Wecare At Rolling Meadows Rehab And Nursing Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 100.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-02-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility provided policies and documentation, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints. This failure resulted in the actual harm of staff members restraining a resident to a bed with a bed sheet which caused abdominal bruising for one of eight residents (Resident R1). This was identified as past noncompliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 1/20/26, previously reviewed 1/21/25, indicated that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Thisincludes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Review of facility policy Identifying Involuntary Seclusion and Unauthorized Restraint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-02-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop written policies and procedures that include training new and existing nursing home staff on abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This failure resulted in the actual harm of staff members being unaware that unauthorized physical restraints can be a form of physical abuse and restraining a resident to a bed with a bed sheet which caused abdominal bruising for one of eight residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the United Stated Code of Federal Regulations S483.95 indicated that the facility must have written policies and procedures that include training new and existing nursing home staff in the following topics which include: Prohibiting and preventing all forms of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation.Identifying what constitutes abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of job descriptions, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include:Review of the job description for Registered Dietician (RD) indicated the primary purpose in this position is to plan, organize, coordinate, and evaluate the nutritional components of dietary services for the facility. The essential job function includes the following: -Counsels residents, their responsible parties and facility staff on sound nutritional practices to promote food health. -Oversees the duties and functions of the Dietary Manager and other staff as instructed by the facility.Review of the job description for Food Service Director indicated the primary purpose in this position is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Food Services department.During an interview on 9/9/25, at 9:40 a.m. [NAME] Employee E16 confirmed there was not a Dietary Manager at the facility. A new dietary manager was hired and starting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staff to perform essential kitchen duties.Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to perform essential kitchen duties.Findings include:Review of facility dietary department policy Master Staffing Plan reviewed 1/20/25, indicated the dietary department is adequately staffed to provide safe, high quality food service to residents. Staffing levels will be developed by the administrator and the department management team.During an interview on 9/9/25, at 9:40 a.m. [NAME] Employee E16 stated sometimes the facility only has two or three staff members in the kitchen to serve 110 residents (census on 9/9/25). They stated sometimes someone from housekeeping comes and helps them in the kitchen. They stated lunch tray line was supposed to start at 11:15 a.m.During an observation on 9/9/25, at 9:42 a.m. three employees were noted to be working the day shift on 9/9/25. [NAME] Employee E16, Dietary Aid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections. Findings include:During an interview on 9/9/25, at 9:08 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility just hired the Infection Control Nurse and that she is not trained and that the DON is acting as the Infection Control Nurse at this time, as she has the training. The DON confirmed that the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management.28 Pa. Code: 201.19(3) Personnel records.28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of two nursing units (A and B nursing units). Based on observations, review of facility policy, resident, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of two nursing units (A and B Nursing Units). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment dated 1/21/25, indicated in part the facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition. During an interview on 9/11/25, from 11:29 a.m., through 12:25 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3 and Nurse Aide Employee E4 stated that they had wipes before and now the facility took them away, washcloths are to be used but staff will not reuse a washcloth on a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, resident interviews, resident council meeting, resident choice menu selections, and meal observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident selected menu items for 12 of 12 residents (Resident R6, R8, R24, R43, R57, R101, R2, R500, R501, R502, R503 and R504).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Food Preferences, dated 1/21/25, indicated that individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to diet will only be ordered with the resident's or representative's consent.During an interview on 9/9/25, at 10:08 a.m., with Residents R6, R24 and R101, indicated that the dietary department does not serve all items on ticket and cannot get an alternate if requested.During an interview on 9/9/25, at 10:15 a.m., Resident R57 stated the facility serves a lot of rice and eggs. Cannot get alternate if requested.During the resident council meeting on 9/10/25, at 11:15 a.m., the consensus of the group indicated that last night French fries were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented for one of four residents (Resident R69).Findings include: Review of facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 1/21/25, indicated the facility will implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBP's include wound care (any surgical wound requiring a dressing, any pressure injury that is a Stage 2, 3, 4, unstageable or Deep tissue injury requiring a dressing, and lacerations that require a dressing). A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/1/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, heart failure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skills to carry out the daily functions of the food and nutrition services department. Finding include: During an interview on 3/27/25, at 8:33 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility currently did not have a Dietary Manager and a Dietary Manager from South Hills facility has been ordering the facility food. The NHA stated that the remote Dietician who covers the facility is there a weekly. The Regional Dietician will be coming in the facility but this will be her second visit since the last Dietary Manager quit. The NHA stated that he has cooked evening meals and the Maintenance Director has been helping when able. The NHA stated that if an immediate food item is needed he goes to Walmart. The previous Dietary Manager was terminated on 2/18/25, per facility staffing records. During an observation on 3/27/25, at 8:43 a.m., staff in the kitchen indicated they did not have a Dietary Manager and that a Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
  Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility files and an interview with the Nursing Home Administator, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker. Findings include: Review of the staffing records indicated that the previous Social Worker was terminated on 2/24/25, and the facility has been without a qualified Social Worker in the position since. During interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on 3/27/25, at 8:45 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker. Pa Code 211.16. Social Services. Pa Code 201.14 (a)Responsibility of licensee.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were completed accurately for nine of 11 residents (Resident R3, R39, R71, R72, R73, R74, R79, R82, and R83). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated October 2023 indicated: -Section C, C0100, Brief Interview for Mental Status: Resident interview should be conducted because the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method, and if an interpreter is needed, one is available. -Section D, D0100, Resident Mood Interview: Resident interview should be conducted because the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method, and if an interpreter is needed, one is available. -Resident R3 had an MDS completion date of 8/16/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of pressure ulcers for one of three residents (Resident R82). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pressure Ulcers / Skin Breakdown dated 3/28/23, indicated the physician will help identify factors contributing or predisposing residents to skin breakdown. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/3/24, included the diagnoses of history of a stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), muscle weakness, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Section GG - Functional Abilities and Goals indicated that Resident R82 required substantial/maximal assistance (Helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WECARE CENTERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $340K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA