on a daily basis. Findings include:Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 9/30/25, 10/27/25, 12/30/25, 1/30/26 and 2/27/26 reflected concerns that Resident Council members complained that food preferences were not being honored. During the Resident Council meeting held with the State Agency on 3/25/26 7 of 7 participants stated this had been a long standing issue that was not being addressed. Resident Council members reported being frustrated and angry that basic food and drink preferences were not honored. Example was given wanting orange juice every day at breakfast but receiving apple juice instead. On 3/26/26 at 11:28 am during an interview with Dietary Manager Y she reported there were no audits that pertained to accuracy of meal trays/honoring food preferences and menu concerns. Dietary manager Y stated they use a buddy system to ensure tray accuracy and resident preferences were met. When quired about the effectiveness of the buddy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directive (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) information was in place for one resident (#100) of two resident reviewed for advance directives.Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident 100 (R100) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 3/25/26 revealed R100 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 3/19/26 reflected R100 was alert and oriented x 4, was able to make needs known and had a diagnosis of respiratory failure with several comorbidities. The progress notes also reflected R100 made it known he did not want to be resuscitated in the event his heart stopped. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Through interview and observations, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment without the overpowering smell of urine for two residents (R7 and R11) of two residents reviewed for a homelike environment with the potential to affect all residents on that hall. Findings IncludeResident #11 (R11)Review of the medical record reflected that R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of paraplegia, acute kidney failure, encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device, abnormal gait and mobility.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/11/2026 revealed R11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R11 was maximal assistance on toileting, showering, dressing lower body, sit to stand and transferring from one surface to another. Resident #7 (R7)Review of the medical record reflected that R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a significant change Minimum Data Set was completed timely in one (Resident 3) out of 19 reviewed for Significant Change Minimum Date Sets. Findings include. Review of the medical record reflected R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, vascular dementia, and displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/23/26, reflected R3 scored 3 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 3/26/25 at 9:12 AM, R3 was observed in a common area seated in a wheelchair. A fall mat was observed in R3's room. Review of a Progress Note dated 6/4/25 stated R3 was discovered face down with left shoulder pinned under roommates' bed .Resident has bruise to his left eye and forehead. Resident being sent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to revise care plans for three residents (R1, R4 and R7) to reflect a room change, use of hand rolls and receiving hospice services of 19 residents reviewed. Findings IncludeResident #1 (R1)Review of the medical record reflected that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with lower respiratory infection, weakness, presence of vascular implants and grafts, disorder of the brain, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, colon cancer with a colostomy bag, anxiety and depression.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/12/2025 revealed R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R1 needed substantial assistance with showering and personal care. R1 was maximal assistance on toileting, showering, dressing lower body, sit to stand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Through observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three residents (R1, R7 and R22) of four were bathed, had their hair washed, had their facial hair shaved to maintain the highest practicalable physical, emotional and psychological wellbeing.Findings IncludePertains to Intake #2728007Resident #1 (R1)Review of the medical record reflected that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with lower respiratory infection, weakness, presence of vascular implants and grafts, disorder of the brain, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, colon cancer with a colostomy bag, anxiety and depression.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/12/2025 revealed R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R1 needed substantial assistance with showering and personal care. R1 was maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review this facility failed to maintain range of motion in one resident (R#4) of two residents reviewed for range of motion resulting in failure to participate in her activities of daily living.Findings IncludeResident #4 (R4)Review of the medical record reflected that R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary tract infection, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) chronic respiratory failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region- stage 3, paraplegia- incomplete, chronic pain, muscle wasting and atrophy.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) revealed R4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R4 was dependent for showers, personal care, toileting, dressing lower body, sit to stand and transferring from one surface to another.During an interview on 03/24/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care, including tracheal suctioning was provided consistent with professional standard of practice for one Residents (#6) of three Residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings Included:Resident #6 (R6)Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke), tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the trachea), gastrostomy (a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach to provide nutrition), chronic respiratory failure, pressure injury to right heel, anxiety, insomnia, abnormal posture, lack of coordination, language deficits, paralysis right side of body, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux, and protein-calorie malnutrition. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/06/2023, revealed R6 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to remove all expired medications from two of four medication administration carts used to administer medications to residents with the potential to affect half of the facility census of 93. Findings Include During observation and interview on 03/25/2026 at 8:16 AM, writer asked to look through medication cart labeled Hall A. Writer found Allergy Relief 24 hr. 180mg tab expired 01/26. Naproxen Sodium 220mg tab expiration date has been removed, all white with no date.During observation and interview on 03/25/2026 at 8:36 AM, writer asked to look through medication cart labeled Hall B. Writer found Cetirizine HCI 10 mg tab- Expiration date had been removed, wiped off, plain white area where expiration date was.During observation and interview on 03/25/2026 at 10:45 AM, writer asked to look through the medication room at the nurses' station. No outdated medications found, refrigerators and freezer temperatures were present and within normal range.During an interview on 03/26/2026 at10:29 AM, DON B stated it would be the expectation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the published menu was served as planned to six residents and residents were consistently informed in advance of any menu changes affecting all residents consuming food from the kitchen resulting in resident dissatisfaction with their meal experience and feelings of frustration related to meals voiced in confidential resident group the the potential to effect all 93 residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 3/24/2026 at 9:19 AM, tour of kitchen with Kitchen Manager (KM) Y. Menus were reviewed and KM Y reported residents had option related to menus and reported if residents did not prefer main dish they had option for alternative option and also had options for always available items. During an observation, interview and record review on 3/25/2026 at 11:15am, this surveyor observed tray line services. KM Y and cook verified posted menu that included roast beef, potatoes, butter carrots, roll, and beverages. Observed several resident meal tickets with request for grilled cheese…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure palatable and appetizing food was served to two (Resident #2 and Resident #49) of 2 residents reviewed for receiving palatable and appetizing food, resulting in potential for decreased oral intake.Findings include:During an observation on 3/25/2026 7:21 AM, this surveyor observed a full uninsulated tray cart located on Hall C (secure memory unit) with no staff delivering trays at that time. Two nurses were observed at medication cart and several residents were observed wandering the hall and six residents were sitting at the dining room table at the end of the hall with no staff in the dark. Continued observation on 3/25/2026 at 8:08 AM, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) LL entered R2 room with breakfast tray. (about 45 min after arrival of tray) Continued to observe and at 8:15 AM R49 was served first bite of breakfast with staff assist. (almost one hour after tray delivered). Observed 11 residents in secure memory dining room with two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility Arbitration Agreement failed to explicitly state that neither the resident nor his or her representative was required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility and state that the binding arbitration agreement allows the resident or anyone else to communicate with federal, state, or local officials such as federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health departement employees and representatives of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for one resident (#73) of three Resident reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. Findings Included:Resident #73 (R73) Review of the medical record revealed R73 was admitted to the facility 02/01/2023 with diagnoses that include atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque build-up in artery walls), polyneuropathy (wide spread peripheral nerve damage), insomnia, contracture (long lasting tightening of muscle) of left elbow, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, dementia, abnormal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0848 — isolatedProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility Arbitration Agreement failed to explicitly state that the agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties for one resident (#73) of three Resident reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. Findings Included:Resident #73 (R73)Review of the medical record revealed R73 was admitted to the facility 02/01/2023 with diagnoses that include atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque build-up in artery walls), polyneuropathy (wide spread peripheral nerve damage), insomnia, contracture (long lasting tightening of muscle) of left elbow, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, dementia, abnormal posture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, alcohol abuse, gastro-esophageal reflux, and chronic hepatitis (inflammation of the liver). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/13/2026, revealed R73 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide coordination of care for hospice services for one resident (R7) of one reviewed for additional services above and beyond the facilities provides.Findings IncludeResident #7 (R7)Review of the medical record reflected that R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and signed onto hospice 02/12/2026.Diagnoses of Huntington's disease, dementia, other disorders of the muscles, emotional deficit related to cerebrovascular disease, protein-caloric malnutrition, weakness and repeated falls.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/2025 revealed R7 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance revealed R7 was dependent on toileting, showering, lower body, sit to stand and transferring from one surface to another with a mechanical device.Record review revealed R7 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that appropriate hand hygiene was conducted during dressing changes for two residents (#63, #88) and during medication administration observation with the potential to affect facility census of 93. Findings included:During an observation on 03/25/2026 at 8:04 AM, LPN OO was preparing medications for R57, writer did not see LPN OO perform hand hygiene prior to getting in the medication cart. LPN OO did not perform hand hygiene before going into the R57's room nor after administering R57's medication. No hand hygiene in R57's room or prior to returning back to the medication cart. During an interview with Infection Preventionist D stated she would expect the nurses to use hand hygiene between each resident. She did education on hygiene as well as an annual skills fair. During an interview on 03/26/2026 at10:29 AM, DON B stated it would be the expectation that all nurses use hand hygiene between residents and after administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the Comprehensive Care Plan for one (R6) of three reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur (6/8/25), seizures, difficulty walking, diabetes, dementia and impulse disorder. The modification of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/11/25, reflected R6 scored six out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and had two or more falls since admission or the prior assessment. On 12/30/25 at 12:57 PM, R6 was observed up in their wheelchair, in a common area, with shoes on both feet. Anti-rollback brakes, rear anti-tip bars and a drop seat (seat tilted back) were observed on R6's wheelchair. R6's bed height was observed to be in a low position, with a standard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2697023.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure the accuracy of medication orders for one (R4); and 2) administer medication according to Physician Orders for one (R4) of three reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included rheumatoid arthritis, pain, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and fibromyalgia. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/15/25, reflected R4 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). According to the medical record, R4 discharged from the facility on 12/15/25. R4's December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) reflected Alendronate Sodium 70 milligrams (mg) by mouth, once daily, every Sunday, for Osteoporosis was due to be administered on 12/14/25 at 6:00 AM. The medication was not documented as administered. Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcers for two resident (#2, #8) of three residents reviewed for the development of pressure ulcers. Findings Included: Resident #2 (R2) Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility 11/21/2024 with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, Alzheimer's disease, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), stage 3 kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, abnormal posture, protein-calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure (CHF), insomnia, obesity, anxiety, depression, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), atrial fibrillation, and arthropathy (any disease of the joints). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/02/2025 demonstrated R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 08 (moderate cognitive impairment). During observation and interview on 05/28/2025 at 07:28 a.m. R2 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for one (Resident #33) of 18 reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #33 (R33) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's Disease with early onset, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/8/24, reflected R33 scored three out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 12/19/24 at 11:22 AM, R33 was observed seated at a dining table, drinking a beverage. On 12/19/24 at 2:52 PM, R33 was observed lying in bed, with their eyes closed. Snacks and a beverage were observed on the over-bed table. A Psychiatric visit note for 10/16/24 reflected R33 had dementia with violent behaviors, which was not related to their terminal hospice diagnosis. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nephrostomy tube care was ordered and completed for one (Resident #47) of one residents reviewed for nephrostomy care. Findings include: Resident #47 (R47) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 (R47) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included tubulointerstitial nephritis (inflammation of the tubules of the kidneys), hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculus obstruction (kidney and ureter obstruction due to stones), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine unable to flow due to obstruction). R47 was unable to participate in an interview due to an intellectual disability. On 12/17/24 at 12:09 PM, R47 was observed in bed, peering around the room. R47 was not conversant. A nephrostomy bag was observed on the left side of R47, laying flat on the mattress at the left elbow level of R47. Urine was observed in the bag and in the entire length of the nephrostomy bag tubing. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to initiate intervention for the prevention of repeated falls at bedside for 1 resident (R38) of 3 residents reviewed for falls resulting in the potential for repeated falls at bedside. On 12/17/24 at 3:53 PM during observation and interview R38 pointed at her eye which appeared bruised extending around the entire eye. R38 responded, uh huh when asked if she had fallen. R38 was quite busy in her room, moving place to place independently in the wheelchair. A nurse on the unit said that R38 had recently fallen twice in one day. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R38's original admission date was 3/27/23 and recent admission date was 4/15/23. R38 had the following pertinent diagnoses: Dementia (a neurological condition affecting the brain which can cause loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), Aphasia (a language disorder affecting the ability to communicate), Transient Ischemic Attack and Cerebral Infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure water was available for 1 resident (R24) of 1 resident reviewed for hydration resulting in the potential for inadequate fluid intake. Findings Include: On 12/17/24 at 1:33 PM during observation and interview R24 was upright in bed and established strong eye contact and was able to participate in an interview. It was noted during observation that R24's water cup was on a bedside table positioned to the left side of the bed and up against the wall. This positioned the table and water to the left and behind her head and out of sight and reach. There was also a rolling type of bedside table near the bed, and within resident's reach, but no water cup on it. When asked if R24 enjoyed drinking water her response was, I love it. On 12/17/24 at 4:42 PM during observation and interview R24 smiled and said a few words. Her words were muffled as she spoke through a dry mouth. It was noted during observation that the water was in the same place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication with the dialysis center, pertaining to a fluid restriction, for one (Resident #42) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #42 (R42) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/4/24, reflected R42 scored 12 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 12/18/24 at 2:51 PM, R42 was observed in bed and reported having had a dialysis treatment that day. R42 was observed to be drinking from a bottle of Coca Cola. On 12/20/24 at 11:55 AM, R42 was observed asleep, in bed. A 20 ounce bottle of Sprite and a 16 ounce styrofoam beverage cup, with a straw, were observed on R42's over-bed table. Review of R42's medical record reflected a fluid restriction of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) failed to ensure justification for an increase in psychotropic medications and 2) failed to attempt nonpharmacological interventions for two (Resident #9, Resident #33) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #9 (R9) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 (R9) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, bipolar disorder, and depression. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/29/24, reflected R9 scored four out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 12/17/24 at 2:21 PM, R9 was observed in his room watching television. Review of a Psychiatric Visit note dated 5/13/24 recommended a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of R9's Trazodone. The GDR recommendation was to reduce R9's Trazodone 150 milligrams (mg) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to, 1) ensure appropriate storage of medications, including narcotics; and 2) ensure one medication cart was free of expired medications. Findings include: On 12/18/24 at 1:36 PM, several medications were observed at the nurse's station unattended and readily accessible to staff, ambulatory resident's, and visitors. The medications included fentanyl Transdermal Patch (opioid medication), Bumetanide (water pill) Oral Tablet 2 milligrams (MG), Sinemet (Parkinson medication) Oral Tablet 25-100 MG, Carvedilol (used to treat high blood pressure) Oral Tablet 25 MG, Gabapentin (treatment for nerve pain and/or seizures) Oral Capsule 100 MG, Potassium Chloride Oral Tablet Extended Release, Spironolactone (treatment of high blood pressure/water pill) Oral Tablet 25 MG, Levothyroxine (thyroid hormone) Sodium Oral Tablet, and Omeprazole (treatment of acid reflux) Oral Tablet Delayed Release 20 MG. On 12/18/24 at 1:45 PM, Nursing Home Administrator A identified the unattended medication and removed the medication from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate hospice services for one resident (#56) out of one resident reviewed for coordination of hospice services. Findings Included: Resident #56 (R56) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 (R56) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of brain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/1/24, reflected R56 scored three out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS revealed that R56 was utilizing hospice services. On 12/18/24 at 12:23 PM, R56's Hospice Communication binder was reviewed. R56's Hospice Care Plan was not located in the binder. On 12/18/24 at 1:14 PM, the electronic medical record was reviewed which revealed a hospice care plan dated October 2023. No current care plan could be located. On 12/20/24 10:17 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B was asked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (1) effectively date mark all potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food products, (2) effectively don hair and beard restraints, (3) effectively clean and maintain food service equipment, and (4) monitor food for safe temperatures prior to serving and maintain temperature logs effecting 74 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and resident foodborne illness. Findings include: During a kitchen observation on 10/11/23 at 8:35 AM, vegetable soup was observed in a refrigerator in a 4-liter container dated 10/09/23. Dietary Manager (DM) F was interviewed at the same date and time and stated the vegetable soup was homemade and did not have cooling temperatures from 10/09/23 or any other cooling log records. DM F stated he didn't know if the soup was placed in the refrigerator in the same container or after cooling in shallow pans. On the right side, on the bottom of the same refrigerator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable bathroom for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident #42), resulting in an environment in disrepair. Findings include: Resident #42 (R42) On 10/09/23 at 10:35 AM R42 was observed sleeping in bed. R42's sink bowl was observed pitted and stained. R42 shared a bathroom with two other residents; peeling paint and several cobwebs were observed on the walls and flaked paint was noted on the floor, to the right of the toilet. R42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]; had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 03 (00-07 Severe Cognitive Impairment); and required extensive assistance in toileting. The same MDS assessment revealed R42 had the diagnoses of Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, Aphasia (unable to comprehend or formulate language), and a seizure disorder. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1. Dispose of expired eye drops; 2. ensure medications/treatment carts remained secured in 1 of 2 medication/treatment carts reviewed, resulting in the potential for medications given to residents to have decreased potency, reduced strength, effect, and medication errors. Findings include: During an observation on [DATE] at 11:00 AM, Hall C medication cart was observed unlocked in hall with no staff in area. At 11:10 AM, staff passed unlocked cart and nurse returned to Hall C medication cart at 11:11 AM and locked cart. During an observation on [DATE] at 11:52 AM, Hall B medication cart was observed unlocked in the hall with no staff observed in area. Nurse returned to the medication cart at 11:56 AM and locked the cart. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:09 PM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T unlocked Hall A odd medication cart. Review of the medication cart revealed an open bottle of latanopost 0.005%, eye drops dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure updated and accurate advance directive information was in place for three residents (Resident #8, #18 and #52) of four reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility, or other healthcare providers. Findings Include: Review of the MICHIGAN DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE PROCEDURE ACT, Act 193 of 1996 revealed that, An order executed under this section shall be on a form described in section 4. The order shall be dated and executed voluntarily and signed by each of the following persons: (a) The declarant, the declarant's patient advocate, or another person who, at the time of the signing, is in the presence of the declarant and acting pursuant to the directions of the declarant. (b) The declarant's attending physician. (c) Two witnesses [AGE] years of age…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans, for one of 19 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #42), resulting in the potential for falls, pressure ulcers, and unmet needs. Findings include: Resident #42 (R42) R42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]; had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 03 (00-07 Severe Cognitive Impairment); and required extensive assistance in toileting. The same MDS assessment revealed R42 had the diagnoses of Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, Aphasia (unable to comprehend or formulate language), and seizure disorder. On 10/09/23 at 10:35 AM R42 was observed lying in bed sleeping, lower legs were observed with edema (swelling). In review of R42's care plans, there were no goals or interventions to address R42's edema. In review of R42's risk for falls care plan dated 3/23/23;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters upon administration of blood pressure medications for 1 resident (Resident #37) of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for adverse drug consequences. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #37 (R37) was readmitted to facility 6/28/2023 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, essential hypertension, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/25/23 reflected that R37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section G of the same MDS reflected that R37 required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toilet use. In an observation and interview on 10/9/23 at 10:50 AM, R37 was observed sitting at edge of bed, dressed in black shirt and pants, with oxygen in place at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. R37 stated that he had been hospitalized a few months back as was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent when 3 medication errors were observed from a total of 39 opportunities for one resident (R1) of nine residents observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69%. Findings include: During an observation on 10/11/23 at 7:49 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) S prepared R1 medications at the C hall Medication cart located outside R1 room. LPN S prepared several oral medication and three respiratory medications that included Spiriva 18 mcg, Breyna(Symbicort) 160-4.5 mcg/act and Albuterol 108mcg/act. LPN S entered R1 room and administered R1 oral medications and instructed R1 to use respiratory medication Spiriva first. R1 inhaled twice and rinsed mouth. LPN S handed R1 the Breyna inhaler after attaching it to spacer. R1 was observed administering two puffs back to back with no time between puffs. LPN S did not provide guidance to R1 related to deep breathing, holding inhalation or waiting to administer second puff. LPN S…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for 1 resident (Resident #30) of 3 reviewed for food preferences and for 9 of 9 residents in the confidential group, resulting in meal dissatisfaction and frustration when food choices were not honored and disliked foods continued to be served on meal trays. Resident #30 Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #30 (R30) was readmitted to facility 6/19/2023 with diagnoses including obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/16/23 reflected that R30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section G of the same MDS reflected that R30 required two-person extensive assist with bed mobility, two-person dependent assist for transfers and toilet use, and supervision after set up for eating. In an observation and interview on 10/09/23 at 9:58 AM, R30 was observed lying in bed, on back, dressed in a long sleeve black shirt. R30 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-20 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 11 of 12 residents in group knew what their resident rights were, where the posting of resident rights, the Ombudsman and State Agency contact information was located. Findings Included: During group meeting on 12/19/2024 at 11:03 AM, 11 of the 12 residents in attendance did not know who the Ombudsman was, or where the posting was located with the Ombudsman contact information. The 11 residents also did not know where the State agency contact information was located nor were the 11 residents aware that they had the right to put in a complaint with the State agency. 11 of the residents also stated they did not know what resident's right were, and were not ever told of them. On 12/20/2024 at 9:47 AM, the State agency, Ombudsman contact information, was observed to be located in a common area that led to the dining/activity room in a glass case on the wall. The poster for resident to file a complaint to the State agency was observed to have the incorrect department listed. In an interview on 12/20/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVON HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RENEWAL HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| GOTTLIEB, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 45% | since 05/10/2022 |
| FREUND, ELIYAHU | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/10/2022 |
| KOENIG, JOSHUA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/10/2022 |
| SCRATCH, DANA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| FRANKEL, ELIYAHU | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| ILLUMINATE HC LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| HEIDGER, SANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/22/2024 |
| JOHNCOX, KELLIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/09/2022 |
| YALAVARTHI, JYOTHSNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/10/2025 |
| ADRIAN PROPCO | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/10/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $970K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235504. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.