WellBridge of Fenton
901 Pine Creek Drive, Fenton, MI 48430 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (810) 616-4100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.3% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.9% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.6% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.3% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 1.64 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.1%CMS range 52.5–67.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.2–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.2%CMS range 2.9–9.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 01/13/2026 at 8:25am-8:50am, during the kitchen tour with Certified Dietary Manager/Culinary Specialist A and Chef B, observed overhead spray nozzle hanging inside the sink basin near the dishwashing area. When interviewed at this time, CDM A stated there is a work order to fix the overhead spray nozzle. According to the 2022 Food Code, 5-202.13 Backflow Prevention, Air Gap, An air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture, equipment, or nonfood equipment shall be at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and may not be less than 25 mm (1 inch).On 01/13/2026 at 8:25am-8:50am, observed yellow residue on the interior wall of the ice machine, located in the kitchen. When interviewed at this time on how often the ice machine is cleaned, CDM A stated it's cleaned every month. According…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach, responded to in a timely manner, and that staff were respectful upon entering the residents' rooms and providing care for five confidential residents (#6, #35, #60, #75, #86) and a confidential group of residents.Findings include:Confidential Group of Residents On 1/13/26 at 2:00 PM, a group of Residents were assembled. The Residents were asked about any concerns they had regarding the care provided by staff at the facility. Three of the Residents answered questions and engaged in conversation. One Resident reported concerns of call lights not answered timely and reported wait times of 30 minutes at times. One Resident reported that staff would answer timely but leave to get supplies and then not come back or take a long time to return to address the Resident needs. When asked if there were concerns of staff with personal phone use while providing care, one of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate and timely Beneficiary Notification (NOMNC and ABN) to two (2) residents (Resident #95 and Resident #67) of 3 residents reviewed for Medicaid/Medicare Coverage/Liability Notice.Findings include:FacilityResident #95 (R95)On 1/13/26 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor requested a NOMNC and ABN Notification for 3 residents. It was noted upon review of the submitted documents that the facility did not issue Resident #95 (R95) a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) on the resident's last covered date of 8/30/2025.A review of the Electronic Record revealed that, according to the Census Report in PCC, R95 billing status immediately switched from Medicare Part A to private pay on 8/30/25.The facility Social Worker SW was interviewed on 1/13/26 at 2:50 PM. The SW explained why no NOMNC and ABN Form were submitted for R95. She apologetically explained that they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nail care was provided, and handwashing was offered prior to dining for one resident (Resident #6), of one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care.Findings include:Resident #6 (R6):On 1/12/26 at 1:08 PM, an observation was made of R6 sitting up in bed eating lunchtime meal. The Resident expressed that he liked the food. An observation was made of the Resident eating some of his food. The Resident had chocolate on his overbed table, bed sheet, blanket, and on the bed frame. The Resident asked to have his pillow put back underneath his head that was laying on the floor underneath his bed. Staff were summoned and assisted with the pillow underneath the Resident. The Staff member did not assist with cleaning the chocolate from the items or offered to wash the Resident's hands. An observation was made of R6's hand with long fingernails on right hand with debris under the nails. Around the nails in the cuticle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were securely stored for safe administration, for one resident (Resident #78 (R78)) of 12 residents, 1 medication storage room, and 4 wall-mounted medication storage units reviewed for medication storage, resulting in the potential for medication error or misappropriation.Resident #78 (R78):According to a review of R78's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing care related to medical diagnoses of Chondrocostal junction syndrome (inflammatory condition affecting the cartilage where the ribs in sternum meet), subsequent fall, acute with chronic respiratory failure, Myocardial infarct (heart attack), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Dementia. R78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) record revealed Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 6/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 01/12/2026 at 9:45AM, R78 was observed resting in bed. R78 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents identified with qualifying wounds and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes (PEG - delivers nutrition and medications directly into the stomach), for two residents Resident #9 and Resident #60 (R9 and R60)) of eight residents reviewed for infection prevention. Findings include:Resident #60 (R60):According to a review of R60's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing care related to medical diagnoses of: fracture of right great toe, cellulitis (Infection) of right toe, atherosclerosis (hardening of arteries) of right left with gangrene (infection), Proteus Mirabilis Morganii (multi-resistant drug organism - MDRO) Additional diagnosis included: diabetes mellitus, right dorsum 1st digit (Hallux) - amputation in 09/2025 including treatment of hyperbaric chamber therapy. R60's Minimum Data Set (MDS) record revealed Brief Interview of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity for 4 residents (Resident's #66, #73, #68, and #281) and 5 of 7 confidential Resident Council group meeting (held on 12/10/24) residents, regarding call lights within reach and the timely answering of the call lights. Findings Include: Resident #73: Review of the Face Sheet, care plans dated 10/29/24, nursing note's dated 11/24 through 12/10/24, and physician orders dated 12/24, revealed Resident #73 was 68 years-old, alert with memory deficient and confusion, and had a feeding tube; he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was an 1 person assist with 2 persons for walker, and he has a history of falls at the facility and respiratory impairments with oxygen dependency. The resident's diagnosis includes, stroke, Aphasia (communication deficit), hemiplegia, hemiparesis with left sided weakness, Dysphagia (swallowing deficit), chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, congestive heart failure, Dementia, memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5% when six medication errors were observed from a total of 29 opportunities for three residents (#'s 28, 34, and 288) of six residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 20.69% and the potential for adverse medication effects and decreased medication efficacy. Findings include: Resident #34: On 12/11/24 at 7:52 AM, medication pass observation for Resident #34 was completed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) O. Upon entering Resident #34's room, a breakfast food tray with all food eaten was observed in the room. LPN O was observed checking the Resident's blood glucose level at the bedside. The blood glucose level result was 428. LPN O reviewed the Resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and verbalized the Resident needed 10 units of insulin based on the blood glucose level. The MAR showed Resident #34 had a documented blood glucose level of 254 on 12/11/24 at 5:19 AM. LPN O obtained the Resident's Insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure appropriate labeling, storage, and disposal of medications and medical supplies, per professional standards of practice for two of two medication storage rooms in the 400 hallway and in two residents' rooms, resulting in medications left unattended and unsecured, lack of dating of medications with a shortened expiration date after opening, storage of contaminated medications and medical supplies with new medications and medical supplies. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:45 PM, an interview was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) Q. When queried regarding storage of resident controlled and narcotic medications, RN Q revealed all controlled substances are stored in a locked cabinet at the front of the hall, near the center hub. An observation and tour of the 500-hall narcotic locked storage wall box was completed with RN Q at this time. Upon opening the wall box, two oral medication syringes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two resident's (Resident's #28, and #55) care plans were updated and individualized, resulting in the potential for unsupervised outdoor activity, falls, and not meeting residents' needs. Findings Include: Resident #28: Review of the Face Sheet, fall report dated 1/22/24, nurse's note's dated 6/24 through 12/10/24, and care plans dated 10/23, revealed Resident #28 was [AGE] years old, alert with confusion, admitted to the facility on [DATE], had an extensive history of falls at the facility and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living, and transfers. The resident's diagnosis included vascular dementia with cognitive, cancer of breast and uterine, and undergoing treatment, intracerebral bleed, malnutrition, chronic lung disease and dependent on oxygen, cystic disease of liver, chronic pain, anemia (low iron), back fracture, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, muscle wasting, major depression, adjustment disorder, anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive skin care (assessments, treatment order, and documentation) for one resident (R#55) of 2 residents reviewed for skin and wound care of 41 total samples, resulting in the potential for severe pain, infection, and further delay in appropriate treatment. Findings include: Resident# 55 (R55): R55 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on 4//26/24 with the diagnosis of Chronic Diastolic Congested Heart Failure (CHF), Severe Morbid Obesity, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute Respiratory Failure with hypoxia in addition to other diagnoses. R55's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13/15, which indicates that a person's cognition is intact. Section GG of the MDS, dated [DATE], revealed that R55 required Substantial/ Maximal assistance with the following activities: Toileting Hygiene, shower, and upper body dressing. However, the assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to mitigate risk of injury during wheelchair transport for one resident (Resident #45) of five residents reviewed for accidents resulting in the potential for injury. Findings include: Resident #45: On 12/11/24 at 1:30 PM, Resident #45 was observed being pushed down the hallway in a wheelchair by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) S. The wheelchair did not have footrests, and the Resident was attempting to hold their legs up. Resident #45's feet were observed getting closer to the floor the further they were pushed. An interview was completed with CNA S on 12/11/24 at 1:40 PM. When queried if they were pushing Resident #45 in the hallway without footrests, CNA S confirmed they were. CNA S was then asked about the facility policy/procedure related to pushing residents in wheelchairs without footrests and replied, We do. CNA S then stated, Not really supposed to but they (residents) want help and don't have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was in place for indwelling catheter changes and that the indwelling catheter changes were documented for one resident (R69) of one resident reviewed for catheters, resulting in the absence of a physician's order for indwelling catheter changes and the absence of documentation of indwelling catheter changes. Findings include: Resident #69 (R69): R69 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include kidney failure, depression, hypertension and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system. On 12/10/24 at 03:37 PM, record review revealed that there was a care plan in place for the use of the catheter, an order is present to care for the catheter every shift with the size of the catheter and catheter balloon size. There was no order present for intervals for changing the catheter. On 12/10/24 at 03:50 PM, R69 was asked when the last time their catheter had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to enter a physician's order timely for dialysis perma-cath care and follow a physician's order to complete dialysis documentation for one resident (R289) of one resident reviewed for dialysis care, resulting in incomplete and missing dialysis record forms and the absence of documentation of the dialysis perma-cath site being monitored. Findings include: Resident #289 (R289): R289 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure and dependence on renal dialysis. R289 has brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating that R289 is cognitively intact. On 12/09/24 at 03:27 PM, record review revealed that R289 attends dialysis at [NAME] Davita on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays with a chair time of 02:15 PM. On 12/10/24 at 01:48 PM, record review revealed a physician's order to monitor the dialysis perma-cath to the right chest wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary and good working condition, and 2) Ensure proper maintenance of kitchen equipment (dishwasher), resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illness with hospitalization, and cross contamination affecting 81 residents who consumed oral nutrition from the facility kitchen of a total census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of the Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective October 1, 2012, Chapter 4-501.14 directs that equipment cleaning frequency is to be throughout the day at frequency necessary to prevent recontamination of equipment and utensils. On 12/9/24 at 10:05 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen accompanied by Culinary Specialist H and Executive Chief I, the following was observed: -At 10:07 a.m., the inside door of the ice machine was found to have a build-up of calcium-like hard white substance coating the door gasket on the left side, directly over the ice when the door was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and ensure hand hygiene per professional standards of practice during medication administration for two residents (#32 and #48) of six residents reviewed during medication pass observation resulting in the potential for cross contamination and spread of microorganisms. Findings include: A medication pass observation for Resident #32 was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) Q on 12/10/24 at 1:50 PM. RN Q did not perform hand hygiene prior to entering Resident #32's room and/or preparing the Resident's medications. Following completion of medication pass administration, RN Q exited Resident #32's room without completing hand hygiene. RN Q did not complete hand hygiene prior to entering Resident #48's room at 2:00 PM on 12/10/24. RN Q was observed obtaining Resident #48's medications from the in-room medication cabinet and then administering the medications without performing hand hygiene. An interview was completed with Clinical RN F on 12/11/24 at 11:23 AM. When queried regarding hand hygiene prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00146582, MI00146860, and MI00147441. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents were treated with respect and dignity by not ensuring call lights were in reach and answered timely, ensure respectable customer service and ensure the provision of Resident rights with care planning that included Resident representative input/awareness of resident's care, for Residents (#1, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 10) of eight reviewed for call lights, abuse, and resident rights, resulting in care needs not met timely, lack of Resident/resident representative awareness in Resident's received care, feelings of frustration and anger and the potential for unmet care needs and lack of psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: Resident #1: A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 9/22/23 with re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00146860 and MI00147441. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor and inform the physician promptly regarding the declining status post-fall for one resident (Resident #5), resulting in the delay in treatment and hospitalization for Resident #5, who sustained a brain bleed post-fall. Findings include: Resident #5 (R5): According to the review of records conducted on 1023/24 at 10:00 AM, R5 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the primary diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation, Anxiety, Depression, and Chronic Respiratory Failure in addition to other diagnoses. R5 was discharged from the hospital after a fall on 8/6/24. The resident was assessed, alert, and oriented according to records on the 8/4/24 Incident Report. The list of medication orders dated August 2024 revealed that R5 was taking an anticoagulant (Eliquis) for a history of Atrial Fibrillation as a diagnosis. R5 Care plan interventions dated 8/31/2023 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to IntakeNumber MI00146582 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to enter a physician's order for wound care and update a skin integrity care plan timely for one resident (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in late physician's orders for wound care and late revision of a skin integrity care plan. Findings include: R7 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction, contractures, dementia and age-related physical debility. R7 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 0, indicating R7 has a severe cognitive impairment and during the survey was not observed to communicate with anyone and would occasionally moan out in pain during care. On 10/23/24 at 12:00PM, R7 was observed sleeping in bed, dressings were noted to the left and right elbows. Bilateral elbows were propped up on pillows for pressure reduction, pressure reduction mattress was in place and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store nebulizer equipment per facility policy and follow a physician's orders for oxygen administration for two residents (R3, R10) of three residents reviewed for nebulizer equipment, resulting in nebulizer equipment being stored on a bedside table and the medication chamber having fluid in it and not receiving the physician's ordered amount of oxygen administration. Findings include: Resident #3: R3 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) chronic respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension and major depressive disorder. R3 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating they are cognitively intact. On 10/23/24 at 11:30AM, R3 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the room and watching television. R3 was observed to be receiving oxygen at 3 liters per minute via a nasal cannula and a nebulizer machine was sitting on the nightstand with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00146860. Based on Interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain Physician visit documentation of one resident (Resident #5) in a timely manner of three residents reviewed for physician visits, resulting in delayed implementation of treatment orders and the potential for inappropriate physician's orders. Findings include: Resident # 5 (R5): According to the review of records conducted on 1023/24 at 10:00 AM, R5 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the primary diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation, Anxiety, Depression, and Chronic Respiratory Failure in addition to other diagnoses. R5 was discharged from the hospital after a fall on [DATE]. R5 medication orders reviewed revealed that she was taking an anticoagulant (Eliquis) for the history of Atrial Fibrillation as a diagnosis. R5 Care plan interventions dated [DATE] were noted under anticoagulant therapy. Resident R5 fell twice on [DATE] and [DATE]. R5 was sent to a nearby emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow facility policy for EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) for one resident (R7) of one resident reviewed for EBP, resulting in the nurse performing wound care without the required PPE (personal protective equipment) for a resident on EBP. Findings include: Resident #7 (R7): R7 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction, contractures, dementia and age-related physical debility. R7 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 0, indicating R7 has a severe cognitive impairment and during the survey was not observed to communicate with anyone and would occasionally moan out in pain during care. On 10/24/24, record review revealed a physician's order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions as directed. This includes gowns and gloves for high-contact resident care activities. Specify why: foley, peg tube, pressure wound. The order was dated 9/5/24. On 10/24/24, wound care was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00143332 and MI00146115. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document post-fall monitoring, complete neurological checks and implement appropriate interventions for two residents (Resident #701 and Resident #703) of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in, Resident #701 sustaining a fall without facility post-fall monitoring and neurological checks and Resident #703 sustaining three falls with subsequent injuries, one day apart, without meaningful interventions implemented, consistent neurological checks and post-fall monitoring/documentation. Findings Include: Resident #701: On 8/21/2024 at approximately 2:00 PM, a review was completed of Resident #701's medical record. It revealed the resident completed a hospice respite stay from 1/12/2024 to 1/15/2024 with diagnoses that included, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Seizures and Anorexia. Resident #701 required the assistance of staff for ADL (Activities of Daily Living)'s and had severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake #'s: MI00142837, MI00142926 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication between clinical services and social services to develop a person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident #501) of 4 residents reviewed for behavioral care, resulting in unmet care needs and a lack of individualized approaches to care with the likelihood of emotional and behavioral care needs being unassessed. Findings Include: Resident #501: A review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #501 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of a brain bleed, schizophrenia, GERD, visual loss, urinary retention and hypertension. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had full cognitive abilities with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 and the resident needed some assistance with most care. A record review of the progress notes revealed Resident #501…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00138923 and MI00139581. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure that four residents' (Residents #6, Resident #19, Resident #56, and Resident #323) call lights were answered timely, and 2) Ensure that food was served warm for one resident (Resident #19), and 6 of 6 confidential residents from the Resident Council group meeting (held on 11/29/23) verbalizing complaints regarding staff answering their call lights, resulting in verbalizations of not wanting to eat cold food, embarrassment, accidents due to not being able to get to a toilet in time, shame and the potential of unmet care needs. Findings Include: Review of the facility Resident Rights/Dignity policy (un-dated), revealed all residents have the right to receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of their needs and preferences. Review of the facility Answering the Call Light policy (un-dated) reported, Answer the resident's call light as soon as possible. If you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0555 — patternHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the residents an opportunity to choose their own attending physician and failed to honor their choice for an alternate physician for five of seven confidential residents during the Resident's Council group meeting, resulting in a lack of confidence and trust in health and medical decisions, lack of information and follow-up about their health status, feelings of intimidation and hopelessness on their rights to choose an attending physician for their best health and wellbeing. Findings include: On 11/29/23 at 1:15 PM, a group of seven Confidential Residents were interviewed during the survey task for the Resident Council. Meeting minutes for past Council meetings were reviewed before the group meeting. The group was asked about individual issues and concerns not brought to the Resident Council meetings. Five of seven confidential residents expressed dislike and frustration with their assigned attending physician. During the meeting, five residents queried the surveyor about how to go about getting a physician of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was supplied from the pharmacy or that the medication dispensing system was utilized to obtain the needed intravenous (IV) medication, Vancomycin, for one resident (Resident #221) of one resident reviewed for IV medication administration, resulting in IV medication not given as ordered, an interruption in the antibiotic treatment of an infection, with the potential for worsening of an infection and deterioration of health and well-being. Findings include: Resident #221: A review of Resident #221's medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, cellulitis of right lower limb, and Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed the Resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 that indicated intact cognition and the Resident needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store and handle medications in accordance with acceptable pharmaceutical standards of practice: 1.) for one medication room, one narcotics cupboard and 2 resident rooms (Resident #1 and Resident #41); 2.) ensure medication refrigerator temperatures outside of acceptable parameters were addressed; 3.) ensure narcotic keys for the 100 hall were secured; 4.) ensure two nurses sign that they completed a shift to shift narcotics count; 5.) ensure medications stored in a resident's room are not returned to the medication room for use on other residents, resulting in the potential for contamination of medications, incorrect administration of medications, a lack of therapeutic benefits necessary to promote healing for residents, increased potential for adverse effects, and resident, staff or visitor access to unsecured medications. Findings Include: FACILITY Medication Storage and Labeling On 11/28/23 at 1:57 PM, during a tour of the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00138923. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (Resident #22 [R#22]) authorized financial representative was able to make decisions regarding their choice for ancillary health insurance of one resident reviewed for rights exercised by representatives, resulting in the feeling of fear of exploitation and that the facility failed to uphold the resident's rights and ensure that the resident was protected from financial exploitation and/or misappropriation. Findings Include: Resident #22 (R#22): A record review was conducted on 11/29/23 at 4:30 PM. According to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), R#22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the most recent PASARR (dated 7/29/23), R#22 had the following diagnoses: adjustment disorder with depressed mood, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions in addition to other diagnoses and was receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), Level 1 and Level 2, was completed for one resident (Resident #13) of two residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for inappropriate admissions and the absence of available services for mental disorders or intellectual disability. Findings Include: Medicaid.gov: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASARR requires that Medicaid-certified nursing facilities: 1. Evaluate all applicants for ser Evaluate all applicants for serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID) 2. Offered all applicants the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care settings) 3. Provide all applicants the services they need in those settings PASARR is an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) showers and nail care for one resident ( Resident #25) of five residents reviewed for ADL's, resulting in Resident #25 not receiving showers/baths as scheduled or nail care. The lack of care caused the resident to feel frustrated, discouraged and lowered their quality of life. Findings Include: Resident #25: Activities of Daily Living: A record review of the Face Sheet and the Minimum Data Set MDS) assessment indicated Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, congestive heart failure, Crohn's disease, COPD, Atrial fibrillation, anxiety, chronic pain, history of strokes, hypothyroidism, GERD. The MDS assessment, dated 9/24/2023, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15. The resident was able to feed self but needed assistance with all other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that wounds were assessed, monitored, wound care was provided and appropriate interventions were in place for one resident (Resident # 25) of 9 residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in Resident #25 developing a wound on the right knee and left ankle with no treatment or monitoring ordered after identification. Findings Include: Resident #25: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, congestive heart failure, Crohn's disease, COPD, Atrial fibrillation, anxiety, chronic pain, history of strokes, hypothyroidism, GERD. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15. The resident was able to feed self but needed assistance with all other ADL's. During a tour of the facility on 11/28/23 at 10:11 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00140875. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place and supervision was provided after a fall with injury for one resident (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in Resident #2 falling out of bed while reaching for the call light, hitting her head and suffering a femur fracture. Findings Include: Resident #2: Accidents: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Cerebral Palsy, Diabetes, asthma, depression, bipolar disorder, hypertension, Chronic pain syndrome, GERD, and anxiety. The MDS assessment, dated 09/05/2023 indicated that the resident had full cognitive abilities, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 and was able to feed self and needed assistance with all other care. The resident was readmitted on [DATE] after hospitalization for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the integrity of the intravenous (IV) tubing was maintained during administration of IV antibiotics, flush a Midline IV while the Midline IV was not in use and document the changing of the dressing and measurements for the Midline IV for one resident (Resident #221) of one resident reviewed for IV care, resulting in the potential for infection, malfunction of the PICC line and lack of documentation of performed procedures in the medical record. Findings include: Resident #221: A review of Resident #221's medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, cellulitis of right lower limb, and Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed the Resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 that indicated intact cognition and the Resident needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store nebulizer treatment equipment in a clean and sanitary manner for one resident (Resident #222) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, resulting in the potential exposure to infectious organisms, respiratory infection and deterioration of health and well-being. Findings include: Resident #222: A review of Resident #222's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, acute pulmonary edema, cardiac arrest, diabetes, heart failure, sepsis, pneumonia, bacteremia, and acute and subacute infective endocarditis. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/26/23, revealed the Resident had intact cognition and needed partial/moderate assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bathing, and dressing upper and lower body. A review of Resident #222's Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor sedating medications for one resident (Resident #41) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in Resident #41 repeatedly requesting not to take the medications and having lethargy and falls. Findings Include: Resident #41: Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, cardiac defibrillator, anxiety history of falls with right fibula fracture prior to admission, and pain left hip. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had full cognitive ability with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 and the resident needed some assistance with all care. On 11/29/2023 at 12:19 PM, during a tour of the facility, Resident #41 was observed with her door closed. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5% when 2 medication errors were observed from a total of 28 opportunities for two residents (Resident #221 and Resident #223) of four residents observed for medication administration, resulting in an error rate of 7.14% with the potential for adverse reactions, uncontrolled pain and the change in medication regimen related to the omission of the 4% Lidocaine patch (topical medication used to help relieve pain, works as a local anesthetic and can be used for nerve pain) for Resident #223 and the medication Tramadol (medication used for moderate to severe pain) 50 mg (milligrams) not given at the appropriate time for Resident # 221. Findings include: On 12/1/23 at 9:03 AM, an observation was made of Nurse O during medication administration for Resident #221. The medications were given as ordered except for the Tramadol was not given with the other ordered medications at this time. On 12/1/23 at 9:15 AM, an observation was made of Nurse O during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE WELLBRIDGE GROUP — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E2G, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 12/04/2012 |
| SENIOR CARE EQUITIES NO 16 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 12/04/2012 |
| PERRY, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 01/01/2016 |
| WRONSKI, FRANK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 12/04/2014 |
| TISCH, ANGELA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/16/2021 |
| SANGSTER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2016 |
| NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2016 |
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235715. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.