Huron Woods Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 44.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00153102. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure safe transfer utilizing a mechanical lift (device to move a dependent individual from one surface to another) and ensure planned interventions were in place for fall prevention, for one resident (#701) of three residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #701 experiencing a fall during a mechanical lift transfer resulting in an intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH- bleeding into the ventricles of the brain). Findings include: Resident #701 Review of intake documentation revealed a concern that Resident #701 had a fall with head injury while being transferred with a mechanical lift. The intake detailed that the facility did not identify a root cause of the fall/accident and did not report the fall with severe injury to the State Agency. Per the Intake, Resident #701's health had declined since the occurrence, and they are not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent falls and implement meaningful interventions for three residents (Residents #16, Resident #36, Resident #46), resulting in injuries, pain, and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Accident/Incident Report Fall management' policy, dated 6/2018, revealed the purpose was to establish a standard of accident/incident completion and to evaluate the facility responsibility to make every effort to decrease the likelihood of a recurrence by investigating incidents, understand how they occur and applying appropriate action. Record review of the facility provided form CMS-802 MDS Resident Matrix, dated 11/28/2023, revealed a census of 47. Record review of the category 'Fall (F), Fall with injury (FI) or Fall with Major injury (FMI) noted 18 residents had sustained falls while residing at the facility. That is a 38% fall rate for residents residing in the facility. Resident #16: Record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake Number 2796974. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement physician's orders for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed, resulting in a chest x-ray not being performed. Findings include:Resident #1 (R!): R1 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, chronic cough and the need for assistance with personal care. Record review of a progress note from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H, dated 1/14/2026 at 22:40pm, revealed that nursing staff were called to the room of R1. The daughter was observed feeding R1 Tic-Tacs and stated she was checking R1's swallowing abilities. The daughter stated that R1 did seem to be having some issues with swallowing and her lungs sounded bad. At this time the daughter requested a chest x-ray be ordered. The nurse present in the room assessed R1's lungs sounds and noted the lungs were clear to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 02/18/2026 at 8:44am during the initial kitchen tour with Corporate Dietician F observed the drain line to the ice machine sitting directly in the drain. According to the 2022 Food Code, 5-202.13 Backflow Prevention, Air Gap, An air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture, equipment, or nonfood equipment shall be at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and may not be less than 25 mm (1 inch).On 02/18/2026 at 12:25pm during lunch observation, observed a tray with purees individually stored in bowls on the tray line. Puree green beans were temped at 123 F and puree chicken was temped at 127 F using Thermapen. During this observation, [NAME] G was interviewed on what the temperature should be while hot holding, and she answered 135 F. Corporate Dietician F was also interviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' Advanced Directives' code status was documented and accessible in the medical record for 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #5) of 8 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. Findings Include: Resident #3 (R3):A record review of R3's [NAME] Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview mental status (BIM's) score of 11 of 15, which indicated R3 was moderately cognitively impaired. R53 was admitted to skilled nursing on [DATE] with diagnoses of Inflammatory disorder of scrotum, diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), malignant neoplasm of left main bronchus (left lung cancer), need for assistance with personal care and spinal stenosis of cervical and lumbosacral regions.A record review of R3's physician determination of decision-making capability dated [DATE] revealed that R3 was capable of making medical treatment decisions. A record review of R3's face sheet revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate notice of non-coverage and maintain documentation for three residents (#56, #58, #59) of five residents reviewed, resulting in the lack of full disclosure related to Medicare rights and the inability to appeal the discharge in the time frame allotted by Medicare. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Advanced Beneficiary Notice' policy, dated 11/2022, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to prepare and deliver to the resident or resident authorized representative an Advanced Notice (ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) when the utilization review entity expects that Medicare probably will not pay for or will not continue to pay for extended care items or services . In an interview and records review on 02/18/2026 at 1:48 PM, Staff A Admissions Director reviewed 5 residents records with the state surveyor for Advanced Notice (ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC):Resident #56:Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that diabetic foot care was provided for one resident (R34) of one resident reviewed for ancillary services. Findings include: Resident #34 (R34):A record review of R34's [NAME] Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15, which indicated R34 was cognitively intact. R34 was admitted to long term care (LTC) on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 with diabetic polyneuropathy (nerve damage), difficulty walking, need for assistance with personal care, history of falling, abnormalities with gait and mobility and lack of coordination. On [DATE] at 11:03AM, During an interview with R34 she said that she had asked to be seen by the podiatrist several times and stated that she felt he doesn't have enough time for me. R34 said the podiatrist 'pops in when he gets time' otherwise the staff told me that I needed to be on the calendar to be seen. R34 stated my nails are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that oxygen was ordered, and care planned for 1 resident (Resident #9) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings Include: Resident #9: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Heart failure, history of a stroke, left side weakness, hypertension, hypothyroidism, COPD, diabetes, depression and anxiety. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mild cognitive decline with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 12/15 and needed assistance with all care. On 2/17/2026 at 3:39 PM, during a tour of the facility Resident #9 was observed lying in bed awake, an oxygen concentrator was running with oxygen set at 3 liters per minute. The resident was asked if that is what it was normally set at and she said she didn't know.On 2/17/2027 at 3:50 PM, Nurse H was interviewed about Resident #9's oxygen and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) yearly performance reviews were conducted for two of five CNA's reviewed, resulting in the lack of yearly education training. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Facility Staffing Template' policy, dated 6/2019, revealed it is the policy of the facility to conduct, document and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which included both the residents' population and the resources the facility needs to care for the residents. (c.) Facility resources needed to provide competent care for residents including staff, staffing plan, staff training/education and competencies, education and training . Record review of the facility 'Facility Assessment', dated 10/13/2025, revealed the facility used computerized training assigned specialized training with lessons to address Alzheimer's disease and pertinent communication strategies with the resident experiencing behavioral health needs. Individualized training will further assist with interventions to specifically…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective in-service nurse aide training program, that ensured continued compliance with educational training of 12 hours required annually for aides employed at the facility for 1 of 5 certified nursing assistants (CNA) resulting in continued non-compliance. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Facility Assessment', dated 10/13/2025, revealed that the facility used computerized training assigned specialized training with lessons to address Alzheimer's disease and pertinent communication strategies with the resident experiencing behavioral health needs. Individualized training will further assist with interventions to specifically address behavioral training and meaningful interventions. Annual CNA/Nurse skills training is performed by the Corporate Clinical Educator. PCC Behavioral Care Assessment and Infection Prevention features have been implemented to better identify and track resident associated behaviors and infections and trends. Current CNA/Nurse training courses are sufficient and address…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake 1341963. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure physician supervision of medical care for one (#701) of one resident reviewed, resulting in lack of physician and/or advanced practice Health Care Provider (HCP) assessment and treatment of an alteration in skin integrity. Findings include: Review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) documentation, submitted on 6/24/25 at 7:37 PM, revealed the facility received a concern from Family Member Witness C on 6/24/25 at 5:40 PM that Resident #701 had called them on 6/23/25 at approximately 10:00 PM and told them that someone had been sexually harming them. The facility completed an investigation and determined there was insufficient evidence to support the occurrence of the alleged event. Record review revealed Resident #701 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00150598. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent repeated falls for one resident (Resident #101) of 4 sampled residents, resulting in Resident #101 sustaining repeated falls from her wheelchair, Findings include: Resident #101: In an observation and interview on 3/5/2025 at 8:10 AM, Resident #101 was seated up in the resident's room in a wheelchair with the footrest in place. Resident #101 was asked about a fall in February 2025. The Resident stated that yes, she fell from her wheelchair and went to the hospital. Record review of Resident #101's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed an elderly female with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15- indicating cognitively intact. Section I- Active diagnoses included: Medically complex conditions, diabetes, hemiparesis, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, ischemic cardiomyopathy, dysphagia, insomnia. Section G- Functional Abilities:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE PEPLINSKI GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $933K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI