Parkdale Manor Health & Rehabilitation
814 West South Avenue, Maryville, MO 64468 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (660) 582-8161 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.6% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 18.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.6% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.8% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.8% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.9% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.0% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.3% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.19 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.90 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.4%CMS range 39.7–68.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.8–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 30.4 residents a day — about 35% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect two residents (Resident #31 and #12) right to be free from physical and verbal abuse, when Resident #11, pushed resident #31 against a wall and when Resident #11 ran at Resident #12 with raised fists and threatened to kill him/her. This affected two of three sampled residents (Resident #31 and #12). The facility census was 33. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevent Program, dated December 2016, showed:-Residents had the right to be free from verbal and physical abuse;-The facility will protect residents from abuse;-The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse or mistreatment of residents. I think it would be best to move Resident #11's information to the top since this person was involved in both incidents. 1.Review of Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 04/17/26, showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Supervision with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient number of nursing staff (including aides) to respond to residents call lights timely. This affected three (Resident #1, #2, and #3) of four sampled residents. The facility census was 30.Review of the facility Staffing policy, dated October 2017, included staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident's plan of care. The facility will provide enough staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment.Review of the facility policy titled Answering the Call Light, dated March 2021, included: - The purpose of the procedure is to ensure timely response to the resident's requests and needs; -If the resident needs assistance, indicate the approximate time it will take for you to respond; If the resident request is something you can fulfill, complete the task within five minutes if possible; -If uncertain as the whether or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to identify, maintain, and evaluate concerns for effective resident care. This deficient practice had the potential to not identify issues and/or capture the efforts made in measuring the care and services for 28 residents.The facility census is 28. Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program revised April 2014 revealed, Policy Statement The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility- wide Quality Assurance and performance Improvement (QAPI) program to actively pursue quality of care and quality of life goals. During an interview on 03/14/25 at 12:12 PM, the Administrator was asked about the QAPI Program, and an example of a Performance Improvement Projects (PIP) that was in progress. The Administrator stated they were not currently working on a PIP due to not having the staffing in place to perform QAPI activity. The Administrator was asked how the facility identified issues…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee met on a quarterly basis to work on performance improvement projects (PIP) and track the performance of the PIP. This deficient practice had the potential to not identify or improve the care and services for 28 residents.The facility census is 28. Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan revised April 2014 revealed, Policy Statement This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems. Policy Interpretation and Implementation The objectives of the QAPI Plan are to: 1. provide a means to identify and resolve present and potential negative outcomes related to resident care and services; 2. Provide structure and processes to correct identified quarterly and/or safety deficiencies; 3. Establish and implement plans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice, form CMS-10055, or the Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) form CMS-10123 for Medicare Part A Services when they were no longer covered or coverage was ending for two of three residents reviewed (Resident (R) 24, and R32) out of a total sample of 18 residents. This deficient practice had the potential for residents not to be provided the information about what services may not be covered by Medicare for residents to make an informed decision about receiving therapies.The facility census is 28. Review of the facility policy titled, Medicare Advance Beneficiary Notices dated April 2021 revealed, Policy Statement: Residents are informed in advance when changes will occur to their bills. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. If the director of admissions or benefits coordinator believes (upon admission or during the resident's stay) that Medicare (Part A of the Fee for Service Medicare Program) will not pay for an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to inform the Ombudsman of hospital transfers for two of four residents (Resident (R)8 and R27) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 18. The failure had the potential to cause the Ombudsman to not be aware of any trends or patterns of hospitalization of residents at the facility. The facility census was 28. 1.Review of the Census tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R8 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/25/25 located under the MDS tab in the EMR revealed R8 was discharged from the facility with an anticipated return from the hospital. Review of a nurse progress note dated 02/25/25 at 2:27 PM located under the Prog Note (Progress Notes) tab of the EMR revealed the nurse went to assess R8 and found him to be showing signs and symptoms of respiratory distress. The physician was in the facility at the time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to label and date enteral feedings for two of two residents (Residents (R) 27 and R29) who required enteral feedings out of a total sample of 18 residents. This failure increased the risk of nurses not knowing if the correct formula and rate was being provided and what date the formula was hung. The facility census is 28. Review of the policy titled Enteral Feeding via Continuous Pump revised November 2018 revealed . On the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered, and initial that the label was checked against the order . 1.Review of R27's Face Sheet located in the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of R27's Physician orders located in the Order tab in the EMR dated 08/15/24, revealed .NPO [nothing by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate a new PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level One for one of four residents (Resident (R) 21) reviewed for PASARR to reflect new psychiatric diagnoses out of a total sample of 18 residents. The failure to maintain a PASARR Level One that reflected the new diagnoses of R21 had the potential to delay or limit necessary assistance should R21 experience a psychiatric episode that disrupted her daily life. The facility census is 28. Review of the Census tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R21 was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Level One Nursing Facility Pre-admission Screening for Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability, or Related Condition signed by the hospitalist on 11/30/21 prior to R21's admission to the facility and provided by the Administrator revealed the screening form contained the demographics fields to be complete, but the medical/psychiatric questions were unanswered, and the fields…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level One for one of four residents (Resident (R)21) reviewed for PASARR to reflect a positive or negative screen result out of 18 sample residents. The failure to maintain a PASARR Level One that reflected either a positive or negative screen result had the potential to limit or delay the assistance needed for R21 should R21 experience a psychiatric episode. The facility census is 28. Review of the Census tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R21 was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Med Diag (Medical Diagnoses) tab of the EMR revealed that R21 was diagnosed with morbid obesity and dysphagia. There was no reference to a psychiatric diagnosis. Review of the Level One Nursing Facility Pre-admission Screening for Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability, or Related Condition signed by the hospitalist on 11/30/21 prior to R21's admission to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided per resident preference for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident (R)18). This deficient practice had the potential for residents dependent on staff to not maintain personal hygiene and not maintain participation in activities of daily living. The facility census is 28. Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018, revealed, Policy Statement: Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation l. Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services to ensure that their activities of daily living (ADLs) do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the recommendations to obtain weekly weights for one of two residents (Resident (R) 27) reviewed for nutrition out of a total sample of 18 resident which caused inadequate tracking of weight loss or gain. The facility census is 28. Review of the facility's policy titled Weighing and Measuring revised March 2011 revealed .The purpose of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident, and provide a baseline height in order to determine the ideal weight of the resident . Review of the Face Sheet located in the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen (O2) concentrators had dust free filters on the inlet where the air came into the machine for one of two residents (Resident (R) 25) reviewed for oxygen usage out of a total sample of 18 residents. This deficient practice had the potential for increased chance of infection and unnecessary respiratory treatment. The facility census is 28. Review of the facility's policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)- Prevention of Infection revised November 2011, revealed, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff. Steps in the Procedure Infection control considerations Related to oxygen Administration. 9.Wash filters from oxygen concentrators every seven days with soap and water. Rinse and squeeze dry. 1. Review of R25's undated Face Sheet located in R25's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated diagnoses to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assure staff followed acceptable standards of practice for one (1) of the five (5) sampled residents, (Resident #1), when staff failed to follow provider orders, remove a resident's surgical staples in a timely manner, and charted that the surgical staples had been removed per provider orders and were not actually removed. The facility census was 24. The facility did not provide policies and procedures relating to physician orders and weekly skin assessments. Review of the facility's policy for Wound Care, revised October, 2010, showed: - The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing; - Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure; - Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident; - The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: - (1.) The type of wound care given. - (2.) The date and time the wound care was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to promote an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives when staff did not offer evening (HS) snacks to all residents. This affected eight of 12 sampled residents, (#1,#2, #4, #9, #12 and #16) and other residents who attended the resident group interview. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility's policy for serving snacks between meal and bedtime, revised September 2010, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to provide the resident with adequate nutrition; - Review the resident's care plan and provide for any special needs of the resident; - The person performing this procedure should record the following information in the resident's medical record: the date and time the snack was served; the amount of snack eaten by the resident; if the resident refused the snack, the reasons why and the intervention taken. 1. Review of Resident #9's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During an interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) approved surety bond that was equal or greater than one and one-half times the average monthly balance for the residents' personal funds for the last 12 consecutive months from July 2022 through June 2023. This has the potential to affect all residents who had money in the trust account. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility policy, Surety Bond, dated March 2021, showed: -Our facility has a current surety bond to assure the security of all residents' personal funds deposited with the facility; -A surety bond is an agreement between the facility, the insurance company, and the resident or the State acting on behalf of the resident, wherein the facility and the insurance company agree to compensate the resident for any loss of resident's funds that the facility holds, accounts for, safeguards, and manages; -This facility holds a surety bond to guarantee the protection of residents' funds managed by the facility on behalf of its residents; -All funds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they utilized the correct Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of non- coverage (SNFABN) form (a form that provides information to residents/beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility), for two of three residents sampled for beneficiary notifications (Residents #5 and #12). The facility census was 22. Review of the facility policy, Medicare Advance Beneficiary Notice, dated April 2021, did not address the utilization of the correct 2020 dated ABN form. Review of Resident #5's Beneficiary Notice CMS-10055 form showed his/her last covered day of Part A services was 2/28/23. The resident signed the form on 2/16/23. The facility did not use the most updated form from 2020. The facility issued the old form dated 2018. Review of Resident #12's Beneficiary Notice CMS-10055 form showed his/her last covered day of Part A services was 2/28/23. The residents' representative signed the form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment when staff failed to: properly clean resident room floors, properly strip and re-wax to maintain tiles around the base of resident toilets. Additionally, the facility failed to repair damaged base boards in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], fix a dragging door to restroom in room [ROOM NUMBER], and repair a damaged circular metal floor plate in the 500 hall; As well as failure to maintain the entrance to the facility by not removing spider webs, and a bird's nest from above main entry doors. This effected the quality of life for all residents in the facility. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility policy on floor cleaning and maintenance dated December of 2009, showed: - Floors shall be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; - All floors shall be mopped/cleaned/vacuumed daily in accordance with our established procedures; - Floor cleaning procedures are maintained by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care which included measurable objectives and timeframe's for two sampled resident, (Resident #24 and Resident #9). Staff failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care that addressed hearing issues for Resident #9 and develop a plan of care to address Resident #24's diagnosis of a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder that develops in some people who have experienced a shocking, scary or dangerous event). The facility census was 22. Review of the facility's Comprehensive, Person-Centered Care Plan Policy, revised December 2016, showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will include: o Measurable time tables o Describe services that are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for two residents out of the two sampled closed resident records (Resident #15 and Resident #28). The facility census was 22. The facility did not provide a policy addressing discharge summaries. 1. Review of Resident #15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 4/28/23 showed: - No cognitive impairment; - Assistance of one staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's); - Diagnosis included, high blood pressure and depression; - Resident planned to return to the community. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/21/23 showed: -The resident is a full code; -The resident would like to return home following his/her rehabilitation stay. Review of the nurses' notes dated 5/5/23 at 9:16 A.M. showed the resident left the facilty with a friend. Review the of resident's medical record did not show a discharge summary. During an interview on 8/3/23 at 5:40 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that seven of 12 sampled residents (Residents #1, #20, #12, #2, #16 #19, #23), who required staff assistance, were provided with adequate assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's: tasks completed to care for oneself daily such as bathing, dressing, moving from a chair to bed, and personal hygiene), as well as failed to provide proper incontinence care for Residents #16, #23, The facility census was 22. Review of the facility ADL policy dated March 2018, showed: -Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene; -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility accidents or injuries when transferring two sampled residents (Resident #11 and Resident #12) during the use of a mechanical lift transfer. The facility census was 22. Review of the manufactures instructions for the Drive mechanical lift, dated July 2020 showed: -Keep the legs of the lift in the closed position while transferring the resident; -Do not lock the rear casters of the patient lift when lifting an individual; -Locking the rear castors could cause the patient lift to tip. 1. Review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS (a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 5/17/23, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Receiving Hospice services; -Diagnoses included, dementia, high blood pressure, kidney disease and diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents #14 and #19) when staff failed to: effectively clean oxygen concentrator filters, properly install oxygen concentrator humidifier bottles, properly label and date oxygen concentrator tubing bags, and additionally failed to follow a physician order by providing the accurate amount of ordered oxygen liters. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility's oxygen administration policy, dated October 2010, showed: - The purpose of the policy is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; - Staff is to review the physician's order for oxygen administration; - A humidifier bottle is necessary when performing this procedure; - Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered; - Check the humidifying jar to be sure they are in good working order and are securely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents due to extended call light response times, which affected seven of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #1, #2, #5, #9, #11, #16 and #19), failed to provide showers for Resident #1, #2, #16 and #19, and failed to provide a bedtime snack for Resident #1, #2, #4, #9, #12 #16 and #19, and other residents who attended the resident group interview. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility's policy for answering call lights, revised March 2021, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs; - If the resident needs assistance , indicate the approximate time it will take for you to respond; - If the resident's request requires another staff member, notify the individual; - If the resident's request is something you can fulfill, complete the task within five minutes if possible; - If you are uncertain as to whether…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census was 22. The facility did not provide a policy for RN coverage. Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal data (PBJ- a report that provides staffing data set information submitted by nursing homes on a quarterly basis) for Quarter 2 2023 (January 1 to March 31) showed no RN hours on 1/1, 1/14, 1/15, 2/6, 2/11, and 2/12. Review of staffing sheets confirmed there was no RN hours on 1/1, 1/14, 1/15, 2/6, 2/11, and 2/12. Review of staffing schedules for May 2023 showed no RN on the following days: 5/3, 5/4, 5/8, 5/10, 5/11, 5/12, 5/13, 5/14, 5/16, 5/18, 5/19, 5/22, 5/26, and 5/30. Review of daily staffing sheets for May 2023 showed no RN hours on 5/13, 5/14, 5/19, 5/21, 5/27, and 5/28. Review of staffing schedules for June 2023 showed no RN on the following days: 6/1, 6/2, 6/6, 6/7, 6/8, and 6/12 through 6/30. Review of daily staffing sheets for June 2023 showed no RN hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made nine medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error which resulted in a medication error rate of 36%, which affected five sampled residents, (Resident #2, #6, # 9, #18, and #19). The Facility census was 22. Review of the facility's policy for administering medications, revised April 2019, showed: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; - The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review of the facility's policy for nasal administration, revised 8/20, showed in part: - Medications will be administered in a safe and effective manner. The guidelines in this policy detail how to administer nasal sprays or drops; - When required by manufacturer, prime the pump by holding the bottle upright and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and failed to have a plan that contained all required elements. Facility census was 22. Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy dated February 2020, showed: - The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for residents; - The QAPI program will provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life; - The QAPI program will provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators; - The QAPI program will reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care and services; - The QAPI program will establish systems through which to monitor and evaluate corrective actions; - The owner and/or governing board…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, data-driven quality assessment and assurance (QAA) activities and a quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program that focused on outcomes of care and quality of life when they failed to provide documentation and evidence of its ongoing QAA/QAPI program. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy dated February 2020, showed: - The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for residents; - The QAPI program will provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life; - The QAPI program will provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators; - The QAPI program will reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee that meets at least quarterly and as needed and contains the minimum required members. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy dated February 2020, showed: - The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for residents; - The QAPI program will provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life; - The QAPI program will provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators; - The QAPI program will reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care and services; - The QAPI program will establish systems through which to monitor and evaluate corrective actions; - The owner and/or governing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and review their infection control polices at least annually, and additionally failed to provide care in a manner to prevent infections or the possibility of acquiring infections when they did not change their gloves or wash hands between dirty and clean tasks which affected Resident #23. The facility additionally failed to ensure that new staff received tuberculin skin testing and that it was completed prior to new employees working, which could have an an negative impact on all residents. The facility census was 22. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Policy, with a revision date of October 2018, showed: -An infection and control program is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections; -The elements of the infection and control program consist of procedures, surveillance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain the ability to communicate for one of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #9). The facility census was 22. The facility did not provide a policy related to scheduling appointments for residents. 1. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/5/23 showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Minimal difficulty with hearing; - Required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility; - Dependent on the assistance of two staff for transfers; - Upper and lower extremity impaired on both sides; - Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF, accumulation of fluid in the lungs and other areas of the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, obstruction of air flow that interferes with normal breathing), dementia and anxiety. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 7/20/23 showed it did not address the resident's hearing issues. Observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed assess one resident (Resident #24) for a history of trauma and provide trauma informed care for a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that is triggered by a terrifying event). The facility census was 22. Review of the facility's Trauma Informed Care policy, revised March 2019, showed: -The purpose of this policy is to guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specify to individuals that have experienced trauma; -All staff are provided in-service training about trauma and its impact on health and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that is triggered by a terrifying event); -Nursing staff are trained on trauma assessment and how to identify triggers associated with re-traumatizing the resident; -Caregivers are taught strategies to help eliminate or mitigate a resident's triggers; -The comphrensive assessment should be used as a screening tool to identify a history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-09-01 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide residents with Saturday mail delivery. This affected all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 30. 1. Review of the undated Resident Rights policy showed: - The right to have communication with and access to people and services inside and outside of the facility. - The right to exercise his/her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident of the United States. - The right to have access to a telephone, email, and mail. - The right to communication in person, by mail, email, and telephone with privacy. 2. No mail delivery policy was provided. 3. During the resident council meeting on 8/25/21 at 2:30 P.M. the resident's said: - They do not regularly get their mail delivered on Saturday's. - Five out of 11 residents said they would like to get their mail delivered on Saturday's. 4. During an interview on 8/27/21 at 10:28 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said: - Yes, the resident's get their mail delivered on Saturdays. - He/she does not know who is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN), other than the Director of Nursing (DON), for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. This affected all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of the staffing schedule dated, July, 2021, showed two days where the facility did not have an RN working. Review of the staffing schedule dated, August, 2021, showed six days where the facility did not have an RN working. During an interview on 8/24./21, at 11:12 A.M., the Administrator said: - The Interim DON is the Corporate Nurse; - The new DON will start on 9/1/21. During an interview on 8/27/21, at 4:39 P.M., the Interim DON said: - The facility does not have an RN to work eight hours a day, seven days a week.
- Potential for harm · F2021-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure store food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen and dry storage area in a sanitary manner. This affects all residents who receive their food from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 30. Observation on 8/24/2021 at 12:31 P.M. of the kitchen showed: -the floor under the dishwashing sink was dirty with debris and dark matter -a substance was splattered several places on the ceiling, near the center of the ceiling and above the door by the dishwasher -a black matter on the floor along the edging below the cabinets -the fire extinguisher is resting on the floor -the underside of the hood above the stove is dirty with grease and dust -the drain for the griddle is dirty with grease and food particles -vent over the hanging pots and pans is dusty -the large trash can near the stove does not have a lid -a frozen coffee drink belonging to staff in the large stand up freezer -an open package of sausage patties,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they conducted a complete criminal background check (CBC) through the Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) for one of five staff members hired since the last full survey and who were selected for review. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, dated August 2006, showed: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual. -The facility conducts employee background checks and will not knowingly employ any individual who has been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating individuals. -Comprehensive policies and procedures have been developed to aid the facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of the residents. The abuse prevention program provides policies and procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-01 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to, within 14 days after a facility completes a resident's assessment, electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) System for quarterly reviews as well as upon a resident's transfer, reentry, discharge and death, which affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #1) and three additionally sampled residents (Residents #235, #236 and #237). The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised July 2017, showed the facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to CMS' system in accordance with current and federal guidelines. 1. Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record (EMR) showed staff opened a MDS in American Health Tech…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff developed, implemented and updated, person-centered care plans that included measurable objectives to meet the residents needs, condition and risks for 4 out of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #4, #5, #7, #23.)The facility census was 30. Review of the care plan policy dated 2001 and revised December 2016 showed: - The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. - The care plan interventions are developed as a result of the comprehensive assessment. - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will include: a. Measurable objectives and goals. b. Describe the services that are to be provided to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being. c. Include the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes. d. Incorporate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents remained free from accident hazards because water from the tap is to hot, which affected 2 (Resident #7 and #19) out of 12 sampled residents, and staff did not use proper technique during transferring with a gait belt (a belt placed around the waist to aid in transferring the residents from one area to another), which affected two of 12 residents, (Resident #19 and #23). The facility census was 30. Review of the policy regarding checking water temperatures included: - The policy was not dated. - The dial thermometer is accurate to 1 to 2 degrees Fahrenheit, however should be calibrated on a regular basis. - The water being tested should run 3 to 5 minutes. - Insert the stem of the thermometer into the stream of running water, fully immersing the sensor. - The temperature should be ready to read after 10 to 15 seconds in the running water. Review of the water temperature log dated 7/28/21 showed: - Temperature of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to assure that staff provided proper respiratory care when the staff failed to date oxygen tubing, failed to properly clean oxygen concentrator filters, and failed to cover nebulizer masks and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) masks. Which affected four of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #7, #19, #17 and #21) . The facility census was 30. 1. The facility did not provide a policy . 2. Review of Resident #7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the staff), dated 5/16/21 showed: - Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used to determine the resident's cognitive status), score of 15, indicating that the resident is cognitively intact. - Activities of daily living (ADLs', activities that a resident is able to complete with no or minimal assistance), dependence on staff for transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene - Frequently incontinent of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff properly stored and discarded resident medications, stock medications, and treatment supplies. Staff failed to date medications when opened and failed to ensure medications are kept in a secure manner. Staff failed to ensure insulin Flexpens were dated when opened, which affected three of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #5, #10 and #28). The facility census was 30. 1. Review of the facility's policy for administering medications , revised April 2019, showed, in part: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; - The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering.; - When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Review of the facility's insulin administration policy, revised September 2014, showed, in part: - The purpose is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes; - The policy did not address insulin pens dated when opened. 2. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received foods prepared in a way to conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance and failed to serve foods that are a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide dietary policies. An observation of the lunch meal service on 8/26/2021 at 12:11 P.M. showed: -The lunch meal consisted of a marinated chicken breast, cooked broccoli, garlic breadstick, cottage cheese. -The broccoli was very mushy and had little flavor. An observation of the evening meal tray on 8/26/2021 at 5:28 PM showed: -The meal consisted of cheesy ham hashbrown casserole, garlic breadstick, lettuce salad with ranch dressing, and chocolate pudding with vanilla wafer cookies. -The casserole was 170.7 degrees, the breadstick 120.6 degrees, the lettuce salad 53.2 degrees, the pudding 54.6 degrees. -The casserole consisted of hashbrown potatoes, ground ham, a cream sauce and melted cheese on top. It tasted of very salty ham. The breadstick was soft and tasted good. The lettuce in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public when they did not keep the parking lot in good repair and failed to maintain all areas of the facility. The facility census was 30. Observation on 8/24/21 starting at 11:00 A.M., through 8/27/21 showed: - The facility's front parking lot with large areas of missing concrete and only gravel. Some areas measured approximately three feet wide in some spots and at least 6 feet long. The concrete had deteriorated from around the joints in the concrete. - Window sill outside rotted on all windows on the west front outside of the building. The two located the furthest from the facility's entrance actually had wood missing, crumbling when touched and peeling away. - Egress doors located on the end of the 100 and 200 halls each had two windows, one large and one small, on the side of the door. The windows had metal frames around them had rusted with the worst places being the metal frame separating the large window from the small window. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to promote an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives when staff did not honor a resident's preferences for bedtime which affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #26) and failed to honor a resident's preference for smoking which affected Resident #5. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's smoking policy for employees, revised May, 2019, showed, in part: - It is the policy of this facility to provide our employees with as near a smoke-free environment as possible and to ensure safe smoking practices for those who smoke; - Residents and visitors: While this policy applies primarily to our staff, certain smoking restrictions apply to our residents and visitors. Residents and visitors are not permitted to smoke in any area that is not designated as a smoking area. Smoking is not permitted in resident rooms. The facility did not provide a smoking policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they notified one of 12 sampled residents' (Resident #26) family when the resident fell. The facility's census was 30. Review of the facility's Falls-Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018, showed the plan did not direct staff when or who to notify when the resident falls. Review of the Resident Incident Review form, part of the facility's electronic medical record program, showed staff should document in the Actions Taken section of the form the name of the physician and family members they notified of the fall, the date/time contact initiated and the date/time responded. Staff also had a line on the form to put the name of the person completing the form. Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/5/21, showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment; - Independent with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-01 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff notified residents and/or their representative when there was a change in one sampled resident's (Resident #9) covered services when he/she was discharged from skilled nursing services and remained in the facility. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy for providing Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN). Review of information provided surrounding Resident #9's discharge from skilled nursing services showed: - Episode start date of skilled nursing services: 5/28/21; - The resident's last covered date of skilled nursing services was 7/15/21; - The facility initiated the resident's discharge from physical therapy and the resident remained in the facility. - Staff did not provide or have the resident or his/her representative sign the SNF ABN to notify them of what services were no longer covered by Medicare if the resident continued to receive them. During an interview on 8/27/21 at 3:00 P.M., the administrator said she did not realize there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an entrapment assessment was done prior to installing quarter side rails on the both sides of the resident's bed, and failed to do quarterly entrapment assessments. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. 1. Review of the Bed Safety Policy dated 2001 and revised December 2007 showed: -To prevent deaths/injuries from the bed and related equipment, the facility shall: a. Maintenance staff shall inspect all of the resident beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. b. Review that gaps within the bed system are within the dimension regulation. The resident's weight, movement and bed position shall be considered as well. c. Ensure that the bed side rails are installed properly per the manufacturer guidelines to ensure proper fit. - The maintenance department shall provide a copy of the inspections to the Administrator and report to the Quality Assurance (QA) committee for appropriate action. - If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they used residents' comprehensive, person-centered assessment to develop and update residents' care plans to ensure the plan directed staff on how to provide care for each resident which affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #234). The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Center policy, revised December 2016, showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. - Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan will be consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his/her plan of care. - Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. - The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the physician order for eye drops matched the mediation label on the eye drops. This affected one resident (Resident #5) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the medication administration policy dated 2001 and revised April 2019 said: - Medications are administered according to the prescribers' orders, including any required timeframe. - Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee to inform process changes and/or the need for additional staff training. - The person administering the medication will check the label 3 times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method/route of administration before giving the medication. Review of the policy for installation of eye drops dated 2001 and revised January 2014 said: - The person administering the eye drops is to wash his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of the pharmacist's recommendations for two of 12 sampled residents, Resident #5 and Resident #21. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy for drug regimen reviews. 1. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 8/10/21, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene; - Upper and lower extremity impaired on both sides; - Had seven insulin injections in the last seven days; - Had seven antidepressants in the last seven days; - Had seven diuretics in the last seven days; - Had seven opiods in the last seven days; - Diagnoses included anemia ( (low number of red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to your body's tissues), diabetes mellitus, low back pain, hemiparesis (muscle weakness or paralysis on one side of the body). Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made two medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, a medication error rate of 8%, which affected two of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #5 and #27). The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's administering medications, revised April 2019, showed, in part: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of the facility's administering topical medications, revised October 2010, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of topical medications; - Prepare the correct dose of medication; - Apply medication: paste, cream, ointment or lotion:removed tongue blade from sterile wrapper. Place medication on the tongue blade and transfer to gloved hands. Warm the medication in gloved hands and apply gently to the skin. 1. Review of Resident #5's physician order sheet (POS), dated August 2021, showed: - An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-15 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal data (PBJ- a report that provides staffing data set information submitted by nursing homes on a quarterly basis) for Quarter 2 2023 (January 1 to March 31) which had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 22 residents. Review of facility policy, Reporting Direct-Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal), dated October 2017, showed: -Staffing and census information will be reported electronically to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) through the payroll-based journal system in compliance with 6106 of the Affordable Care Act; -Direct-care staffing and census information will be reported electronically to CMS through the payroll-based journal system; -Direct-care staffing information includes staff hired directly by the facility, those hired through an agency, and contract employees; -For auditing purposes, reported staffing information is based on payroll records, or other verifiable information; -Staffing information is collected daily and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-09-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to post accurate and current nurse staffing information, in a clear and readable format in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors, per shift , on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy for posting staffing information. 1. Observations from 8/24/21 through 8/27/21 at various times showed the facility did not post the staffing data in a prominent readily accessible place; - The nurse staffing forms were on a clipboard on a shelf at the nurse's station. During an interview on 8/27/21 at 2:43 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said: - He/she had only been working for a couple of weeks; - He/she did not know where the nurse staffing was posted. During an interview on 8/27/21 at 4:39 P.M., the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) said: - She thought it was kept on a clipboard on a shelf at the nurse's station.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MO OP HOLDCO, LLC — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LICHTENSTEIN, ELI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/11/2024 |
| LICHTENSTEIN, ISAAC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/11/2024 |
| MANDELBAUM, CHAIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/11/2024 |
| PARKDALE MANOR PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| BOMAR, SALLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| JEWETT, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| KRAMER, SHMUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $109K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265591. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.