Clover Meadows Healthcare And Rehabilitation Cente

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 96.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2581082Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a resident's Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Care Plan (CICP) after facility identification of a skin condition. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following:A review of the resident admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to dementia, depression, and malignant neoplasm of the breast.A review of the annual Minimum Date Set (MDS-an assessment the facilitates a resident's care) dated 9/27/25, indicated that Resident #1 had severe cognitive deficits and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. The MDS also reflected that the resident was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers. The MDS indicated that the resident had interventions in place such as a pressure reducing device for the wheelchair and bed, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a.) a physician's order (PO) was in place for a resident who used a machine that helps you breathe for sleep apnea (a sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts), which the resident brought from home, b.) a PO was in place for the proper settings, c.) a PO was in place to maintain the cleanliness of the machine and it's parts in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for respiratory care; and d.) respiratory masks were stored properly after use to prevent contamination. This was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #9 and #238) that were reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the follows: 1. On 1/12/25 at 11:07 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #9 in bed covered with a sheet. The surveyor observed a nasal pillow mask (a type of mask that delivers air pressure directly into the nostrils through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards by adjusting medication administration times to accommodate a resident's dialysis (a clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidneys) schedule for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #62, reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT# NJ00179885 Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to submit a report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) within the two-hour timeframe for an allegation of abuse made by a resident, (Resident #82). The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for abuse investigations and was evidenced by the following: On 1/12/25 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #82 in bed. The surveyor interviewed the resident, and the resident had no concerns. On 1/14/24 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in their room in bed. The surveyor interviewed the resident regarding an incident in November but the resident had not wanted to speak about any incident regarding staff. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #82. A review of the admission Record revealed diagnoses which included but not limited to; heart failure, generalized muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. A review of the most recent comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and pertinent record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of the Narcotic Shift Count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling and was evidenced by the following: On 10/26/23 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse #3 (LPN #3), reviewed the narcotic logbook for the North Wing Back Hall medication cart. The Controlled Drugs Accountability/Count Sheet for August, September, and October 2023 shift logs revealed the following incomplete or blank sections: 8/5/23 - 11 PM -7 AM total incoming count section containing counts for Bingo, Boxes, Bottle, and Sheet. 8/6/23 - 11 PM -7 AM total incoming counts for Bingo, Boxes, Bottle, and Sheet. 8/19/23 - 11 PM -7 AM total incoming and total outgoing counts for Bingo, Boxes, Bottle, and Sheet. 8/22/23 - 7 AM - 3 PM outgoing nurse signature 8/27/23 - 3 - 11 PM outgoing nurse signature 8/31/23 - 11 PM -7 AM total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications and properly label opened multidose medications. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 1 medication storage rooms and 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 10:27 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse #3 (LPN #3), reviewed the North Wing Back Hall medication cart. The following was observed: One (1) opened aluminum envelope of dorzolamide hydrochloride and timolol maleate ophthalmic solution, usp 2%/0.5% preservative free (a prescription eye drop medication used to treat glaucoma) labeled from the manufacturer to contain 15 single use containers, opened and contained 18 single use containers. The opened envelope had the date 10/24 written on it but was not labeled with a resident's name. One (1) opened bottle of artificial tears eye drops in its box…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy and promote dignity during resident assessment and medication administration. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (#20 and #52) reviewed for dignity and was evidenced by the following: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 10/24/23 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 seated in the wheelchair in the hallway outside of their room. When interviewed, the resident reported a positive cough last evening. Review of Resident #20's admission Record revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in October of 2023 with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort breathing), heart failure, end-stage renal (kidney) disease and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to clean your blood when your kidneys are not able to). Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transfer discharged or expired resident's personal needs account (PNA) funds back to the appropriate jurisdiction within 30 days of death or discharge and ensure that the total amount in the PNA account did not exceed the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit. This deficient practice was identified for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for PNA accounting (Resident #7, #9, #298, #299, #300, #301, and #302). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the Clover Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Funds Balance Report - Resident Trust Liability (RTL) dated [DATE]. The RTL indicated the following balances: Resident #7 had $3,243.35, Resident #9 had $2,129.42, Resident #298 had $2.912.53, Resident #299 had $2,670.82, Resident #300 had $3,589.39, Resident #301 had $2,302.49, and Resident #302 had $2,729.20. Further review of these resident's medical records indicated that Resident #298…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ00167863 Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident to resident abuse for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #52 and #64) reviewed for resident to resident abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #64's electronic health record (EHR) and noted a Behavior Note within the Progress Notes (PN) that was documented on 09/23/23 at 6:38 PM, that was written by the Registered Nurse (RN) and revealed that the resident was observed taking food off of the food cart. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) covered the food cart and the resident became argumentative, cursed at another resident and a confrontation occurred with the same resident. No injuries were noted. CNA intervened, removed resident from the area and resident was taken back to his/her room. The RN indicated that both the resident's physician and responsible party were notified and psychiatry was reconsulted. On 10/25/23 at 10:44…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ00151166 Based on interviews, medical records review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/30/23, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures for a facility-initiated discharge. A resident (Resident #243) left the facility against medical advice (AMA) and ended up at the hospital. The hospital reached out to the facility when the resident was ready for discharge from the hospital and the facility would not permit Resident #243 to return back to the facility. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #243, 1 of 1 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #243 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to bell's palsy (weakness of the facial muscles on one side of the face), hypotension (low blood pressure), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 09/13/21,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MB HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $463K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ