Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 27% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 104.3 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 76 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #'s: NJ175457, NJ175482 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to report a newly developed pressure ulcer (PU) and implement a physician's order (PO) for wound care to treat a facility acquired PU for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PU's, (Resident #110). The PU worsened from an excoriation (wearing off the skin) that was identified on 6/20/24 to an unstageable PU ( covered with slough (a soft, yellow or white, often stringy material that accumulates on the surface of a wound) or eschar (a layer of dry, dead tissue that forms over a deep wound) and cannot be staged which are caused by prolonged pressure, shear and friction and can lead to infection and complications). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/5/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical records (paper and electronic) of Resident #110, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #110…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions which included proper glove use for one of one kitchen. This failure placed 113 census residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 06/03/26 at 11:42 AM, a [NAME] was observed with gloves on preparing the plates for each food tray. As the [NAME] was preparing specialized plates, the [NAME] was touching other items in the kitchen (opening and closing the warmer, touching other surfaces away from the tray line) with the same gloved hands. The [NAME] then went back to tray line and started preparing plates for residents and touched the food on the plate with the same gloved hands used when starting to prepare resident food plates. The [NAME] stated gloves needed to be changed when they touched other things before they went back to touching food on tray line. During an observation on 06/03/26 at 12:45 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) was assisting with tray line preparing plates for the residents. A meal slip showed a resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure female residents had facial hair removed for two of four residents (Resident (R) 43 and R70) and fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for two of four residents (R65 and R92) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) of 35 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect resident care including personal hygiene in the facility. Findings include: Findings include: 1. Review of R43's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, and lack of coordination. Review of R43's Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, dated 02/15/24, revealed R43 had ADL self-care performance deficiencies related to dementia, disease process related to Parkinson's disease and limited mobility. R43 required total staff assistance of one staff with personal hygiene. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were evaluated with clinical indications for use documented for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (lorazepam) beyond 14 days for one of five residents (Resident (R) 10) and ensure target psychotropic behavior monitoring was conducted for one of five residents (R4) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 35 sample residents. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of adverse consequences. (Cross Reference F756)Findings include:1. Review of R10's electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/25, with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation. Review of R10's EMR Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab, dated 12/09/25, indicated that the resident was placed on hospice care and the goal was to provide the resident with comfort care. Review of R10's EMR Treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported timely to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one of one resident (Resident (R) 66) reviewed for abuse out of 35 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk of other vulnerable residents being abused. Findings include:Review of R66's electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 06/06/26. Review of R66's EMR admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) located under the MDS tab, dated 05/13/26, indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 06/01/26 at 10:36 AM, R66 stated he felt like he/she was being mentally abused since the facility held his/her mental health medications. There was no documentation related to this allegation. During an interview on 06/03/26 at 1:35 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately screened and had documentation to support the use of wander guards for one of two residents (Residents (R) 4) reviewed for wander guards of 35 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect all residents with wandering behaviors. Findings include:Review of R4's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/07/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of MDS along with previous MDS assessments completed on 01/13/26 and 10/14/25 revealed no wandering behavior was exhibited. Review of R4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to the installation of side rails for two of three residents (Resident (R) 12 and R54) reviewed for side rails out of 35 sampled residents. The lack of alternate side rail measures and proper assessment/consent could lead to potential restraint or side rail entrapment. Findings include:1. Review of R12's Face Sheet in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia and lack of coordination. Review of R12's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/13/26 and located in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 which indicated R12 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R12's Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities were responded to after the Consultant Pharmacist identified that there was a required stop date for one of six residents (Resident (R) 10) reviewed for medication regimens of 35 sampled residents. The Consultant Pharmacist identified that there was a required end date for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (lorazepam) and the facility failed to respond and correct the order. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary prolonged use of psychotropic medication. Findings include:Review of R10's electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/25, with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation. Review of R10's EMR quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference date of 03/17/26, located under the MDS tab indicated that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 which revealed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of three medication storage rooms and one of four medication carts were free of expired medications, syringes, collections tubes for specimens, and COVID-19 test for 113 census residents. This practice had the potential to affect medications and biologicals efficacy.Findings include:During an observation on 06/02/26 at 10:28 AM, alongside the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2, revealed all three medication storage rooms had Medline industries, sterile foam tipped applicators, expired on 05/26 and Medline industries, safety syringe 25Gx1.0 (139 syringes), expired 11/26/25. Observation of the first and second floor medication storage rooms revealed Osang Heatlhcare, (OHC), covid-19 antigen self-test expired 05/05; One a day vitamin, two bottles expired 04/26; and Cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%, two bottles expired 05/26. Observation of the first-floor medication cart revealed morphine oral 5mg (milligram) (25 syringes Predose) expired on 03/24. LPN2 confirmed at this time that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in rooms with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for one of one resident (Resident (R) 83) reviewed for infection control of 35 sample residents. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents and increase the risk for cross contamination and the spread of infections throughout the facility. Findings include: Observation on 06/02/26 at 9:13 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER]-D revealed signage on the outside of door which indicated EBP. Registered Nurse (RN) 2 was administering medications to R83 in bed A by the door and checking the resident's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) tube. RN2 was observed wearing gloves but no gown and was observed pulling back the residents' blankets. RN2 was observed leaning across R83 contacting the residents' stomach area while he/she touched the residents' peg tube with his/her hand. RN2 removed gloves and disposed of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility assessment review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff; individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement; and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles for two of two staff (Registered Nurse (RN) 2 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1) reviewed for training with the potential to affect 113 census residents. This failure had the potential to lead to increased spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, updated 01/02/26 and provided by the facility, revealed the facility provided staff training/education and competencies that were necessary to provide care and support for their resident population. The training/education and competencies/skill checks were generally provided upon hire, during monthly in-service/training, whenever an area of concern was identified, or new areas were identified based on resident diagnosis and/or clinical condition. Review of RN2's employee Personnel Training File, provided by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$47,304 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $47,304 — penalty dated 2024-12-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MB HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ