Linden Place Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 89.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from employee to resident physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident investigated for abuse (Resident #13). Resident #13 had reported to the facility Nurse Aide (NA)#1 needed to feed her roommate correctly. Resident #13 alleged later the same evening NA #1 grabbed Resident #13's face very hard, squeezed her face, in a manner which scared the resident and after the incident the resident was found to have bruising on her right jawline and right cheek. The findings included: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebrovascular accident (stroke), contracture of right hand and forearm, and anxiety disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #13's cognition was intact for daily decision making and she required total assistance with activities of daily living. The assessment indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain in good repair a resident's room door and bathroom sink in 1 of 11 resident rooms and 1 of 11 resident bathrooms on 1 of 2 halls whose room and/or bathroom was observed to have environmental concerns (Resident #48).The findings included:1) An initial observation of Resident #48's room was conducted on 1/5/26 at 1:10 PM. This observation revealed the door latch on the door to the resident's room did not secure the door so that it would remain closed. Accompanied by the facility's Maintenance Director, an observation of the door to Resident #48's room was conducted on 1/8/26 at 4:00 PM. When the Maintenance Director was shown the door latch and strike plate on the resident's door, he reported having worked on the door in the past. However, he acknowledged the repair did not appear to have fixed the problem. The Maintenance Director was observed as he attempted several times to close the door, but the door would not latch so that it would remain closed. The Director stated the door would likely need to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to: 1) Label a medication with the minimum required information (including the resident's name) stored on 1 of 2 medication (med) carts (North Hall Med Cart #2); 2) Discard expired medications stored in 1 of 1 medication storeroom (North Hall Medication Storeroom) and on 1 of 2 medication carts observed (North Hall Med Cart #2); and 3) Date medications as to when they were opened to allow for the determination of the shortened expiration date for medications stored in 1 of 1 medication storeroom (North Hall Medication Storeroom).The findings included:1. An observation was conducted on 1/5/25 at 2:45 PM with Medication (Med) Aide #1 of the North Hall Medication Storeroom. The observation revealed the following medications were stored in the Medication Storeroom:a. One (1) unopened, single-use vial of Arexy for injection (a vaccine for Respiratory Syncytial Virus or RSV) dispensed by the pharmacy on 4/4/25 for Resident #48 was stored in the medication storeroom refrigerator. The manufacturer's expiration date was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to act upon group grievances, resolve repeat grievances, and/or communicate the facility's efforts to address grievances voiced during Resident Council meetings for 2 of 3 months reviewed (November 2025 and December 2025).The findings included:Resident Council minutes completed on 10/14/25 by the previous Activities Director, Activities Director #1, revealed the following grievances were expressed: staff had poor attitudes and used foul language, medications were dropped off and left in resident rooms, call lights not in reach, staff observed voicing confidential resident information in public areas, unsanitary shower rooms and bathrooms, and lack of communication regarding room changes. A review of the grievances for October 2025 revealed one grievance form completed by the Administrator on 10/14/25 that corresponded to the Resident Council minutes dated 10/14/25. This form revealed no mention of the grievances voiced by the Resident Council related to staff voicing confidential resident information in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and consistent advance directive information throughout both the electronic medical record and paper record kept at the nursing station for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident #96). The findings included:Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with cumulative diagnoses which included cancer and generalized muscle weakness.On [DATE] at 10:15 AM, a 3-ring binder containing paper copies of the residents' advance directives was observed at the nursing station. A review of Resident 96's record kept in this binder revealed it included a signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form dated [DATE] and printed on bright yellow/orange-colored paper indicating the resident had a DNR status with No Expiration Date. Further review of the 3-ring advance directive binder revealed it also contained a Medical Order for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form dated [DATE] and signed by the resident's Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the areas of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a review to determine if the resident needs specialized services and nursing home care) Level II status (Resident #2) and Hospice services (Resident #17). This occurred for 2 of 32 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #17).The findings included: 1. Resident #2's electronic medical record (EMR) included a PASRR Level II Determination Notification letter issued 11/22/23 which had no expiration date. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a cumulative diagnosis which included schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. The resident's care plan included an area of focus which reported the resident had a Level II PASRR status related to a serious mental illness and related condition due to schizophrenia (Initiated 3/25/25). Resident #2's most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan in the areas of use of a colostomy bag and urinary catheter (Resident #52), dialysis treatment (Resident #14), and discharge goal (Resident #65) for 3 of 32 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The findings included: 1.Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included necrotizing fasciitis, other specified soft tissue disorders, and rectal hemorrhage. The resident was admitted with a colostomy bag and a urinary catheter. A review of Resident #52's physician orders dated 10/27/2025 revealed orders for catheter care, including checking the placement of the catheter strap every shift and monitoring urinary catheter output every shift. Physician orders dated 10/29/2025 directed staff to check and empty the resident's colostomy bag every shift and replace it as needed. A review of Resident #52's care plan dated 10/28/2025 revealed that no care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to shave facial hair for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident #65). The findings included:Resident #65 was admitted to the facility 11/18/25 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, needs assistance with personal care and muscle weakness.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 11/24/25 documented Resident #65 was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision or touching assistance with personal hygiene needs.A care plan developed on 12/4/25 documented Resident #65 required staff supervision/touching assistance with personal hygiene and included the goal that Resident #65 would improve current level of function in ADL through the next review. Interventions included Resident #65 required assistance by staff with personal hygiene. Resident #65 was observed on 1/5/26 at 12:26 PM. Resident #65 had a full beard that was approximately an inch in length and a mustache approximately 1/2 inch in length, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the treatment of a stage 3 pressure ulcer and failed to set a pressure relieving air mattress to the correct setting for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #17). The findings included:Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included cerebral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and peripheral vascular disease.The care plan revised on 08/29/25 revealed Resident #17 had a pressure ulcer on her coccyx and was at risk for further breakdown related to failure to thrive and disease process. The goal was Resident #17's pressure ulcer would show signs of healing and remain free from infection. Interventions included assessing resident for risk of skin breakdown, keeping skin clean and dry as possible, and skin assessments as indicated. Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to post cautionary signage outside the resident's room to indicate supplemental oxygen was in use for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #88).The findings included:Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of systolic (congestive) heart failure.The resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS reported Resident #88 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) census revealed the resident was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] with re-entry to the facility on [DATE].Resident #88's Physician's Orders included an order received on 12/11/25 for supplemental oxygen to be provided via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute as needed for shortness of breath to maintain an oxygen saturation rate greater than 90%. During an observation conducted on 1/5/26 at 10:15 AM of Resident #88, the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 medication errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 8% for 2 of 6 residents observed during the medication administration observations (Resident #11 and Resident #33).The findings included:1. Breo Ellipta is an aerosol powder for inhalation used for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or asthma. The manufacturer's Full Prescribing Information for the Breo Ellipta inhaled medication included Administration Information. These instructions read, in part: After inhalation, the patient should rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing to help reduce the risk of oropharyngeal candidiasis [a superficial yeast infection of the mouth, also known as oral thrush].On 1/7/26 at 8:33 AM, Medication Aide (Med Aide) #2 was observed as she prepared and administered ten (10) medications to Resident #11. The medications administered to the resident included 200 - 25 micrograms (mcg) per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLIANCE HEALTH GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC