Senior Citizens Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff, and Physician interview, the facility failed to safely transfer a dependent resident from wheelchair to bed which resulted in the fracture of the right humeral head (shoulder joint) and injury to the toenail of the right great toe with bleeding for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #27) reviewed for accidents The findings included: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of a stroke that resulted in right sided weakness. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #27 was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS indicated the Resident was dependent on 2 staff members for transfers and was coded as having impairment on 1 side of his upper and lower extremities. A care plan for an activities of daily living (adl) self-care performance deficit was last revised on 3/21/23. The interventions included assistance from 2 staff members and a mechanical lift for transfers, extensive to total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and Physician, resident, Responsible Party (RP), and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a pest free living environment for 1 of 1 resident residing in the facility (Resident #42). The facility's failure contributed to Resident #42 sustaining a rash to her arms and legs due to ant bites resulting in itching and discomfort. The Findings included: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, diabetes, and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive 1-2 staff member assistance with all activities of daily living including bed mobility. Resident #42 was coded as having no limitations in her range of motion, clear speech, and had the ability to understand others. A review of the Pest Control Commercial Services Agreement dated 7/11/23 stated services would be provided weekly specifically targeting roaches, ants,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep food service equipment free of debris and corrosion by failing to clean 2 of 3 HVAC (heating and air conditioning system) filters observed. This practice had the potential to affect food served to the residents who resided in the facility.The findings included:During the tour of the kitchen with the Certified Food Manager on 3/10/26 at 11:56 AM the kitchen preparation table was observed. Two feet above the food preparation table where wrapped silverware was stacked ready for lunch service, 2 of the 3 HVAC vents were observed with dark debris on the metal vents. The air filter system was off at the time. A second observation on 03/11/2026 11:08 AM the kitchen filters were observed in the same condition with dark debris on the metal vents. The air filter system was on and blowing towards the tray line, 6 feet away. The tray line was not in use at the time.In an interview on 3/11/26 at 11:10 AM the Certified Food Manger stated the HVAC filters were not on a kitchen cleaning schedule as Maintenance came in every 1-2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with staff, Director of Nursing, Nurse Practitioner, Pharmacy Technician, and Pharmacist, the facility failed to provide services to ensure the acquiring, dispensing, and administration of medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #59). The facility failed to have an anticonvulsant, antipsychotic, and a triple-therapy bronchodilator available for administration to Resident #59.The findings included:Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included COPD, depression and bipolar disorder.a. Resident #59 had a physician order initiated on 2/5/26 for Divalproex Sodium Oral Capsule Delayed Release Sprinkle 125 milligrams(mg) (an anticonvulsant medication sometimes used for mood stabilization)- Give 1000 mg by mouth at bedtime for bipolar disorder.Documentation on the February Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #59 revealed that Divalproex Sodium was not administered on 2/6/26 by Nurse #1,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner, Pharmacist, Assistant Director of Nursing, and Director of Nursing, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1 of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #59). The facility failed to administer prescribed antipsychotic medication, anticonvulsant medication and triple therapy bronchodilator to Resident #59. The findings included:Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression and bipolar disorder. a. Resident #59 had a physician order initiated on 2/5/26 for Divalproex Sodium Oral Capsule Delayed Release Sprinkle 125 milligrams(mg) (an anticonvulsant medication sometimes used for mood stabilization) Give 1000 mg by mouth at bedtime for bipolar disorder.Documentation on the February Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #59 revealed that Divalproex Sodium was not administered on 2/6/26 by Nurse #1, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and review of the Facility Assessment the facility failed to ensure the required parties were involved in developing the Facility Assessment, failed to evaluate contracted services utilized by the facility to provide necessary care for its residents during normal operations and emergencies, and failed to ensure the staffing plan considered specific staffing needs for each unit and shift as required, which had the potential to affect 49 of 49 residents. The findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment revealed it was revised 8/13/24 and updated on 9/24/24 and 11/01/24. The persons involved in completing the assessment were listed as the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), the Medical Director, Social Service Director, Food Service Director, Environmental Operations Director, Therapy Director, and a Governing Board Member. There was no indication that direct care staff were involved in completing the assessment or that the facility solicited and considered input from residents, resident representatives and family members. The Facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate payroll data on the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) related to Registered Nurse (RN) hours and licensed nursing coverage 24-hours per day. This was for 1 of 3 quarters reviewed for sufficient nurse staffing (Quarter 3 2024). Findings included: Review of the PBJ for Fiscal Year Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 through June 30) revealed there were no Registered Nurse (RN) hours for 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/27/24, 4/28/24, and 6/15/24. The PBJ report also noted the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day for 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/28/24, 6/15/24, and 6/16/24. Review of the Posted Daily Nursing Staffing Forms, Daily Staffing Sheet, and the nursing staff time detail reports for 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/27/24, 4/28/24, and 6/15/24 revealed there were RN hours for the 3rd quarter of the fiscal year 2024. The Posted Daily Nursing Staffing Forms, Daily Staffing Sheet, and the nursing staff time detail reports for 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/28/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct quarterly reviews of resident care plans for 5 of 23 resident care plans that were reviewed (Resident #23, Resident #6, Resident #9, Resident #8, and Resident #45). The findings included: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and osteoarthritis. A review of Resident #23's care plan revealed the most recent review date of 7/30/24 and no further reviews or updates had been completed. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. An interview was completed on 12/3/24 at 10:03 am with the Director of Nursing (DON) who revealed she was both the MDS Nurse and the DON for the facility. She stated she was responsible for reviewing resident care plans. The DON verified Resident #23's care plan review was overdue. The DON stated she was aware the resident care plans were behind, and she was working on getting them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to correctly code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the areas of falls and restraints for 2 of 23 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed for accuracy (Residents #45 and #23). The findings included: 1. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis, dementia, and a history of a stroke. An incident report dated 8/5/24 at 5:37pm stated Resident #45 was observed laying on the floor in front of her personal recliner. The note stated Resident #45's lower extremities had normal range of motion and were without pain. The facility Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified and an order for an x-ray of the Resident's left hip was received. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was severely cognitively impaired and was coded no for any falls since admission/entry, reentry, or prior assessment. The review further revealed the questions regarding the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a physician order for dialysis in the medical record for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #204). Findings included: Resident #204's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] included instructions that included the name, address and telephone number of the dialysis center and indicated Resident #204's chair time was Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 12:00 PM. Resident #204 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including end stage renal disease stage 5. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #204 was coded for dialysis. During an interview with the Unit Manager on 12/3/2024 at 2:51 p.m. she revealed she was responsible for admitting Resident #204 to the facility. She stated she reviewed the hospital discharge summary for Resident #204, and she did not remember how she omitted entering the physician order for dialysis in his medical record. In an interview with Nurse #2 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, pharmacy director interview, physician assistant interview, and resident interview the facility failed to provide medications upon admission for 18 hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for provision of medication upon admission. Findings included: Resident #1 had cumulative diagnoses some of which included Type 2 diabetes, Hypertension, Bipolar disorder, congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, status post orthopedic surgery, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Documentation in the electronic medical record of Physician orders listed as entered on 10/30/2023 by Nurse #2 at 12:57 PM for Resident #1 included the following medications: - Novolin (Insulin) 70/30 Flex Pen Subcutaneous Suspension Pen 60 units of insulin to be injected subcutaneously every morning for Type 2 diabetes. 15 units of insulin were to be injected subcutaneously if Resident #1 was not eating breakfast. - Novolin (Insulin) 70/30 Flex Pen Subcutaneous Suspension Pen 30 units of insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, Physician Assistant interview, Pharmacy Director interview, Surgical Physician interview and resident interview the facility failed to provide antibiotic, diabetic, hypertension, antiepileptic, and pain medication as ordered resulting in significant errors by omission of high alert medications for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. Antibiotic medications were delayed after admission to the facility due to a transcription error for Resident #1. Diabetic, hypertension, antiepileptic, and pain medication were omitted initially upon admission due to a delay obtaining required medications from the pharmacy for Resident #1. Findings included: 1.Documentation on a hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was to be discharged to the facility post operation for an amputation. The problem list on the discharge summary revealed Resident #1 had a diabetic infection of his left foot. The surgical wound was cultured and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$55,760 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $55,760 — penalty dated 2023-09-27
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-25 for 22 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLIANCE HEALTH GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $303K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC