Foltsbrook Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 171 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 163 beds and averages 135.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2021-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00269612 and NY00272726) conducted on 6/1/21- 6/9/21, the facility did not ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #93 and #141) reviewed. Specifically, - Resident #93, who had intact cognition and a diagnosis of quadriplegia (paralysis), sustained burns from food/beverages on multiple occasions. On 1/2/21, the resident microwaved soup and spilled it on their leg causing a 9.5 by 5.5 centimeter second-degree burn, which is currently a non-healing wound. On 1/9/21, Resident #93 microwaved a beverage and spilled it, sustaining a cluster of blisters on their abdomen. On 4/27/21, staff microwaved soup and provided it to Resident #93, who was lying in bed; the resident spilled the soup on their abdomen, sustaining a 12 by 26 centimeter second-degree burn.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for the Physical Therapy gym and for 2 of 5 resident units (Units 1 and 4) reviewed. Specifically, the Physical Therapy gym, Unit 1, and Unit 4 had several walls with patched holes and missing paint. Findings include: The facility policy, Homelike Environment, revised 12/2024, documented the residents were provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility staff and management should to the extent possible, reflect a personalized homelike setting that included clean, sanitary, and orderly environment, inviting colors and décor. Work orders dated 1/1/2025 to 1/29/2025 documented there were multiple open work orders that had not been completed. The following observations were made on Unit 4: - On 1/23/2025 at 10:31 AM, 1/24/2025 at 7:51 AM, and 1/29/2025 at 8:26 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals reviewed (the 1/24/2025 2nd floor lunch meal and the 1/27/2025 1st floor lunch meal). Specifically, food was not flavorful and was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meals on 1/24/2025 and 1/27/2025. Additionally, two residents (Residents #24 and #35) stated the food did not taste good and they did not receive enough food. Findings include: The facility policy, Dining Atmosphere, dated 12/2024 documented meals were served in a way that enhanced the individual's dining experience, because the presentation of the meal could directly affect how much an individual ate. Hot food must be hot, and cold food must be cold (as acceptable to the individual being served). During an interview on 1/23/2025 at 10:45 AM, Resident #24 stated the food lacked flavor. During an observation on 1/23/2025 at 12:22 PM, the menu…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen had soiled and poorly maintained equipment and improper food and food product storage. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Food and Supply Storage, documented all food and supply items were held and stored safely and securely, maintained quality, and were protected against contamination, spoilage, and theft. All storage areas were always kept clean and in good working condition. Stored unused food was wrapped and labeled with the name and date of production. The undated facility policy, Cleaning and Mopping of Floors, documented food particles and other unwanted foreign materials were effectively removed from flooring. All floor areas of the department were swept and mopped at least twice daily. Equipment was cleaned underneath, and no standing water was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for multiple resident areas on 1 of 5 resident units (5th floor) reviewed. Specifically, there were fruit flies on the 5th floor. Findings include: The facility policy, Pest Control, dated 12/2024, documented the facility would take all reasonable measures to prevent and control pests, insects, and rodents through routine cleaning, proper food storage, and regular pest control services. The third-party pest control logs dated 10/17/2024,10/24/2024,10/31/2024,11/07/2024,11/14/2024, 12/05/2024,12/11/2024,1/16/2025,1/23/2025 documented treatments for insects and flies in the facility and the facility was inspected and serviced. The following observations were made on the 5th Floor: - on 1/23/2025 at 10:30 AM there was a fruit fly on the cart in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER] - on 1/23/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/20254, the facility did not ensure the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 was not provided with a meal before going to outside dialysis (filtering of blood during kidney failure) appointments. Findings included: The facility policy, Food Palatability, revised 12/2024, documented the facility provided residents with nutritious, well-balanced, and palatable meals that met their individual dietary needs and preferences. The facility policy, Medical Transport Process, dated 8/12/2024 documented when an appointment was scheduled early in the morning and the resident was not allowed to eat prior to the appointment, dietary was notified and a to go breakfast was prepared for the resident. This pertained to any meal missed when on an appointment. If residents choose not to take a meal, one would be prepared upon return. Resident #4 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review. and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00361906 and NY00351460) surveys conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #116 and #226) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #116 was not shaved, and Resident #226 was not shaved and groomed. Findings include: The facility policy, Activities of Daily Living, revised 3/2018, documented residents were provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently received the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services were provided for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00351460) surveys conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #115) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of a Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #115's two Stage 2 (partial thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcers. Additionally, the resident had an alternating air pressure relieving mattress (a mattress with air filled cells that inflate and deflate to redistribute pressure) that was not set to their correct weight. Findings include: The facility policy, Support Surface Guidelines, revised 9/2013, documented residents at risk of skin breakdown were assessed for appropriateness of pressure reducing devices. Redistribution support surfaces…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the expiration date when applicable for 3 of 5 medication carts (1st, 2nd, and 4th floor medication carts), and 1 of 5 treatment carts (1st floor treatment cart). Specifically, the 1st and 4th floor medication carts and the 1st floor treatment cart were left unattended and unlocked; and the 2nd floor medication cart contained 3 insulin pens without an opened or expired/discard date. Findings include: The facility policy, Security of Medication Cart, revised 12/2024, documented the nurse secured the medication cart during the medication pass to prevent unauthorized entry. Medication carts were always locked when out of the nurse's view. The facility policy, Storage of Medications, revised 12/2024, documented drug containers that had missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels were returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/23/2025-1/29/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #112) reviewed, and for 1 of 1 staff bathroom (the basement breakroom bathroom) reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #26 did not use appropriate personal protective equipment when providing care to Resident #112 who was on transmission based precautions (droplet precautions) for influenza; and the soap dispenser in the women's bathroom located off the facility breakroom in the basement was not functional. Findings include: The facility policy, Influenza, Prevention and Control of Seasonal, revised 3/2022, documented all staff received education and training on preventing transmission of infectious agents, including influenza, during orientation to the facility. Contact and droplet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00365213), the facility failed to honor advance directive wishes for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (attempt to restart the heart) was implemented on Resident #1 when it was established they were unresponsive and without a pulse before their advance directive wishes were determined; once their advance directives were determined to be do not resuscitate (withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation and allow a natural death) based on their Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, cardiopulmonary resuscitation ceased, only to be resumed due to staff appearing on scene and misunderstanding the resident's advance directives. Subsequently, once emergency medical services arrived on scene, cardiopulmonary resuscitation ceased once again due to clarification of the resident's advance directives (do not resuscitate), and the resident expired. Findings include: The facility policy Advance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WECARE CENTERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY