No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation, LLC

4112 Spring Hill Road, Portage, PA 15946 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (814) 736-6006 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 736-6006 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0610) — most recent May 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
711 Caldwell Ave · (814) 736-9628 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3692 Portage St · (814) 713-8058 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
739 Prospect St · (814) 736-4261 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Monument Wy · (814) 736-3390 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.0%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.4%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.7%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine27.8%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.2%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%9.5%12.0%typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.5%CMS range 35.9–60.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.2–17.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.04
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.15
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.96
RN hoursweekends
62.9%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-18)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated April 8, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was taking an anti-anxiety medication, and had a diagnosis of anxiety. A psychological assessment of Resident 5, dated Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated February 19, 2026, March 1, 2026, March 24, 2026, March 27, 2026, April 14, 2026 included orders for the resident to receive 1 milligram (mg) lorazepam every six hours as needed for anxiety. A review of the medication administration records (MAR) for Resident 5, dated March, and April 2026, revealed the resident was administered 1 mg of lorazepam on March 4 at 12:28 a.m. and 12:21 p.m., March 6, March 7 at 03:03 a.m. and 4:04 p.m. and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a provider's orders for two of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 8, 48). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated April 10, 2026, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included a urinary tract infection and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a progressive brain disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for medications and treatments for seven of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 6, 12, 16, 17, 24, and 48).Findings include: A facility policy regarding medication administration, dated August 26, 2025, indicated that staff are to obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician's orders. When applicable, hold medications for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated May 3, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for her daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes. The resident's care plan, dated October 16, 2022 indicated that the resident would be medicated per the physician's orders. Physician's orders for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that treatments and recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed and completed for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 52) who had pressure ulcers. Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated April 11, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, had limited range of motion to her lower extremity, and had a stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling). A wound consult note, dated April 27, 2026, revealed Resident 4 had a stage IV pressure ulcer to her sacrum (lower part of spine) that had undermining (occurs when tissue beneath the wound edges…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed for the care of long-term intravenous catheters for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed for the care of long-term intravenous catheters for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding intravenous (IV) catheters (a thin tube placed in a vein that can be used for an extended period of time to deliver fluids and/or medications), dated April 26, 2025, revealed that the catheter was to be flushed with 5 milliliters (ml) of normal saline (salt water solution) before and after the infusion (of medication). Physician's orders for Resident 8, dated April 24, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 2 grams (g) of Cefepime Hydrochloric acid (HCl) (an antibiotic)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for five of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 5, 17, 24, 37). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding disposal of discontinued controlled/narcotic medications, dated August 25, 2026, revealed that controlled/narcotic medications must be destroyed in the presence of two licensed nurses. The two nurses will count together the remaining amount of controlled/narcotic medications to be destroyed. Two nurses will sign and date the control drug record upon witnessing the destruction of the controlled/narcotic medications, logging the amount of medications destroyed. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated April 11, 2026, indicated that the resident was able to make herself understood and could understand others, was cognitively intact, required assistance with care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered the COVID vaccination and that education was provided to the resident and/or representative regarding the benefits and potential risks of the COVID vaccination for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 36, and 52) and failed to ensure that staff were offered the COVID vaccination and that education was provided to the resident and/or representative regarding the benefits and potential risks of the COVID vaccination. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated April 22, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and was not up to date with the COVID vaccination. Review of the immunization records for Resident 1 revealed no documented evidence that the resident was offered, received, or refused the COVID vaccine and that education was provided to the resident and/or representative regarding the benefits and potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for five of five Nurse Aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8).Findings include: The facility assessment, dated January 2026, indicated that all personnel, including managers, staff, and volunteers, were to receive education related to Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI). Review of Nurse Aide 4's education record dated 2024-2025 revealed that the employee did not have training on QAPI. Review of Nurse Aide 5's education record dated 2024-2025 revealed that the employee did not have training on QAPI. Review of Nurse Aide 6's education record dated 2024-2025 revealed that the employee did not have training on QAPI. Review of Nurse Aide 7's education record dated 2024-2025 revealed that the employee did not have training on QAPI. Review of Nurse Aide 8's education record dated 2024-2025 revealed that the employee did not have training on QAPI. An interview with the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 24 and 36).Findings include: A facility policy regarding use of psychotropic medications, dated August 26, 2025, indicated that prior to initiating or increasing a psychotropic medication, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must be informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives for the medication, including any black box warnings for antipsychotic medications, in advance of such initiation or increase. The resident has the right to accept or decline the initiation or increase of a psychotropic medication. The facility will document that the resident or resident representative was informed in advance of the risks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 4, 7).Findings include:The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, revealed that Section N0415B1 Antianxiety medications was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period, Section N0415F1 Antibiotic medications was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period, and Section N0415J1 Hypoglycemic medications was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period.Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated October 6, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 0.5 milligrams (mg) of lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) every morning and at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 52 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 24 and 36).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 24, dated May 7, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and received an antidepressant medication.Physician's orders for Resident 24, dated April 30 and May 11, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 5 mg of buspirone every morning and bedtime for depression and then 2.5 mg of buspirone every morning and night for depression.Medication Administration Records (MAR's) for Resident 24 for May 2026, revealed the resident received buspirone from May 1 through May 18, 2026.There was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed to address Resident 24's depression and use of buspirone.Interview with the Director of Nursing on May 18, 2026, at 12:06 p.m. confirmed that the resident did not have a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for four of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 16, 24 and 52).Findings include: A facility policy for Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change dated August 26, 2025, indicated that the comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated February 15, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, did not receive an anticoagulant, and had diagnoses that included high blood pressure and dementia. Current physician's orders for Resident 13 included an order to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of apixaban (anticoagulant) twice a day for atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat),.A review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR's) for Resident 13 for May 2026 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident had dentures in place for breakfast for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 36). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care of dentures, dated August 26, 2025, revealed that nursing staff will provide denture care. If a resident is unable to care for their own dentures, dentures will be cleaned for them during routine oral care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 36, dated May 6, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs and had a diagnosis of malnutrition. A physician's order for Resident 36, dated May 15, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive a regular diet, mechanical soft texture with nectar consistency liquids. An admission assessment for Resident 36, dated May 1, 2026, revealed that the resident had upper and lower dentures. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment was as free of accident hazards by failing to complete safety assessments for air mattress use for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 6, 24).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding air mattresses, dated August 26, 2025, indicated that the air mattress would be used in accordance with evidence-based practice for residents with or at risk for pressure injuries. Air mattresses would be chosen by matching the potential therapeutic benefit with the resident's specific situation. Considerations for utilizing air mattresses included: medical condition, size and weight, mobility and activity levels, need for moisture control or shear reduction, presence of pressure injuries, risk of developing a pressure injury or at high risk for additional pressure injuries, pain and discomfort, and an excessive amount of penetration of the surface. Air mattresses would be utilized in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nephrostomy output was monitored for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 4) who had a nephrostomy tube (a flexible tube inserted into the kidney to drain urine), and failed to ensure that a follow up appointment was kept for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated April 11, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had limited range of motion of the lower extremities, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had nephrostomy tubes (thin catheter inserted through the skin into the kidney to allow urine to drain directly into a collection bag outside the body), and diagnoses that included renal disease and obstructive uropathy (blockage in the urinary system).Physician's orders, dated October 23, 2025, included orders for staff to empty the resident's bilateral nephrostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 52) who had a feeding tube.Findings include: The facility policy regarding enteral tube feedings, dated August 26, 2025, indicated that prior to the administration of the tube feeding, staff were to verify the placement of the feeding tube and were to document the verification of the tube placement. The tube feed was to be flushed before and after feedings and medications. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 52, dated April 17, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care tasks, and had a feeding tube. Physician's orders for Resident 52, dated April 14, 2026, included orders for the resident to receive Jevity 1.5 (a tube feeding formula) 237 milliliters five times a day. Observations for Resident 52 tube feed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer a resident's continuous oxygen as ordered for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding oxygen therapy, dated August 26, 2025, indicated that oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition warranting oxygen and the response to oxygen therapy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12 dated April 30, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required supervision with daily care needs, received oxygen therapy, and had a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD-a disease that limits blood flow to the heart caused by plaque buildup in the arteries).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 17). Findings include: A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 17, dated March 20, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, had pain occasionally, received as needed pain medications, was taking an opioid medication (a controlled medication used to treat pain), and had diagnoses that included fibromyalgia (chronic condition causing pain in muscles and joints throughout the body). Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated January 27, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 50 mg of Tramadol (opioid medication) every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of Resident 17's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026, revealed that the resident received 50 mg of Tramadol on April 8 at 7:39 a.m.; April 9 at 7:10 a.m.; April 10 at 6:40 a.m.; April 11 at 6:12 p.m.;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending July 2, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending May 18, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to accurate MDS assessments, creation of care plans, revision of care plans, quality care, safety/accidents, bowel/bladder incontinence and indwelling urinary catheters, maintenance of IV catheters, narcotic accountability, and infection control. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding accurate MDS assessments, cited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 52). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was offered and/or received the influenza immunization for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 24) and failed to ensure that each resident was offered and/or received the pneumococcal immunization for five of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 5, 24, 48 and 52). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the influenza vaccine, dated August 26, 2025, indicated that between October 1 and March 31 each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized during that time. For those who receive the vaccine, the date of the vaccine, lot number, expiration date, person administering, and the site of the vaccination shall be documented in the resident's medical record. A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented on the informed consent form and placed in the resident's medical chart. The infection preventionist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility assessment and employee education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed the required annual education for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 4, 6, and 7).Findings include: The facility assessment regarding education, dated January 2026, indicated that all personnel, including manager, staff (both employees and those who provide services under contract), and volunteers, indicated that the nurse aides would receive their necessary education credits annually. Review of the employee education file for Nurse Aide 4 revealed that there was no documented evidence of twelve hours of required education completed between 2024-2025. Review of the employee education file for Nurse Aide 6 revealed that there was no documented evidence of twelve hours of required education completed between 2024-2025. Review of the employee education file for Nurse Aide 7 revealed that there was no documented evidence of twelve hours of required education completed between 2024-2025.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food stored in the kitchen and dry storage room was dated once opened. Findings include: The facility policy regarding food storage, dated March 12, 2025, revealed that any food item once opened should be labeled with an open date. Observations in the dry storage room on June 30, 2025, at 8:53 a.m. revealed that there was one 10-pound bag of pasta that was opened and not dated with an open date. Observations in the kitchen refrigerator on June 30, 2025, at 9:01 a.m. revealed two opened and undated 5-pound bags of cheese, one with parmesan and the other with a mixture of cheddar and mozzarella. Observations in the kitchen on June 30, 2025, at 9:07 a.m. revealed that there was approximately ten pounds of flour and twenty-five pounds of rice that were opened and not labeled with an open date. Interview with the Dietary Manager and Director of Nursing on June 30, 2025, at 8:45 a.m. and 11:32 a.m. respectively, confirmed that all open food items in the kitchen should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required timeframe for 10 of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 14, 26, 34, 43, 44, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that for admission MDS assessments, the assessment completion date was to be no later than the resident's admission date plus 13 calendar days. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 14, dated May 12, 2025, revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care in place. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis, with a significant change in condition, on re-admission, and as needed or requested by the resident and/or resident's representative. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated April 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy (a condition where there is a blockage in the urinary tract, preventing normal urine flow). A care plan for the resident, dated February 11, 2025, revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure urinary output was monitored for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 1) who had an indwelling urinary catheter, and failed to ensure proper incontinent care was completed for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding urinary output, dated March 12, 2025, revealed that the volume of urine output was to be documented in the resident's chart or electronic medical record. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 24, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care tasks, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine), and had diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder (a lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition). Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated May 26, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that intravenous catheters were flushed according to facility policy and failed to ensure that physician's orders for the care and maintenance of intravenous catheters were obtained for two 35 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding midline (a thin, flexible tube inserted into a large vein in the upper arm to administer medication or fluids intravenously) maintenance and care, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that staff was to change the transparent dressing every week or as needed if soiled, damp and/or loose. Staff was flush the line according to the physician's orders. The policy regarding flushing the peripheral intravenous access (the insertion of a short, flexible catheter into a peripheral vein, typically in the hand or arm, to deliver medications, fluids or other therapies directly into the bloodstream), dated March 12, 2025, indicated that the following regimen should be used when flushing an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician and the resident's responsible party regarding a change in condition for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding changes in a resident's condition or status, dated March 12, 2025, revealed that physicians, responsible family members or legal representatives would be notified as soon as possible of any changes in the resident's condition. A quarterly admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated May 31, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses that included diabetes, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of Resident 2's care plan, dated November 1, 2023, indicated that the resident had a history of acute (sudden onset) respiratory failure. A nursing note for Resident 2, dated November 13, 2025, at 6:17 p.m. revealed that when staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and facility grievance/complaint logs, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow its grievance policies regarding maintaining a log of all grievances received for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding grievances/complaints, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that a concern form is initiated when a concern/grievance is brought forward by a staff, family, responsible party and/or resident. After obtaining necessary information from the resident, family, responsible party and/or staff the concern form is completed and submitted to the Social Services Director or the Administrator who then distributes it to the appropriate depart head(s). The Social Service Director will log the form into a concern and grievance log. The Social Services Director will maintain a concern and grievance log as well as ensure concerns/grievances are completed and followed up with in a timely manner including effectiveness. Results of concerns/grievances will be maintained for a minimum of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative, in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital, to ensure that a bed-hold notice was provided to the resident's responsible party and that the ombudsman was notified of the transfer to the hospital, for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 19, 38), and failed to complete a post discharge summary for one of 35 resident's reviewed (Resident 37) Findings include: The facility's policy regarding bed-holds and returns, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and bed-hold policies. An original is to be placed in the resident chart and one given to the family. The facility's policy regarding physician discharge summary revealed that when a resident is discharged the physician will complete and sign a discharge summary that includes the diagnosis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 25). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Section N0415G1 Diuretic Medications was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period, and Section N0415K1 Anticonvulsant Medications was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated May 21, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 20-25 milligram (mg) of Lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide (a combination antihypertensive-diuretic medication used to lower blood pressure) in the morning for hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: A facility policy for Care Plans, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that the resident and his or her representative were encouraged to participate in the development and implementation of the resident's person-centered care plan. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated April 10, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance from staff with daily care tasks, and received an anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and diuretic medication. Physician's orders for Resident 9, dated September 9, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of Apixaban (anticoagulant-used to prevent blood clots) by mouth every morning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated June 20, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, and could usually understand others. Physician's orders for Resident 12, dated May 20, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive one gram (gm) of Meropenem (an antibiotic to treat a variety of serious bacterial infections) intravenously (a medical process that administers fluids, medications and nutrients directly into a person's vein) every eight hours for a urinary tract infection for seven days (a total of 21 doses). Review of Resident 12's Medication Administration Records (MARs) for May 2025 revealed that staff documented as administering the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by failing to ensure that fall/injury prevention interventions were in place for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated April 10, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance from staff with daily care tasks, and had limited range of motion to her lower extremities. The resident's care plan, dated June 19, 2025, revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and indicated that fall mats were to be at bedside. A nursing note for Resident 9, dated June 13, 2025, at 2:50 a.m., revealed that the resident was found lying on the floor on the left side of her bed. New interventions included placing her bed in the lowest position and bilateral fall mats. Observations of Resident 9 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 25). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding disposal of narcotics, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that controlled/narcotic medications were to be destroyed in the presence of tow licensed nurses. The two nurses would count together the remaining amount of controlled/narcotic medications to be destroyed. Two nurses would sign and date the Control Drug Record upon witnessing the destruction of the controlled/narcotic medications, logging the amount of medications destroyed. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 25, dated April 22, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, received pain medication routinely and as needed, and received an opioid (a controlled pain medication). Physician's orders, dated April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 25) who were receiving hospice services. Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 25, dated April 22, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, received hospice services, and had a diagnosis of cancer. Physician's orders and a care plan for Resident 25, dated April 15, 2025, included an order for the resident to be treated by hospice (end-of-life services) for basal cell carcinoma (skin cancer) of the left upper limb. As of July 1, 2025, there was no documented evidence in the resident's clinical record, or in the hospice provider's clinical record, that the facility obtained updated hospice nurse aide or registered nurse charting. The last hospice nurse aide charting located on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending June 5, July 11, and December 26, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending July 2, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to care plan revisions; providing quality care; ensuring that the resident's environment was free from accident hazards; maintaining intravenous catheters; preventing issues with the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and attendance records for the facility's Quality Assurance Committee, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all required members of the Quality Assurance Committee attended quarterly meetings. Findings include: The facility's policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, dated March 12, 2025, revealed that meetings would be held at least quarterly and would include the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, all department heads, a community member, and the Medical Director. Review of the attendance records for the facility's Quality Assurance Committee meetings revealed that the Medical Director did not attend any meetings that were held during the first quarter of 2025. Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 2, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. confirmed that the Medical Director did not attend meetings of the Quality Assurance Committee that were held during the first quarter of 2025. 28 Pa code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper hand washing techniques were used during medication administration for three of three residents observed (Residents 2, 29, 45). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hand hygiene, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that all employees were to follow the hand washing procedure, which included hand sanitizing, before preparing or handling medications, and after removing gloves. Observations during the medication pass in A hall on July 2, 2025, at 8:33 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 prepared Resident 45's medications and administered them. Without sanitizing her hands, she donned gloves and entered Resident 29's room and took the resident's blood pressure. She doffed her gloves and without hand sanitizing she prepared and administered Resident 29's medications. She then went to Resident 2's room and donned gloves and checked the resident's blood sugar. She doffed her gloves and without hand sanitizing she prepared the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that peripherally-inserted central catheters (PICC lines) site dressings were changed per physician's orders for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding PICC line maintenance and care, dated May 6, 2024, indicated that staff are to change the dressing every week. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated December 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was always understood, always understood others, was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and that he was receiving intravenous medications (IV). Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated December 18, 2024, included and order for the resident to have the PICC line dressing changed every week. Review of Resident 2's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated December 2024, revealed that staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 6). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Resident Rights, dated May 6, 2024, revealed that the facility would protect and promote the rights of each resident, particularly those rights that pertain to a dignified existence. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated December 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was always understood, always understood others, was cognitively impaired, and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. Observations of Resident 2 on December 26, 2024, at 8:36 a.m. revealed that the resident had no curtain or blind covering the window to the outside. His bed was on the window side of the room and the window faced the facility's main parking lot. A significant change MDS assessment for Resident 6, dated December 16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure personal privacy for one of six resident reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Resident Rights, dated May 6, 2024, revealed that the facility would protect and promote the rights of each resident, particularly those rights that pertain to a dignified existence. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated December 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was always understood, always understood others, was cognitively impaired, and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. Observations of Resident 2 on December 26, 2024, at 8:36 a.m. revealed that the resident had no curtain or blind covering the window to the outside. His bed was on the window side of the room, and the window faced the facility's main parking lot. Interview with Resident 2 on December 26, 2024 at 8:36 a.m. revealed that he has asked for a curtain or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was completed for an injury of unknown origin, to rule out that abuse and/or neglect were involved for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse and neglect, dated May 6, 2024, indicated that the Director of Nursing/designee conducts the investigation. Reviews the accident/incident report; obtains written statements of staff assigned to the resident for the shift during which the allegation is noted, and 24 hours prior if indicated; and interviews witnesses, if any, and obtains statements. The facility's policy regarding incident/accident reporting, dated May 6, 2024, indicated that in the case of an incident or injury of unknown etiology, an investigative report of injury unknown origin and investigative report of skin tear/bruise of unknown etiology are completed, as needed. All employees assigned to the resident involved in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's directions for use, investigative reports, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible by failing to follow the manufacturer's directions for use of a high-back reclining wheelchair for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in a fall. Findings include: Operation instructions for the Medline Standard Manual Wheelchairs, dated December 30, 2021, revealed that to ensure safety in using this Medline wheelchair, all warnings and safety information and all instructions must be followed. Failure to do so may result in serious bodily injury or damage to the chair. Recliner models only: DO NOT use the recliner wheelchair without the anti-tip devices installed. Anti-tippers MUST be always attached, and both must be adjusted to the same height. Ensure the anti-tippers are secured as evidenced by the spring buttons fully protruding out of the holes. Anti-tippers (included with select models): Rear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's written menus, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: A facility's policy regarding menu management, dated May 6, 2024, revealed that menus were to be posted on menu boards located in the dining room and hallway. Temporary changes to the menu will be posted daily on the menu boards. To ensure consistency, all meals served will strictly adhere to the pre-approved menus. The facility's written and posted weekly menu for the lunch meal on June 3, 2024, revealed that the residents were to receive bread with margarine. Observations during the lunch meal on June 3, 2024, at 12:08 p.m. revealed that the residents did not receive bread or margarine for the lunch meal. Interview with the Dietary Manager on June 3, 2024, at 12:58 a.m. revealed that a new cook eliminated the bread from the menu for lunch and she did not know why, but the residents should have been provided bread and margarine with their meal. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(a) Dietary Services. 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for were followed for three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 27, 35) and failed to ensure that neurological checks were completed following an unwitnessed fall for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: A facility policy related to physician's orders, dated May 6, 2024, indicated that medications, treatments, and care is provided to residents upon written and/or verbal order. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated May 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others, required assistance with daily care needs, received insulin, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 11, dated October 18, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 44 units of Glargine insulin (a long-acting insulin) subcutaneously (injected just under the skin)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for four of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 11, 29, 34). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated May 6, 2024, revealed that all medications were ordered, acquired, and administered in accordance with Pennsylvania State Regulations as governed by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, and in accordance with all policies and procedures of the facility. If a medication was to be administered at a specific time, the specific time may be based upon resident's choice. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated May 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others, had complaints of pain rated as a 5 out of 10 on a pain scale, and was receiving controlled pain medication. A care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to respond timely to pharmacy recommendations for four of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 11, 35, 36) and failed to obtain completed pharmacy recommendations for physician review for two of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 29). Findings include: The facility's policy for drug regimen review, dated May 6, 2024, indicated that a drug regimen review is performed by a licensed pharmacist for every resident each month. The pharmacist will report any medication irregularities and recommendations to the attending physician on a pharmacy review sheet. The physician will respond to the pharmacist's recommendation on the review sheet, and it will be returned to the facility to be acted upon. The review sheet will be filed in the resident's chart in the physician progress section and will be kept in the chart for one full year. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated April 12, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of a resident's needs by failing to ensure that the call bell was within reach for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 35). Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 35, dated March 8, 2024, indicated that the resident was sometimes understood and could sometimes understand, was cognitively impaired, and required maximum assistance for transfers and toileting. The resident's current care plan indicated that the resident had decreased mobility and that staff were to ensure the call bell was within reach, and the resident was to have her bed and chair alarms on and operational while she was in her bed or chair. Observations of Resident 35 on June 3, 2024, at 10:31 a.m. revealed that the resident was lying in bed, and the call bell was in her nightstand drawer with the drawer closed and was not within her reach. The resident's bed alarm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to address and maintain advance directives as part of the clinical record for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding advance directives (instructions regarding the provision of health care and life sustaining measures when the resident is incapacitated), dated May 6, 2024, indicated that upon admission residents and/or their responsible party are asked if an advanced directive or living will exists. If an advanced directive or living will exists, it is reviewed and placed in the resident's chart. If an advanced directive or living does not exist, the resident and/or their responsible party are asked if they wish to complete one. Advanced directives are reviewed with the residents as needed by social worker and acknowledgment forms are filed in the resident's medical record. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the status of nursing licenses was checked with the State Board of Nursing for one of two nurses reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse 2) and failed to complete a Nurse Aide Registry verification for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse, neglect or mistreatment, dated May 6, 2024, indicated that potential employees must pass the pre-employment screening process to be hired at the facility. Potential employees must pass a criminal background check inquiring for a history of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of residents as defined by the requirements of federal regulations. This search includes attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers, and checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries. The personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse 2 revealed a start date of February 10, 2019. However, there was no documented evidence until July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 29, 43). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated May 14, 2024 revealed that the resident was able to make herself understood and understood others, was moderately cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for personal care needs, and had a mechanically altered therapeutic diet. A care plan for Resident 13, dated June 21, 2022, revealed that she had an impaired nutritional status and required a mechanically altered therapeutic diet with thickened liquids that was to be provided as ordered. Physician's orders for Resident 13, dated May 9, 2024, included orders for the resident tor receive a carbohydrate controlled, mechanically soft textured diet, with thin consistency liquids, and may have salads per speech therapy. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a professional (registered) nurse assessed a resident after a fall for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated May 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was able to make herself understood and understood others, was moderately cognitively impaired, and required assistance from staff for personal care needs. A licensed practical nurse's note for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow treatment recommendations for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A facility policy regarding pressure ulcer prevention and management, dated May 6, 2024, revealed that a wound care nurse consult would include assessment and finding, which may include stage, measurements, appearance, and treatment recommendations in the consult report. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated March 27, 2024, indicated that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others, was dependent on staff for care, and was at risk for a pressure ulcer (skin breakdown caused by prolonged, unrelieved pressure). Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated May 15, 2024, included an order for the resident to have his right heel cleansed, patted dry, Medihoney (wound ointment) applied, then covered with bordered gauze once daily and as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that contracture management services were provided as care planned for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 25). Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 25, dated March 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others, was dependent on staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). Occupational Therapy orders for Resident 25, dated January 10, 2024, included an order for the resident to have passive range of motion (when someone physically moves or stretches a part of your body) to all joints in her left hand twice a day. A care plan for Resident 25, dated May 1, 2024, revealed that the resident was on a restorative nursing program for range of motion. Nursing tasks for Resident 25 included that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly secured in the medication cart. Findings include A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 244, dated May 28, 2024 revealed that the resident understood others and was understood, was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for personal care needs, and has a diagnosis of gout (a build up of uric acid that causes pain and inflammation). Observations on June 3, 2024, at 10:49 a.m. revealed that there was a round white pill on the floor of Resident 244's room. Physician orders for Resident 244, dated May 13, 2024, included an order for the resident to be administered 100 milligrams (mg) of Allopurinol in the morning for gout. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 5 on June 3, 2024, at 10:59 a.m. confirmed the white pill with 349 IJ was identified as Allopurinol (a medication used to treat gout), and Resident 244 was currently prescribed the medication. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding nursing documentation, dated May 6, 2024, revealed that all documentation confirms that care was provided. Documentation identifies the resident's status, clinical findings and interventions. It is the staff's responsibility in documentation, which acts as proof that care was provided. All documentation was to be done in the electronic record Point Click Care (PCC). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated May 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was able to make herself understood and understood others, was moderately cognitively impaired, and required assistance staff for personal care needs. A licensed practical nurse's note for Resident 13, dated February 21, 2024, indicated that she was lying on her fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending June 1, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending June 5, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to develop resident care plans, failure to provide quality of care, failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records, and failure to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications. The facility's plans of correction for deficiencies regarding developing and implementing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that based on nurse aides' hire dates, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed at least 12 hours of inservice education for one of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 6). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding nurse aide inservice training, dated May 6, 2024, indicated that the facility will maintain an ongoing educational program for the development and improvement of skills of the facility's personnel, including at a minimum, annual in-service training. Certified Nursing Assistants are required to complete at a minimum 12 hours total annually. Nurse aide education records revealed that based on their hire dates Nurse Aide 6 did not have at least 12 hours of education annually as follows: Nurse Aide 6's hire date was May 18, 2018, and inservice records revealed that she had no annual education completed between May 2022 and May 2024. Interview with the Human Resources Director on June 5, 2024, at 10:40 a.m. confirmed that Nurse Aide 6 did not have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident and/or the resident's representative at the time of transfer for three of three residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding bed holds (holding a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for hospitalization), dated October 6, 2023, indicated that the admission director/designee will contact the resident/resident's representative following a facility-initiated transfer to an acute care facility or hospital. The original copy of the facility's bed-hold policy was to be placed in the resident's chart and the copy can be given to the family. This can be in person or sent via email. If the representative is present, then they can be informed at that time. Then document in the resident's electronic medical record that the resident/representative was notified either via phone call or in person and received a copy and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit the readmission of a hospitalized resident without providing evidence that the facility was not able to meet the resident's needs for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding notice requirements for transfer/discharge of a long-term resident, dated October 6, 2023, indicated that the facility must permit each resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility, the safety of individuals in the facility is endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident, or the health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered. The facility must also be sure to document the danger that failure to transfer or discharge would pose. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were accurately documented for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated December 27, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood, understands, and had a diagnosis which included osteomyelitis (a serious infection of the bone that can be either acute or chronic) and aquired absence of the right great toe. A wound healing center note for Resident 1, dated January 2, 2024, revealed that staff was to leave the dressing on the resident's foot for three days and then apply betadine dressings daily. Review of Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TARs) for January 2024 revealed that staff completed the betadine dressing to the resident's right foot on January 5, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that the betadine dressing was completed on January 6 and 7,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MB HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRODT, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 04/07/2017
DORFMAN, YAAKOVIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2017
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2017
PILLER, MENDYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2017
EVANS, CHADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
SOMMERS, DOVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/07/2017
MB HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2017
FOCKLER, CRAIGIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$246K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 47%Medicare 4%Other / private 49%

This home reported $246K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$310per resident / day
operating cost
$9,413per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396088. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next