No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laverna Manor Health & Rehabilitation

904 Hall Avenue, Savannah, MO 64485 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (816) 324-3185 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0568, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$101,967 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $101,967 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-16)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
803 W US Highway 71 · (816) 324-3121 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
205 S US Highway 71 · (816) 324-4211 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
402 E Price St · (816) 324-8108 · Call to confirm hours
Park
202 E Duncan Dr · (816) 324-3315 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
707 S Hall Ave · (816) 324-5700

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.7%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.5%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.8%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.9%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine8.8%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.1%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.992.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.432.331.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.6%CMS range 47.8–78.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.9–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.5–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
57.1%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 60.2 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.39 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-16)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for one of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #63), who was a full code. On [DATE] the resident's visiting family member alerted staff to the resident's room stating the resident had a seizure and was gasping for air. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B arrived and found the resident was not breathing and had no pulse or lung sounds present, and then observed the resident with agonal breathing (abnormal, slow, gasping breaths that happen when death is close, or the heart has stopped). LPN B asked the resident's family member if he/she wanted him/her to begin CPR and informed the family member the resident was gasping, because he/she was trying to get oxygen to his/her brain. Approximately 3-4 minutes after being asked, the family member told LPN B not to perform CPR because it's not what the resident wanted. LPN B did not perform CPR, and the resident passed away at the facility. The facility census was 61.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of one cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) with a known elopement risk and history. On 7/18/24, the resident became combative when staff attempted to redirect the resident back inside the facility from an outside activity, made multiple attempts to leave the facility unassisted, reached the facility parking lot in one attempt, and threw objects out the dining room window. On 7/20/24, the resident eloped out of a dining room window (six feet from the bottom of the windowsill to the grass below) around 4:00 P.M. and was brought back into the facility. The resident was placed on one-on-one at that time until the dining room windows could be secured. The facility staff did not continue the one-on-one or secure the resident's bedroom window. The resident removed his/her window screen and went out his/her second story window (approximately 13 feet 5 inches above the paved sidewalk below) between 8:15 P.M. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to properly transfer one resident (Resident #1), in a safe manner, when the staff failed to ensure the resident's sling was securely connected to the mechanical lift (a mechanical device used to safely lift and transfer people with limited mobility, like the elderly or disabled, from one surface (bed, chair, toilet) to another, using a sling for full-body support, preventing caregiver strain and patient falls) when transferring the resident, and the resident fell from the lift to the floor causing pain to the resident's shoulders and left hip. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents policy, dated July 2017, showed:-In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents; -Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents; -Nursing staff, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food that was palatable, attractive, and at safe and appetizing temperature during meal service, and additionally the facility failed to follow menus. This affected 8 of 15 sampled residents (Residents #10, #12, #18, #15, #4, #32, #49, and #58). The facility census was 61.Review of facility policy Food Temperatures, undated, showed:- All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held, and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F);- All cold food items must be stored at a temperature of 41 degrees F;- Temperatures should be taken periodically to assure hot foods stay above 135 degrees Fahrenheit and cold foods stay below 41 degrees F during the holding and plating process and until food leaves the service area;- Foods should be transported as quickly as possible to maintain temperatures for delivery and service. If food transportation time is extensive, food should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality, when the facility failed to obtain an order to flush a peg tube (a tube placed in the stomach to provide a route to deliver nutrition, medications and fluids) for Resident #6, failed to ensure Resident #1 had a Physician's order for Hospice (end of life care), and failed to ensure a resident (Resident #39) who required crushed medication had an order for their medications to be crushed. These failures affected three of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 61. 1.Review of the facility's policy for Maintaining Patency of a Feeding Tube (Flushing), revised November 2024, showed: - The purpose of this procedure is to maintain patency of a feeding tube. - Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. - For maintaining patency of a feeding tube: Flush enteral feeding tube every four hours with 30 milliliters (ml.), or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff discarded expired medications and biologicals stored in the North medication room and in the North nurse's cart per policy, failed to date opened bottles of Lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) per policy for four of 15 sampled residents (Resident #1, #5, #59, and #67), and failed to date an opened vial of Tuberculin (TB) Purified Protein Derivative (PPD, a skin test used to help diagnose tuberculosis infection) per policy, and failed to date an opened insulin pen for one resident (Resident #56) Additionally, the staff failed to regularly check the refrigerator temperatures that contained medications and failed to defrost the freezer per policy. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility's policy for Storage of Medications, revised 12/2025, showed: -The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. -The nursing staff are responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when facility staff failed to observe proper hairnet procedures in the kitchen, failed to monitor food items for expiration dates, and failed to properly monitor food cooking and serving temperatures. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 61. Review of facility policy Food Temperatures, undated, showed:- The temperatures of all food items will be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal;- All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held, and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit;- All cold food items must be stored at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit;- Temperatures should be taken periodically to assure hot foods stay above 135 degrees Fahrenheit and cold foods stay below 41 degrees Fahrenheit during the holding and plating process and until food leaves the service area;- Pork should be cooked to a minimum of 145…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an antibiotic stewardship program that included consistent monitoring by facility staff for antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use when the facility failed to keep a consistent record of antibiotic use for four residents at the facility (Residents #29, #43, #49, and #66). This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship policy, dated December 2024, showed the purpose of the antibiotic stewardship program was to monitor the use of antibiotics in the facility's residents with seven core elements which included leadership commitment, accountability, drug expertise, action, tracking, reporting, and education. Tracking to include how and why antibiotics are used, the amount of antibiotics used, and tracking adverse outcomes from antibiotics. Education of staff, residents and family regarding the use of antibiotics. Review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship and infection surveillance book showed no tracking of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue advanced beneficiary notice of non-coverage form to notify one resident (Resident #66) of changes in coverage to items and services covered by Medicare and/or by the Medicaid State plan and failed to notify one resident (Resident #70) of their right to appeal a notice of non-coverage of items and services covered by Medicare and/or by the Medicaid State plan, affecting two out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 61.Request of facility policy Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Notice not provided.1.Review of Resident #70's electronic medical record and Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, dated 3/11/26, showed:- A physician's order for the resident's last covered day for Medicare Part A service was 9/25/25;- Progress notes showed the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted on 9/25/25.- The facility was unable to show that a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (Form CMS 10123-NOMNC - A form that informs the resident on their right to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility) in a timely manner and in accordance with guidelines for one resident (Resident #60) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 61.Review of the facility's policy, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised July 2017, showed:- Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes;- The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in accordance with current federal and state guidelines;- Timeframes for completion and submission is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual.Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual for assessment transmission showed the following:- Comprehensive assessments must be transmitted electronically within 14 days of the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter (a thin tube inserted into the bladder through the urethral opening to drain urine), received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible, when the facility staff failed to ensure proper urinary catheter care was performed for one (Resident #29) of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 61.Review of the facility's Urinary Catheter Care policy, dated September 2014, showed:- Use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward;- The facility's policy did not address the use of disposable wipes when providing catheter care. Review of Resident #29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally required assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 1/22/26, showed the resident:- not cognitively intact;- dependent on staff for carrying out activities of daily living;- had diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (a strategy to decrease transmission of multidrug resistant organisms where staff wear a gown and gloves during high contact care for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices) when providing direct care for a resident that had an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin tube inserted into the bladder through the ureteral opening to drain urine) (Resident #29) and additionally, when the staff failed to clean the port of an insulin pen prior to attaching the needle which affected Resident #69. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 2/3/26, showed: - EBP is indicated for residents with wound and/or indwelling medical devices such as urinary catheters and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) had the right to be free from misappropriation when staff failed to follow protocol and conduct an investigation when each resident had missing fentanyl pain patches and staff did not account for the missing patches. The facility census was 55.Review of the facility provided policy titled, Storage of Controlled Substances, dated 8/2020 showed:-Any discrepancy in controlled substance counts is reported to the Director of Nursing immediately; -The Director or Designee investigates and makes every reasonable effort to reconcile all reported discrepancies.1. Review of Resident #2's Medical Record showed:-He/She admitted to the facility on [DATE]-He/She had a diagnoses of Anoxic Brain injury (brain damage caused by complete loss of oxygen to the brain), major depressive disorder, quadriplegia, convulsions, low heart rate, and atrial fibrillation; -He/She had significant cognitive loss; -He/She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one resident (Resident #1)when the physician ordered for the resident to be sent to the hospital for X-rays and an evaluation after the resident fell from a mechanical lift sling and experienced pain, and was not. The facility census was 55.Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Orders, showed: -The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders;-Supervision by a Physician: Each resident must be under the care of a Licensed Physician authorized to practice medicine in the state and must be seen by the Physician at least every sixty (60) days;-A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident;-Orders must be written and maintained in chronological order; -When recording treatment orders, specify the treatment, frequency and duration of the treatment. 1.Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet on 12/9/25, showed:-He/She had the diagnoses of cerebral infarction due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure one resident (Resident #2) was free from misappropriation of his/her property when the resident's narcotic medications were found missing from the facility. The facility census was 58. Review of the undated facility abuse policy included: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation or resident property and exploitation. Review of the Controlled Substances policy, revised April 2019, showed: - Controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift; - Upon receipt: the nurse receiving the medication and the individual delivering the medication verify the name, dose and quantity of each controlled substance being delivered. Both individuals sign the controlled substance record of receipt. - At the end of each shift: Controlled medications are counted at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse doing off duty determine the count together. Any discrepancies in the controlled substance count are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep one resident (Resident #1) safe from sexual abuse when another resident (Resident #2) ran his/her hand up the inside of Resident #1's thighs and grabbed his/her genital area. The facility census was 61. On 5/5/25, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which began on 4/14/25. Upon discovery, the facility administration immediately conducted an investigation and corrective actions were implemented including: Resident #1 and #1 were seperated immediately, the facility staff assessed both residents and neither resident had injuries, Resident #2 was placed on 1:1 monitoring on 4/14/25, Resident #2's physician ordered Sertraline (a medication to treat anxiety and depression) for Resident #2, Abuse training was started for staff on 4/15/25. The noncompliance was corrected on 4/17/25. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, dated July 2017, showed: -Residents have the right to be free from abuse. This includes, but is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of R57's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R57's diagnoses included acute on chronic combined systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, and supraventricular tachycardia. Review of an MDS located in the EMR under the MDS tab, with an ARD of 09/17/24 indicated R57 was taking an anticoagulant agent. Review of R57's active Orders located in the EMR under the Orders tab revealed an order dated 09/07/24, for aspirin low dose oral tablet delayed release 81 mg (antiplatelet agent) but no order for an anticoagulant agent. During an interview on 10/07/24 at 1:15 PM and a second interview on 10/10/24 at 11:54 AM, the MDSC stated she received advisement from a consulting group that aspirin should be coded as an anticoagulant, so she had been coding all residents on aspirin as anticoagulant on the MDS assessment. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 1:05 PM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one of four residents (Resident (R) 42) reviewed for abuse out of 23 sample residents when R23, with a history of hitting another resident, hit R42 in the shoulder unprovoked. This failure had the potential to affect all the residents on the secured unit who were at risk of abuse. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, ''Abuse Prevention Program,'' revised 10/16, revealed our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. 1. Review of R42's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, depression, and psychotic disorder. Review of R42's admission ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/02/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident (R) 29 and R61) reviewed for discharge to the hospital were provided with written transfer/discharge notice that stated the reason for transfer, the place of transfer, and other information regarding the transfer, out of 23 sample residents. This failure has the potential to affect the residents by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised December 2016, showed: .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2. Under the following circumstances, the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge: a. The transfer is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility .3. The resident and/or representative (sponsor) will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident (R) 29 and R61) reviewed for facility initiated emergent transfer to the hospital received a written bed hold notice that included all required information of 23 sample residents. This failure had the potential to contribute to possible denial of re-admission and loss of the residents' home following a hospitalization for residents transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, revised March 2017, showed: Policy Statement. Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representative will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. Policy Interpretation and Implementation.3. Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the resident representatives that explains in detail: a. the rights and limitations of the resident regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and submitted for processing for one of one resident (Resident (R) 14) triggered for no assessment in over 120 days from 23 residents reviewed in the sample. This failure has the potential to adversely affect care planning and care provision for any resident that may not have received a thorough assessment. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Assessments, revised March 2022, revealed: .Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. Comprehensive assessments are conducted in accordance with criteria and timeframes established in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual . Review of the October 2023 RAI Manual revealed on page 2-18: Quarterly (Non-Comprehensive) .ARD [Assessment Reference Date] of previous . assessment of any type + 92 calendar days . On page 2-34: The ARD of an assessment drives the due date of the next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Please refer to Event ID: RX1712 Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure menus were prepared in advance when menus were developed and prepared to meet resident choice when menus were not posted in advance, residents were not offered to choose their menu options, and alternatives were not posted for residents to see. This deficient practice affected three of five sampled residents, (Resident #2, #3 and #4) The facility census was 58.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Please refer to Event ID: RX1712 Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff served food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature when hot food was not served at an appetizing temperature (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4), when meat was too hard to be cut (Resident #5), and when condiments were not offered (Resident #1) for five of five sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5). The facility had a census of 58.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Please refer to Event ID: RX1712 Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to maintain food temperatures during distribution from the kitchen to the steam table and from service point to resident delivery. The facility failed to maintain temperatures out of danger zone and did not temperature check foods on the steam table after reheating in the kitchen and transporting the food to steam table. The facility did not check the temperature of food warmed in the microwave to ensure it was at a safe temperature. The facility failed to cover all foods for transport to special care unit, failed to maintain safe food preparation when they reused meal trays for meal service delivery to other residents in the dining room. The facility failed to ensure their dishwashing temperatures were checked and documented on the temperature log daily. The facility census was 58 residents.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-25 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they cared for residents in a dignified way when they served meals with plastic cutlery and Styrofoam for three (Resident #1, #2, and #3, ) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility provided policy, Resident Rights, dated December 2016 showed: -Rights include a resident's right to a dignified existence. Review of the facility provided policy, Dignity, dated February 2021 showed: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. -The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices and preferences. -Residents are provided with a dignified dining experience. 1. Review of Resident #1 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure menus were prepared in advance when menus were developed and prepared to meet resident choice when menus were not posted in advance, residents were not offered to choose their menu options, and alternatives were not posted for residents to see. This deficient practice affected three of five sampled residents, (Resident #2, #3 and #4) The facility census was 58. Review of facility policy, The Dining Experience, dated 2021, showed: -Dining expererience will be person centered with purpose of enhancing each individual's quality of life being supportive of each individual's needs during dining. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facilty staff) dated 3/17/24, showed: -He/She had a Brief Interview fro Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 and was cognitively intact; -He/She had clear speech, was able to make self-understood and had clear comprehension of others; -He/She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff served food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature when hot food was not served at an appetizing temperature (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4), when meat was too hard to be cut (Resident #5), and when condiments were not offered (Resident #1) for five of five sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5). The facility had a census of 58. Review of facility policy, the dining experience, dated 2021, showed: -The dining experience will be person centered with the purpose of enhancing each individual's quality of life and being supportive of each individual's needs during dining. Individuals will be provided with nourishing, palatable, attractive meals that meet daily nutritional, and/or special dietary needs and food preferences and are served at a safe and appetizing temperature. -Food will be at the proper temperature, texture, and/or consistency to meet each individual's needs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to maintain food temperatures during distribution from the kitchen to the steam table and from service point to resident delivery. The facility failed to maintain temperatures out of danger zone and did not temperature check foods on the steam table after reheating in the kitchen and transporting the food to steam table. The facility did not check the temperature of food warmed in the microwave to ensure it was at a safe temperature. The facility failed to cover all foods for transport to special care unit, failed to maintain safe food preparation when they reused meal trays for meal service delivery to other residents in the dining room. The facility failed to ensure their dishwashing temperatures were checked and documented on the temperature log daily. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Review of facility policy, food temperatures, dated 2021, showed: -The temperatures of all food items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) met on a quarterly basis and included the appropriate attendees; failed to identify, develop, implement, monitor and evaluate system problems. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, revised April, 2014, showed, in part: - This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to actively pursue quality of care and quality of life goals; - The primary purpose of the QAPI program is to establish data driven, facility wide processes that improve the quality of care, quality of life and clinical outcomes of our residents; - The QAPI program has been developed with four strategic elements in mind. 1) Design and scope: the program is ongoing and comprehensive; it involves the full range of services and departments in the facility; it covers all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies as part of their Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, revised April, 2014, showed, in part: - This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to actively pursue quality of care and quality of life goals; - The primary purpose of the QAPI program is to establish data driven, facility wide processes that improve the quality of care, quality of life and clinical outcomes of our residents; - The QAPI program has been developed with four strategic elements in mind. 1) Design and scope: the program is ongoing and comprehensive; it involves the full range of services and departments in the facility; it covers all systems of care and management practices, with priority given to quality care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee that meets at least quarterly and as needed and contains the minimum required members. The facility census was 59. The facility did not provide a policy regarding their QAA committee. The facility was unable to provide any record or minutes of the QAA program. During an interview on 8/25/22 at 4:44 P.M., the Administrator said: - She had been in her position since June; - They have not had a formal QAPI meeting; - The committee would include herself, the Director of Nursing (DON), Social Services, MDS/Care Plan Coordinator and therapy.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy for antibiotic stewardship, revised December, 2016, showed: - Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program; - The purpose of the antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in the residents; - Orientation, training and education of staff will emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship and will include how inappropriate use of antibiotics affects individual residents and the overall community; - Training and education will include emphasis on the relationship between antibiotic use and: gastrointestinal disorders; opportunistic infections; medication interactions; and the evolution of drug-resistant pathogens; - If an antibiotic is indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they designated staff to serve as their infection preventionist (IP) who is responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP). This affected all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's undated policy for infection control guidelines for all nursing procedures showed, in part: - The purpose is to provide guidelines for general infection control while caring for residents; - Prior to having direct-care responsibilities for residents, staff must have appropriate in-service training on general infection and exposure control issues, including: the facility protocols for isolation (standard and transmission based) precautions; the location of all personal protective gear; the location of medical waste disposal containers; the facility exposure control plan; and the facility protocol for occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens; - Prior to having direct care responsibilities for residents, staff must have appropriate in-service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity for four of 15 sampled residents (Residents #27, #47, #159, and #260)when facility staff failed to keep residents clean and groomed, provide showers and incontinent care, transfer one resident to the dining room in a forward facing position, and allow one resident to handle to manager his/her finances. The census was 59. Review of the facility's Quality of Life - Dignity Policy with a revised date of February 2020 showed: - Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well being, level of satisfaction with life, feeling of self-worth and self-esteem; - Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times; - Residents are groomed as they wished to be groomed; - Residents are encouraged and assisted to be dressed in their own clothes; - Residents may choose when to sleep, eat and conduct activities of daily living. 1. Review of Resident #47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they did not hold residents' monies separate from facility money when they did not reimburse residents and/or their responsible parties after the residents were discharged , which affected 19 residents sampled for resident trust fund (RTF) review and review of the facility's Interim Aged Analysis Detail report (Residents #12, #19,#42, #50 #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #311, #312, #314, #315, #316, #317 and #318). The facility's census was 59. Review of the facility's Final Conveyance of Resident Funds and Credit Balances policy, revised April 2014, showed the facility maintains a system that assures a full, complete ,and sparate accounting, according to generally accpeted accounting principles for each resident's funds entrused to the facility on the resident's behalf. The systme precludes and commingling of resident funds with facility funds unless instruction has been obtained and authorizied by the resident/responsible party. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they submitted their current bond to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) for approval after increasing their bond amount covering the Resident Trust Fund (RTF) account which affected all 44 residents who held money in the RTF. The facility census was 59. Review of the DHSS database, which tracks the most up to date information regarding approved bonds for RTF accounts for all facilities that hold resident monies showed an approved bond amount of $45,000, approved by DHSS on 4/14/20. Review of the Resident Funds Bond Worksheet, a form used by DHSS to determine what the facility's bond should be and if they have the appropriate approved amount for their bond, showed: - The average balance for the previous twelve months in the facility's RTF bank account of $53,607.52; - After multiplying this amount by 1.5, the approved bond amount should be $81,000; - The business office manager (BOM) wrote on the form the facility's approved bond amount equaled $100,000. During an interview on 8/25/22 at 2:30 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided transfer or discharge notification to residents and/or their responsible party and the reasons for the transfer/discharge in writing in a language they understood and failed to provide information on those residents transferred to the Ombudsman's office. This affected three of 15 sampled residents, ( Resident #17, #19, and #40). The facility census was 59. The facility did not provide a policy for transfers and discharges. 1. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/2/22 showed: - Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Dependent on the assistance of two staff for transfers; - Extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; - Diagnoses included cancer, coronary artery disease (coronary arteries narrow limiting blood flow and oxygen to the heart) and diabetes mellitus. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff issued a notice of their bed-hold policy prior to/upon transferring three of 15 sampled residents, (Resident # 17, #19, and #40) to the hospital. The facility census was 59. The facility did not provide a policy for a bed-hold with transfers. 1. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/2/22 showed: - Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Dependent on the assistance of two staff for transfers; - Extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; - Diagnoses included cancer, coronary artery disease (coronary arteries narrow limiting blood flow and oxygen to the heart) and diabetes mellitus. Review of the resident's electronic medical record showed: - On 6/2/22 at approximately 8:30 P.M., the nurse was alerted by staff of the resident being unresponsive. The nurse found the resident in bed with eyes closed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of care when staff failed to obtain an order for accuchecks (tests the blood sugar level to determine the dose of insulin) for three of 15 sampled residents ( Resident #5, #29, and #40), failed to follow the facility policy for blood glucose monitoring when staff did not allow alcohol to completely dry before obtaining the blood sugar readings, which affected four sampled residents (Resident #3, #5, #29, and #40). Staff failed to administer eye drops according to manufaturers' guidelines for one sampled resident (Resident #50). Staff failed to administer nose spray according to manufacturer's guidelines for one sampled resident, (Resident #35). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy for obtaining a fingerstick glucose level, revised October 2011, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to obtain a blood sample to determine the resident's blood glucose level; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care which affected three out of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #21, #40, and #209) and the failed to ensure showers were completed for four sampled residents (Residents #19, #26, #27, and #47). The facility census was 59. The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Supporting, with a revised date of March 2018, showed residents who are unable to carry out ADL independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The policy directed the following: - Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care (POC), including appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident when residents were not offered activities. This affected seven residents (Residents #4, #21, #27, #28, #47, #209 and #260). The facility census was 59. The facility did not provide a facility policy or job description for activities as requested. Review of the facility's Quality of LIfe - Dignity Policy with a revised date of February 2020 showed: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well being, level of satisfaction with life, feeling of self-worth and self-esteem; -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times; -Residents are groomed as they wished to be groomed; -Residents are encouraged and assisted to be dressed in their own clothes; -Residents may choose when to sleep, eat and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to be consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent, provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing, preventing infection, and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing. This affected three of the fifteen sampled residents, (Resident #26, #36 and #159). Facility census was 59. Review of the facility policy titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries with a revised date of April 2020 showed: -Preparation: review the resident CP and identify the risk factors as well as interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. -Skin assessment: Inspect the skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care or activities of daily living (ADLs). a) Identify any signs of developing pressure injuries (i.e. color, temperature, consistency.) b) inspect pressure points (bony areas) c) wash the skin after any episodes of incontinence using Ph balanced skin cleanser. d) moisturize dry skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe, free of accidents for six of 15 sampled residents (Residents #2, #28, #29, #50, #159, and #260) when staff failed to complete a gait belt transfer properly and safely for (Resident # #28), failed to ensure staff used a mechanical lift to transfer properly and safely and failed to assess a resident who is a smoker and has oxygen in his/her room without orders. This affected residents (#159 and #260). The facility failed to ensure the floors were dry for three Residents, (Resident #2, #29 and #50). The facility census was 59. Review of facility provided policy titled Lifting machine, using a mechanical, with a revised date of July 2017 showed in part: --General Guidelines 1) At least 1-2 nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. 2) Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks that require; b) transferring a resident from bed to chair, e) toileting or bathing, and f) repositioning. 4)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care when staff failed to properly clean oxygen concentrator filters for three of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #17, #26 and #260) and when staff failed to obtain an order for oxygen therapy which affected Resident #26 and #260. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy for oxygen administration, revised October 2010, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; - Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure; - Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident; - The policy does not address how often the oxygen tubing should be changed or if it should be dated and when the filters should be cleaned. Review of facility provided policy titled Oxygen Administration, with a revised dated of October 2010 shows in part; - Purpose - to provide guidelines for safe oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they staffed a registered nurse (RN) at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week on the day shift, which had to potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 59. The facility did not have a policy addressing RN coverage. Review of their June 2022 staffing schedule showed: - The following days without RN coverage 6/3/22 through 6/5/22; 6/10/22 through 6/11/22 6/13/22 through 6/15/22 6/20/22 - The following days did not have RN coverage during the day shift 6/6/22 6/8/22 through 6/19/22 6/22/22 through 6/28/22. Review of the July 2022 staffing schedule showed: - The following days without RN coverage: 7/9/22 7/21/22 through 7/25/22 7/29/22 - The following days did not have RN coverage during the day shift 7/1/22 7/9/22 7/10/22, had an RN scheduled for 7.5 hours on the evening shift 7/11/22 and 7/12/22 7/15/22 through 7/18/22 7/21 through 726/22 7/30/22 and 7/31/22. Review of the August 2022 staffing scheduled showed: - The following days without RN coverage. 8/2/22 8/4/22 and 8/5/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides met the minimum qualifications which included satisfactory participation in a State-approved nurse aide training and competency evaluation program and who was at least [AGE] years of age. Review of the facility's job description of a nurse aide (NA), dated January 2017, showed the NA works under the supervision of the charge nurse to provide residents with basic bedside care and assistance with activities of daily living in accordance with the standards, policies and practices of the department. NOTE: For continued employment beyond 120 days following date of hire, the NA must complete the state required certified nurse aide (CNA) course of training and pass the examination. Qualifications included the NA must be enrolled in a CNA program. Review of the list of current staff provided by the facility on 8/22/22 showed: - NA B began employment on 10/26/21 as an NA; - NA C began employment on 11/11/21 as an NA; - NA D…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy Drug Regimen Reviews (DRR) were completed and in the resident's medical record monthly for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident #17 and #22). The facility census was 59. Record review of the facility's policy titled Medication Therapy, revised April 2007 showed: -Each resident's medication regiment shall include only those medications necessary to treat existing conditions and address significant risks; -The consultant pharmacist shall review each residents medication regiment monthly.1. Review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: - Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Dependent on the assistance of two staff for transfers; - Required extensive assistance of one staff for dressing and toilet use; - Diagnoses included cancer, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and coronary artery disease (CAD, caused by plaque buildup in the wall of the arteries that supply blood to the heart). Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made five medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error which resulted in a medication error rate of 20%, which affected four of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #3, #29, #35 and #40). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy for administering medications, revised April 2019, showed, in part: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed; - The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering; - When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container; - Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. Prior to administering insulin with an insulin pen, the nurse verifies that the correct pen is used for that resident. Review of the leaflet for Novolog Flexpen, revised 3/2021,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to discard expired medications and biologicals stored within the medication carts and medication rooms, failed to ensure insulin pens had a pharmacy label on them to indicate who they belonged to and failed to ensure medication was not placed in the resident use refrigerator, failed to record temperatures within the medication refrigerator, failed to ensure medication labels matched the physicians order sheet, and failed to ensure the narcotic count was reconciled each shift. This affected nine of nine sampled residents, (Resident #3, #6, #19, #22, #28 #49, #50, #110, and #260 ). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy for storage of medications, revised April 2019, showed, in part: - The facility stores all drugs and biological's in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; - Drugs and biological's used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls; - Drugs and biological's are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to assure staff served food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and acceptable temperature to the residents. The facility census was 59. No facility policy on food temperatures was provided. Observation of the kitchen on 8/24/22 at 9:12 A.M., showed: -All the pureed foods already prepared. During an interview on 8/24/22 at 9:25 A.M., The Dietary Manager in Training said: -He/she prepares the pureed food early so it will be ready for the next meal; -The pureed foods are already prepared and in the oven to be kept up to temperature until serving time; -Lunch was scheduled to be served at or around 12:00 P.M. Observation of the kitchen on 8/25/22 at 6:56 A.M., showed: -All the pureed foods already prepared and on the steamtable. Observation of the regular meal test hall tray on 8/25/22 at 8:A.M., showed: -Scrambled eggs was 83 degrees Fahrenheit; -Gravy was 101 degrees Fahrenheit; -Sausage was 78 degrees Fahrenheit, Observation of the pureed meal test tray on 8/25/22 at 8:58 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a nourishing snack at bedtime and suitable, nourishing alternative meals and snacks that must be provided to residents who want to eat at nontraditional times or outside of scheduled meal service times, consistent with the residents' plan of care. This affected four of fifteen sampled residents, (Resident #17 and #22). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy titled Snacks (between Meal and Bedtime) Serving with a revised date of September 2010 showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide the resident with adequate nutrition. The policy directed the following: - Preparation 1) review the resident's care plan and provide for any special needs of the resident. 3) Check the tray before serving the snack to be sure that it is the correct diet ordered and that the food consistency is appropriate to the resident's ability to chew and swallow. - Steps in the procedure: 1) Place the snack on the over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's Food Storage: Dry Goods policy, with a revised date of September 2017 showed: - All items will be stored on shelves at least six inches above the floor; - All packaged and canned foods items will be kept in clean, dry and properly sealed; - Storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification and date marked as appropriate. Review of the facility's Food Storage: Cold Foods policy, with a revised date of April 2018 showed: - All perishable foods will be maintained at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below; - All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Review of the facility's Environment policy, with a revised date of September 2017 showed: - The Dining Services Director with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff treated one of 3 sampled residents, selected for the closed record review (Resident #61) with dignity and respect when staff held the resident in a four-point physical restraint while they provided perineal care while the resident struggled to free him/herself during an aggressive behavior episode. The facility's census was 59. Review of the facility's Use of Restraints policy, revised April 2017, showed restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms and never for discipline or staff convenience or the prevention of falls. When the use of restraints is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time necessary, and the ongoing re-evaluation for the need for restraints will be documented. The policy interpretation and implementation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for those residents that are incontinent of bladder and bowel and/or have an indwelling Foley catheter. This affected two of fifteen sampled residents, (Resident #26 and #159). Facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy regarding peri care showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the residents skin condition. The policy provided the following direction: - Preparation - review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. - Equipment - wash basin, towels, wash cloths, soap (or other authorized cleansing agent) and person protective equipment (e.g. gowns, gloves, mask etc. as needed.) - Steps in the procedure - *place equipment on the bedside table and arrange the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide one of three sampled residents, selected for the closed record review (Resident #61) the necessary behavior health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility's census was 59. Review of the facility's Behavior Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring policy, revised March 2019, showed: - The facility will provide and residents will received behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance it the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. - Behavioral symptoms will be identified using facility-approved behavioral screening tools and the comprehensive assessment. - Behavioral health services will be provided by qualified staff who have the competencies and skills necessary to provide appropriate services to the residents; - Residents will have minimal complications associated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with the hospice provider in the development of a coordinated Plan of Care (POC) and documentation ensure the residents' receiving hospice services needs are addressed and met, failed to ensure each resident's written (POC) included both the most recent hospice POC and facility's POC to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being. This affected two of the fifteen sampled residents, (Resident #36 and #159). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy regarding Hospice Program services within the facility, with a revised date of July 2017 showed: - In general, it is the responsibility of the facility to meet the resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative, and ensure that the level of care provided is appropriately based on the individual resident's needs. These include: a. 24- hour room and board care; b. Administering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed ensure they provided the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) and the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) forms to notify residents who had been receiving skilled nursing services for physical, occupational or speech therapies prior to being discharged from these services to inform them of their rights to appeal the discharge. This affected two of three residents sampled for this review (Residents #2 and #310). The facility census was 59. The facility did not provide a policy for providing SNFABN and NOMNOC forms. 1. Review of Resident #2's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, completed by the facility showed: - Medicare Part A skilled services episode start date: 4/18/22; - Last covered day of Part A services: 6/24/22; - The facility initiated the discharge and the resident had benefit days remaining; - The facility checked to indicate they did not give notices; social services did not completed. 2. Review of Resident #310's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$101,967 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-03-16
  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-12-12
  • $32,799 — penalty dated 2025-08-11
  • $32,125 — penalty dated 2024-07-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MO OP HOLDCO, LLC — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.3+1.7 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LICHTENSTEIN, ELIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2024
LICHTENSTEIN, ISAACIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2024
MANDELBAUM, CHAIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/11/2024
LAVERNA MANOR PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
CICERO, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
FLETCHELL, KARENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
KRAMER, SHMUELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$143K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 7%Other / private 22%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $143K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$270per resident / day
operating cost
$8,198per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$215per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265787. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next