WellBridge of Rochester Hills

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 528 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 189 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 94.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely assist with a transfer to the toilet, wheelchair, and bed, complete a thorough and timely investigation to determine the root cause of injuries and accidents, and implement effective interventions to prevent multiple falls for four (R9, R8, R25, and R35) of seven residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in R9 falling during a transfer to the toilet and sustaining a tibia fracture that required surgery, R25 sustaining a hematoma that required treatment in the hospital after being injured during a mechanical lift transfer and two additional hospitalizations regarding hoyer lift injuries, and R35 sustaining abrasions to the legs and face after falling. Findings include: Resident #9 (R9) On 9/9/24 at approximately 1:00 PM, R9 was observed sitting up in bed. An immobilizer brace was observed on R9's right leg which extended from the ankle to above the knee. When queried about what happened, R9 reported she fractured her tibia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions and treatments were in place to prevent the development/worsening of a heel ulcer for one resident (R38) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in R38 obtaining a stage 3 pressure ulcer on their right heel. Findings include: On 8/1/23 at approximately 10:07 a.m., R38 was observed up in a geriatric chair (medical reclining chair) No heel protector boots were observed to be on R38's right heel. On 8/1/23 the medical record for R38 was reviewed and revealed the following: R38 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including CVA (stroke) and Hypertension. A review of R38's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/11/23 revealed R38 was dependent on staff for most of their activities of daily living. R38's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was four indicating severely impaired cognition. A Physician progress note dated 7/24/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 3017844.Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an injury of unknown origin for one (R204) of three residents reviewed for an injury of unknown origin. R204 was diagnosed with a right leg . comminuted impacted proximal tibial shaft fractures, mild posterior displacement of the distal fracture fragment, minimal angulation. Comminuted proximal fibular shaft fractures (both lower right leg bones broken, the tibia and fibula fractured in multiple pieces and the broken bone pieces pushed into each other from the force of the injury) .Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) noted concerns regarding their loved one with dementia, who is immobile and required extensive assistance with care, to have sustained a broken right leg without a clear explanation as to how the injury occurred.A review of the medical record revealed R204 was initially admitted to the facility in 2024, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #3015838. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and implement interventions/diagnostics in a timely manner for one resident (R202) of three residents reviewed for changes in condition. Findings include:On 5/26/27 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R202 experienced a delay in assessment and interventions when they sustained a dislocated hip. On 5/26/27 at approximately 9:29 a.m., during a discussion with family member F (FM F), FM F indicated they had a concern regarding a delay in identifying a change in condition for R202 which resulted in a dislocation of their right hip. FM F reported that the change in condition started on 3/18/26 when they noticed R202 was experiencing increased pain in afternoon during a visit. On 3/20/26 another visit, a member from the therapy department reported that R202's right foot and hip looked turned out and R202 was experiencing more increased pain and on 3/21/26. A different family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2711407.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Physician evaluation and/or assessment of wounds and failed to follow the facility's policy for Pressure Ulcers for one (R205) of three residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed poor care provided to R205 resulting in the worsening of wounds.A review of the medical record revealed R205 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: dementia and sarcopenia (age-related progressive loss of muscle mass, strength, and function). A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 12/23/25, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 (which indicated moderately impaired cognition). R205 required staff assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).A review of the progress notes revealed an identified Stage II pressure wound to the Coccyx and a right elbow abrasion.A review of the medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): 2706041 & 2711391.Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation by a facility staff member, for one (R203) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation and abuse. Findings include:A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part, . Resident (R203) presented story to both daughter and officer regarding the ring being taken by someone who had covered their face and took the ring off her finger. review of the time frame it was made possible that the perpetrator mentioned above was the first person into room (number) after the daughter had left for the night. Immediately after speaking with officer (name), the facility suspended the employee listed at <sic> the perpetrator above. Around 10:03PM officer (name) called writer back to state ring was in fact taken off guest and pawned the morning of 12/12/2025. The suspect was not fully…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): 2706041 & 2711391.Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act and failed to accurately and timely report findings to the State Agency (SA) for one (R203) of three residents reviewed for Misappropriation and Abuse. Findings include:A review of an initial investigation report submitted to the SA on 12/12/25 at 10:41 PM, documented in part . Guest in (room number and name) mentioned to a staff member that her ring was missing and had been taken off her hand. Guest has a BIMS of 5/15. Staff member notified nurse on unit who notified DON (Director of Nursing). DON then notified abuse coordinator. Nurse called daughter who is POA (power of attorney) to notify her of the situation. Skin and pain assessment completed. Responsible party notified, Authorities notified. Ring has not been located in the facility at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2677719Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for 14 residents (R's 3, 5, 7, 25, 26, 39, 66, 70, 72, 88, 97, 103, 104 and 108) of 19 residents reviewed for neglect. Findings include,A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged on 11/23/25 There were no nurses on the 200 and 400 hallway. My family member did not receive their night meds [medications] and other residents did not either. Staff said they called the 'DON' [Director of Nursing] and their managers to get help but no one answered. A review of the November 2025 Medication admission Records [MAR] for residents currently on the 200 and 400 Halls revealed multiple missed medications and treatments for residents on the 200 Hall on the midnight shift 11/23/25-11/24/25. Continued review revealed missed medications and treatments were also missed on the100 Hall on 11/23/25. On 12/10/25 at 1:02 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] 'H' was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide information regarding an advance directive & failed to offer the resident and/or resident representative the opportunity to formulate an advance directive for one (R56) of one resident reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed R56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 11/7/25. Diagnoses included: chronic kidney disease, colostomy status and sepsis. On 12/9/25 at 10:47 AM, R56 was observed in their room sitting in their wheelchair. An interview was conducted with the resident at that time. Review of the EMR (electronic medical record) revealed R56's brother was documented to be the POA (Power of Attorney) for Care and Financial for R56.A review of the medical record revealed no documentation of the facility staff to have provided information to R56 or R56's brother regarding information on advance directives and no documentation that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate positioning to prevent the potential for wound development and progression for one Resident (R108) of two residents reviewed for positioning. Findings include: On 12/09/25 at 11:38 a.m., R108 was observed at approximately 11:38 a.m. seated upright in their recline high back wheelchair, dressed, pushing their wheelchair down the hallway. R108 was sacral sitting (sliding forward in their wheelchair seat, onto their sacrum - bone at base of spine). R108 was observed with a full body mechanical lift sling underneath them, with no wheelchair cushion observed. On 12/09/25 at approximately 11:45 a.m., R108's Certified Nurse Aide, (CNA) P, was asked if R108 had a wheelchair cushion underneath them. CNA P confirmed R108 did not have a wheelchair cushion underneath them. R108's room was observed, and there was no wheelchair cushion. Two blue foam heel protectors were observed and an air bed mattress. Review of R108's nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received assistance with their hearing aides to maintain their hearing ability for one (R89) of one resident reviewed for hearing. Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 10:17 AM, R89 was observed lying on their back in bed. An interview was attempted, however R89 stated they were unable to hear the surveyor. A signage on the resident wardrobe was observed to alert the staff that the resident had new hearing aids. The surveyor had to talk into the right ear of R89 to complete the interview. On 12/10/25 at 12:40 PM, R89 was observed lying on their back in bed. An interview was attempted, however R89 stated they were unable to hear the surveyor. The surveyor talked into the right ear of the resident and asked about their hearing aids. R89 stated their hearing aides were in the drawer of their nightstand but could not reach them. R89 stated staff would have to provide them with their hearing aids to put them in.A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intakes 2614504 and 2569835. This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS).DPS #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable accident when one resident, R901, of two residents reviewed for supervision fell out of bed during care. Findings include: Review of a complaint intake, received on 9/10/25 at 3:43 p.m., revealed the complainant reported they received a call from the facility on August 17, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., when they learned R901 rolled off their bed with two people assisting them, which they did not believe was possible. Afterwards, they were told their family member was being changed and fell off the bed. The complainant alleged their family member subsequently developed bruising on their right arm and had head and back pain. They alleged they were not given an explanation of what occurred and were concerned about R901's safety in the facility. Review of R901's Fall Assessment report, dated 8/18/25 at 1:31 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,523 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,523 — penalty dated 2024-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE WELLBRIDGE GROUP — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI