West Woods of Niles
1211 State Line Rd, Niles, MI 49120 · For profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (269) 684-2810 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,800 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-03)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 16.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 39.0% | 12.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.9% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.7% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.1% | 14.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.1% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.1% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.72 | 1.84 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.64 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.8%CMS range 36.2–55.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.5–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 12.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.6–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 107.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2715364.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quality wound care to promote healing and prevent the deterioration of a pressure ulcer for 1 (Resident #121) of 3 residents reviewed for wound care resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy when on 1/8/26, Resident #121 was hospitalized with altered mental status and septic shock (life-threatening condition caused by a severe infection) from a necrotic (death of cells in tissue) sacral ulcer (pressure ulcer at the base of the spine) with osteomyelitis (infection in a bone) requiring surgical intervention and bone debridement. Findings include: Resident #121 The Immediate Jeopardy began on 12/26/25 when Resident #121 was unable to have his pressure ulcer cared for per orders and was not completed by nursing staff and was subsequently hospitalized with altered mental status and septic shock from necrotic (dead tissue) sacral ulcer with osteomyelitis requiring surgical intervention and bone debridement. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2659614 & 2661255Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for 1 resident (Resident #100) of 7 residents reviewed for medication errors, resulting in a change in condition, emergent transfer, and hospitalization for Resident #100. Findings include: Resident #100: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, dysarthria (a motor speech disorder that causes slurred or slow speech due to weak or uncoordinated speech muscles), memory deficit following a stroke, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disfunction caused by systemic metabolic problem such as liver or kidney failure, diabetes, sepsis), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with communication caused by impairments in thinking skills like memory, attention, and problem solving). Review of Medications for Resident #100 revealed, .Resident Medications: acetaminophen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00143902 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a timely assessment for a change in condition in 1 (Resident #100) of 1 resident reviewed for timely assessment for a change in condition resulting in the delay of communication with a provider, delay of transfer to acute care setting for evaluation and a delay of treatment. Findings include: Resident #100 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 had pertinent diagnoses which included: rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown that causes toxins to leak into the bloodstream), abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility, and acidosis (blood becomes too acidic due to problems related to kidneys or lungs). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #100 was cognitively intact. In a telephone interview on [DATE] at 3:49 PM., Family Member (FM) S reported that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00144494 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent the worsening of a pressure ulcer in 1 (Resident #101) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in Resident #101 being sent to the hospital for evaluation and/or treatment. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 had pertinent diagnoses which included: pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage 4, osteomyelitis of the vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (infection of the vertebra bone in the sacral region), and functional quadriplegia (the complete inability to move). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 4/11/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 which indicated Resident #101 was cognitively intact. Review of Wound Measurement 2.2 for Resident #101 dated 4/11/24 15:32 PM., revealed .sacral wound measures 13.9 X 14.6 X 4.2 stage IV present on admission .wet to dry dressing removed and wound vac placed as per hospital orders .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake numbers MI00143061 and MI00143279. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff followed care planned interventions and professional standards of care for 2 residents (Resident #1 & #3) out of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in major injuries (fractures) after avoidable falls. Findings: Resident #1 (R1) Review of an admission record reflected R1 admitted to the facility with the following pertinent diagnoses: muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, erosive osteoarthritis, difficulty walking and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Care Plan initiated on 12/13/2021 reflected R1 had Altered functional mobility and ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) related to her diagnoses. The care plan specified that R1 was to ambulate with therapy only (intervention initiated 6/19/23 and resolved on 2/26/24). FALL RISK MANAGEMENT interventions included in the ADL care plan indicated R1 was to have one person assistance with transfers. The care plan also indicated Resident (R1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-10 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations for certified nursing assistants were completed, resulting in the potential for the delivery of nursing and related services that does not support or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations for certified nursing assistants were completed, resulting in the potential for the delivery of nursing and related services that does not support or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include: Review of The Essentials Guide to Healthcare Performance Reviews, www.hrforhealth.com. 2024, revealed The benefits of healthcare performance reviews go beyond creating a better experience for your team .the most important [benefit) is performance reviews lead to improved performance .greater productivity and better overall experience for your patients. In an interview on 02/06/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food and drink at a palatable temperature in 2 (R32 and R72) of 22 residents reviewed for palatability among all residents. This deficient practice has the potential to result in decreased food consumption and potential nutritional decline.Findings include: Resident #32 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident # 32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: parkinson's disease (a progressive, incurable neurodegenerative(gradual dysfunction and death of neurons in the brain) disorder of the central nervous system primarily affecting movements, causing tremors and balance issues), muscle weakness and dementia (an umbrella term for a progressive decline in cognitive function). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #32 with a reference date of 1/27/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 13/15, which indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings include: On 2/4/26 at 10:46 AM, an interview with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) UUU found that staff typically date items for a three-day discard and use the day it was made or opened to label. On 2/4/26 at 10:54 AM, observation of the two-door reach in refrigeration unit found a half empty gallon of milk dated 1/26/26. When shown to CDM UUU she discarded the product. On 2/4/26 at 10:56 AM, observation of the walk-in cooler found an open package of polish sausages with no date to indicate when the item should be discarded. On 2/4/26 at 11:57 AM, observation of the Front Street refrigeration unit found two containers of cottage cheese with best by dates of 2/2/26, an open gallon of milk with a best by date of 1/28/26, and a pitcher of thickened water dated 1/28/26. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 2 (Resident #121 and #19) of 22 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical record documentation, resulting in the potential for staff and providers mismanaging care for residents. Findings include:Resident #121Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #121 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #121's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed, Wound Care; Sacrum: Cleanse area with NS (normal saline), Frame wound withtegaderm (type of wound dressing), loosely fill area with black foam, Cover with drape/tegaderm to secure seal. Cut quarter size hole into middle of drape and connect suction pad . Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to: 125mmhg Set vacuum at 125 mmHg Intermittent. Inspect settings and visualize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices for 6 residents (#90, #76, #32, #8, #13 and #27) of 6 sampled for infection control; as evidenced by failure to 1. Properly implement transmission-based precautions and complete testing on symptomatic residents; 2. Ensure resident shared equipment was properly cleaned; and 3. Ensure the cleanliness of a tube feeding pole/pump and the surrounding surfaces.Findings include: Review of A systematic review on the causes of the transmission and control measures of outbreaks in long-term care facilities: Back to basics of infection control. revealed The unique characteristics of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) including host factors and living conditions contribute to the spread of contagious pathogens. Control measures are essential to interrupt the transmission and to manage outbreaks effectively. This review indicates that the violation of basic infection control practice could be a major role…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment, for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #103) including a dusty and broken oscillating fan and an unkept resident room resulting in the potential for unsafe and uncomfortable resident environment.Findings include: Resident #4 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #4 was a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: vascular dementia (cognitive impairments resulting from a decrease in blood flow), hemiplegia affecting the left non-dominate side (decrease use of the left side of the body) and cerebral infarct due to occlusion (stroke due to a blocked blood vessel). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4, with a reference date of 12/23/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9/15 which indicated Resident #4 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 02/04/26 at 12:26 PM, 02/05/26 at 1:15 PM, and 02/06/26 at 9:15 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF-ABN) to 3 (Resident #123, Resident #124, and Resident #125) of 3 residents reviewed for proper notification related to Medicare A insurance coverage and facility care costs.Findings include:Resident #123Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #123 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic kidney disease stage 3 (mild to moderate damage to kidneys resulting in decreased ability to filter out water and fluid from the body).Review of SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form for Resident #123, completed by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A on 02/05/26 revealed Medicare Part A Services Episode Start Date: 11/17/25 and Last covered day of Part A service: 12/19/25 and NHA A documented No, SNF ABN form was not provided to Resident #123 for Other- Resident (#123) started custodial care on 12/20/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2735016. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a staff member. Findings include: Resident #114: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #114 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (the body's immune system attacks the protective covering of the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, disrupting signal transmission), need for assistance with personal care, suprapubic catheter (thin, flexible tube inserted through a small incision in the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine), muscle wasting and atrophy multiple sites (loss of muscle tissue characterized by decreased size, strength, and function), depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #114, revised on 11/28/25, revealed the focus, .Altered functional mobility and ADL's (activities of daily living) related to: MS (muscle sclerosis), obstructive and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of potential neglect (elopement) to the State Agency for 1 resident (Resident #109) of 1 resident reviewed for reportable incidents resulting in the potential for additional reportable incidents to not be reported and cause a delay in the investigative process.Findings include: Resident #109 (R109)During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 3:04 PM, R109 Guardian (G) BBB stated that R109 can smoke outside with R47's daughter or a staff member but not by herself. G BBB stated R109's face sheet should show who she was able to go out with. Review of R109's face sheet revealed Special Instructions.(R109) is allowed to go outside and leave facility with (R47's daughter) or (Senior Services staff name omitted) only per her guardian. Review of the Wandering Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed .Assessment Summary: (R109) is not a wandering risk, she does wear a wander guard (wearable electronic tag to monitor movement and can trigger alarms when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper procedure for a facility-initiated discharge for 1 (Resident #120) of 1 resident reviewed for facility-initiated discharge resulting in the unapproved discharge of the resident from the facility.Findings include: Resident #120Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #120 was a male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: acute osteomyelitis left ankle and foot (sudden and severe bone infection, often caused by bacteria).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #120, with a reference date of 10/27/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9/15 which indicated Resident #120 was moderately cognitively impaired.Review of Interdisciplinary Documentation for Resident #120 on 01/05/26 at 14:52 (2:52 PM) revealed .attempted to speak to Resident #120 this day in order to plan a safe D/C (discharge).This resident normally responds to discussions for D/C that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement resident comprehensive care plans for 1 resident of 22 (Resident #27) reviewed for care planning resulting in a lack of service for residents to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include: Resident #27: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #27 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included stroke, contractures (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, skin caused the joint to shorten and become very stiff) right elbow, right hand, and right ankle; contractures left elbow, hand, and ankle; abnormalities of breathing, epilepsy, and tube feeding due to a persistent vegetative state. Review of Care Plan for Resident #27 revised on 11/12/24 revealed the focus, . (Resident #27 is dependent on the staff for all ADL cares related to her persistent vegetative state. She has contractures to bilateral upper extremity joints and bilateral ankles. with the intervention .FALL - RISK MANAGEMENT: * Low bed in lowest position except with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2715364. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify an acute change in condition for 1 (Resident #121) of a total sample of 22 residents reviewed for quality of care resulting in a delay in treatment for Resident #121 who was sent to the hospital on 1/8/26 and diagnosed with altered mental status and septic shock (life-threatening condition caused by a severe infection) from necrotic (death of cells in tissue) sacral ulcer with osteomyelitis (infection in a bone). Findings include: Resident #121Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #121 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #121's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #121) has the potential for an acute condition change with cardiopulmonary, metabolic or infectious complicationsrelated to atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise, reduce hazards, and ensure the safety of 2 (Resident #109 and Resident #32) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards resulting in an elopement and a fall. Findings include: Resident #109 (R109) Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R109's initial admission date was 5/2/2025 with pertinent diagnoses including anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder (intense mood swings ranging from extreme highs and lows), mild cognitive impairment and depression. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 10 out of 15 which indicated R109 cognition was moderately impaired. Review of R109's incident report dated 1/1/2026 revealed Nursing Description: (R109) exited the building at 1855 (6:55 PM). The main entrance door alarm was sounding and (R109) was outside sitting on the sidewalk between the main entrance and the office entrance. (R109) was wearing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain sufficient hydration and consistent nutritional status monitoring and re-evaluation by a nutrition professional of residents at risk for altered hydration and nutritional status for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #18, #98, #32) reviewed for hydration/nutrition resulting in the potential for dehydration, weight loss, and unmet resident needs.Findings include: Resident #18: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #18 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, paralysis left side, stoke, dementia, need for assistance with personal care, and stroke. Review of Care Plan for Resident #18 revised on 1/7/25, revealed the focus, .(Resident #18) has the potential for an altered nutritional status primarily related to her diagnoses of dementia and type 2 DM (diabetes). This may lead to diminished cures of hunger or thirst and a decreased understanding of the importance of eating as well as altered blood sugars. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pre-dialysis assessments were completed for 1 (Resident #19) of 4 residents reviewed for dialysis services, resulting in the potential for miscommunication, inadequate documentation of resident's clinical conditions, and unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #19Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #19 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness and end stage renal disease (final stage of chronic kidney disease, where the kidneys can no longer function adequately to sustain life without treatment). Review of Resident #19's Care Plan revealed, Focus: Hemodialysis required to remove urea & other toxic products from the blood: At risk for loss of vascular access; clotting, hemorrhage(bleeding), infection. At risk for exacerbation of heart failure with inadequate dialysis or increased hypervolemia (fluid overload). Date Initiated: 10/14/2025. Interventions: Assess fluid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented review of pharmacy recommendations timely for 1 resident (Resident #5) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications resulting in the potential for medication side effects to occur and/or unnecessary medications for residents.Findings include:Resident #5 (R5)Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R5's initial admission date was 10/30/2023 with pertinent diagnoses including depression, delusions (delusions are false beliefs that persist despite evidence to the contrary), bipolar disorder (intense mood swings ranging from extreme highs and lows), dementia (decline in cognitive abilities severe enough to interfere with activities of daily life) and chronic pain. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 10 out of 15 which indicated R5 cognition was moderately impaired. Review of R5's active physician orders revealed Olanzapine (Zyprexa, antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #114) resident of 6 reviewed for unnecessary medications was prescribed a controlled medication, resulting in the use of a controlled addictive substance without adequate diagnosis or indications of use with potential for adverse side effects including negative physical and psychosocial side effects. Findings include: .Use of Adderall can create psychological dependence, physiological dependence, and tolerance may occur with amphetamine; dextroamphetamine therapy. Abrupt discontinuation or a significant dose reduction of CNS (central nervous system) stimulants after prolonged use may produce withdrawal symptoms that include dysphoria, depression, fatigue, vivid and unpleasant dreams, insomnia or hypersomnia, increased appetite, and psychomotor retardation or agitation. Signs and symptoms of chronic amphetamine abuse include severe dermatoses (skin defect or lesion of the skin), marked insomnia, irritability, hyperactivity, personality changes, and psychosis with features indiscriminate from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, document, and provide treatment per professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #103) of 1 resident reviewed for management of skin and wounds, resulting in lack of assessment, monitoring, and the potential for a decline in overall health status.Findings include:Resident #103: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes and edema. Review of Care Plan for Resident #103, revealed a focus of .(Resident #103) has the potential with acute condition change with cardiopulmonary, metabolic or infectious complications Diabetes Mellitus, Sterocoral Colitis, (serious inflammation of the colon caused by severe chronic constipation and impaction) Bilateral (both sides) hearing loss, and Hypertension (high blood pressure). with the intervention .Assess and document edema, breath sounds, circumoral (blueish tint around the mouth due to poor oxygen) or nail bed cyanosis (blueish tint on the nail bed). Review of admission Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control protocols and practices for 2 (Resident #103 & #105) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the increased potential for the spread of infection, bacterial harborage, cross contamination, and disease transmission for residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) dated March 20,2024, revealed, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities .EBP are used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of PPE (personal protective equipment) to donning (putting on) of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs (multi drug resistant organisms) to staff hands and clothing .EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: o Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1) implement transmission-based precautions for 1 (Resident #35) of 18 residents reviewed for isolation precautions, 2) properly clean and sanitize resident shared equipment and 3) ensure proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) resulting in the potential for the spread of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission for residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of CDC's Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare Delivery in All Settings, published 4/12/24 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed: Adherence to infection prevention and control practices is essential to providing safe and high-quality patient care across all settings where healthcare is delivered .core practices include: clean and disinfect .frequently touched surfaces .ensure proper use of personal protective equipment .implement additional precautions (i.e., Transmission-Based Precautions) .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a qualified Infection Preventionist worked at least part-time at the facility, was provided sufficient time to perform the Infection Preventionist role, and was present to properly assess, implement, and manage the Infection Prevention and Control Program. Findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program with a reference date of 3/2020, revealed: It is the policy of this facility to implement the Infection Prevention and Control Program utilizing a systematic, coordinated and continuous approach guided by OSHA regulations, and pertinent state, federal and local regulations pertaining to infection control. The Infection Prevention Manager has the authority to institute any surveillance, prevention, or control measure indicated. Review of a Facility Assessment with a reference date of 10/23/24 revealed: Evaluation of Infection Prevention and Control Program: .The Infection Preventionist is a dedicated position to the role. In an interview on 1/8/25 at 1:13pm, Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 immunizations were offered to 10 residents reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations, resulting in an increased risk for infection, and the potential spread of COVID-19 infection to other residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: Review of the facility's Covid-19 Vaccine Administration policy, with a reference date of May 2023 revealed: It is the policy of this facility to facilitate through partnership with the local health department, consulted pharmacy, and contracted pharmacy to provide the COVID-19 Vaccine according to standards set forth by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. In an interview on 1/8/25 at 1:13pm, Infection Preventionist (IP) J reported she was behind on several of her responsibilities including offering covid 19 vaccinations to some residents. IP J reported the facility offered a round of covid vaccinations in October 2024, but there had not been follow up for residents who could not receive the vaccination at that time due to the lack of a consent form, or who were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF-ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to 2 (Resident #26 and Resident #291) of 3 residents reviewed for proper notification related to Medicare A insurance coverage. Findings include: Resident #26 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #26 had pertinent diagnoses which included: Chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure (increased fluid influences the heart's ability to pump), anxiety disorder, and dementia. Resident #291 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #291 had pertinent diagnoses which included: spinal stenosis of the cervical region with surgical aftercare (surgical procedure on the neck). On 1/6/2025 at 10:22 AM., during entrance conference, a list of all discharged residents during the past 6 months, from Medicare A insurance coverage was requested from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A. On 1/6/2025 at 4:46 PM., NHA A provided an electronic copy of a list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent, meaningful and person centered activities for 1 (Resident #29) of 2 reviewed for activities provided by the facility, resulting in the potential for loss of interaction, joy, self-esteem, growth, sense of wellbeing, autonomy, connectedness, identity, creativity, independence, pleasure, and comfort. Findings include: Resident #29 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included persistent vegetative state. Review of Resident #29's Care Plan revealed, Per Social service interview: (Resident #29) . worked in fast food and retail. She enjoys music and church. (Resident #29) is dependent on staff for all activities and needs. Activity staff provide manicures, pedicures, music, church on TV or tablet. Date initiated: 4/9/20. Goal: In room activities of choice which include: Music, manicures, Reading books/magazines to her. Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00147700. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the elopement and ensure the safety in 1 (Resident #238) of a total sample of 18 reviewed for accidents resulting in Resident #238 exiting the facility from a staff exit door and getting 30 feet away from the building before staff found her with the potential for serious harm, injury, and/or death. Findings include: Resident #238 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #238 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included difficulty in walking. Review of Resident #238's Wandering Risk Assessment Scale dated 9/19/24 indicated that Resident #238 was identified as a high risk to wander, and the facility staff placed a wander guard device on her prophylacticly. Review of incident report dated 10/7/24 revealed, (Resident #238) exited the building and was accompanied by staff back into the facility. (Resident #238) was observed outside in the courtyard, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that that QAA (quality assessment and assurance) meetings had the Medical Director as a mandatory attendee at least quarterly resulting in the potential for the Medical Director to not be notified of quality deficiencies occurring in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program policy last revised January 2015 revealed, Policy: With the support of the governing body and administration, it is the policy of this facility, to implement and maintain a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program (QUAPI). QUAPI activities will involve members at all levels of the facilities organization to identify opportunities for improvement; address gaps in systems or processes; develop and implement an improvement or corrective plan; and continuously monitor the effectiveness of actions . 2. Governance and Leadership: a. The Quality Assurance Committee meets a minimum of monthly and is designated as the steering committee to oversee QUAPI and provide opportunity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00144494 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop care plan interventions to prevent the development of and/or worsening of pressure ulcers and develop interventions for wound vac (a device that applies gentle pressure to assist with wound healing) use for 1 (Resident #101) of 2 residents reviewed for care plan interventions related to pressure wounds resulting in Resident #101's existing pressure ulcer worsening, and the development of additional pressure wound. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 had pertinent diagnoses which included: pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage 4, osteomyelitis of the vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (infection of the vertebra bone in the sacral region), and functional quadriplegia (the complete inability to move). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 4/11/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 which indicated Resident #101 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during wound care dressing change in 1 (Resident #102) of 1 resident reviewed for wound care dressing changed resulting in the potential for the introduction of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission. Findings include: Resident #102 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 had pertinent diagnoses which included: pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage 4, osteomyelitis of the vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (infection of the vertebra bone in the sacral region), and muscle weakness (generalized). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #102, with a reference date of 3/22/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #102 was cognitively intact. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #102 revealed . enhanced barrier precautions during high contact resident activities every shift for . wound care active on 3/28/24 .Wound care: coccyx- cleanse with normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake number MI00143279. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a dignified manner for 1 resident (Resident #5) when a nurse attempted to administer medications to a resident who was naked, suspended in a shower sling and having a bowel movement. Findings: Resident #5 (R5) Review of an admission Record reflected R5 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, mild dementia, mixed anxiety disorder and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Review of a Care Plan initiated on 1/25/2023 reflected that R5 had altered functional mobility and ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) and was totally dependent on staff for bathing and transfers with a mechanical lift. During an interview on 3/14/24 at 10:17 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) reported she knew about an incident of undignified care for R5 from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) U as witnessed and reported by Certified Nursing Aides (CNA's) R and Q in September of 2023. The DON reported the concern…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00142068. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to an alarming exit door per policy/procedure to ensure resident safety in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #101) reviewed for wandering/supervision, resulting in an elopement and the potential for injury. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, obstructive lung disease, dementia, stroke, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 11/28/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of a Wandering Risk Assessment Scale for Resident #101, dated 11/28/23, revealed .(Resident #101) is alert and oriented with confusion and forgetfulness at times. He is independent with wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure ADL (activities of daily living) care plan interventions were implemented for 1 (Resident #29) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in pain and frustration due to inadequate assistance for bed mobility during incontinence care. Finding include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #29, with a reference date of 11/7/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #29 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #29's Care Plan revealed, .altered functional mobility and ADL's .Interventions: .Bed Mobility: assist of two. Date initiated: 1/25/23 . In an interview on 11/27/23 at 01:13 PM, Resident #29 reported that she often times has a wet or soiled brief for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided timely/as scheduled per resident preference and plan of care for 2 (Residents #42 and #54) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, resulting in Resident #42 being left on the commode for an extended period, Resident #54 not consistently receiving showers as scheduled, and the potential for dissatisfaction with care. Findings include: Resident #42 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #42 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with (acute) exacerbation, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the tissues), and orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure upon standing). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42, with a reference date of 11/20/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #42 was cognitively intact. Further review of said MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 (Resident #449) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards, resulting in the potential for resident to sustain a fall with injury. Findings include: Resident #449: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #449 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, stroke, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, delirium, anemia, attention and concentration deficit, frontal lobe and executive function deficit (difficult to start or complete tasks), aphasia (loss of the ability to understand or express speech caused by brain damage, like with a stroke), dysphagia (damage to the brain responsible for production and comprehension of speech), and memory deficit. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #449, revised on 11/7/2023, revealed the focus, .(Resident #449) has altered functional mobility and ADLs related to: CVA (cerebral vascular accident- stroke)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and perform hand hygiene in accordance with standard infection control practices in 1 (Resident #29) of 1 resident reviewed for UTI's (urinary tract infections), resulting in the potential for skin breakdown and recurrent infection. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #29, with a reference date of 11/7/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #29 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #29's Care Plan revealed, .altered functional mobility and ADL's .Interventions: .Elimination: Wears incontinence products, check and change before and after meals, HS (bedtime) with rounds and prn (as needed), assist when verbal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders related to the application of a Continuous Positive Aireway Pressure (CPAP - used to treat sleep apnea) in the evening in 1 (Resident #63) of 1 resident reviewed for CPAP use, resulting in the potential for respiratory distress while sleeping. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #63 had pertinent diagnoses which included obstructive sleep apnea, morbid obesity, and a history of Covid-19. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #63, with a reference date of 10/31/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #63 was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 11/27/23 at 1:33 PM., Resident #63 reported she could not remember the last time she wore her CPAP at night. Resident #63 reported that the staff did not put her CPAP on her at night. Resident #63's CPAP mask was observed in a bag on top of the CPAP machine, under a red towel on the bedside table. Resident #63 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary clinical treatments were ordered and/or documented in 2 (Resident #77 & #448) of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting the potential for residents not receiving appropriate interventions. Findings include: Resident #77: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #77 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included pseudocyst of pancreas (fluid collection surrounded by a wall of fibrous & granulation tissue), acute kidney failure with medullary necrosis ( a disorder of the kidneys in which all or part of the openings of the collecting ducts enter the kidney and where urine flows inot the ureters), moderate protein calorie malnutrition, gall stones, pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas), spinal cord damage, heart failure, and muscle weakness. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #77, revised on 10/30/23, revealed the following interventions, .PHYSICIAN ORDERS: admission orders implemented as noted on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,800 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,400 — penalty dated 2024-07-03
- $8,400 — penalty dated 2024-07-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-10 for 34 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE PEPLINSKI GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACKERMAN, AMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| ACKERMAN, RICKY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| BAUMGARTEN, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| BAUMGARTEN, THERESE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| PEPLINSKI, SHELI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| PEPLINSKI, TODD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| SCHADE, JEFFERY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| SCHADE, TAMARA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| THOMPSON, BRIAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| THOMPSON, SHELLY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2012 |
| PLANTE & MORAN PLLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| SEARS, MONICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/18/2022 |
| SOLAREWICZ, MACIEJ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| WINKELS, KATHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/06/2016 |
| THE PEPLINSKI GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| WEST WOOD ESTATES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235594. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.