Aspire Senior Living Jonesburg
308 Cedar Avenue, Jonesburg, MO 63351 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (636) 488-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.1% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.9% | 17.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.9% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.1% | 17.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.2% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.55 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 81.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 62.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.79 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.93 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to safely transfer one resident (Resident #3) when staff failed to utilize two staff members while using a mechanical lift, the mechanical lift tipped over, which resulted in left femoral fractures, right femur fractures, a bruise to the forehead, and a T12 compression fracture (occurs when the 12th thoracic vertebra) required hospitalization. Facility staff failed to utilize two staff for bed mobility for one dependent resident (Resident #1) which resulted in a femur fracture. Facility staff failed to utilize two staff in a manner to assure resident safety for one resident (Resident #2) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 63.1. Review of the facility's Safe Resident Handling and Transfers policy, dated 10/1/25, showed residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident while keeping the employees safe in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify the physician after a change in condition for one resident (Resident #1) out of one sample residents when staff assisted the resident with positioning, heard a pop and the resident complained of pain. The facility census was 63.1. Review of the facility's Notification of Changes policy, dated 01/30/24, showed the facility must immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his/her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications). 2. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 01/15/25, showed the resident had an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to a diagnosis of left sided paralysis and required two staff for transferring.Review of the facility report, dated 04/21/26, showed the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to meet professional standards of practice when staff failed to complete weekly skin assessments for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 62.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity, dated 01/30/24, showed the medical record will contain all documentation regarding assessment of skin.Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Observation, undated, showed a full body, or head to toe, skin observation will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission and weekly thereafter;The facility did not provide a policy for following physician's orders.2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 09/25/25, showed staff assessed the resident with moderate cognitive impairment.Review of the resident's care plan, dated 12/29/25, showed staff assessed the resident with impaired cognition and at risk for skin breakdown and pressure ulcers.Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify one resident's (Resident #1) out of one sampled resident representative in a timely manner when staff assessed the resident with an open area to the knee and bone protruding through the skin. The facility census was 59. The administrator was notified on 11/18/25 of Past Non-Compliance, which occurred on 10/06/25 when nursing staff failed to notify Resident #1's Power of Attorney (POA) of a change in condition to an old fracture to the right knee with new bone protrusion. Nursing staff completed in-service training on when and who to notify after a change in condition on 10/10/2025. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Notification of Changes, dated 10/01/25, showed the purpose is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident and notifies the resident representative when there is a change requiring notification. The facility must inform the resident and/or notify the resident's legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstances requiring notification include;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to use standardized recipes to prepare foods for service to all residents and serve food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus. Facility staff failed to provide menus with the food items and portion sizes to be served for all diet types utilized by the facility and failed to record substitutions made to the menus. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Service to Residents, dated 01/30/24, showed food will be prepared and served in a manner that meets the individual needs of the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled Menus, dated 01/30/24, showed the policy directed staff that the menus must: -Meet the nutritional needs of the residents in accordance with established national guidelines;-Be prepared in advance;-Be followed;-Reflect, based on a facility's reasonable efforts, the religious, cultural, and ethnic needs of the resident population, as well as input received from residents and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and outdated use and ensure the use of food in a first-in, first-out manner. Facility staff failed to ensure dishes were clean and air dried prior to stacking in storage to prevent the growth of foodborne pathogens. Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff also failed to maintain kitchen surfaces and equipment clean and in good repair to prevent potential contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 59. 1.Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Food in Refrigeration, dated 01/30/24, showed: -Store raw meats on the bottom shelves to prevent contamination of other perishable items; -Food being returned to storage after cooking or preparation must be covered; -All containers must be labeled with the contents and date the food item was placed in storage; -Food items that remain sealed from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to maintain resident rooms. Staff failed to clean and maintain wheelchairs for four residents (Resident #5, #6, #16, and #58) of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Maintenance, dated 01/30/24, showed it is the job of all staff to identify areas of concern regarding the maintenance of the building. Preventive maintenance will occur throughout the year. Review of the facility policy titled Maintenance Work Request, dated 01/30/24, showed when a resident, staff member, or family member recognizes the need for maintenance services, a Maintenance Work Request form will be completed by a staff member. Maintenance personnel will review all Maintenance Work Requests daily, Monday through Friday, and prioritize work to be done. All Maintenance Work Requests will be completed within five days of receipt, unless the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for three residents (Resident #6, #38 & #55) with diagnoses and/or activity preferences out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/30/24, showed each resident will have a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his/her preferences and goals and address the resident's nursing, medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan will be developed by the interdisciplinary team using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, to assess the resident's clinical condition as well as cognitive and functional status and the use of services. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised, based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions, by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to document the required neurological checks (an assessment completed to determine if the nervous system is impaired) and update the plan of care with interventions after falls for four residents (Resident #6, #21, #25 and #34) out of 24 sampled residents. Staff failed to update the fall risk assessment for three residents (Resident #21, #25, and #34) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Fall Incident Reporting and Neurological Checks Policy, undated, showed the purpose is to ensure timely, accurate reporting and monitoring following any resident fall in order to promote safety, identify causes, prevent recurrence, and promptly detect and manage potential injuries, especially head trauma. All resident falls, whether witnessed or unwitnessed, must be immediately reported, documented, and followed by a comprehensive assessment, including neurological checks when head trauma is suspected, or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use proper hand hygiene and provide perineal care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for four residents (Residents #1, #5, #41 and #55) out of five sampled residents. The facility staff failed to implement appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of communicable diseases when staff failed to screen four staff (Nurse Aide (NA) S, Registered Nurse (RN) P, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) Q and NA R) out of 8 staff sampled for tuberculosis (TB), a contagious, air-borne bacterial infection primarily affecting the lungs, in accordance with facility policy. The Facility census was 59.1. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy, dated 01/30/24, showed hands should be washed for at least twenty seconds using soap and water under the following conditions:-Before having direct contact with a resident;-After having direct contact with a resident;-After contact with blood, body fluids, excretions, secretions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide care and services in a dignified manner, when staff propelled one resident (Resident #55) of a sample of 24 residents, down the hall backwards in a mechanical chair and left one resident (Resident #6) of a sample of 24 residents, in the dayroom with clothes soiled with food debris. The facility census was 59.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Protecting, Promoting and Ensuring Resident Rights-Facility Responsibility, undated, showed each resident has the right to a dignified existence. All staff will be advocates for resident rights. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, undated, showed staff should ensure that resident rights are respected, protected, and promoted. Staff should inform residents of their rights and provide an environment in which they can be exercised. Residents do not leave their individual personalities or basic human rights behind when they move to a long-term care facility. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to consistently document the code status as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) or Full Code - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ((CPR) an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions and rescue breathing to restart a person's breathing and heartbeat) on the face sheet, and/or Physician Order Sheet (POS) for five residents (Resident #20, #25, #34, #42 and #53) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 59.1. Review of the facility policy titled Basic Life Support/CPR, dated [DATE], showed the purpose is to ensure this facility is able to, and does provide, emergency basic life support when needed, including CPR, to any resident requiring such care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel in accordance with related physician orders, such as DNR and the resident's advance directives. Potential rescuers will initiate CPR, in addition to calling 911, unless a valid DNR order is in place; and the facility staff must provide basic life support,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain signed consent for bed rail use and failed to assess three residents (Resident #2, #5 and #15) out of four sampled, for bed rail use. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Rail, dated 01/30/2024, showed bed rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attached to the bed. Examples of bed rails include grab bars, assist bars, side rails, and safety rails. Review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation. The Facility should maintain evidence that is has provided sufficient information so that the resident or resident representative could make an informed decision. The Facility will assess the resident's need for bed rails, documentation in the resident's record will reflect this assessment and related information. 2. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete entrapment assessments and regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four residents (Residents #2, #3, #5, and #15) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 59.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Rail, dated 01/30/24, showed assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Ensure the bed's dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size and weight. Inspect and regularly check the mattress and bed rails for areas of possible entrapment. Check bed rails regularly to make sure they are still installed correctly as rails may shift or loosen over time. The facility must also conduct routine preventive maintenance of beds and bed rails to ensure they meet current safety standards and are not in need of repair. After installation of bed rails; it is expected that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to report to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the two-hour required timeframe a resident to resident altercation between two residents (Resident #1, and Resident #2) when Resident #1 slapped Resident #2. The facility census was 56. 1. Review of the facility's abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment policy, dated 1/30/24, showed the purpose of the policy is to ensure all alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse are thoroughly investigated and reported to the proper authorities within the required time frames. All alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made to the administrator of this facility and to other officials to include State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long term care facilities. 2. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from verbal and physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA A) threatened Resident #1 with rough treatment. The facility census was 60. The administrator was notified on 12/24/24 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 12/24/24. On 12/24/24, staff notified the administrator they witnessed CNA A telling Resident #1 he/she would manhandle the resident if the resident did not cooperate with care. Staff immediately suspended CNA A, assessed the resident for injuries, and notified the required parties and agencies. The administrator terminated CNA A on 12/26/24. The administrator in-serviced all staff, on abuse and neglect policies and procedures by 12/30/24. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation Policy, dated 1/30/24, showed the purpose is to ensure each resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, and corporal punishment of any type by anyone. Review showed abuse is a willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an appropriate emergency discharge notice for one resident (Resident #1) and failed to allow Resident #1 to return to the facility when the resident was ready for discharge from the hospital. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the facility's Transfer and Discharge policy, undated, showed staff were directed to: -Ensure resident rights are protected when the facility can no longer provide care or services needed; -The facility must notify the resident at least thirty days prior to the anticipated transfer; -A transfer or discharge will not be done except when the safety of individuals in the facility is endangered, due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident, and as documented/confirmed by a physician; -Preparation and orientation of the resident is essential to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. Sufficient preparation means that the facility informs the resident where he/she is going and takes steps under its control to ensure safe transportation. The facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to maintain walls, floors, lighting, and sink countertops in good repair. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's Physical Environment policy, undated, showed: -The facility will provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public; -The facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to protect the health and safety of residents, personnel and the public; -Resident rooms must be designed and equipped for adequate nursing care, comfort, and privacy of residents; -Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition; -The policy did not contain direction or guidance to report facility repairs or routine inspection of the facility. 2. Observation on 08/20/24 at 10:55 A.M., showed occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on the secured unit with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the bed hold policy for three residents (Resident #27, #50, and #163) of three sampled residents who discharged to the hospital. The facility census was 60. 1.Review of the facility's Bed Hold policy, undated, showed the following: -The facility will notify all residents, and/or their representative of the bed hold policy guidelines upon admission to the facility, at the time of transfer to the hospital or leave and at the time of non-covered therapeutic leave; -If the resident or representative wants to hold the bed, a signed authorization of the bed hold selection notice must b e obtained with each physician approved hospitalization; -Signed authorization must be received within 48 hours of the transfer or leave, if it occurs during the week and by the first business day following the transfer if it occurs on a weekend or holiday. 2. Review of Resident #27's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for three residents (Resident #41, #44, and #164) out of ten sampled residents. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's Care Plan Comprehensive policy, dated March 2015, showed: -The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool; -Assessment of each resident is ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition; -The interdisciplinary team is responsible for the periodic review and updating of care plans when a significant change has occurred, at least quarterly, and when changes occur that impact the resident's care; -A well developed care plan will be oriented to assessing and planning for care to meet the resident's medical, nursing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight (8) consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, reviewed July 2024, showed the facility to have an RN at least 8 hours per day, seven days a week. Review of the facility's Nurse Staffing, dated 08/01/24 through 08/22/24, showed staff did not provide an RN eight hours a day on 8/3/24, 8/4/24, and 8/17/24. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 8:38 A.M., RN K said there are times when there is not an RN in the building and has been times that the only other RN aside from him/her was the Director of Nursing (DON). He/She said the DON tries to keep RN coverage on duty but one is not always available. RN K said he/she fills in when he/she can on the weekends. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 9:26 A.M., the DON said he/she tries to keep RN coverage of 8 hours everyday to include the weekends, but just doesn't always have one available. He/She said a RN has been hired to work every other weekend.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to destroy medications in a timely manner for seven residents (Resident #1, #6, #20, #21, #23, #25, #33, and #37). Staff failed to discard expired medications from one out of two sampled medication carts. Failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and effective manner, by not ensuring medications were properly labeled and contained in their original package until time of administration on two of two sampled medication carts. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated March 2015, showed: -Medications must be stored in the container in which they were received; -No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with established guidelines. Review of the facility's Medication Destruction policy, revised March 2015, showed: -All medications not returned to the issuing pharmacy will be destroyed; -Two licensed nurses or one licensed nurse and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the appropriate qualifications, when the facility did not employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional full-time. This failure has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's Dietary Supervisor (DS) position description, undated, showed the minimum requirements for the position included Certified Dietary Manager Certification (CDM) or equivalent credential required. During an interview on 08/20/24 at 11:03 A.M., the DS said he/she had been the DS for about three years. The DS said he/she started the CDM course a couple of years ago, but never finished. The DS said he/she had not completed other dietary management training. The DS said he/she was aware of the requirement to complete the CDM or equivalent certification. The DS said the dietician comes to the facility about every other month. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 11:45 A.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to close the computer screens from view which showed resident information when left unattended for two (Resident #44 and #46) out of five sampled residents and on two medication carts. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's Protecting, Promoting and Ensuring Resident Rights policy, dated 1/30/24, showed the resident has the right to personal privacy and secure confidential personal and medical records. 2. Observation on 08/21/24 at 2:33 P.M., showed Registered Nurse (RN) J entered Resident #44's room and did not minimize or lock the compter screen on the treatment cart. Observation showed the residents medical information displayed. Observation on 08/21/24 at 2:51 P.M., showed RN J entered Resident #46's room. and did not minimize or lock the compter screen on the treatment cart. Observation showed the residents medical information displayed. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 3:12 P.M., RN J said staff should close the screen or lock it when stepping from the cart to maintain privacy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information in an manor easily accessible for residents and visitors, and failed to include the required data in the posting. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's Nurse Staffing Information policy, undated, showed: -The facility must post the following information daily: facility name, current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), and the resident census; -The facility must post the nurse staffing data as specified above daily at the beginning of each shift; -Must be posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. 2. Review of the facility's Staff Hour Posting, dated July 1, 2024, showed staff did not document the census or document actual hours worked for 28 of 31 days in July 2024. 3. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent or reduce the risk of spreading bacteria, when staff failed to wash or sanitize their hands in between glove changes when providing wound care for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) of four sample residents. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care and Treatment, dated 03/2015, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Hand washing must be done as outlined in the guidelines; -Put gloves on; -Remove the soiled dressing and place in the trash bag; -Remove the gloves and discard in the bag; -Wash your hands and put on clean gloves; -Clean the wound according to the order; -Remove gloves, place in trash bag, and put on a clean pair of gloves; -Apply clean dressing as ordered; -Wash your hands. 2. Review of the Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 01/03/24, showed the staff assessed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain a process to follow generally accepted accounting principles to reconcile the Resident Trust Fund Account monthly. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility staff did not provide a policy for reconciling the resident trust fund. Review of reconciled resident trust bank statement balances and resident trust fund balance reports for the period from July 2022 through June 2023 showed staff did not reconcile the accounts at the end of each month. Further review showed reconciled bank statement and resident trust balances as follows: -July 22 Reconciled bank balance was $65,746.10, Trust balance was $65,218.30; -August 22 Reconciled bank balance was $69,661.05, Trust balance was $68,948.20; -September 22 Reconciled bank balance was $64,744.57, Trust balance was $64,702.08; -October 22 Reconciled bank balance was $65,907.8, Trust balance was $65,865.37; -November 22 Reconciled bank balance was $65,048.95, Trust balance was $65,006.46; -December 22 Reconciled bank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to document residents' code status consistently, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) or Full Code (Resuscitate refers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation-CPR) for three residents (Resident #23, #31, and #48). The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's Advance Directive Policy, dated [DATE], showed: -Upon admission of a resident, the social services designee will inquire of the resident, and/or his/her family members, about the existence of any written advanced directives; -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record under the advanced directive tab. 2. Review of Resident #23's Face Sheet in their Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed staff documented the resident as full code status. Review of the resident's Outside of the Hospital DNR form showed the resident revoked his/her DNR status on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents had a DA-124 Level I screen (used to evaluate for the presence of psychiatric conditions to determine if a preadmission screening/resident review (PASARR) Level II screen is required) completed as required, for three residents (Residents #21, #48, and #52). The census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for PASARR screening. 2. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/15/23, showed the following: -Date of admission 6/1/21; -No screening information regarding PASARR, Level II PASARR, or conditions related to serious mental illness/intellectual disabilities/related conditions; -Diagnoses included major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, facility staff failed to meet professional standards of care when nursing staff did not count scheduled narcotics at change of shift when the medication cart changed from one staff member to another. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's Scheduled Medications policy, dated March 2015, showed: -Scheduled medications will have disposition records that are in a binder on the medication cart or area instructed by the Director of Nursing (DON); -All schedule II, III, IV, V medications must be counted (comparing number of pills to disposition record) at every change of shift by two Certified Medication Technician (CMT)s, or one CMT and one licensed nursing staff; Both personnel must sign verification of correct count for Schedule II, III, IV and V medications; -If, at any time, the count is incorrect, the CMT must notify licensed nursing staff, who will call the DON or designee for instruction. Review of the facility's Narcotic Count policy, dated March 2015, showed: -One Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to assist seven out of fifteen sampled dependent residents (Resident #5, #10, #21, #28, #41, #56 and #57) with grooming and bathing as needed. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy, dated March, 2015, showed the policy did not give staff direction for bathing and grooming. 2. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 6/17/23 , showed facility staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -Totally dependent on two plus persons for transfers; -Totally dependent on two plus persons for toilet use: -Required physical help of one person for bathing. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 5/25/23 showed the goal for the resident was to not exhibit complications of prolonged immobility and would be kept clean, dry, odor free and well groomed. Review of the resident's shower sheets between 5/1/23 and 7/13/23 showed staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards when facility staff failed to ensure electronic cigarettes were kept secure for one resident (Resident #10), failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were stored in a safe manner not accessible to residents, and failed to ensure one resident (Resident #23) took all medications prior to leaving the resident's room, leaving two potassium pills on the resident's bedside table. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy Resident Rules and Regulations, undated, showed the following: - For safety reasons, the resident and any visitor to this facility is hereby advised not to smoke cigars, cigarettes, and vapes except under supervision and/or in designated smoking areas. Residents may not retain matches, lighters, or electronic cigarettes/chargers. 1. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment tool,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to store and label medications in safe and effective manner in one of one medication storage rooms, and one of two medication storage carts. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's Medications, Storage Of Policy, dated March, 2015, showed staff were directed as follows: -No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing Pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with established guidelines; -Medications must be stored in the container they were received in. 2. Observation on 7/13/23 at 8:40 A.M., showed the medication storage room contained one Medline lubricating jelly box of 144 packets with an expiration date of June 2023. Observation on 7/13/23 at 9:00 A.M., showed the 500 hall medication cart contained the following: -One round yellow tablet; -One oval shaped blue tablet; -One orange round tablet; -One oval yellow tablet. 3. During and interview on 7/14/23 at 9:05 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C said all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain and follow current guidance and procedures for immunizations of residents against pneumococcal pneumonia (infection caused by bacteria) in accordance with national standards of practice and failed to offer, administer, and document the administration or refusal of the pneumococcal immunization for two of eight residents (Residents #3 and #41) sampled. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a resident immunization policy. Review of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), pneumococcal and influenza vaccine timing for adults, dated 2023, showed the following: -Four types of pneumonia vaccines are acceptable for adults 65 years or older. PCV13: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar13), PCV15: 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Vaxneuvanc), PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar20), and PPSV23:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to implement policies and procedures for reporting when staff failed to notify local law enforcement agency for a potential theft of pain medication and failed to notify the State Survey agency for a resident to resident altercation after Resident #48 punched Resident #46 in the shoulder. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse policy, dated November 2017, showed: -The nursing home Administrator or designee will report abuse to the state agency per State and Federal requirements; -The facility will ensure that any reasonable suspicion of crimes committed against a resident of this facility will be reported to the appropriate Law Enforcement Agency as established by section 6703(b)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. When there is reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred, then in addition to reporting the allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency, the incident must be reported to the local law enforcement; -The facility will adhere to reporting time frames as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #3) who received tube feeding (supplies liquid nutrition) through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) received the appropriate treatment and services. The census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's Enteral Nutritional Therapy (Tube Feeding) policy, dated March 2015 showed staff are instructed to check the pump flow rate every shift and clear pump at the end of shift to document volume infused. Review of Resident #3's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 4/06/23, showed facility staff assessed the resident as: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Totally dependent for feeding and hygiene; -Diagnosis included unspecified intellectual disabilities, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and aphasia (brain disorder where a person has trouble speaking or understanding other people speaking). Review of the resident's Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility staff failed to review, revise and develop individualized interventions for one resident (Resident #48) who had behaviors and failed to provide the required Nurse Aide dementia training in the past 12 months. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE], showed: -22 Residents have behavioral health needs; -All staff will be trained on hire and annually regarding care and management of persons with dementia; -Certified Nurse Aides will be trained on hire and annually regarding dementia management training. Review of the facility's Census and Conditions dated 7/11/23 showed: -29 residents with dementia or Alzheimer's Disease; -22 residents with behavioral healthcare needs. Review of the facility's Care Plan Comprehensive policy, dated March 2015 showed: -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) with input from the resident, family and/or legal representative will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-08-28 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete the required nurse staffing information to include the facility census. The facility census was 59.1.Review of the facility's policy titled Nurse Staffing Information, dated 01/30/24, showed the facility must post resident census daily at the beginning of each shift in a clear and readable format.2. Review of facility's August daily nurse staffing sheets showed the sheets did not contain a facility census on 08/07, 08/08, 08/12- 08/15, 08/18, 08/19, and 08/25- 08/28/25. 3. Observation on 08/25/25 at 11:49 A.M., showed the facility nurse staff posting located by the nurses' station did not contain a facility census.Observation on 08/26/25 at 10:13 A.M., showed the facility nurse staff posting located by the nurses' station did not contain a facility census.Observation on 08/27/25 at 8:49 A.M., showed the facility nurse staff posting located by the nurses' station did not contain a facility census.Observation on 08/28/25 at 08:35 A.M., showed the facility nurse staff posting located by the nurses'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-14 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to post the telephone number for the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline (used to report allegations of abuse and neglect) in a form and manner accessible to residents and visitors, and failed to post the name, address and phone number for the Long-Term Care Ombudsman and resident rights on the secured unit. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for the required postings. Observations from 7/11/23 at 10:00 A.M. through 7/14/23 at 10:00 A.M., showed the facility did not post the name, address, and toll free telephone number for the Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline in an accessible location for residents or visitors to use if needed or post the name, address and phone number for the Long-Term Care Ombudsman and resident rights in a form and manner accessible to the residents and visitors on the secured unit. During an interview on 7/14/23 at 9:07 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said there are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to review and update their Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) on an annual basis. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program binder, undated, showed it contained a blank cover page to be used to document annual reviews. Review of the facility's Change of Ownership documentation, showed the current facility ownership was effective 6/01/21. During an interview on 7/14/23 at 11:55 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON)/ Infection Preventionist (IP) said the facility's Infection Prevention and Control policies were not reviewed or updated annually. The DON/IP said the new owners provided the manual but he/she hasn't done anything with it. He/She said the policies are supposed to be reviewed every year and he/she did not know why they were not.
- No harm found · B2023-07-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide resident council with a written response to grievances. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy Section 504 Grievance Guidelines showed the policy did not contain direction for staff concerning written responses to a grievance. Review of the resident council minutes for the months of May, June, and July 2023 showed staff did not document they provided a written response to resident council grievances. 2. During an interview on 7/12/23 at 2:40 P.M., resident council members said it takes a long time to hear about concerns brought to the facility's attention from council meeting and they do not get a written response about what will be done from facility staff. During an interview on 7/14/23 at 8:52 A.M., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) L said they take residents concerns to the administrator to check on. During an interview on 7/14/23 at 8:58 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said if he/she could take care of the concern for the resident he/she would immediately. If not the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALVERT, GREGG | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 12% | since 06/01/2021 |
| HARRIS, JERRY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 06/01/2021 |
| STEELE, SHERI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 06/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $202K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.