Valley View Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident #10, #9, and #13), in a review of 13 sampled residents, were treated with dignity and respect. Certified Medication Technician (CMT) F was rude and rough during care for one resident, (Resident #10) and the resident said it hurt his/her feelings and made him/her feel angry. CMT F was rough and forceful with Resident #9's care and the resident said it made him/her feel like he/she wasn't worth anything. Resident #13 reported CMT F was condescending and liked to show his/her authority; the resident said it made him/her so angry he/she wanted to punch CMT F in the face. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy Resident Rights, revised December 2016, showed all employees should treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Review of the facility's policy Conduct and Behavior, revised May 2019, showed examples of conduct and behavior that were considered inappropriate and therefore prohibited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-10-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff adequately documented assessments and monitoring of pressure ulcers (any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure, resulting in damage to underlying tissue that usually occur over bony prominences and are graded or staged to classify the degree of tissue damage observed) for one resident (Resident #333), in a review of 22 sampled residents; failed to maintain documentation of communication with the resident's physician on the changes to the resident's pressure ulcers to ensure appropriate treatment and care of the pressure ulcers; failed to ensure the resident's physician or designee followed facility policy to examine the resident's pressure ulcers upon readmission to the facility and to evaluate and document the progress of the pressure ulcers during resident visits; and failed to re-evaluate the need for ordered interventions, including a low air loss mattress, when the condition of the resident's pressure ulcers worsened. The pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff safely transferred two residents (Residents #133 and #21), in a review of 22 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #30), who required assistance with transfers. Staff failed to utilize proper transfer technique when transferring Resident #133, when staff did not use a gait belt and did not ensure the resident wore proper foot wear during a transfer which resulted in a fall with injury. The resident sustained a displaced fracture of the tibia/fibula (ankle) as a result of the fall. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility policy, Managing Falls and Fall Risk, revised [DATE], showed the following: -Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling; -According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a fall is defined as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for two residents (Resident #1 and #7) in a review of 13 sampled residents, to maintain proper grooming to include nail care and personal hygiene. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised March 2018, showed the following: -Resident's will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs; -Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal and oral hygiene; -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight to ensure one resident (Resident #1), did not obtain a lighter and cigarettes within the facility on multiple occasions. The resident was also observed smoking in his/her room wearing oxygen and admitted to staff he/she was smoking in the facility. Staff educated the resident not to smoke in the building and on the smoking policy. There was no documentation any other interventions were put in place or the resident's smoking assessment was updated until 2/19/25. On 2/20/25 during the night, the resident was observed smoking and admitted to smoking in the facility on more than one occasion and was found with two lighters and a half pack of cigarettes. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy titled, Smoking Policy, dated 10/2/24, showed the following: -When the resident requested to smoke, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will assess the resident's capabilities and deficits to determine appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served to residents in a safe and sanitary manner when staff failed to utilize proper hand hygiene and gloving techniques, hair restraint usage, surface sanitation, food storage, and dish handling and storage. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility policy, Food Preparation and Service, revised 4/2019, showed the following: -Food and nutrition services employees will prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; -Food and nutrition services staff, including nursing services personnel, wash their hands before serving food to residents. Employees also wash their hands after collecting soiled plates and food waste prior to handling food trays; -Gloves are worn when handling food directly and changed between tasks. Review of the facility policy, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised 10/2017, showed the following: -Food and nutrition services employees will follow appropriate hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for four residents (Residents #21, #40, #283, and #31), in a review of 22 sampled residents, and four additional residents (Resident #71, #38. #79 and #50). Staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene during personal care for Residents #21 and #71; failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during personal care for Resident #71 who had a gastrostomy tube (a flexible tube that is surgically inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach that allows for the delivery of nutrition and medication directly into the stomach); failed to ensure Resident #40's urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to excrete urine from the body) drainage bag was stored off the floor; failed to ensure Resident #283's wound vac (a treatment device that uses pressure to help close wounds and increase healing) was kept up off the floor while in use;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral hygiene for two residents (Residents #41 and #48), who required assistance with oral care, in a review of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility's policy, Mouth Care, revised February 2018, showed the following: -Purpose of the procedure was to keep the resident's lips and oral tissues moist, to cleanses and freshen the mouth, and to prevent oral infection; -The following should be documented in the resident's medical record; -1. The date and time the mouth care was provided along with the name and title of the individual who provided the mouth care; -2. Complaints of pain or discomfort of the mouth; -3. If the resident refused the treatment, the reason why, and the intervention taken; -4. The signature and title of the person recording the data. (The facility policy did not direct staff on how often they should provide oral care.) 1. Review of Resident #41's undated medical diagnosis record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director or his/her designee attended the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings on a quarterly basis. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility's QAPI Plan, dated March 2020, showed the following: -The Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee was designed to address quality deficiencies through analysis of the underlying cause and actions targeted at correcting systems at a comprehensive level; -QAA committee was responsible for analyzing identified problems, establishing, corrective actions, measuring progress against the established goals and benchmarks, and communicating information to staff and residents and reporting findings to the administrator and governing board; -The QAA committee consisted of the Administrator, all department heads, Medical Director, and Pharmacist. 1. Review of the QAA meeting attendance log, dated 07/30/24, showed no documentation the facility's Medical Director and/or designee attended the meeting. Review of the QAA meeting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #2 and #7) in a review of seven sampled residents, who the facility identified as dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the resident's physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Staff failed to ensure Resident #2 was kept clean and dry, repositioned in bed, provided access to a call light, and had access to water and fluids. Staff also failed to provide incontinence care to Resident #7 for over seven hours when the resident had informed staff. Instead of providing care, staff covered the resident's soiled bed linens with a towel. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, dated March 2018, showed the following: -Residents would be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living; -Residents who were unable to carry out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, in a review of seven sampled residents (Resident #2), who had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to allow urine to drain from the bladder), and who had a history of urinary tract infections (UTI), was provided with urinary incontinence care and indwelling catheter care in a manner to prevent the spread of bacteria that cause infections. The facility had 12 residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility policy Urinary Catheter Care dated September 2014, showed the following: -The purpose was to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections; -Use standard precautions when handling or manipulating the drainage system; -Maintain clean technique when handling or manipulating the catheter, tubing or drainage bag; -Do not clean the periurethral area with antiseptics to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections while the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands and changed soiled gloves after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional practices during personal care for one resident (Residents #2), in a review of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility policy Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated August 2019, showed the following: -The facility considered hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections; -All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections; -All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents and visitors; -Hand hygiene products and supplies shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies; -Wash hands with soap and water when the hands were visibly soiled and after contact with a resident with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of three residents' (Resident #1, #2 and #3) narcotic pain medication when certified medication technician (CMT) A removed one hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a combination medication used to relieve pain containing an opioid pain reliever and a non-opioid pain reliever) 5 milligrams (mg)/325 mg pill from Resident #1's and #3's narcotic medication card and removed two hydrocodone 10 mg/325 mg pills from Resident #2's narcotic medication card and admitted to ingesting them while on duty. The facility census was 81. The administrator was notified on 3/6/24 of the past non-compliance which occurred on 2/27/24. On 2/27/24 the consulting pharmacist was at the facility conducting a random spot check of medications. The pharmacist counted narcotics with CMT A and found medications that were missing from three residents' narcotic cards. The pharmacist asked what happened to them and CMT A admitted to ingesting the medications. Upon discovery, the administrator suspended CMT A, assessed all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$62,733 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $24,786 — penalty dated 2025-02-25
• $37,947 — penalty dated 2024-10-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MO OP HOLDCO, LLC — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $593K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO