Barclays Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 172 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment services consistent with professional standards of practice by not ensuring a resident received blood sugar monitoring and insulin medication according to a physician's order for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following.On 8/15/2025 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #24 self-propelling in the hallway, was talking to themselves, and appeared confused. The surveyor attempted to interview Resident #24, but they did not respond. A review of the medical record revealed the following:A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), (an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care), dated July 23, 2025, reflected that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to respond in a timely manner to the Consultant Pharmacist's (CP) monthly recommendations from May, June and July 2025, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/15/2025 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #24 seated in a wheelchair self-propelling with their feet down the hallway. The resident was talking to themselves and appeared confused. The surveyor attempted to interview the Resident #24, but they did not respond.A review of the medical record revealed the following information: The admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder and Type 2 diabetes (DM). A review of the Order Summary Report (OSR) (physician's order sheet) dated August 2025 revealed a Physician's order (PO) dated 7/1/25 for insulin lispro (medication used to lower blood sugar), inject as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to inform and offer educational material regarding Advance Directives (AD) written instruction including but not limited to living will, medication restrictions, and treatment restriction for the provision of healthcare when an individual is incapacitated) with a resident and/or legal representative. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #24, and Resident #25) reviewed for AD and was evidenced by the following: On 8/12/2025 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 in bed with tube feeding (food provided via a tube into the stomach) infusing. in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1. The surveyor attempted to talk to the resident, but the resident did not respond. On 8/12/2025 at 10:31 AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #25 which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to maintain a resident's wheelchair, wheelchair right armrest, and bathroom in a clean and homelike condition. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for equipment and environmental care (Resident #44), and was evidenced by the following:Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a resident's wheelchair, wheelchair right armrest, and bathroom in a clean and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for environment (Resident #44), and was evidenced by the following:On 8/12/2025 at 9:32 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor interviewed Resident #44 in their room and was seated in their wheelchair. The resident stated that their wheelchair was pretty dirty and was unsure when it was last cleaned. The surveyor observed visible debris and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for personal property to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to end stage renal disease (kidney failure) and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) and assessment that facilitates a resident's care dated 8/8/25, reflected that Resident #11 scored a 10 of 15 on the basic interview for mental status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and exhibited behaviors such as refusal of care. A review of the Care Plan (CP) did not reflect that the resident had accusatory behavior or fabricated stories.On 8/13/2025 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #11 who stated that agency Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and thoroughly and timely investigate an allegation of misappropriation of property by 1 of 1 resident (Resident #11) who reported missing property to the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to end stage renal disease (kidney failure) and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) and assessment that facilitates a resident's care dated 8/8/25, reflected that Resident #11 scored a 10 of 15 on the basic interview for mental status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and exhibited behaviors such as refusal of care. A review of the Care Plan (CP) did not reflect that the resident had accusatory behavior or fabricated stories.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one (1) of 1 resident (Resident #71) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following:Review of the admission Record (admission summary) reflected that Resident #71 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic lung condition that makes breathing difficult) and depression.A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates a resident's care dated 6/25/2025, indicated that Resident #71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15 which indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #71 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) and was not on continuous and intermittent oxygen (O2) treatments.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of the Nurse Staffing Report and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 9 of 10 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter 1 2023 (October 1 - December 31) revealed the facility had no RN hours for the following dates: -10/01/23 (Saturday) -10/02/23 (Sunday) -10/09/23 (Sunday) -10/15/23 (Saturday) -10/16/23 (Sunday) -10/29/23 (Saturday) -10/30/23 (Sunday) -11/12/23 (Saturday) -11/13/23 (Sunday) -12/24/23 (Saturday) Review of the Employee Daily Schedule By Shift, provided by the facility, for the aforementioned dates, verified that there was no RN scheduled to work 8 consecutive hours on the following days: -10/01/22 -10/02/22 -10/09/22 -10/15/22 -10/16/22 -10/29/22 -10/30/22 -11/12/22 -12/24/22 During an interview with the surveyor on 02/23/24 at 10:32 AM, the Staffing Coordinator (SC) stated that they were to have staffed one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by a.) ensuring that the resident's wheelchairs were cleaned and repaired in a timely manner and b.) ensuring that each resident had their own waste receptacle (trash can) in their room. This deficient practice was observed for 8 out of 8 residents (Resident #2, #6, #25, #29, #44, #65, #72 and #78) and 3 out of 9 rooms (Rooms 106, 125 and 130) observed during environmental rounds. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 02/16/24 at 09:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #65's wheelchair in the hallway folded but the bottom portion of the wheelchair where the footrest attached and to lock the wheelchair appeared to be dusty and have brown rust on it. On 02/16/24 at 09:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #72's wheelchair right arm rest was ripped, the bottom portion of the wheelchair where the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to include a resident's indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for urinary catheter. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/15/24 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #75 in a geriatric (Geri) chair (a padded, reclining wheelchair). The resident stated he/she had a urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to empty urine) that was recently changed. The surveyor observed the resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was secured to the Geri chair without a privacy cover and the bottom of the bag was touching the floor. According to the admission Record, Resident #75 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure (sudden kidney damage), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of the body), chronic kidney disease stage 3, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) with lower urinary tract symptoms.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MB HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ