Laurel Manor Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 281 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 94.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint 2639643Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a physician order for oxygen was obtained upon a resident's admission. Specifically, the facility implemented and maintained oxygen therapy as part of a resident's Care Plan (CP) without a corresponding physician order to support its use. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #5).According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: unspecified fracture of upper end of right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, unspecified fall, emphysema (chronic, progressive lung disease characterized by damage to the air sacs), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (a progressive, chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow, making it difficult to breathe).According to the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/1/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the risk of entrapment, try alternatives, and/or obtain informed consent before initiating side rails for seven (Residents (R)1, R11, R83, and R87) of seven residents reviewed for side rails. These failures could result in serious injury or death to residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Side Rail, dated 12/24, provided by the facility revealed It is the policy of this facility to provide residents with side rails as an enabler for bed mobility. Procedure: 1. Upon admission, the nurse will assess the need for side rails using the Side Rail Assessment form in [Electronic Medical Record software]. 2. Side rails will be monitored and re-evaluated on a quarterly basis (based on MDS [Minimum Data Set] schedule) or as warranted by the resident's condition. 3. Residents may request the use of side rails for their own personal reasons. It is the resident's right that this decision must be honored. 4. If…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment was completed after admission for one resident (Resident (R) 110 out of 24 sampled residents.Findings include:Review of R110's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of R110's NJ [New Jersey] Department of Human Services Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I screen, dated 08/21/25 and located in the resident's EMR under the Miscellaneous tab, revealed no indication of mental illness identified. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 2:40 PM the Social Services Director (SSD) said she was not aware that R10 PASARR level I was not completed correctly. She stated that staff are usually looking for diagnosis like bipolar and schizophrenia but agreed that any mental illness diagnosis should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure five of five newly admitted residents (Residents (R)6, R57, R87, R105, and R108) had documentation the Baseline Care Plan had been reviewed with the resident and/or representative within 48 hours, and a copy of the Care Plan had been offered. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Comprehensive revised June 2025 indicated: The resident's baseline care plan is developed within 24-48 hours through the admission assessment. There was no procedure of the resident and/or their representative involvement with the baseline care plan. 1. Review of R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Clinical Census tab revealed he had been admitted on [DATE]. Review of R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/03/25 under the MDS tab revealed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 0 out of 15 which indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to hold medication when blood pressure was outside of the parameters for two of two residents (Residents (R)1 and R8) reviewed for medications and ensure the appropriate use of a wander guard device for one of two residents (R11) reviewed for wandering. These failures had the potential to cause residents' conditions to exacerbate and affect quality of care.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, reviewed 06/25It is the policy and procedure of the facility to provide the nursing staff with anunderstanding of proper medication administration. 1. Hold parameters: Check blood pressure and/or pulse rate immediately prior to pouring. Review of the facility policy titled, Wander Guard, revised 11/2021 revealed, it is the policy and procedure of this facility to provide a safe environment for its residents should a resident be identified as a wanderer. A wander…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. A total of four errors occurred out of 25 opportunities for error for two of five residents (Resident (R) 82, and R 108) observed for medication administration. The facility's medication error rate was 16%. The findings include: Review of the Medication Administration Policy reviewed date 06/2025 revealed under Policy, It is the policy and procedure of the facility to provide the nursing staff with an understanding of proper medical administration .Under Medication Timing item 2. revealed Medication ordered with food may be administered with milk and graham crackers (or similar items). 3. Medication ordered with meals should be given with the meal (i.e. Metoprolol). 4. Medication ordered before a meal should be specific to manufacturer's recommendation and administered prior to the start of the meal.). 1.Review of R82's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one Resident (R)105 with a tracheostomy, corrugated respiratory tubing which delivered humidified oxygen, and a moisture collection bag had been kept off of the floor. Having the tubing and collection bag on the floor put R105 at risk of infection.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Tubing and Respiratory Products revised October 2024 indicated, All oxygen tubing would have been properly stored to prevent the transmission of infection. If the tubing falls on the floor, it shall immediately be discarded and replaced to prevent contamination. Review of R105's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Census List under the tab Census revealed she had been admitted on [DATE]. Review of R105's EMR Medical Diagnosis under the tab Medical Diagnosis revealed she had been admitted with a fracture of the base of her skull, epidural hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and previous acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ171256 Based on observation, interview, record review and pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled substance inventories were completed in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 5 medication carts reviewed ( Lower [NAME] medication cart #3 and Redwood medication cart #2) during the medication storage and labeling task. The evidence was as followed: On 04/04/2024 at 10:51 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) stated that when the pharmacy brought in the controlled substances (drug or other substance that is tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction), both the incoming and outgoing nurses should sign the Controlled Substance Inventory Record (CSIR) and count the actual medication cards. LPN # 1 also confirmed that the CSIR should not be missing any documentation signatures. At that time, the surveyor, in the presence of LPN # 1, reviewed the Lower [NAME] medication cart #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dignity during meal services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #89) observed who required assistance with eating. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 04/04/24 at 12:21 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #89 being fed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) in the main dining room. The LPN stood over Resident #89 who was seated at a dining table. At 12:28 PM, the LPN walked away from Resident #89 to assist another resident. When the LPN returned to Resident #89, she sat next to the resident while she fed him/her. At 12:36 PM, the LPN stood back up and continued to feed Resident #89 while standing over the resident. During an interview with the surveyor on 04/04/24 at 12:40 PM, the LPN stated that when staff feed residents, the staff should be seated in front of the resident for better etiquette. The LPN further stated that she stood up while feeding Resident #89 because her back hurt. 2. On 04/05/24 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #: 169845 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan to address a.) fall prevention interventions and b.) pressure ulcer interventions. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 19 residents reviewed for resident-centered care plans (Resident #62 and #397) and was evidenced by the following: 1.) According to the admission Record, Resident #62 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to spinal stenosis (condition where spinal column narrows and compresses the spinal cord) and abnormality of gait and mobility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool which facilitates resident's care dated 03/02/24, indicated that Resident #62 scored a 7 out of 10 on the Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident had moderate impairment in cognitive status. On 04/04/24 at 12:10, the surveyor observed Resident #62 in the main…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MB HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ