Maybrook Hills Rehabilitation And Healthcare Cente
301 Valley View Boulevard, Altoona, PA 16602 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 240 certified beds · (814) 944-0845 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.1% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.2% | 17.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.5% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.6% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.23 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.64 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.8%CMS range 27.0–42.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.7–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.7–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 211.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions in a resident's care plan to prevent a wandering resident from entering other's rooms for six of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated June 10, 2026, revealed that the resident's care plan will address resident goals, actual and potential problems, needs, strengths and individual preferences of the resident. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated June 15, 2026, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively intact, ambulated without assistance, and had wandering behaviors. The resident's care plan, most recently updated 6/26/26, revealed that she wanders and that she would not significantly intrude on the privacy or activity of others. Observations of Resident 19 on June 30,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) validation report, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Care Area Assessment Process of comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments and comprehensive assessments were completed in the required time frame for 11 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 9, 30, 39, 51, 85, 108, 115, 180, 222, 238). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that for admission MDS assessments, the assessment completion date, and the Care Area Assessment (CAA - the process of completing an in-depth assessment of triggered, potentially problematic care areas) completion date (Item V0200B2) were to be no later than the resident's admission date plus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for 15 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 22, 43, 71, 72, 75, 77, 83, 108, 112, 115, 124, 150, 190, 199).Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to have a completion date (Section Z0500B) that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days.A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 10 had an ARD of May 2, 2025. There was no previous quarterly or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument, clinical records, and the Minimum Data Set validation report, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the required electronic system, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System, within 14 days of completion for 3 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 26, 83, 218). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (federally-mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that comprehensive MDS assessments must be transmitted electronically within 14 days of the Care Plan Completion Date (V0200C2 + 14 days). All other MDS assessments must be submitted within 14 days of the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B + 14 days). The MDS assessment validation report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for six of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 5, 8, 75, 112, 186). Findings include:The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Section N0350A (insulin) was to be coded with the number of days that insulin injections were received during the seven-day assessment period, Section N0415C1 (antidepressant medication) was to be checked if the resident received an antidepressant medication during the seven-day assessment period, Section N0415F1 (antibiotic medication) was to be checked if the resident received an antibiotic medication during the seven-day assessment period, Section N0415G1 (diuretic medication) was to be checked if the resident received an diuretic medication during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for three of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 51, 72, 180). Findings include:A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 51, dated May 20, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was incontinent of bowel, and that she required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs. Physician's order for Resident 51, dated May 19, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 8.6 mg Senna Oral, give 4 tablets as needed for constipation if no bowel movement in three days. Physician's order, dated May 19, 2025, was for the resident to receive 10 milligrams (mg) of Bisacodyl Suppository (treats constipation) as needed for constipation if no bowel movement in four days. Review of Resident 51's task record, dated July 2025, revealed that the resident had no bowel movement from July 11-17, 2025 (7 days). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for one of 65 residents reviewed (Resident 83).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 83, dated July 24, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance from staff with daily care tasks. Physician's orders for Resident 83, dated February 23, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 500 milligram (mg) of amoxicillin (antibiotic) by mouth daily for prophylaxis for urinary tract infection (UTI) and an order with a start date of January 24, 2023, for one gram (gm) of Methenamine Hippurate (antibiotic) by mouth every morning and at bedtime for UTI prevention due to a history of urinary tract infections with sepsis. There was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed to address Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to date an opened multidose vial of tuberculin solution (used to detect tuberculosis infection) in one of two medication storage area refrigerators reviewed (Unit D2). The facility's policy regarding medication storage, dated July 17, 2025, indicated that it is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on their premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations.Manufacturer's instructions for Aplisol solution, dated November 2013, indicated that vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation which may affect potency.Observations of the facility's medication storage area refrigerator on D2 unit, on August 5, 2025, at 1:45 p.m. revealed an opened and undated vial of Aplisol solution for TB skin testing (to test for tuberculosis).Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 at the time of the observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 65 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include:CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding as needed (prn) pain medications, dated May 8, 2025, revealed that prn medications would be administered according to the physician-ordered parameters. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated April 14, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, understood and able to understand others, required supervision with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included right arm fracture, osteoporosis and a pathological fracture of the lumbar spine. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated April 9, 2025, included an order for the resident to have acetaminophen (Tylenol) 325 mg, two tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for mild pain with a level of (1-3), and oxycodone 5 mg, one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to use proper infection control practices for handling linen while providing care for two of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 11). Findings include: The facility's infection control policy concerning handling of linen, dated May 8, 2024, revealed that staff is to handle soiled linen using standard precautions, such as wearing gloves. Observations on November 18, 2024, at 10:17 a.m. revealed that Nurse Aide 1 exited the room of Resident 11 carrying soiled laundry with her bare hands and placed them in the dirty linen bin in the hallway. Interview with Nurse Aide 1 on November 18, 2024, at 10:18 a.m. confirmed that she should wear gloves while handling soiled laundry. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated November 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. Observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission and annual Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for four of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 32, 128, 204, 225). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days following admission, that the Assessment Reference Date (ARD - the last day of an assessment's look-back period) must be set within 366 days after the ARD of the previous comprehensive assessment, and that the assessment was to be completed no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. An admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required timeframe for four of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 33, 147, 157, 159). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to be completed no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 33, with an ARD of June 12, 2024, was due to be completed by June 26, 2024, but was not signed as completed until June 27, 2024, which was 15 days from the ARD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for eight of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 3, 143, 148, 171, 182, 192, 194). Findings include: The Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, revealed that Section N0415F was to be coded (1) if an antibiotic medication was administered while a resident at the facility during the seven-day assessment period. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated April 28, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 1 gram of Hiprex (an antibiotic) twice a day for recurrent urinary tract infections. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 1, dated August 2024, revealed that the resident was administered 1 gram of Hiprex from August 1 through 28, 2024. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were provided as ordered by the physician for two of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 143). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated May 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a diagnosis which included heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart cannot pump enough blood and oxygen to the body's organs). A care plan for the resident, dated June 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was on an as needed diuretic (a drug that increases urine production, which helps the body get rid of extra salt and fluid) related to edema (swelling caused by fluid trapped in the body's tissues). Staff was to administer her medications as ordered. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated June 1, 2024, included an order for staff to weigh the resident daily, and if the resident's weight was up two pounds or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that enteral feedings (feeding through a tube inserted directly into the stomach) were administered in accordance with physician's orders and failed to ensure that residents who were receiving enteral feedings received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for two of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 20, 56). A facility policy for tube feeding, dated May 8, 2024, revealed that it is the policy and procedure to provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally. The procedure for administering tube feeding includes to check for residual (the amount of gastric fluid in the stomach between feedings) by pulling back no more than 150 cubic centimeters (cc). Note the amount of residual if any. Return the gastric contents back into the stomach and clamp the gastric tube. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 20, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to use proper infection control practices for cleaning durable medical equipment for two of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 47, 133), and for providing care for five of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 101, 152, 163, 184, 204). Findings include: Observations during the medication administration on August 27, 2024, at 8:37 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 5 obtained Resident 47's blood pressure prior to preparing the resident's medications. After Licensed Practical Nurse 5 administered Resident 47 her medications, she then went to Resident 133's room. Without cleaning the blood pressure cuff, she then obtained Resident 133's blood pressure prior to preparing his medications for administration. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 5 on August 27, 2024, at 9:03 a.m. confirmed that the blood pressure cuff should have been cleaned prior to obtaining Resident 133's blood pressure. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents and staff, as well as observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents could make choices about aspects of their lives that were significant to them, such as eating in the dining room with other residents, for nine of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 70, 72, 79, 125, 149, 151, 157, 162, 164). Findings include: Interview with Resident 72 on August 25, 2024, at 11:21 a.m. revealed that she likes to eat in the main dining room but has been unable to do so because the air conditioner is broken and the facility said that it would be too hot in there to have the dining room open. She indicated that the facility is waiting on a part to come to fix the air conditioner. During an group interview with Residents 70, 72, 79, 125, 149, 151, 157, 162, and 164 on August 26, 2024, at 2:04 p.m. the residents reported that they would like to eat in the main dining room, but they were told that they are unable to do so because the air conditioner is broken and the facility said that it would be too hot in there to have the dining room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare coverage, or failed to provide 48-hour advanced notice, for two 57 residents reviewed (Residents 201, 228). Findings include: Resident 201's medical record revealed that he began Medicare A services on March 1, 2024, and his last covered day was April 22, 2024. The medical record indicated that the facility initiated discontinuation from Medicare Part A coverage and that the resident's benefit days were not exhausted. The facility had no documented evidence that the resident was issued a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, or an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) as required. A verbal notification was provided to the resident's responsible party on May 1, 2024, which was not 48 hours in advance. The ABN notice provided to the resident's responsible party did not include the items and services that are/are not covered under Medicaid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative, in writing, regarding the reason for hospitalization for six of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 85, 96, 157, 171, 192, 218). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 85 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for personal care needs, had an indwelling catheter (thin tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), and had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following a stroke. Nurses' notes for Resident 85, dated August 16, 2024, revealed that the resident was not looking good, was visibly shaking, and stated he felt cold. He required oxygen and had bleeding at his indwelling catheter site. The physician was notified, and the resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. The resident was admitted to the hospital with an elevated troponin level (blood test that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for two of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 96, 171). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 20243, indicated that the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) was to be no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that a significant change in the resident's status occurred (determination date + 14 calendar days) and the significant change comprehensive MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that significant a change in the resident's status occurred (determination date + 14 calendar days). A care plan for Resident 96,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans to address individualized resident care needs for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident 182). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 22, 2019, indicated that the facility would develop a written care plan that was individualized for each resident and address goals, actual and potential problems, needs, strengths, and individual preferences of the resident. An admission MDS assessment for Resident 182, dated June 30, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. Physician's orders for Resident 182, dated June 25, 2024, included an order for the resident to use a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) at bedtime for sleep apnea (disorder that causes breathing to stop or become shallow during sleep). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 182, dated August 2024, revealed that the resident used a CPAP device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for two of 57 residents reviewed (Residents 125, 191). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated May 8, 2024, indicated that the facility would develop a written care plan that was individualized for each resident and address goals, actual and potential problems, needs, strengths, and individual preferences of the resident. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 125, dated June 2, 2024, revealed that she was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene needs, and had diagnosis that included having a left hip fracture. The care plan for Resident 125, dated July 12, 2024, indicated that the resident was receiving anticoagulant (blood thinner) therapy for a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). Review of the Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and the facility's investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free from falls as possible and failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident 165) who had a history of falling. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 165, dated August 6, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for daily care needs and assistance for transfers, had a history of falls, and had diagnoses that included lower back pain, difficulty walking, and dementia. A nursing note for Resident 165, dated August 22, 2024, at 8:20 p.m., revealed that the resident had a fall out of her wheelchair to the side of her bed. Resident 165 was assessed and had a red, swollen right wrist with no injuries as evidenced by an X-ray on August 22, 2024. An incident report for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 46, dated July 3, 2024, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included depression and PTSD. A review of Resident 43's care plan, dated July 9, 2024, indicated that the resident had PTSD and depression. There was no documented evidence the facility identified Resident 46's specific triggers that could re-traumatize the resident or implement measures as to how facility staff could prevent or minimize triggers from occurring. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a list of nurse aides provided by the facility and their personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on the hire dates for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 1, Nurse Aide 2, Nurse Aide 3). Findings include: A review of the personnel file for Nurse Aide 1 revealed a hire date of August 11, 1998, with a performance evaluation completed on August 12, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that her annual performance evaluation was completed as required in August 2023. A review of the personnel file for Nurse Aide 2 revealed a hire date of July 2, 2008, with a performance evaluation completed on June 28, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that his annual performance evaluation was completed as required in July 2023. A review of the personnel file for Nurse Aide 3 revealed a hire date of August 12, 2018, with a performance evaluation completed on August 12, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that her annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) were properly secured in the medication cart for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident 14) and failed to ensure that medications were appropriately labeled for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident 47). The facility's policy for medication storage dated May 8, 2024, included that all controlled drugs are stored under double-lock and key. Physician's orders for Resident 14, dated August 25, 2024, included an order to give the resident 0.5 milligrams (mg) of Clonazepam every eight hours for anxiety. Observations of the [NAME] Hall medication cart on August 27, 2024, at 8:39 a.m. revealed that the second drawer from the top of the medication cart had one medicine cup in it containing one round yellow pill. There was no name or label attached to the medication or cup. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 4 at the time of the observation revealed that the medication was a controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions and failed to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair and beard coverings in the kitchen. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hair net policy for nursing home kitchen staff, dated May 8, 2024, revealed that kitchen staff should maintain personal hygiene. Hair should be clean and neatly tied or pinned back under a hair net. Facial hair, such as beards, must also be covered with a beard net. Observations in the main kitchen during the lunch meal tray line on August 27, 2024, at 11:45 a.m. revealed that Dietary Worker 6, Dietary Worker 7, Dietary Worker 8, Dietary Worker 9, Dietary Worker 10, and Dietary Worker 11 had beards that were not covered with beard nets/covers during tray line. Dietary Worker 12 and Dietary Worker 13 did not have their hair completely under a hair net during food preparation. Interview with the Dietary Manager on August 27, 2024, at 11:47 a.m. confirmed that dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident 225). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 225, dated August 15, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood, could understand, was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care tasks, and required hemodialysis treatments (procedure that removes waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to do so). A care plan for Resident 225, dated August 9, 2024, indicated that she was at nutritional risk due to the need for more protein due to end-stage renal disease and hemodialysis. Resident 225 had an intervention to monitor, record, and report any muscle wasting or significant weight loss to the physician. Physician's order for Resident 225, dated August 9, 2024 indicated that the resident was ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident 128). Findings include: The hospice contract for Family Hospice dated, January 1, 2020, revealed that the agency shall provide the facility with a copy for each hospice patient of the most recent plan of care specific to each patient, the physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs)for Resident 128, dated July 10, 2024, revealed that the resident was rarely understood and had a memory problem, was dependent on staff for her daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of dementia. A care plan for Resident 128, dated August 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was receiving hospice care. A hospice Election of Benefit document (a form signed to indicate that the individual waives all rights to traditional Medicare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending October 26, 2023, and a complaint investigation survey ending April 16, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems with audits to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the audits were to be reported to the QAPI committee for review. The results of the current survey, ending August 28, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies regarding timely completion of comprehensive assessments, accuracy of assessments, development of comprehensive care plans,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in a significant medication error for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated April 3, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, received a diuretic (water pill), and had diagnoses that included heart failure. A nursing note, dated May 22, 2024, revealed that laboratory results were reviewed with the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP - a registered nurse who has advanced education and clinical training in a health care specialty area), and new orders were received for 40 milligrams (mg) of Torsemide (water pill) twice a day for two days and 20 milliequivalents of potassium chloride (supplement) daily for three days and obtain a basic metabolic panel (BMP - blood test that checks the levels of different substances in your blood) on May 24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, job descriptions, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to correctly transcribe physician's orders for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. A job description for registered nurses, undated, indicated that the registered nurse was to ensure that the highest degree of quality care was maintained at all times and was to provide direct nursing care as needed. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated April 3, 2024, indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen was provided as ordered by the physician for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding oxygen use, dated May 8, 2024, indicated that the facility was to provide oxygen as ordered by the physician. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated July 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and received oxygen. A care plan for the resident, dated February 22, 2024, revealed that the resident received oxygen therapy. Physician's orders, dated July 10, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive oxygen at two liters per minute (lpm) every shift for hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues). Observations of Resident 1 on August 7, 2024, at 3:11 p.m. and 3:15 p.m. revealed that the resident had oxygen in use via a concentrator (electrical machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff reported an allegation of verbal abuse in a timely manner for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse, dated May 8, 2024, indicated that each resident had the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property. No one may subject residents to abuse including, but not limited to facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the residents, family members or legal guardians, friends and other individuals. Observances, complaints or evidence of alleged abuse, neglect and/or mistreatment are thoroughly investigated and reported to the appropriate parties. The definition of verbal abuse meant the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully included disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families or within hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address resident care needs for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents 3, 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated February 21, 2024, revealed that the interdisciplinary team will develop and implement the comprehensive care plan within 21 days of admission. The comprehensive care plan will address resident goals, actual and potential problems, needs, strengths, and individual preferences of the resident. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated March 1, 2024, indicated that he was cognitively intact and had ointments/medications applied to areas other than his feet. An admission nursing assessment, dated February 23, 2024, revealed that Resident 3 had an open area on his left shin that measured 2.0 x 2.0 centimeters (cm). Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dialysis residents had an active physician's order to attend dialysis and failed to obtain physician's orders for the care and monitoring of dialysis sites for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 7, dated March 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - permanent kidney failure that requires a regular course of dialysis or a kidney transplant) requiring dialysis (mechanical cleansing of the blood for a person whose kidneys are not functioning normally) and had a right subclavian dialysis catheter (a tube inserted into a vein in the chest to provide access for dialysis). Dialysis communication sheets for Resident 7 revealed that the resident received dialysis March 22, 25, and 27, 2024, and April 1, 3, 5, 8, and 12, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence in Resident 7's clinical record that physician's orders were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents 3, 7). Findings include: The Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, revealed that Section N0415J (Hypoglycemic Medications - medications that lower blood sugars) was to be checked if the resident was taking any medications by pharmalogical classification, not how it was used, during the last seven days, or since admission/entry or reentry if less than seven days. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated February 23, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 1000 milligrams (mg) of Metformin HCl (hypoglycemic medication) with meals for diabetes and 2 mg of Glimepiride (hypoglycemic medication) with meals for diabetes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for wounds in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow recommendations from wound consultations for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 3), and failed to ensure that the physician was notified about elevated blood sugar results as ordered for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding wound care, dated March 14, 2024, indicated that the facility was to promote wound healing and prevent infections. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated March 1, 2024, indicated that he was cognitively intact and had ointments/medications applied to areas other than his feet. An admission nursing assessment, dated February 23, 2024, revealed Resident 3 had an open area on his left shin that measured 2.0 x 2.0 centimeters (cm). Physician's orders, dated February 23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents 2, 9). Findings include: A facility policy regarding nursing documentation, dated February 21, 2024, revealed that the facility documents by exception and all documentation confirms that care was provided. Staff were responsible for documenting acts as proof care was provided. All documentation was to be completed in the electronic record Point Click Care (PCC). All events such as falls, skin abnormalities, etc. should be documented. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated February 15, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood, could understand, was cognitively impaired, required assistance with daily care tasks, and had a history of falls. A fall care plan for Resident 2, dated November 15, 2021, revealed that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory specimens were obtained as ordered by the physician for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated November 18, 2023, included an order for the resident to have a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity obtained (urine tests to check for an infection). A nursing note for Resident 2, dated November 18, 2023, revealed that the resident refused to have a catheter placed (an invasive procedure to collect urine from the bladder) for a urine specimen and would urinate using the toilet. A nursing note, dated November 25, 2023, indicated that Resident 2's family was still requesting that the resident have her urine checked for infection as per the physician's order from November 18, 2023. A nursing note for Resident 2, dated December 8, 2023, indicated that the family continued to request that the urinalysis and culture and sensitivity be completed. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated December 8, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission and annual Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required timeframe for seven of 58 residents reviewed (Residents 51, 80, 156, 168, 170, 183, 191 ). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days following admission. An admission MDS assessment for Resident 51 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident's admission MDS assessment was dated as completed on September 15, 2023, which was 16 days after admission. An admission MDS assessment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for nine of 58 residents reviewed (Residents 48, 57, 79, 113, 117, 126, 148, 155, 192). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, revealed that Section N0410D (hypnotic medication) was to be coded with the number of days the resident received a hypnotic medication during the seven-day assessment period. Physician's orders for Resident 48, dated September 5, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 15 milligrams (mg) of Restoril every 24 hours at bedtime as needed for insomnia. The resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2023 revealed that the resident received Restoril…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address care needs for four of 58 residents reviewed (Resident 5, 45, 67, 150). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plan development, dated June 26, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of this facility to develop and review an interdisciplinary care plan to meet resident care and educational needs. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated July 6, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required minimal to moderate assistance with daily care needs. Physician's orders, dated October 9, 2023, for Resident 5, included an order for contact precautions. A nursing note, dated September 13, 2023, at 2:05 p.m., revealed that Resident 5 had a biopsy (skin sample for testing) of a rash, and there was a new order of contact precautions until the rash was resolved. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding notification of the physician for blood sugar results were followed for one of 58 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 48, dated September 11, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received insulin (medication that lowers blood sugar levels), and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 48, dated September 5, 2023, included an order for the resident to have his blood sugar checked before meals and at bedtime, and the physician was to be notified if the blood sugar was less than 70 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) or greater than 400 (mg/dL). Resident 48's Medication Administration Record (MAR's) for September and October 2023 revealed that the residents blood sugar results were less than 70 mg/dL at 6:00 a.m. on September 16 and October 21 and 29,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of package inserts, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discard expired medical supplies in one out of three medication rooms reviewed (D1) and one out of one treatment rooms reviewed. Findings include: The facility had no policy relating to the use of outdated medical supplies. Per the package insert for the blood collection tubes, they expire on the last day of the month and year indicated. Observations in the phlebotomy basket (basket holding blood collection tubing and tubes) in the D1 medication room on [DATE], at 1:28 p.m. revealed that there were 33 blood collection tubes that were expired. There were nine gold-top tubes that expired [DATE]; 11 blue-top tubes that expired [DATE]; six red-top tubes that expired [DATE]; two green-top tubes that expired [DATE]; two lavender-top tubes that expired [DATE]; and three dark purple-top tubes that expired [DATE]. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 5 and Registered Nurse 6 on [DATE], at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility's policies, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable and at proper temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding dietary food temperatures, dated June 26, 2023, indicated that temperatures are to be recorded and taken randomly throughout the meal service. Hot foods shall be held at 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above until served and cold foods should be held at 41 degrees F or below. Interviews with Residents 42, 106, 127, 148, and 195 on October 23, 2023, during the initial survey sampling process, revealed that the food served by the facility at meal times was not served hot enough, and that their meals arrive with food being cold. Interview with Residents 8, 42, 48, 73, 85, 157, and 160 during a group meeting on October 24, 2023, at 1:15 p.m. revealed that the food served by the facility at meal times was not served hot enough, and that their meals arrive in styrofoam containers and the food is cold. Observations of the lunch meal service in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions. Findings include: Observations in the main kitchen on October 23, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. revealed a large air vent in the ceiling between a prep table, the walk-in-cooler, and walk-in-freezer that had an accumulation of dust that extended out onto the ceiling tiles surrounding the air vent. There was a large air vent in the ceiling between the steam tables and ovens that had an accumulation of dust that extended out onto the ceiling tiles surrounding the air vent, and there was a large air vent in the ceiling between the Dietary Director's office and the end of tray line that had an accumulation of dust that extended out onto the ceiling tiles surrounding the air vent. Observations in the main kitchen on October 24, 2023, at 11:10 a.m. revealed that the large air vent in the ceiling between a prep table, the walk-in-cooler, and walk-in-freezer had the same accumulation of dust that extended out onto the ceiling tiles surrounding the air vent.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending October 20, 2022, and May 8, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending October 26, 2023, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to complete MDS assessments accurately, failure to revise a resident's care plan to include current interventions, failure to maintain compliance with the regulation regarding proper storage and labeling of medications, and failure to serve palatable food at appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and information provided by the facility, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective preventative maintenance program for the walk-in-freezer and failed to maintain the dish machine in proper working condition in the Main Kitchen, taking away the residents' right to have a homelike environment. Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for use for the [NAME] Duracool walk-in-freezer, dated February 5, 1997, revealed that the owner/user is responsible for the proper upkeep of a [NAME] walk-in. Simple procedures of cleanliness and preventative maintenance will ensure many years of trouble-free service. The owner was to maintain unrestricted air flow across the condensing unit and be sure the condenser coil was kept free of dirt at inlet (behind usually) and outlet (in front usually). Periodically check the heater cable in the freezer door for function. Periodically check the function…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' baseline care plans included information regarding their immediate care needs for one of 58 residents reviewed (Resident 195). Findings include: An entry tracking form for Resident 195, dated October 16, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Physician's orders for Resident 195, dated October 16, 2023, included orders for the resident to receive 800-160 milligrams (mg) of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (antibiotic) twice a day for seven days for a urinary tract infection, and 30 mg of duloxetine HCl (antidepressant) twice a day for nerve pain. There was no documented evidence that a baseline care plan (developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission) included information regarding the resident's care needs related to receiving an antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for three of 58 residents reviewed (Residents 31, 145, 152). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care planning, dated June 26, 2023, indicated that a resident's care plan was to be reviewed and revised as needed. A diagnosis record for Resident 31, dated June 24, 2022, revealed that the resident had diagnoses that included hypertension and myocardial infarcation. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated August 12, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility and transfers. Physician's orders for Resident 31, dated July 4, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive acyclovir (a medication to treat infections) 200 mg two times a day for five days for a rash. Nursing clinical notes, dated July 10,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as resident, family, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had proper assistive devices to maintain adequate hearing for one of 58 residents reviewed (Resident 92). Findings include: Manufacturer's instructions for the hearing aides, dated May 2023, indicated that if the battery door of the hearing aide was difficult to close, check that the battery was inserted correctly and that the flat side was facing upwards. If the battery was not inserted correctly, the hearing aide would not work and the battery door could be damaged. The flat side was marked with a + symbol either on the sticker or on the battery. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 92, dated September 14, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required minimal assistance with daily care needs, and had minimal difficulty with hearing. Resident 92's care plan, dated May 17, 2022, revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate that was less than five percent. Findings include: Observations during medication administration on October 25, 2023, revealed that two medication administration errors were made during 30 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 6.66 percent. Physician's orders for Resident 165, dated October 27, 2022, included an order for the resident to receive one 2.5 milligram (mg) tablet of Midodrine (used to treat low blood pressure) three times per day. Staff was to monitor the resident's blood pressure one hour prior to administration and one hour after administration. Staff was to hold the medication if the resident's blood pressure was 160/90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or above. Physician's orders for Resident 165, dated July 17, 2023, included an order for staff to check the resident's blood pressure one hour prior to the administration of the Midodrine and one hour after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 58 residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 45, dated August 6, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assist for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 45, dated September 28, 2023, included an order to change and date oxygen tubing and set-up including foam ear protectors, remove concentrator filter, cleanse with soap and water, rinse, towel dry and replace on night shift every Wednesday. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 45 revealed no documented evidence that the oxygen tubing, ear protectors, and concentrator filter was changed per physician orders. An interview with the Director of Nursing on October 26, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MB HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MB VV ALTOONA HOLDINGS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 29% | since 02/28/2018 |
| BRODT, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 02/28/2018 |
| DORFMAN, YAAKOV | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2018 |
| IKE, AKIKO | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/30/2018 |
| PILLER, MENDY | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2018 |
| FARKOVITS, JOSHUA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2018 |
| BUTERBAUGH, HEIDI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2024 |
| SOMMERS, DOVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/28/2018 |
| SCHLOSS, DEBORAH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/28/2025 |
| MB HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2018 |
| SCHARF, BRETT | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/1998 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $864K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395514. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.