No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Piedmont Hills Center for Nursing and Rehab

109 S Holden Road, Greensboro, NC 27407 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 126 certified beds · (336) 522-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$217,827 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $217,827 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3723 W Market St Unit B · (336) 456-4743 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
207 S Westgate Dr · (336) 273-9611 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2823 Spring Garden St · (743) 222-3933 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4010 Walker Ave · (336) 292-5761

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.1%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%7.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.7%5.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.2%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened36.5%18.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.9%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%5.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.2%14.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.8%78.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission38.4%22.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.9%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 69% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.7%CMS range 32.4–58.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.5–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified82.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.33
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
47.3%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 122.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff, Medical Director and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to ensure the necessary supervision was provided to a severely cognitively impaired resident to prevent an avoidable accident. Resident #1 was prescribed a puree diet and had a history of choking. On 3/19/25 Resident #1, who was known to have poor safety awareness, had a choking episode in the main lobby. Staff performed a back blow that produced a piece of bread from his mouth. He was assessed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) and determined to return to his baseline. Following the 3/19/25 choking incident, all facility staff were educated on the importance of providing residents with diets per the physician order. On 4/22/25, while dinner trays were being picked up by the staff, Resident #1 took a hot dog off an unattended meal cart, put part of it in his mouth, and began to choke. Staff provided abdominal thrusts and were unable to dispel the food. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews with staff and the Medical Director, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #1). On [DATE] Resident #1 requested incontinence care and Nurse Aide (NA) #1 gathered supplies and raised the level of the bed to provide care. NA #1 asked Resident #1 to turn on her side away from NA #1. NA #1 stated she had her right-hand touching Resident #1 and while the resident was turning the brief fell on the floor. NA #1 took her hand off Resident #1 when she bent down to pick up the brief and Resident #1 rolled off the bed onto floor hitting her head. Nurse #1 was called to the room and assessed Resident #1 and noted she was incoherent and unable to answer questions. When Nurse #1 palpated Resident #1's head she yelled out in pain her head and neck hurt. Resident #1 yelled out in pain when Nurse #1 assessed her upper extremities. Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room (ED) on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to verify competency for cleaning and disinfecting glucometers according to the manufacturer's instructions. Medication Aide (MA) #1 was observed to conduct a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) check on Resident #1 and using the same shared glucometer proceeded to check blood sugar levels on Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 without disinfecting the glucometer between any of the residents. MA #1 was interviewed and reported she worked at the facility for approximately 2 years and her competencies for cleaning and disinfecting glucometers per the manufacturer's instructions had never been verified. She stated she never cleaned and disinfected the glucometer between residents. This was for 1 of 1 Medication Aide reviewed. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 7/10/24 when the failure to verify the competency of MA #1 on the cleaning and disinfecting of a glucometer resulted in the MA's failure to clean and disinfect a shared glucometer between residents when conducting FSBS checks.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility staff failed to disinfect a shared blood glucose meter (glucometer) between residents whose blood glucose levels required monitoring. Medication Aide (MA) #1 was observed to conduct a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) check on Resident #1 and using the same glucometer proceeded to check blood sugar levels on Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 without disinfecting the glucometer between any of the residents. This occurred while there were no residents with known bloodborne pathogens, such as Hepatitis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), in the facility. Failure to clean and disinfect the shared glucometer per manufacturer's instructions after use on each resident has the high likelihood of exposing residents to the spread of bloodborne pathogens. The deficient practice occurred for 4 of 4 residents observed for finger stick blood sugar monitoring. Immediate Jeopardy began on 7/10/24 when MA #1 failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview, staff interviews, Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview and Medical Director interview, the facility staff failed to implement a pain management program that included pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for Resident #518 who was admitted with chronic pain syndrome. Resident #518 was not thoroughly assessed for pain, a plan for pain management was not initiated, pain medication was not ordered, care continued to be delivered to Resident #518 in the presence of pain described at 9 out of 10. Pain interfered with sleep, mobility, and provision of activities of daily living. Resident #518 exhibited verbal and nonverbal cues of pain that included facial grimacing, groaning, and holding tightly onto the grab bars during incontinence care and bed mobility. A diagnostic x-ray was not implemented stat (rush) as ordered. Resident #518 was diagnosed with osteoarthritis following the results of the x-ray. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews of the staff, Family Member, Responsible Party, Paramedic, Nurse Practitioner (NP), Psychiatry NP, and Medical Director, the facility failed to identify the seriousness of new behaviors and increased confusion and complete and document thorough on-going assessments of a resident which delayed medical interventions and treatment. On 10/2/25 nursing staff were aware Resident #1 was undressing, which was a change for the resident and as the day progressed, he became more confused and agitated. A family member visited that evening and found the resident naked on the floor in his room. The family member reported to the nurse that the undressing was out of character for the resident, and he was agitated. The family member told the nurse she felt like something was wrong and asked the nurse to call 911. The nurse checked the resident's temperature, pulse and respirations which were within normal limits and told the family member they would take care of it. The family member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a resident's continence status for 1 of 2 residents who were continent to both bowel and bladder (Resident #518). Findings included: Resident #518 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included chronic pain syndrome, disorder of thyroid, adult failure to thrive, bipolar disorder, constipation, anorexia, hypothyroidism, and spondylosis. Review of Resident #518 admission assessment progress note by Nurse #3, dated 11/17/23, revealed the resident was continent of both bowel and bladder. An interview with Nurse #3 was conducted on 11/29/23 at 3:19pm. Nurse #3 admitted resident on 11/17/23 and indicated upon her assessment, Resident #518 was continent of both bowel and bladder. Nurse #3 indicated that resident required the nurse aide to offer a bed pan for toileting. Nurse #3 was not aware that Resident #518 was asked to wear a brief by staff. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, Responsible Party interview, On-Call Nurse Practitioner interview, Nurse Practitioner interview, and Medical Director interview, the facility failed to notify the physician immediately after Resident #5 exhibited a change in condition related to a fall. Resident #5 had a low pulse during vital sign checks after the fall and Resident #5's Responsible Party identified a hematoma on the resident's head later in the day and requested he be sent to the hospital. The deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #5). The findings Included: Resident # 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, abnormal findings on diagnostic imagining of skull and head, and dementia with behavioral disturbance.A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the incident report dated 9/3/25 at 11:30 AM, written by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a newly admitted resident that required assistance with bed mobility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents. (Resident #1) Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included dialysis dependent end stage renal disease (ESRD), metabolic encephalopathy, hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, history of seizures, venous sinus thrombosis 12/2024 (rare form of a stroke), and history of pulmonary embolism. Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. The assessment also indicated Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort, helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort) with roll left and right (the ability to roll from lying back to left and right side, and return to lying on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included stage 4 kidney disease and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. While reviewing the section of the MDS titled functional abilities and goals, the section for self-care was observed not to be completed. Further reviews of subsequent quarterly MDS assessments were observed to have the self-care section filled out. During an interview with MDS Nurse #1 on 12/3/24 at 2:48pm, the MDS Nurse explained she had been hired as the MDS Nurse in September 2024 and prior to that the facility relied on an outside contract company to complete the residents' MDS assessments. She explained the contract company continues to assist with completing MDS assessments. The MDS Nurse reviewed Resident #12's MDS assessment for 1/18/24 and confirmed the self-care section under functional abilities and goals was not completed. She also confirmed Resident #12 had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to offer a resident the opportunity to participate in his care plan meetings for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for care planning (Resident #32). Findings included: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy, vascular dementia, and major depressive disorder. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 12/02/24 at 10:34 a.m., when asked about his care plan meetings, Resident #32 stated he had resided at the facility for two years and no one had ever explained or discussed anything with him. There was no documentation in the medical record or provided by the social worker indicating Resident #32 attended or refused to attend his care plan meetings. An interview with the Director of Social Work (SW) on 12/04/24 at 1:39 p.m., revealed she began working at the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect when Nursing Assistant (NA) #3 and the dietary staff did not ensure Resident #12 received lunch. This occurred for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for food preferences. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F806 Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident with an alternate preference during the lunch meal for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for food preferences.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the areas of smoking (Resident #76) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident #5) for 2 of 18 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The findings included: 1. Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A facility smoking assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #76 required supervision while smoking. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #76 was cognitively intact and was coded as not being a current tobacco user. The smoking assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #76 did not require supervision while smoking and was considered an unsupervised smoker. Review of Resident #76's care plans were reviewed and did not include a care plan or interventions in the area of tobacco use/smoking. An interview with the MDS Coordinator/Nurse #1 on 12/4/24 at 2:37 PM revealed Resident #76 was a smoker when she was admitted to the facility. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to update a care plan for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for care plans. The findings included: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Upon reviewing Resident #12's care plan, it was observed that Resident #12's care plan had not been reviewed since 7/3/24. There was documentation under the care plan section of the electronic medical record for Resident #12 to have her care plan reviewed on 10/22/24. During an interview with MDS Nurse #1 on 12/3/24 at 2:48pm, the MDS Nurse explained she would have been responsible for ensuring Resident #12's care plan had been reviewed but stated she had not been placed in the MDS Nurse role until September 2024. The MDS Nurse stated she would not have reviewed the care plan in October 2024 as indicated in Resident #12's record unless there was a change in condition. She explained she only reviews…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, and Physician interview, the facility staff failed to confirm residents had taken their medication and left the medication on their meal tray. The medication was found by dietary staff. This occurred for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #12 and Resident #58) reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included diabetes and congestive heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's timeline revealed on 8/16/24 the Administrator was sent pictures by the previous Dietary manager of medication that were left on Resident #58's meal tray. Again on 8/18/24 the Administrator received pictures from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide foot care and arrange podiatry services for 1 of 10 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Resident #5 was discovered to have long and jagged toenails on both feet that extended ¼ to ½ beyond the tip of her toes (Resident #5). The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses included diabetes and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 was cognitively intact, and dependent (helper does all the effort) on staff for personal hygiene. Resident #5's comprehensive care plans, last revised on 09/29/24, did not include interventions that addressed her need for assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the podiatry schedules on 7/31/24, 9/5/24, and 11/5/24 revealed no consultation report or notation was made in Resident #5's chart that she had been seen by the podiatrist or had been scheduled to be seen. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview and physician interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration for 2 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #40 and Resident #14). The findings included: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), respiratory failure and vascular dementia. Physician order dated 5/16/24 stated continuous oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula (NC) and as needed (PRN) to maintain {oxygen} saturation (SATS) greater than 90%. Care plan last revised 6/15/24 stated Resident #40 had oxygen therapy. The goal stated Resident #40 would have no signs or symptoms of poor oxygen absorption. The interventions included provide oxygen per physician order. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #40 had moderate cognitive impairment and received oxygen. She required extensive assistance with bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident with an alternate preference during the lunch meal for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for food preferences. The findings included: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included stage 3 pressure ulcer and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating. Resident #12 was documented as being on a therapeutic diet. Resident #12 was interviewed on 12/2/24 at 10:32am. The resident discussed not liking the food at the facility. She explained she would often ask for an alternate meal or a sandwich and would not receive any alternate or sandwich. Resident #12 stated that is why I keep food in my room and pointed to a shelf that had canned food. The lunch meal was observed with Resident #12 on 12/2/24 at 12:15pm. Nursing Assistant (NA) #3 was observed to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and staff, Pharmacist and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to send expired or discontinued narcotic medications back to the pharmacy for 2 of 4 medication carts. Findings included: 1. On 7/10/24 at 11:45 am, the medication cart on 2 North was reviewed with Medication Aide (MA) #2. The following were discovered during the review: a. Eighteen lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets in a pill card labeled with the order to administer one tablet by mouth twice a day for anxiety or restlessness to Resident #7. Thirty lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets were in a second pill card labeled with the same order to administer one tablet by mouth twice a day for anxiety or restlessness to Resident #7. Resident's EMR was reviewed with MA #2. The medical records revealed Resident #7 died on 6/14/24. MA #2 stated the two pill cards should have been sent back to the pharmacy by the nurse on 6/14/24. b. Twenty oxycodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg tablets in a pill card labeled with the order to administer one tablet every four hours as needed to Resident #8. The pill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a 24-hour and 5-day report to the State Agency when the facility became aware of an allegation of misappropriation of property by a staff member on 7/5/24 for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Resident #2). Findings included: A review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy defined Alleged Violation as a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. Under Reporting/Response, the policy stated A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all required agencies (e.g. law enforcement when applicable) within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the sanitizing solution (chlorine) was maintained at the required concentration of 50 ppm (parts per million) during the final rinse cycle according to manufacturer's instructions in the low temperature dish machine. And failed to ensure the ceiling in the kitchen, meal delivery carts, and venting units were clean, free from debris, and/or in good working condition; and pots and pans stacked for use were clean and dry on the storage rack. The facility also failed to ensure the personal food items stored in the nourishment refrigerator/freezer in 1 of 2 residents' nourishment rooms (the first-floor nourishment room) were labeled and dated. These practices had the potential to affect food served to all residents. Findings included: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/27/23 at 10:15 a.m., the operation of the low temperature dishwasher of the soiled breakfast dishes by dietary staff #1 and dietary staff #2 was observed. The sanitizing solution (chlorine) for the low temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor intervention the committee put in place following a focus infection control survey conducted on 2/05/21. This was evident for seven deficiencies that were cited in the areas of Environment (homelike), Activities of daily living for dependent Resident, Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (discharged planning process)Bowel/Bladder incontinence ,Resident Allergies, Preferences and Substitutes and Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary and on the current recertification and complaint survey conducted on 12/04/23. The facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee also failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor intervention the committee put in place following an annual recertification and complaint survey conducted on 12/13/21. This was evident for six deficiencies that was cited in the areas of Environment (homelike), Resident Assessment (Accuracy of Assessment),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-04 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure they had provided mandatory training that outlined and informed all their staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings included: During an interview with the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) on 11/30/23 at 10:35 AM the SDC stated she had been working in her role at the facility for 2 months and had not completed any QAPI in-servicing for the staff as a part of the mandatory yearly facility training. The SDC stated she was also unable to locate any staff QAPI training completed by the previous SDC. During an interview with the facility administrator on 12/1/23 at 9:48 AM she stated the key facility staff was meeting monthly, but she was not aware of the regulation that stated all facility staff should be trained yearly on the facility QAPI program and the current goals they are working towards.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor resident requests for two showers per week for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for self-determination (Resident #101) Findings included: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #101 was cognitively intact, with no behaviors or rejection of care and required moderate assistance with showers. The facility's shower schedule revealed Resident #101 was scheduled for a shower on Monday and Thursday on the evening shift (3:00pm to 11:00pm). Resident #101's medical record did not reveal any refusal of showers that were documented in the progress notes. The facility shower documentation from 10/01/23 through 11/30/23 revealed that Resident #101 had one shower documented on 10/02/23,10.08.23,10.12.23,10/14/23,10/16/23,10/20/23,11/01/23,11/02/23,11/07/23, and 11/30/23. The documentation revealed that Resident #101 was provided a bed bath instead of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to investigate and resolve grievances for Residents #12, #419, #267 and maintain evidence demonstrating the result of the grievances for Residents #80, #29, #68. This was for 6 of 17 residents reviewed for grievances. The findings included: An interview was conducted on 11/30/23 12:30 PM with Social Worker #1. She revealed that when she was made aware of a grievance, she would initiate the grievance form and give it to the appropriate department head to investigate. She further revealed that she had pending grievances that had not been investigated for Residents #12, #419 and #267. The Social Worker indicated that the lack of follow-up on these grievances was due to frequent turnover in the social work department. 1a.Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of Resident #12's grievance dated 1/31/23 was conducted and revealed no documented investigation or follow up noted on the grievance form. An interview was conducted with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident #99, Resident #11, Resident 102, Resident #518, Resident #80 and Resident #51). Findings included: 1a. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of physician order initiated on 4/20/23 revealed Resident #99 had an order for Risperidone (antipsychotic) 1milligram(mg) tablet, give one tablet by mouth one time a day for schizophrenia. Review of physician order initiated on 7/11/23 revealed Resident #99 had an order for Sertraline HCL (antidepressant) 25mg tablet, give one table by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #99 received Risperidone (antipsychotic) 1mg tablet, every day starting 7/1/23 through 7/31/23. Review of the MAR revealed Resident #99 received Sertraline HCL (antidepressant) 25mg tablet, every day starting 7/12/23 through 7/24/23. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide oral hygiene to a resident (Resident #69) dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). This occurred for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for ADL. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and a history of a cerebral infarction. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #69 was cognitively intact, had adequate vision and hearing, required extensive assistance of one staff member with personal hygiene, and did not refuse care. A review of the care plan dated 9/20/2023 included a focused area that Resident #69 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to a history of decreased mobility. The interventions identified the Resident required 1 to 2 person staff assistance with personal hygiene and oral care. An observation of Resident #69 was conducted on 11/27/2023 at 10:25 a.m. and the Resident had only two teeth on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 22 out of 120 days reviewed for staffing. The failure to have RN coverage for the facility had a high likelihood of impacting every resident in the facility. The findings included: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D/FY Quarter 3 2023 (April 1 - June 30) compared to the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheets, and RN timecard reports revealed that there was no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours for 4/2/23, 4/9/23, 5/6/23, 5/7/23, 5/13/23, 5/14/23, 5/15/23, 5/20/23, 6/3/23, 6/4/23, 6/10/23, 6/11/23, 6/18/23. Further review of the Posted Nurse Staffing as compared to the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheets, and RN timecard reports revealed there was no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours for 11/4/23, 11/5/23, 11/6/23, 11/7/23, 11/9/23, 11/20/23, 11/11/23, 11/15/23, 11/18/23. An interview was conducted on 11/30/23 at 10:08 AM with the facility scheduler. She stated she had been in her position for 2 months. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, Consultant Pharmacist, and the Medical Director (MD), the Pharmacy Consultant failed to identify drug irregularities for the use of a psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This was for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #106). The findings included: Resident #106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #106's active orders revealed a physician order dated 07/16/23 for 0.5 milligrams (mg) risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) to be given as one tablet by mouth and scheduled to be administered twice daily for sleep. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/13/23, revealed Resident #106 ' s cognition was severely impaired, and he had no behaviors. The consultant pharmacist's Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure medicated treatment supplies left in an unattended treatment cart for 1 of 2 treatment carts (the upper-level treatment cart). In addition, the facility failed to secure resident medications left in an unattended medication cart for 1 of 2 medication carts (second floor- east side medication cart). The findings included: 1. During hall tour observation on 11/27/23 12:05 PM, the treatment cart #1 on the upper level beside the nurse's station was observed to be unlocked during a continuous observation from 12:05 PM to 12:17 PM. The cart lock button was not pushed in indicating the drawers, which contained the supplies in the cart, were in an unlocked position. On 11/27/23 at 12:17 PM, residents were observed ambulating around the upper-level nurse's station near the unlocked cart without any staff members present. Observation of Treatment Cart #1 with the unit manager on 11/27/23 at 12:20 PM revealed the top drawer to contain topical ointments. The second drawer contained medicated dressings and bandages. Both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to follow a Dental provider's recommendations to assist a resident in obtaining dentures. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #46) reviewed for dental services. The findings included: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility 9/14/2018 with diagnoses that included left hemiparesis, dysphagia, and edentulous. A review of Resident #46's orders revealed a regular texture diet. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact and had no rejection of care. The MDS documented the resident had no complaints or difficulty with swallowing, no coughing or choking during meals, and had not experienced weight loss. A review of the care plan revised 10/24/2023 included a focused area that was initiated 12/28/2018, that read; Resident #46 has an oral/dental health problem related to missing his teeth. The interventions included coordinating arrangements for dental care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by not providing toileting assistance to a resident continent of bowel and bladder (Resident #518). Resident was instructed to use the bathroom in an incontinent brief and she indicated this did not feel-good wearing briefs and did not like it because she was able to tell when she needed to be toileted . This occurred for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings included. Resident #518 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #518 was cognitively intact with no behaviors or rejection of care and frequently incontinent to both bowel and bladder. On 11/29/23 at 5:13am, an observation of incontinence care was made with Resident #518 and NA #3. Resident #518 was noted to be wearing a brief that was soaking wet. After providing incontinence care, NA #3 was observed reapplying a new brief on Resident #518. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure advanced directive information was correct throughout the medical record for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings included: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #71's electronic medical record revealed an active physician's order dated 10/07/2021 that read Full Code. A review of the Social Service Progress Note dated 03/17/2023 revealed a care plan meeting was held with Resident #71 and the Interdisciplinary Care Team. Resident #71's code status was changed to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) per her request. A review of the code status chart for the 200-hall revealed Resident #71 had a signed Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form dated 03/17/2023 signed by the resident and the Nurse Practitioner that read DNR. Resident #71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact. Resident #71's care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and the Medical Director interview, the facility staff failed to notify medical provider of resident's complaint of right shoulder pain, and genitalia area for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. (Resident #518). Findings included: Resident #518 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included chronic pain syndrome, disorder of thyroid, adult failure to thrive, bipolar disorder, constipation, anorexia, hypothyroidism, chronic pain syndrome, and spondylosis. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #518 was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #518 Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note dated 11/20/23 indicated Resident #518 was not sleeping well due to pain. Review of Medical Director's progress note for Resident #518 dated 11/22/23 indicated that resident has pain and numbness in bilateral arms and legs. Review of physical therapy treatment encounter note for Resident #518 dated 11/22/23 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to issue a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), CMS-10055 Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) at least two days before the end of Medicare part A services to two of three residents (Residents #48 and 105) reviewed for SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review. Findings included: 1a. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility under part A Medicare services on 9/21/23. A review of the medical record revealed a CMS-10123 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage letter (NOMNC) was discussed by telephone with Resident #48's responsible party on 11/21/23. The notice indicated that Medicare coverage for skilled services was to end 10/27/23 and the resident would remain in the facility. A review of the medical record revealed a CMS-10055 SNF ABN (ABN) was not provided to the resident or responsible party until 11/21/23. 2b. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility under part A Medicare services on 8/1/23. A review of the medical record revealed a CMS-10123 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to maintain a dresser drawer in good repair for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for a safe comfortable, homelike environment (Resident #98). The findings included: Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set on 10/26/23 revealed Resident #98 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with dressing. During an observation and interview on 11/27/23 at 12:45 PM, Resident #98 was seen sitting on her wheelchair beside a dresser which did not have the front face of the first two drawers and had visible exposed broken wood with rough edges. Resident #98 indicated the dresser had been broken for a long time and she was not able to use it for her belongings. During a follow up observation of Resident #98's room on 11/29/23 at 7:46 AM the dresser drawer was observed to be in the same condition of disrepair. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 7:52 AM, Nurse Aide (NA) #8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property when an unknown person used a resident's bank card information and made an unauthorized purchase. This occurred for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #267) reviewed for abuse. The findings included: Resident #267 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #267 was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 11/30/2023 at 12:30 p.m. with the Social Worker (SW) and she revealed she had started working at the facility in late October 2023. She added when she started, the residents had several concerns and grievances that needed to be addressed. The SW added she received a grievance from Resident #267 on 11/27/2023 around midday. Resident #267 had reported that someone had made a fraudulent charge to her bank card, in the amount of $192.00, and the bank reported to the Resident the charge was made at the facility location. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for immediately notifying the Administrator of allegations when they 1) failed to notify the Administrator of an allegation of abuse (Resident #116) and 2) failed to notify the Administrator of misappropriation of resident property (Resident #267). This deficient practice occurred for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A review of the Review of the facility policy titled: Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated February 2023 Revision read as follows: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0642 — isolated
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to certify the accuracy of pain interview responses relative to the resident's condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident #518) Findings included: Resident #518 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #518's Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note dated 11/20/23 indicated Resident #518 was not sleeping well due to pain. Review of occupational therapy treatment encounter notes for Resident #518 dated 11/20/23 indicated Resident reported 10/10 global pain affecting function. Review of Medical Director's progress note for Resident #518 dated 11/22/23 indicated Resident has pain and numbness in bilateral arms and legs. Review of physical therapy treatment encounter note for Resident #518 dated 11/22/23 indicated Resident reported pain all over body and limiting resident's ability to scoot. Review of occupational therapy treatment encounter notes for Resident #518 dated 11/22/23 indicated Resident reporting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to develop a resident specific care plan for 1) discharge planning and this occurred for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 568) reviewed for discharge planning and 2) urinary catheter status and this occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for urinary catheter care. The findings included: 1)Resident #568 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe burns to 10-19% of the body surface. A review of the electronic medical record revealed Resident #568 was her own legal representative. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #568 had not been willing to participate in the mental assessment and had verbal behaviors of yelling out 1 to 3 days during the lookback period. The assessment did not assess the Resident preference to return to the community. A review of the care plan dated 11/2/2023 did not include the discharge preferences of the Resident. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Responsible Party, and staff interviews the facility failed to have a discharge planning process in place for a resident with a discharge goal of transferring to an alternate facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident for discharge planning (Resident #98). Findings Included: Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included altered mental status. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #98 was cognitively impaired. A telephone interview was conducted with the Responsible Party on 11/28/23 at 10:03 PM. She indicated that she made a request on 11/1/23 for assistance with transferring the resident to another skilled nursing facility and still had not received a response. An interview was conducted on 11/29/23 at 10:30 AM with the Admissions/Concierge Director and she revealed that she was notified on 11/1/23 via email by Resident #98's Responsible Party of the request for discharge planning assistance to another skilled nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and the Medical Director interview, the facility failed to provide a diagnosis for the use of risperidone (a psychotropic medication which is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This was for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings included: Resident #106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/13/23, revealed Resident #106 ' s cognition was severely impaired, and he had no behaviors. Resident #106's active care plan, last reviewed on 11/10/23, revealed a focus that read resident used psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) related to diagnosis (no diagnosis listed). Date Initiated: 08/01/2023. The interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to honor food preferences for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for preferences (Resident #71). Findings included: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the dietary progress note dated 10/13/2022 indicated Resident #71 requested a diabetic diet with yogurt at every meal. Resident #71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated 10/03/2023 revealed Resident #71 had a potential nutritional problem. The interventions included determining Resident #71's food preferences, providing them at mealtime and providing a controlled carbohydrate diet per Resident #71's request. During an interview on 11/27/2023 at 10:13 A.M Resident #71 stated she was not receiving yogurt with her meals. Resident #71 indicated she requested yogurt with every meal due to wanting more protein and it was listed on her meal tickets. During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical record included pneumococcal immunization status to include to inform, offer, and provide education on the pneumococcal immunization. This occurred for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #54, #71, and #80) reviewed for pneumococcal immunization status. The findings included: A review of the facility policy titled; Pneumococcal Vaccine revised January 2023 read: upon admission nursing staff will document in the Immunization Record the resident's history of immunization with the pneumococcal vaccine. 1)Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], for Resident #54, was reviewed for the immunization section. The pneumococcal vaccine question had documentation that read: the vaccine was not up to date and had not been offered. A review of Resident #54's medical record revealed there was no documentation to indicate whether the Resident received or refused a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a privacy curtain for 1 of 1 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for privacy. The findings included: Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her most recent annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed that she was severely cognitively impaired. On 11/27/23 at 9:37 AM, an observation of Resident #80's room revealed half of the metal track on the ceiling was noticed to be missing and there was no privacy curtain hung. During an interview on 11/27/23 at 11:30 AM with Nurse Aide (NA) #6, assigned to Resident #80, she stated that she thought the curtain was removed a couple days ago because it was dirty but she was not sure. She stated that she will use the roommate's curtain to shield Resident #80 from view or she will shut the room door if the roommate is out of the room. During an interview on 11/27/23 at 12:10 PM with the unit manager, he stated that another resident wandered into Resident #80's room and pulled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the mandatory twelve hours of annual in-servicing for 1 of 4 nursing assistants (NA) #1 reviewed for competent nursing staff. The findings included: NA #1 date of hire was 7/21/21. Review of NA #1's educational record did not include 12 hours of the annual mandatory in-servicing for 2022 or 2023. The Staff Development Coordinator was interviewed on 11/30/23 at 9:30 AM. She stated she was new to her role and had been with the facility for 2 months. She stated that the facility did not use an online in-servicing program and was currently still paper-based. She was unable to explain how NA #1's training requirements were missed and added that she was in the process of reviewing all staff members' training files. The Regional Nurse Consultant provided documentation on 12/1/23 at 11:42 AM of NA #1's completed dementia and annual mandatory in-servicing totaling 2.25 hours on 11/22/23. She stated that she was also unable to find the training record for NA #1. She stated that she was aware that all nurse aides must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain walls or baseboards in good condition for 6 of 13 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #213, #215, #217, #218 and #222). This occured for 1 of 2 halls (200 hall) reviewed for clean, comforatble, homelike environment. The findings included: 1. A continuous observation on 12/5/24 from 10:45 AM until 11:00 AM revealed the following: a. Resident room # 213 was observed to have baseboard that was not affixed to the wall. The baseboard could be observed leaning from the wall with dry wall exposed behind the baseboard. b. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] to have baseboard missing from the wall under the TV under bed B. c. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed baseboard to missing beside the bathroom and baseboard was observed to be lyying on the floor by bed B. d. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed was observed to have missing baseboard by bed A. Bed B had a section of baseboard lyying directly on floor. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required time frame for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #109) reviewed for submission of MDS assessments. The findings included: Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation and diabetes mellitus. The admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #109 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record revealed the self-care and mobility section of Resident #109's quarterly MDS with the assessment reference date of 11/19/24 was not completed as of 12/4/24. During an interview on 12/05/24 at 9:58 a.m., the MDS Coordinator revealed she was on emergency leave from the facility on 11/25/24 to 12/2/24. She stated the self-care and mobility section of Resident #109's quarterly MDS should have been completed and submitted into the CMS system (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Data Base System)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-04 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to post the required posting of a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, or a statement the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency. Findings included: During a resident council meeting on 11/28/23 at 1:30 PM, the 8 resident council members that attended the meeting revealed they were not aware of how to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency and did not know how to access information regarding pertinent state agencies and advocacy groups. A tour of the facility, with the Administrator, on 12/1/23 at 10:25 AM, revealed that there was no information posted in the facility with information regarding pertinent State agency and advocacy group information or how to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency. An interview with the Administrator on 12/1/23 at 10:50 AM revealed the signage must have been removed at some point and not replaced.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to display accurate Posted Nurse Staffing Information as compared to the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheets for 30 out of 31 days reviewed for staffing. The findings included: A review of the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheets and timecard reports compared to the daily Posted Nurse Staffing Information sheets from 10/30/23 through 11/30/23 revealed discrepancies in the areas of actual hours worked and actual nursing staff who worked including the licensed Registered Nurses (RNs) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and the unlicensed Medication Aides (MAs), and Nursing Assistants (NAs). The number of unlicensed and licensed staff and actual hours worked on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd shift were incorrect for the following days: 10/29/23, 10/30/23, 10/31/23, 11/1/23, 11/3/23, 11/4/23, 11/5/23, 11/6/23, 11/7/23, 11/8/23, 11/9/23, 11/10/23, 11/11/23, 11/12/23, 11/13/23, 11/14/23, 11/15/23, 11/16/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/20/23, 11/21/23, 11/22/23, 11/23/23, 11/24/23, 11/25/23, 11/26/23, 11/27/23, 11/28/23, 11/29/23, and 11/30/23. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-12-04 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete 3 admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of admission and failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), [which was the last day of the assessment period] for 8 out of 9 sampled residents. (Resident #99, Resident #20, Resident #79, Resident #105, Resident #102, Resident #38, Resident #68, and Resident #106) Findings included: a. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #99 admission MDS assessment with an ARD of 4/27/23 was signed as completed on 7/14/23. b. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #20 annual MDS assessment with an ARD of 7/16/23 was signed as completed on 8/14/23. c. Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #79 admission MDS assessment with an ARD of 4/21/23 was signed as completed on 7/5/23. d. Resident #105 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), [which was the last day of the assessment period] for 8 out of 9 sampled residents. (Resident #21, Resident #89, Resident #37, Resident #25, Resident #86, Resident #55, Resident #54, and Resident #28) Findings included: a. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #21 quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 7/28/23 was signed as completed on 8/15/23. b. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #89 quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 10/9/23 was signed as completed on 10/29/23. c. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #37 quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 5/2/23 was signed as completed on 7/11/23. d. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #25 quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 5/2/23 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$217,827 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $50,505 — penalty dated 2025-10-23
  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-11
  • $18,086 — penalty dated 2024-12-05
  • $35,105 — penalty dated 2024-07-17
  • $96,786 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-02 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLIANCE HEALTH GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
EMANUEL, YOSEFIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2024
ALLIANCE HEALTH GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
REAGAN, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
COALITION GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
TEJAN-SIE, SHEIKHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 4%Other / private 14%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$326per resident / day
operating cost
$9,920per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$339per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345116. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next