No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadow View Health & Rehabilitation

2203 East Mechanic Street, Harrisonville, MO 64701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (816) 380-2622 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
305 W Wall St Ste A · (816) 793-0071 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
505 S Commercial St · (816) 884-1891 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.2 mi
1801 W. Mechanic Street
Park
1004 Parkridge St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2400 E Mechanic St · (816) 380-4800

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.7%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.5%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.6%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.7%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.4%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine13.6%63.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.732.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.432.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.7–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified81.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
46.5%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 86.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-23)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free from accident hazards by not assessing for safe smoking practices for one sampled resident (Resident #340) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of facility's undated policy titled Smoking Policy and Acknowledgement showed: -All residents must be supervised by a facility staff member or personal family member at the designated location. -Smoke breaks were outside in a designated area. -Facility staff member would only supervise smoke breaks at the designated times. -The policy did not include a safe smoking assessment was to be performed for the resident who smoked or be assessed for any special equipment the resident needed while he/she smoked. 1. Record review of Resident #340's admission Record showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a disease process that decreases the ability of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #81) was free from abusive acts when one sampled resident (Resident #25) who had a known history of aggression, anger issues, yelling, hitting and kicking other residents struck the resident in his/her face causing reddened areas to his/her left cheek, nose and the left side of his/her upper lip with a small amount of blood noted out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's policy Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring policy revised 3/2019 showed: -The facility would provide and residents would receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment. -Behavioral health services would be provided by qualified staff who have the competencies and skills necessary to provide appropriate services and treatment. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, monitor and treat non-pressure wounds to the right great toe, the right little toe, the right ankle, the right Achilles tendon (fibrous tissue that connects the calf muscles to the heel bone)) and multiple scabbed areas over the resident's bilateral shins resulting in the non-pressure wounds worsening over the 42 day delay before treatment started for one sampled resident (Resident #14); to ensure the charge nurse reviewed and followed up with lab results for a resident suspected of having Clostridium Difficile (C. Diff - an infection which typically occurs after use of antibiotic medications that can cause symptoms ranging from diarrhea to life-threatening inflammation of the colon); failed to ensure physician orders to treat the infection were obtained immediately and available for one sampled resident (Resident #31) which resulted in the resident having a new onset of stomach issues, loose, watery diarrhea stools that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-20 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess, monitor, document and provide treatment that includes ongoing appropriate interventions related to the resident's behaviors; to ensure monthly psychiatric visits were in the medical record and reviewed by the staff; to ensure supportive services were in place and to have an individualized care plan based on the resident's behaviors of two sampled residents (Resident #14 and #25) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's policy Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring policy revised 3/2019 showed: -The facility would provide and residents would receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment. -Behavioral health services would be provided by qualified staff who have the competencies and skills necessary to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to retain operable thermometers in all refrigerators and/or freezers to confirm adequate temperature ranges; failed to ensure utensils, beverage dispensers, and food preparation items/equipment were kept in a sanitary condition; failed to maintain plastic and/or rubber cutting boards, plate covers, room trays, and utensils in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination); failed to separate damaged foodstuffs, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 87 residents with a licensed capacity for 120 residents at the time of the survey. Review of the 1999 and 2009 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code and Missouri Food Codes, showed:-Chapter 4-101.11: Materials that are used in the construction of utensils and food-contact surfaces…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Legionella (A [NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis, all illnesses caused by Legionella, including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever) and/or other water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) that included specific assessments and contents, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) standards and guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility, and the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication and medical equipment storage in two out of five medication carts and in one out of two medication storage rooms. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Storage pf Medications showed:-Drugs and biologicals were stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. -Only the issuing pharmacy was authorized to transfer medications between containers.-Drug containers that had missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels were returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storage. -Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals were returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.Review of the facility's undated policy titled Labeling of Medication Containers showed:-Labels for stock medications included all necessary information such as:--The name and strength of the drug.--The lot and control number.--The expiration date when applicable.--Appropriate accessory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were in place for self-administration of medication for one sampled resident (Resident #81) and one supplemental resident (Resident #47); and failed to ensure an assessment for self-administration of medication was in place for one supplemental resident (Resident #47) out of 18 sampled residents and seven supplemental residents. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders dated July 2016 showed:-Orders for medications and treatments would be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing.-Medications should be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state.-Drug and biological orders were to be recorded on the physician's order sheet in the resident's chart.-Orders for medications must include:--Name and strength of the drug.--Number of doses, start and stop date,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP a machine that helps you breathe) mask and a nasal cannula (NC a device that gives you additional oxygen (supplemental oxygen or oxygen therapy) through your nose) in a plastic bag for one sampled resident (Resident #25) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 87 residents. A policy was requested on BiPAP mask storage and NC storage and was not received by the time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #25's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnosis: -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs, and the damage results in swelling and irritation, also called inflammation, inside the airways that limit airflow into and out of the lungs).-Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen).-Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (elevated carbon dioxide).Review of the resident's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 9/23/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess and provide supportive interventions for one sampled residents (Resident #59) with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event), and one sampled resident (Resident #66) who had a positive finding on the trauma/abuse/neglect screening out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of Trauma-Informed Care Implementation Center (https://www.traumainformedcare.chcs.org/what-is-trauma-informed-care/) copyright 2021 showed:-Trauma-informed care shifts the focus from What's wrong with you? to What happened to you?-A trauma-informed approach to care acknowledges that health care organizations and care teams need to have a complete picture of a patient's life situation - past and present - to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident shower rooms were kept clean, maintained and free from build-up of black mold like/grime on the lower corner of the shower wall and shower floor tile located on 200 hallway; failed to ensure shower room was maintained and showed missing base board shower tiles and missing tile on memory care floor of the shower room and missing tile in the shower itself. This practice potentially affected all resident residents who used those shower rooms. The facility census was 82 residents. Review of the facility's undated Daily Cleaning of Guidelines showed: -The facility were complete regular inspect the shower room for signs of mold (often appearing as black, brown, or green stains), mildew and clogs. -If mold or mildew return after cleaning report to maintenance immediately. Review of copy Infection Prevention Rounds Maintenance Department check list dated 12/2021 showed: -Insure integrity of caulking and tiles in shower stall is maintained as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1) with limited range of motion (ROM) received restorative therapy services to prevent further decrease in his/her ROM out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Nursing Services dated July 2017 showed: -Residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to promote optimal safety and independence. -Restorative nursing care consisted of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services. -Residents may be stared on restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay, or when discharged from rehabilitative care. -A restorative goal may have included maintaining his/her dignity and self-esteem. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Person injured in unspecified motor vehicle accident. -Fusion of the spine (a surgery performed that joins two or more vertebra (any of the bony or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing numbers to consistently provide timely Activities of Daily Living (ADL - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) assistance for two sampled residents (Resident #77 and Resident #69) out of 18 sampled residents and ADL-dependent residents on the [NAME] Side of the building and to ensure adequate weekend staffing as reflected on the Payroll Based Journal data (PBJ- a report that provides staffing dataset information submitted by nursing homes on a quarterly basis) for the fourth quarter of 2023 (July 1 - September 30, 2023) and first quarter of 2024 (October 1 - December 31, 2023) which had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 88 residents. Review of the facility's Staffing policy, revised October, 2017 showed: -The facility provided sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competencies necessary to provide care and services for all residents according to identified resident care needs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the floor under the refrigerator in the storage room, free of heavy dust buildup; failed maintain the sprinkler heads over the handwashing sink and the food preparation, free of dust buildup on the sprinkler heads; failed to remove a buildup of grime from under the deep fat fryer; failed to maintain the gaskets (a mechanical seal which fills the space between two or more mating surfaces, generally to prevent leakage from or into the joined objects) of the walk-in freezer and the reach-in refrigerator across from the food preparation table in good repair; failed to maintain the ceiling vents in the kitchen free of a heavy buildup of dust; failed to maintain the handles of the food spatula in good repair; failed to maintain the nozzle of the upper spray wand of the dishwasher; failed to have a trash container dietary staff did not have to use their hands to open the lid every time they placed trash in the trash container; failed to maintain the bottled milk in the dining room at or close to a temperature of 41 ºF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the floors free from a heavy buildup of dust and debris in the following resident rooms 208, 207, 302, 300, 601, 510, 500 Hall shower room, 607, 405, 410, 409, 407, 401; failed to maintain the fans free of a heavy buildup of dust in the following resident rooms 302, 301; and failed to maintain ceiling vents free of a heavy buildup of dust in the following resident rooms 405 and the 500 Hall shower room . This practice potentially affected at least 30 residents who resided in or used those areas. The facility census was 88 residents. 1. Review of the undated Housekeeping Route sheet (a sheet which showed the steps to clean the resident rooms), showed: 7-Step room cleaning: 1. Pull Trash. 2. Dust horizontal surfaces. 3. Sanitize high traffic areas. 4. Spot clean walls. 5. Sweep floors under and behind furniture and beds. 6. Damp mop floors under and behind furniture and beds. 7. Wipe down beds. 8. Sanitize high touch areas such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in place for monitoring shower/bathing related to Activities of Daily Living (ADL's- grooming, bathing, hygiene), and to ensure baths or showers were provided at as scheduled for five sampled residents (Resident #6, #32, #58, #76, and #85) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 88 residents. Review of undated facility policy entitled Bath, Shower/tub showed: -The purpose was to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and observe the condition of the resident's skin. -Complete bathing per residence preference (shower or bath). -Document the time the shower/tub bath was performed. -Document the name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with shower/tub bath. -Document all assessment data. -Document how the resident tolerated the shower /tub bath. -Document if the resident refused shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the interventions taken. -Document the signature and title of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to cook broccoli florets so they would not be mushy; failed to follow the recipe for pureed (cooked food, that has been ground, pressed, blended or sieved to the consistency of a creamy paste or liquid) broccoli, so the broccoli would be palatable; and failed to maintain room trays at the 600 Hall and the 300 Hall at or close to 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) at the time of service. This practice potentially affected at least 13 residents. The facility census was 88 residents. 1. Review of the recipe for pureed broccoli florets, dated 9/1/15, showed: - Steam broccoli 15-25 minutes until tender. - Drain broccoli, in large mixing bowl, and toss broccoli with margarine and season with salt and pepper. - Transfer to service pans and hold at a temperature of 135 ºF or greater. - Puree step: Remove desired number of servings and add nutritive liquid such as milk or broth. Blend until desired consistency. - Add approved thickener to achieve desired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was negative airflow in the restrooms of the following resident rooms: 106, 102, 210, 209, 206/204, 205, 311/309, and 302/304. This practice potentially affected at least 20 residents who resided in those rooms. The facility census was 88 residents. Note: Air flow was tested by holding one piece of tissue paper to the ceiling vent. If the paper was drawn up then negative air flow was present; if the paper was not drawn to the ceiling vent, then negative airflow was absent. 1. Observations with the Maintenance Director and the Regional Maintenance Person on 5/21/24, showed: -At 9:52 A.M., there was not any negative airflow from the restroom vent of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 9:57 A.M., there was not any negative airflow from the restroom vent of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 10:04 A.M., there was not any negative airflow from the restroom of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 10:11 A.M., there was not any negative airflow from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the setting of the low air loss mattress (LAL - a mattress designed to distribute weight over a broad surface and help prevent skin breakdown. It has continuous air flow through tiny holes on the mattress surface) for one sampled resident (Resident #77) who had developed a Stage II pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough. It may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility resident census was 88 residents. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer (PU)/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol policy, revised April, 2018 showed the physician will order pertinent treatments, including pressure reduction surfaces and identify medical interventions related to wound management. 1. Review of Resident #77's admission Record showed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of refusal of enteral feeding via feeding tube called Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (is a surgery to place a feeding tube also called a PEG or G-tube) and physician order for total amount caloric formula to be given in a 24 hour period, for one sampled resident (Resident #4) who's at risk for weight loss due to decline health, refusal of treatment and cares out of 18 sampled residents. The facility resident census of 88 residents. Review of the facility Policy for Medication Orders revised on 11/2014 showed: -Enteral feedings orders: when recording orders for enteral tube feedings, specify the type of feeding, amount, frequencies of the feeding and rationale if as needed. -The order should always specify the amount of flushing following the feeding. Review of the facility Enteral Tube feeding via a Pump revised on 11/2018 showed: -Document the average fluid intake per day. -If the resident refused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to puree (to make food into a paste or a thick liquid suspension which is made from finely ground cooked food) turkey into a smooth texture that was not stringy. This practice potentially affected three residents with pureed diets. The facility census was 88 residents. 1. Review of the recipe for pureed turkey showed: - Place turkey roasts in oven at a temperature of 375 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) and roast for 3-4 hours. [NAME] until an internal temperature of 165 ºF was reached. - Remove from oven and allow turkey breast to rest for 15 minutes prior to carving. - Hold at 135 ºF or greater, for service. - For pureed step do the following: Remove the desired number of servings and add nutritive liquid such as milk, broth etc. Blend until desired consistency. Add approved thickener to achieve desired consistency if needed. Observation on 5/19/24 from 12:57 P.M. through 1:00 P.M., showed the following: - DC A did not have the recipe book open. - Dietary [NAME] (DC) A placed 3 servings of (3-4 ounces per serving) into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and enhance one sampled resident's (Resident #2) feelings of self-worth and self-esteem, when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A, was disrespectful and rude out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 93 residents. On 8/14/23, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 8/1/23. The facility administration was notified on the same day of the incident and the investigations were started. Facility staff were educated on Dignity, Respect, and Abuse policy, resident intervention and behaviors before the start of the next shift. Resident care plans were updated. The deficiency was corrected on 8/1/23. Review of the facility policy titled, Dignity, dated 2/2021 showed: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. -Resident were treated with respect at all times. -The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and self-worth for three sampled residents (Resident #14, #44 and #81) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility Resident rights policy revised 12/2016 showed the resident had the right to be treated with kindness, respect, and dignity. 1. Record review of Resident #14's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Diabetes Mellitus (a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin). -Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA, stroke), cerebral artery occlusion with infarct (a blockage in the one or more of the arteries supplying blood to the brain resulting in a stroke). Record review of the resident's Care Plan dated 5/17/22 showed the resident: -Was independent with eating. -Needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of residents needs and preferences to create a home-like environment by serving meals on Styrofoam plates or container and serving beverages in Styrofoam cups for six sampled residents (Resident #3, #340, #14, #44, #84 and #72) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of facility policy entitled Homelike Environment revised February 2021 showed: -Residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. -Staff provided person-centered care that emphasized the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. -The facility staff and management maximized, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflected a personalized, homelike setting. -The facility staff and management minimized, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the right to self-determination and choices by not providing access to food when hungry and/or reasonable access to beverages for seven sampled residents (Residents #12, #21, #87, #14, #44, #3, and #4); and to assist with getting out of bed, getting dressed, and taken to the dining room when requested for one sampled resident (Resident #14) out of 19 sampled residents. This potentially effected all facility residents who were able to consume beverages and food provided by the facility kitchen. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility Resident Rights policy revised December 2016 showed the following rights: -A dignified existence. -Be treated with respect, kindness and dignity. -Self-determination. Record review of the facility Dignity policy revised February 2021 showed: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Employee Disqualification List (EDL), Criminal Background Checks (CBC) and Nurse Aide (NA) Registry checks were completed to ensure potential employees did not have a Federal Indicator (FI - a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) in accordance with the state and federal regulation prior to hire on four out of ten employees sampled. The facility census was 95 residents. Record Review of the Missouri Revised Statute Chapter 660, Section 660.317 showed, prior to allowing any person who has been hired as a full time part time or temporary position to have contact with any patient or resident, the provider shall, or in the case of temporary employees hired through or contracted for an employment agency, the employment agency shall prior to sending a temporary employee to a provider: -Request a criminal background check as provided in section 43.540, RSMo. Completion of an inquiry to the highway patrol for criminal records that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plan meetings were held on admission and quarterly and to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s), and an explanation was not included in the residents medical record why the participation of the resident and residents representative was determined to impractical for the development of the resident's care plan for three sampled residents (Resident #3, #68, and #84) out of 19 sampled residents. This potentially effected all facility residents who could participate in care plan meetings. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of facility policy titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team revised September 2013 showed: -The facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team was responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. -A comprehensive care plan was developed within seven days of completion of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Acetaminophen (an over the counter pain medication) orders were clarified to include parameters (a numerical or other measurable factor) for maximum dose per day for four sampled residents (Resident #68, #37, #72 and #84); and to ensure the pain medication order was confirmed and continued upon admission to the facility for one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018 showed: -The physician and nursing staff would review the details of any recent hospitalization. -The physician would help identify medications and medication combinations that were associated with adverse consequences that could cause significant changes in condition. Record review of the facility Administering Medication's policy, revised April 2019 showed: -If a medication dosage was believed to be excessive for a resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staffing levels were adequate to meet the needs of the residents based on their acuity; and to ensure staffing levels were adequate to get residents dressed, out of bed, and to meals for two sampled resident (Resident #14 and #81) out of 19 sampled residents. This deficient practice potentially affected all residents who needed assistance with Activities of Daily Living(ADL's-dressing, transfers eating, mobility). The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's staffing policy dated 10/2017 showed: -The facility provided sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care an services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and facility assessment. -Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff were determined by the needs of the residents based on the plan of care. Record review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, updated 4/15/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not subjected to unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs which affect psychic function, behavior, or experience); to ensure pro re nata (PRN, as needed or indicated) antipsychotic medications (a group of drugs affecting mental functioning such as mood, behavior, or thinking processes, commonly used to treat psychosis) were not prescribed for more than 14 days; to ensure an oral medication was ordered to try a lower dose of medication for behaviors; and to ensure non-pharmacologic interventions were implemented prior to administering PRN Intramuscular (IM) antipsychotic medication for two sampled residents (Resident #25 and #14); and to ensure documentation showed monitoring of behaviors and response to medications for one sampled resident (Resident #68) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Antipsychotic Medication Use policy, revised December, 2016 showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had sufficient alternate food choices at breakfast including one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of 19 sampled residents. This deficient practice potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Frequency of Meals policy revised 7/2017 showed alternate meals would be offered to residents who choose to eat non-traditional or outside of scheduled meal times. 1. Record review of the facility's undated Spring/Summer Menu Cycle showed: -The breakfast meal was outlined daily with food and beverages. -There was no alternate meal listed for breakfast. Record review of the facility's untitled, undated, alternate menu showed: -The alternate meal choices were lunch and dinner items. -There were no breakfast items listed for daily alternatives. During an interview on 9/19/22 at 10:35 A.M. Dietary Aide (DA) A said he/she was not aware of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's wishes for advanced directives related to a Do not Resuscitate (DNR a directive indicating that, in case of respiratory or cardiac failure, the resident or legal representative had directed that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - a lifesaving technique involving hard, fast chest compressions and/or rescue breaths/oxygen supplementation used when someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) code statuses were communicated to direct care staff and the physician and were reflected on the Physician Order Sheet (POS) and Care Plan for one sampled resident (Resident #42) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy, revised 12-16-22 showed: -Upon admission the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive (a written instruction, such as a living will (a document specifying a person's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to failed to notify the resident's physician when there was a missed medication and when blood sugars continued to be elevated for one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised February 2021 showed: -The facility would promptly notify the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident representative of a change in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. -The nurse would notify the resident's attending physician when that had been: -A need to alter resident's medical treatment significantly. -Significant change in the resident's physical condition. -A significant change of condition is major decline in the resident's status that: -Would not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff of by implementing standard disease related clinical interventions. -Impacted more than one area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of resident abuse were reported to the State immediately or no later than two hours after the allegation was made for an incident of abuse involving two out of 25 sampled residents. Resident #25 was witnessed punching Resident #81, resulting in a bloody nose requiring an emergency room (ER) visit. The facility census was 99 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy, revised 7/2017, showed staff are required to immediately report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment or a crime against a resident. 1. Record review of Resident #81's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning), date 8/22/22, showed the resident: - admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -diagnoses including Dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of resident abuse by not conducting interviews and/or obtaining statements from all witnesses and by not reviewing pertinent information from nursing notes and incident reports and using the information to determine if abuse occurred. This deficient practice affected two residents (Resident #81 and #11) out of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 99 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy, revised 7/2017, showed: -The Administrator will ensure any further potential abuse is prevented. -The individual conducting the investigation will, at minimum: --Review completed documentation. --Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading to incidents. --Interview persons reporting the incident, any witnesses, the residents and their roommates as appropriate, alleged perpetrator, attending physician to determine the resident's cognitive function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative in writing of a discharge including the reason for the transfer for one sampled resident (Resident #90) out of three sampled closed records. The facility census was 95 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #90's admission Record showed the resident: -Was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of lung cancer. -Was at the facility for a rehabilitation stay. Record review of the resident's Discharge Instructions for Care form dated 8/1/22 showed the resident was being discharged to home. Record review of the resident's Progress Notes on 9/19/22 showed no information regarding a discharge transfer notice being given to the resident. During an interview on 9/20/22 at 9:24 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) B said: -He/she completed the nursing part of the discharge including discharge medications. -He/she was not aware of a transfer/discharge letter that needed to be given to the resident upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the follow through of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) recommendations and integrate the recommendations into the care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #90) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring policy revised 2019 showed the Level II PASARR report would be used when conducting the resident assessment and developing the care plan. 1. Record review of Resident #90's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Anxiety Disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of persistent anxiety). -Major depressive disorder (a state of intense sadness or despair that has advanced to the point of being disruptive to an individual's social functioning and/or activities of daily living). -Bipolar disorder (a mental disorder that causes unusual shifts in mood,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or his/her representative with a copy of the baseline care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #341) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility policy Care Plans-Baseline revised December 2016 showed: -A baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate needs would be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission. -The interdisciplinary team would review the health practitioner's orders and implement a base line care plan that met the resident's immediate care needs. -The baseline care plan would be used until staff conducted the comprehensive assessment and developed an interdisciplinary person-centered care plan. -The resident and his/her representative would be provided a summary of the baseline care plan. 1. Record review of Residents #341's admission record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a recapitulation of stay was completed; to have a clear discharge plan after a rehabilitations stay, and to document the disposition of belongings upon discharge for one sampled resident (Resident #90) out of three sampled closed records. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's policy Discharge Summary and Plan revised 12/2016 showed: -When the facility anticipated a resident discharge to a private residence, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan would be developed. -The discharge summary would include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility and a final summary of the resident's status upon discharge. 1. Record review of Resident #90's admission Record showed the resident: -Was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of lung cancer. -Was at the facility for a rehabilitation stay. Record review of the resident's Discharge Instructions for Care form dated 8/1/22 showed: -The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident-centered activities program that provided daily meaningful involvement in activities of choice and included opportunities for individual expression, creativity, enjoyment, success and a sense of belonging and enhanced the physical, cognitive, and emotional well-being for two sampled residents (Residents #81 and #25) who could benefit from daily 1:1 and/or small group activities out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Activity Evaluation policy, revised June, 2018 showed: -An activity evaluation is conducted as part of the resident's comprehensive assessment that reflects the choices and interests of the resident and is used to develop an individual activities care plan. The resident's lifelong interests, spirituality, life roles, goals, strength, needs and activity pursuit patterns and preferences are included in the evaluation. -The activities director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for pressure-reducing boots for one sampled resident (Resident #81) who had a Pressure Injury (PI - localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) definition of a Deep Tissue Injury showed: -A Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) was defined as intact or non-intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable (skin that does not turn white when pressed) deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration or epidermal separation revealing a dark wound bed or blood-filled blister. Pain and temperature change often precede skin coloration changes. This injury results from intense and/or prolonged pressure and shear forces (resistance, such as gravity, between the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required dialysis (process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine - necessary when the kidneys were not able to filter the blood) receives ongoing assessments of the dialysis site, accurate description of resident's the dialysis site, and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for one sampled resident (Resident #341) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of facility policy Hemodialysis (process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine - necessary when the kidneys are not able to filter the blood) Access Care policy revised September 2010 showed: -Central dialysis catheters (type of access used for Hemodialysis. Catheters are placed under the skin and into a large central vein, preferably the internal jugular veins. Catheters are meant to be used for a short period…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Out of 25 observed medication opportunities, two errors occurred during insulin (Insulin is a hormone that lowers the level of glucose (a type of sugar) in the blood) administration resulting in an error rate of 8%. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility Insulin Administration policy revised September 2014 showed: -Onset of action is the characteristic of how quickly a type of insulin reaches the bloodstream and begins to lower blood glucose (sugar). -Rapid-acting insulin has an onset of 10 to 15 minutes. Record review of the facility Administering Medications policy revised April 2019 showed: -Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. -Factors that are considered for administration times included enhancing the optimal therapeutic effect of the medication. -References including manufacturer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors by ensuring Intravenous (IV) medications were administered as ordered for one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 resident's Record review of policy titled Administering Medications revised April 2019 showed: -The Director of Nursing (DON) supervised and directed all personnel who administered medications and/or related functions. -Medications were administered in accordance with the prescriber's orders, and included any required time frames. -Medication errors were documented, reported, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) team. Record review of facility policy titled Administered Medications by IV push revised March 2022 showed: -Reported to physician, supervisor, and on coming shift any results, problems, or complications that occurred during the medication administration. 1. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MO OP HOLDCO, LLC — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CATRON, MICHAELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/12/2022
LICHTENSTEIN, ELIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/12/2022
MANDELBAUM, CHAIMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/12/2022

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 3%Other / private 13%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$248per resident / day
operating cost
$7,543per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$238per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265362. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next