No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wecare At Monroeville Rehabilitation And Nsg Ctr

4142 Monroeville Blvd, Monroeville, PA 15146 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (412) 856-7570 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$256,250 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $256,250 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-16)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
UPMC EAST1.2 mi
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1 Monroeville Ctr · (412) 856-2183 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3893 William Penn Hwy · (412) 372-4079 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
312 Mall Blvd · (412) 372-2758 · Call to confirm hours
Park
115 Rosecrest Dr · (412) 317-5070 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3780 Northern Pike · (412) 373-3560

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.8%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.9%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.7%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.7%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.2%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine35.0%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%9.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.771.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.701.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 6.8–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified68.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 79.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.87 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

73 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Ldisputed · IDR2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, review of facility policies and Safety Data Sheets (standardized document that provides detailed information about the hazards, safe handling, storage, and emergency measures for chemical substances or mixtures), and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to have working laundry equipment to ensure clean and sanitized linens/laundry. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for 67 of 67 residents in the facility.Findings include:Review of facility policy Departmental (Environmental Services) - Laundry and Linen dated 4/1/26, indicated this procedure is to provide a process for the safe and aseptic handling, washing, and storage of linen. General guidelines include:-consider all soiled linen to be potentially infectious and handle with standard precautions.-place any linen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks were maintained at a safe temperature for one of two nursing units observed (First and Second Nursing Units). This failure resulted in a harm to Resident R77 and placed residents on the Second Nursing Unit at risk for serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 26 of 41 residents (Residents R1,R8,R14,R15,R18,R19, R22,R24,R25,R32,R38,R40,R44,R48,R51,R52,R61,R67,R69,R70 R72,R73,R74 R77,R78 ) who were identified as having the physical ability to access hot water outlets in the sinks and/or shower rooms throughout the entire facility.Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Safety of Water Temperatures dated 2/18/26, previously dated 1/20/25 revealed tap water in the facility shall be kept within a temperature range to prevent scalding residents.Water heaters that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of two residents (Resident R1). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for 19 of 91 residents. This was identified as past non-compliance. Review of the facility policy Resident Elopement dated 1/22/25, indicated cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement will be appropriately monitored to reduce the potential for injury. Elopement is defined as a resident leaving the physical structure of the facility without knowledge of facility staff. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/31/25, included diagnoses Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policies, facility submitted data, clinical record and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from verbal and physical abuse which resulted in the harm of Resident R1 to be fearful of staff for one four residents reviewed (Resident R1).Finding include:Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol dated 4/1/26, indicated Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect that resulted in the actual harm of an elopement for one of two residents (Resident R1). This was identified as past non-compliance. Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol dated 1/22/25, defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of the facility policy Resident Elopement dated 1/22/25, indicated cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement will be appropriately monitored to reduce the potential for injury. Elopement is defined as a resident leaving the physical structure of the facility without knowledge of facility staff. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections from resident-to-resident , which created an Immediate Jeopardy for 67 of 67 residents .Findings include:Review of the facility-provided Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) job description indicated, The primary purpose of your job is to lead, direct, and manage the overall operations of the community in accordance with policies and procedures and current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the community. As the Administrator, it is your responsibility to organize, develop, and direct resources to maintain the highest degree of quality care is maintained for each resident at all times.Review of the facility-provided Director of Nursing (DON) job description…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and functional environment in the laundry room.Findings include:Review of facility policy Homelike Environment dated 4/1/26, indicated residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. This includes clean, sanitary, and orderly environment and clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition. Review of facility policy Laundry and Bedding, Soiled dated 4/1/26, indicated soiled laundry shall be handled, transported, and processed according to best practices for infection prevention and control. All laundry is handled as potentially contaminated standard precautions (gloves and gown when sorting). Contaminated laundry is bagged or contained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident interviews, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for two of three residents (Residents R5 and R10).Findings include:Review of facility policy Administering Medications dated 4/1/26, indicated medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including required time frame. Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI committee to inform process changes and/or the need for additional staff training. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely.Review of facility policy Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors dated 4/1/26, indicated residents receiving any medications that had potential for an adverse consequence will be monitored to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, documents, clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain a resident was free from the use of physical restraints without physical restraint order for one of six residents (Resident R2).Findings include:Review of facility policy Use of Restraints, reviewed 4/1/26, indicated restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. When the use of restraints is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time necessary, and the ongoing re-evaluation for the need for restraints will be documented. Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. If the resident cannot remove a device in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, facility submitted data, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in the required timeframe for one of four residents (Resident R1) and failed to report a significant medication error for two of three residents reviewed (Residents R5 and R10) and failed to report the facility's laundry washing machine were not working.Findings include:Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol, dated 4/1/26, indicated abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by individuals, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess the nutritional status and failed to update an individualized care plan to address the nutritional concerns for one of five residents (Resident R11).Findings include:Review of the facility's policy Hydration-Clinical Protocol, dated 4/1/26, indicated the physician and staff will help define the individual's current hydration status (fluid and electrolyte balance or imbalances). The physician will distinguish various types of fluid and electrolyte imbalance (for example, hyponatremia, hypernatremia, pre-renal azotemia, etc.) from true dehydration (clinically significant loss of total body water). Ther staff, with the physician's input, will identify and report to the physician individuals with signs and symptoms (for example, delirium, lethargy, increased thirst, etc) or lab test results (for example, hypernatremia, azotemia, etc.) that might reflect existing fluid and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections.Findings include:A review of the facility policy Surveillance for Infections dated 4/1/26, revealed the infection preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and other epidemiology significant infections that have substantial impact or potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions.A review of the Facility's Job Description-Infection Preventionist dated 4/1/26, revealed that completion of CDC training for Long Term Care Infection Preventionist (IP) or attainment of other acceptable certification within 30 days of employment. The IP will report to the Director of Nursing. The IP will be responsible for program management by developing, implementing and evaluating the organizational infection prevention program, surveillance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food products in the walk-in cooler and freezer which created the potential for cross contamination and failed to make certain staff wore proper hair restraints in the main kitchen. Findings include:During an observation of the main kitchen on 4/12/26, from 9:45 a.m., through 10:02 a.m., the following was observed:The stand-up ice cream freezer had ice buildup, a bottle of ice, and a bowl with food debrisThe freezer had undated juices on a cart, and the air circulation fans had a black substance on the blades.The deep freezer had a plastic bag identified as a roast that appeared freezer burned and totally covered with ice.All dietary staff had hair uncovered and not wearing hairnets. During an interview on 4/12/26, at 11:18 a.m., Certified Dietary Manager Employee E9 confirmed that the facility failed to properly store food products in walk in freezer and deep freezer which created the potential for cross contamination and staff failed to properly wear hair restraints.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was in proper working order in the Main Kitchen. Findings include:04/12/2026 observations from 9:45 a.m., through 10:02 a.m., the following was observed: The dish machine is low temp chemical and when chemical testing strip was performed after three runs, did not go above a 10ppm. The recommended level is identified as 50-100ppm. During an interview on 4/12/6, at 11:18 a.m., the Certified Dietary Manager Employee E9 confirmed that the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was in proper working order. 28 Pa Code:201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on two of four medication carts (medication cart #1 and unused medication cart).Findings include:During an observation on 4/12/26, at 10:00 a.m., Medication cart #1 was left unsecured in the hall and resident identifiable information was observed on the computer screen and on papers on top of the cart. During an interview on 4/12/26, at 10:03 a.m., Registered Nurse Employee E8 confirmed that resident identifiable information was left available for any passerby to see. During an observation on 4/12/26, at 10:38 a.m., of the dayroom, a medication cart identified as not being used was unsecured and had accessible resident identifiable information available.During an interview on 4/12/26, at 10:40 a.m., Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that a narcotic book with resident personal information was accessible to anyone in the dayroom.During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 58 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of two nursing units (Side 1 and Side 2) and failed to provide clean linens, wash cloths and towels to accommodate the needs of the residents of two of two nursing units (Side 1 and Side 2). Findings included: Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment, last reviewed on 6/1/25, indicated that residents are provided with a clean, comfortable homelike environment and encouraged to use their own belongings. The facility staff and management maximize, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting including a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment including clean bed and bath linens that rea in good condition. During observations on 4/12/26 from 10:40 a.m., through 12:27 p.m., the following was observed: The main hall the ceilings have unfinished drywall and spackling, walls have areas with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of increased or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels and failed to assess residents of hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood glucose) for three of seven residents (R1, R14, and R77). Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control define diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your blood stream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop responding to insulin, too much blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R1 and R21).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dialysis Management (Hemodialysis) dated 1/8/26 with a prior review date of 6/1/25. The policy indicates the facility is to complete Pre-Dialysis information on the communication form and send with resident to dialysis on treatment days, to ensure communication of resident information and coordinate care between Dialysis Center and Facility. Dialysis center personnel to complete Dialysis communication form and return to facility. Dialysis Center may provide their EHR documentation vs manual documentation of treatment on communication form. Upon return from Dialysis Center, review information provided on Dialysis communication form/EHR. Communicate and address as appropriate. Facility to complete post-dialysis information/data and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident group interview, a confidential staff interview and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of twelve of twenty-four residents (Residents R1, R2, R5, R14, R36, R51, R60, and R700 R701, R702 R801, and R802).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, reviewed on 1/8/26 with a prior review date of 6/1/25, indicated, attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Minimum staffing requirements imposed by the state are adhered to when determining staff rations but are not necessarily considered a determination of sufficient and competent staffing. Review of the facility policy Answering the Call Light, reviewed on 1/8/26 with a prior review date of 6/1/25, indicated that each resident is provided with a means to call staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure a medication cart for one of three medication carts currently in use (Cart #1) and failed to properly secure a medication cart while not in use for one of four medication carts (Cart #4). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated 6/1/25, indicated drug and biologicals used in the facility are to be in locked compartments under proper temperature. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access. The nursing staff are responsible for maintaining medication storage. Compartments containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. During an observation on 4/12/26, at 10:03 a.m., Medication cart #1 was unlocked and unattended in hall. During an interview on 4/12/26, at 10:03 a.m., Registered Nurse Employee E8 confirmed that the facility failed to properly secure one of three medication carts (Cart #1). During an observation on 4/12/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner which maintained resident dignity for five of twenty-three residents (Resident R40, R51, R700, R701, and R702).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights reviewed on 1/8/26, with a prior review date of 6/1/25, indicated that federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to a dignified existence be treated with respect, kindness and dignity, be free from abuse, neglect, access to people and services both inside and outside the facility. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident council documents, resident group interview, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to respond to concerns from resident council and failed to respond to concerns in a timely manner for seven out of eight months (August 2025, September 2025, October 2025, November 2025, December 2025, February 2026 and March 2026).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Resident Council dated 1/8/26 with a prior review date of 6/1/25. The policy indicates The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for: residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; consensus building and communication between resident and facility staff; and disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents. A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) committee will review information and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an injury obtained during care to eliminate possible neglect for one of seven residents (Resident R77).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating reviewed 2/18/26, with a previous review date of 1/20/25, indicated the facility will report any resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting reviewed 2/18/26, with a previous review date of 1/20/25, indicated all accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that current and accurate nurse staffing information was posted in the facility at the beginning of each shift. Findings include: Observation conducted on 4/12/26, at approximately 9:15 a.m., revealed that nurse staffing information was posted in the main lobby on the reception desk. At that time, the nurse staffing information had the date of (4/10/26), resident census, and the staffing hours did not accurately reflect the current total number of hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for the current date. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 4/12/26, at approximately 11:50 a.m., the NHA confirmed the facility failed to post the required current facility information for staffing hours and the census for 4/12/26.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to ensure that water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks were maintained at a safe temperature for one of two nursing units observed (First and Second Nursing Units). This failure resulted in a harm to Resident R77 and placed residents on the Second Nursing Unit at risk for serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 26 of 41 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility-provided Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) job description indicated, The primary purpose of your job is to lead, direct, and manage the overall operations of the community in accordance with policies and procedures and current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the community. As the Administrator, it is your responsibility to organize, develop, and direct resources to maintain the highest degree of quality care is maintained for each resident at all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, family interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and functional environment in the laundry room.Findings include:During an observation on 4/12/26, at 12:27 p.m., the following was observed: The washing area had two washers; one working washer had the complete front panel of the machine off and was leaking water throughout the washroom onto the floor. There were three dryers, two of which had broken signs on them and the functioning dryer had a brown substance inside the dryer drum. During an interview on 4/12/26, at 12:28 p.m., the Laundry/ Housekeeping Supervisor Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and functional environment in the laundry room. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documents, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain door alarm systems were regularly tested for functionality. Findings include: Review of the facility Maintenance Manager job description indicated the Maintenance Manager Maintains competency & is tested to be competent in:Machine Maintenance requirementsFire Prevention & SafetyInfection Control/OSHA & CDCFacility Maintenance requirements Review of the facility alarm testing instructions stated:Check delayed egress operation (if applicable)1. Push door release hard for a fraction of a second - door should not open and alarm shouldnot sound2. Apply pressure to the door release for the pre-determined nuisance period setting (normally1-3 seconds)3 Door should go into irreversible unlocking sequenceDoor alarm will soundDoor will automatically open within (15-30 seconds)4 Close door and reset the alarm5 Ensure signs are placed on doors adjacent to the release device that read 'Push until alarmsounds. Door can be opened in 15 seconds.6 Confirm that security panels at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of wounds for two of five residents (Resident R4 and R5).Findings include: Review of the PICO 14 Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) System (device used for wound healing) directions for use indicated that the portable pump is connected to the absorbent adhesive dressing. The dressings have a wear time of up to seven days depending on the amount of fluid from the wound, and the pump has a battery life of 14 days. Review of Resident R4's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/3/26, included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles) and diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, resident interviews and observations, staff interviews, and it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two of four residents (Resident R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy Administering Medications 1/8/26, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy further stated that the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record:-the date and time the medication was administered;-the dosage;-the route of administration;-the injection site (if applicable);-any complaints or symptoms for which the drug was administered;-any results achieved and when those results were observed; and-the signature and title of the person administering the drug. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2025, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of five residents (Resident R1). This was identified as past non-compliance.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Wandering and Elopements dated 1/8/26, indicated the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining he lest restrictive environment for residents. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2025, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure equipment was in safe operating condition for two of two crash carts (carts maintained with equipment used in emergencies, 100-Hall and 2-Hall) and two of two facility dryers. Review of the facility policy, Emergency Procedure - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation dated [DATE], previously dated [DATE], indicated, Maintain equipment and supplies necessary for CPR/BLS (cardiopulmonary resuscitation / basic life support) in the facility at all times.Findings include:During an observation of the 100-Hall crash cart on [DATE], at approximately 10:00 a.m. revealed the following items missing from per the inventory on the Emergency Cart Daily Checklist:Blank code bookBand-aids(2) needles with syringesGownsMasksGoggles or face shieldAlcohol based hand rubAmbu-bag(2) 14 French suction kits(2) Christmas tree adaptersNon-rebreather maskNasal canulaReview of the 100-Hall Emergency Cart Checklist for [DATE] revealed the crash cart was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased capillary blood glucose (CBG) levels for four of six residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, and R4).The Centers for Disease Control indicated hyperglycemia is blood glucose greater than 125 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) while fasting (not eating for at least eight hours, or a blood glucose greater than 180 mg/dL one to two hours after eating. If hyperglycemia is left untreated for long periods of time, it can damage nerves, blood vessels, tissues and organs. Review of the facility policy, Diabetes - Clinical Protocol dated 1/8/26, previously dated 6/1/25, indicated, The physician will order appropriate interventions, which may include:Treatment of underlying conditions causing impaired glucose tolerance;Physical activity, diet and lifestyle modifications, where feasible and accepted by the resident;Oral hypoglycemia agents; and/orInsulin (an injectable medication to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0659 — pattern
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy and records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that facility nursing personnel maintain current CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) certification for Healthcare Providers through a CPR provider whose training includes a hands-on session either in a physical or virtual instructor-led setting in accordance with accepted national standards for three of 27 licensed nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employees E10 and E11, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14).Review of the facility policy, Emergency Procedure - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation dated [DATE], previously dated [DATE], indicated Obtain and/or maintain American Red Cross or American Heart Association certification in Basic Life Support (BLS) / Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR).On [DATE], the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided a list of 14 currently employed LPNs and 13 currently employed RNs.Review of the CPR certification cards for LPN Employees E10 and E11, and RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy and records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation that facility nursing personnel have current education and certification to provide basic life support, including CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation), to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 15 of 27 licensed nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employees E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9, E12, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employees E13, E15, E16, E17, and E18).Review of the facility policy, Emergency Procedure - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation dated [DATE], previously dated [DATE], indicated that personnel have completed training on the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and basic life support (BLS), including defibrillation, for victims of sudden cardiac arrest (unexpected cessation of heart pumping, causing an immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program, including additional training topics based on the resident population or outcome of the facility assessment for eight of nine staff members sampled (Employees E19, E20, E21, E22, E24, E25, E26, and E27).Findings include: Review of the United States National Institute of Health: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute document, Cardiac Arrest: Causes and Risk Factors dated [DATE], indicated that Heart problems are the most important risk factors for cardiac arrest. Included in the examples of heart conditions that can precipitate cardiac arrest were: Coronary artery disease (CAD, damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels)Abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmia, dysrhythmia)Atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat)Angina (chest pain from not enough blood flow to the heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical supplies were properly stored and/or disposed of for two of two crash carts (carts maintained with equipment used in emergencies, 100-Hall and 2-Hall).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated 1/8/26, previously dated 6/1/25, indicated that discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. During an observation on 2/2/26, at approximately 11:00 a.m., of the 100-Hall crash cart revealed the following:(1) Yankauer catheter with sterile packaging open.(1) box of acetaminophen suppositories with an expiration date of 12/2024.(1) bottle of 0.9% sodium chloride solution with an expiration date of 5/18/24.(1) I.V. start kit with an expiration date of 4/30/24.(1) I.V. start kit with an expiration date of 9/7/25.(1) concentrator mask with tubing with an expiration date of 03/2025.(1) package of connection tubing with an expiration date of 06/2012.(1) box of glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documents, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the governing body failed to implement policies regarding the management of the operation of the facility by failing to align facility policies with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requirements.Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Governing Body dated [DATE], previously dated [DATE], indicated, The Governing Body is, to the extent required by applicable law, responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding management and operation of the Facility. Review of S483.24(a)(3) Personnel provide basic life support, including CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation), to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives indicated, Ensure staff maintain current CPR certification for healthcare providers through a CPR provider whose training includes hands-on practice and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately document wound care orders and treatments for four of seven residents (Residents R5, R6, R7, and R8).Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 1/23/26, indicated in the Common Diagnoses that the facility would provide care for skin ulcers and injuries. Review of the facility policy, Charting and Documentation dated 1/8/26, previously dated 6/1/25, indicated All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facility communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Review of the facility policy, Wound Care dated 1/8/26, previously dated 6/1/25, indicated that the date and time wound care was given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-29 · tag F0655 — widespread
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan to include instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident for ten of ten residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 6/1/25, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of Resident R1's clinical record reviewed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's facility diagnosis list included Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior) and bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make accessible grievance boxes to residents in two of two locations (front hallway and rear hallway).Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) does not specify exact height requirements for grievance boxes in skilled nursing facilities. However, CMS mandates that grievance procedures be accessible to all residents, including those with disabilities, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In Pennsylvania, the Department of Health incorporates by reference the federal requirements outlined in 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, which pertains to long-term care facilities. These regulations emphasize the importance of accessibility but do not provide additional specifications regarding grievance box placement. To ensure accessibility, the ADA Standards for Accessible Design recommend that operable parts, such as slots on grievance boxes, be mounted between 15 and 48 inches above the floor. This range accommodates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment on two of two nursing units and for seven of twelve residents.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment dated 6/1/25, indicated in part, The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition. Review of information submitted to the Pennsylvania Department of Health on 12/22/25, indicated that Resident R21 had vomited under his bed on 12/18/25, and the dried vomit remained under his bed on 12/22/25. During an interview on 12/22/25, at 12:59 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that Resident R21's room had not been cleaned of the vomit from 12/18/25. During an observation on 12/22/25, at 1:50 p.m. Resident R20's room was noted to have food on the floor with a smell of urine. During an observation of Resident R24's room revealed blood on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to document and/or follow-up on concerns/grievances presented by staff and residents for five of five residents (Resident R11, R12, R13, R14, and R15).Findings include: Review of facility, Grievance Policy dated 6/1/25, indicated the facility is committed to maintaining transparent, fair, and accessible grievance process. Every grievance will be addressed promptly and appropriately, in accordance with federal and state regulations. Residents and their representative must be assured that: They can submit grievances orally or in writing; Their concerns will be investigated and responded to promptly; They will not face discrimination, reprisal, or retaliation; They will receive written notice of grievance outcomes within required timeframes. Review of a grievance filed by Resident R11 on 11/19/25, reported a concern related to not receiving showers. The form section that indicated if the resident/resident representative was informed of the resolution and the name of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from verbal and emotional abuse and/or neglect for three of twelve residents (Resident R15, R23, and R25).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol dated 6/1/25, defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish and neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 10/10/25, included diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for four of five residents (Resident R16, R17, R18, and R19).Findings include:Review of Resident R16's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/30/25, included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles) and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body).Review of an active physician order dated 4/3/24, indicated Resident R16 should have a left protective sleeve and left resting hand splint, to be worn every day, day shift, as tolerated.Review of an active physician order dated 10/29/24, indicated Resident R16 should have a left an Isotoner glove to her left hand daily.Review of Resident R16's plan of care for self-care deficit and skin integrity last reviewed on 10/8/25, both indicated Resident R16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, information submitted to the Pennsylvania Department of Health (PADOH, Resident Council minutes, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 16 of 35 residents (Residents R1, R5, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R20, R22, R26, R27, R30, R31, and R32).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Answering the Call Light dated 6/1/25, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. Review of the facility policy, Activities of Daily Living, (ADL), Supporting dated 6/1/25, indicated, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. During an observation on 12/22/25, at approximately 1:19 p.m. Resident R1 was noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report possible neglect of one of three residents (Resident R23).Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigating dated 6/1/25, indicated The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: The state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility.The local/state ombudsman.The resident's representative.Adult protective services (where state law provides jurisdiction in long-term care).Law enforcement officials.The residents attending physician.The facility medical director. Immediately is defined as: Within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or Within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered for one of three residents (Resident R13).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Laboratory Testing and Result Management dated 6/1/25, indicated, The facility shall ensure that laboratory tests are obtained, processed., reviewed, and acted upon in a timely manner by qualified staff. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/1/25, included diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of -kidney function), heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), and high blood pressure. Review of the plan of care dated 4/8/25, included a care of plan for psoriasis (a chronic skin condition that causes red, itchy, scaly patches). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine if it was safe to self-administer medications for one of five residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Self-Administration of Drugs dated 6/1/25, indicated, If a resident chooses to self-administer medication, he/she will be assessed for the ability to exercise this right safely and accurately. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs dated included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns indicated Resident R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident R1's plan of care updated 10/3/25, failed to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three of ten residents as required (Residents R1, R2, and R3) on two of two nursing units side one and side two. Findings included:Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment dated 6/1/25, indicated in part The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition. During an interview on 7/31/25, at approximately 10:00 a.m. Resident R1 verbalized frustration with the lack of linen at the facility. They always run out of sheets and bath towels, sometimes I have an accident in bed and the staff have to run all over the building to try and find linen it can take an hour. Sometimes you can't get new sheets on your bed after your shower because there isn't any available. During an interview on 7/31/25, at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that fresh drinking water was consistently readily accessible to residents to promote adequate hydration, meet resident preferences, and maintain their comfort for three of ten residents (Residents R1, R2, and R3).Findings include:The U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine suggests adequate daily fluid intake for men: 3,700 mL (milliliter) per day and women: 2,700 mL per day.A review of the facility current Certified Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated Keep residents' water pitchers clean and filled with fresh water (on each shift), and within easy reach of the resident. During an interview and observation on 7/31/25, at approximately 10:00 a.m., Resident R1 was asked by the surveyor if drinking water was provided. Resident R1 stated; they are supposed to bring it three times a day and that never happens. You usually have to ask for water if you want it. You can't get ice because the ice machines are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for one of one AEDs (Automatic External Defibrillators).Findings include:Review of facility policy Automatic External Defibrillator, Use and Care of dated 6/1/25, indicated; Keep a spare battery and adhesive pads in the case, as instructed. Record the expiration date of the battery and the pads on the maintenance log or tag. Check the device and perform maintenance tasks, as directed. Document checks, maintenance steps and date performed on maintenance log and store log with the device.During an observation on 7/31/25, approximately 1:00 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) of the Automatic External Defibrillator (AED, a portable electronic device that can automatically diagnoses and treat the life-threatening heart rhythms) located at the Nursing Station (Side 2) revealed the last AED audit date of 10/8/2020. During an interview on 7/31/25, at approximately 3:15 p.m. RN Employee E1 stated, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner for one of four nursing medication carts (100 Hall) and failed to label multi-dose vials and check expiration dates for two of four nursing medication carts (100 and 200 Hall). Finding include: Review of facility policy Administering Medications dated [DATE], indicated during administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of site of the medication nurse or aide. The policy also states the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. During an observation and staff interview on [DATE] at approximately 8:43 a.m. the Side 1-Front 100 Hallway medication cart was left open and computer screen visible with patient information with no nurse or aide at cart. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete education regarding, Coronavirus Disease (COVID) vaccination for three of five residents (R9, R18, R50), influenza vaccination education for two of five residents (R32, R50) and pneumococcal vaccination education for five of five residents (R9, R18, R32, R36, R50). Finding include: Review of the facility policy Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)-Vaccination of Residents policy dated 6/1/25, indicated before the COVID-19 vaccine is offered, the resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. Review of the facility policy Influenza Vaccine dated 6/1/25, indicated the resident (or resident's legal representative) or employee will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine. Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's/employee's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and documents, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that showers and baths were provided for three of five residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting reviewed 1/22/25, indicated resident will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain activities of daily living. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene/bathing. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, right ankle foot ulcer, and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and health needs) dated 4/14/25, indicated the diagnoses remain current and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify resident representative and/or medical providers of a newly ordered medication or a change in condition for three of seven residents (Resident R10, R11, and R2). Findings include: Review of the policy Next of Kin Notification for Medication Changes, dated 1/22/25, indicated the interdisciplinary team shall notify the next of kin or designated responsible party/HCP (healthcare proxy)/POA (power of attorney) of medication changes for residents in a timely manner to promote informed decision-making and continuity of care. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of Resident R10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels for four of eight residents (Residents R7, R18, R19, and R20). Findings: Review of the facility policy, Diabetes - Clinical Protocol dated 1/22/25, indicated, The physician will order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to blood sugar management. The staff will incorporate such parameters into the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and care plan. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/7/25, included diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels) and diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) Review of Resident R7's care plan initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for two of five residents (Resident R4 and R5). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol last reviewed 1/22/25, indicated the physician will order pertinent wound treatments. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R4 was initially admitted to the facility 6/2/22, and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/4/25, included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), arthritis (inflammation of one or more joints, causing pain and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-31 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — pattern
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide colostomy care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two residents (Resident R5 and R6). Findings include: Review of facility policy Colostomy/Ileostomy Care dated 1/22/25, indicated for staff to review the resident's care plan. Review of Resident R5's clinical admission record indicated that resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/3/25, included diagnoses of diabetes, Ogilvie's syndrome (dilation of the colon in the absence of an anatomic lesion that obstructs the flow of intestinal contents), and the presence of pressure ulcers. Section H: Bladder and Bowel indicated the presence of an ostomy. Review of Resident R5's physician order dated 10/22/24, indicated Colostomy Appliance: Change wafer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of ten of 18 residents (Residents R4, R5, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, and R19). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Answering the Call Light dated 1/22/25, indicated staff will ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. During an observation on 3/26/25, at 3:39 p.m. the call light for Residents R19 was alarming. At this time, six nursing staff members were noted to be seated at the nursing station, without responding. When staff observed the surveyor noting the time, Nurse Aide Employee E13 responded to the call light. During an interview on 3/27/25, at 11:10 a.m. Resident R5 when asked if he felt the facility maintained enough staff, Resident R5 responded, No. Resident R5 stated that call light response time can be long, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately document physician notification for three of eight residents (Residents R7, R8, and R9). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Charting and Documentation dated 1/22/25, indicated All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facility communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Review of a physician order for Resident R7 dated 6/26/24, indicated, Hypoglycemia Protocol Observe Sign/Symptoms of hypoglycemia as needed if blood glucose is less than 70 mg/dl or ordered low parameter follow Hypoglycemia protocol. NOTIFY md (Doctor of Medicine) > 400 BLOOD SUGAR. ADDITION OF PROGRESS NOTE. Review of Resident R7's blood sugar record revealed the following: 1/23/25, at 5:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-31 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation, cited deficiencies from previous surveys, review of plan of correction documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program failed to correct previously cited deficiencies. This has the potential to affect 18 of 91 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program dated 1/22/25, indicated objectives of the QAPI program include providing a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators and to establish systems through which to monitor and evaluate corrective actions. The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending 2/28/24, revealed the facility developed a plan of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. Review of the plan of correction for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective call system for three of five restrooms accessible to residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 1/1/25, indicated that listed under the Physical Environment resources was a nurse call system. During an observation on 3/27/25, at 9:38 a.m. the staff restroom across from the 200-Unit nursing station was observed unlocked, with the door open. Observation of the restroom revealed no emergency call light or call cord attached for emergency use. During an observation on 3/28/25, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the two staff restrooms across from the Activities room were observed unlocked, with the doors open. Observation of the restrooms revealed no emergency call light or call cord attached for emergency use. During an interview on 3/28/25, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the restrooms were unlocked, which allowed access by residents, and confirmed that no call lights were available for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that licensed nurses displayed the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing services for one of two residents (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Management of Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) dated 1/22/25, indicated that Level 3 hypoglycemia is when a resident has altered mental status and/or physical status requiring assistance for the treatment of hypoglycemia. In the actions listed to take include: 1. Call 911 (in accordance with resident ' s advance directives); 2. Administer glucagon (emergency injectable medicine used to treat severe hypoglycemia); 3. Notify the provider immediately ' Review of the Facility Assessment dated 1/1/25, indicated the facility is able to provide care for residents with diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time). Review of the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels and failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood glucose), for 8 of 19 Residents (Residents R3, R9, R54, R55, R59, R61, R66, R187). Findings: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, high blood pressure, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 5/6/24, indicated the diagnoses remain current. Review of a physician order dated 10/12/23, revealed Novolog (fast-acting insulin that starts to work about 15 minutes after injection, peaks in about 1 hour, and keeps working for 2 to 4 hours) insulin, 8 units three times a day. On 4/10/24, Lantus (long-acting type of insulin that works slowly, over about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical supplies were properly stored and/or disposed of in one of two supply rooms (100-Unit supply room ). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated 6/1/23, indicated medications are and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations. During an observation of the 100-Unit supply room on 6/27/24, at approximately 9:17 a.m. the following was observed: (6) boxes Shiley disposable inner trach cannulas, with expiration of 4/20/21 and 8/31/19. (2) boxes of wound irrigation trays, with expiration of 12/23. (6) boxes of 3ml syringes (100 count), with expiration of 10/18/23. (3) urethral catheter, with an expiration date of 6/28/23. (4) intravenous fluid administration sets, with an expiration date of 10/13/23. (1) box of mini-bore IV extension sets, with expiration of 10/30/23 (6 bags in box had prior resident's names). (1) box vacutainers, with an expiration date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of seven residents (Resident R1). This was identified as past non-compliance. Review of the facility policy Resident Elopement dated 6/1/23, indicated cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement will be appropriately monitored to reduce the potential for injury. Elopement is defined as a resident leaving the physical structure of the facility without knowledge of facility staff. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/20/24, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, grievance reviews, facility provided documents, resident records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of resident property for three of three residents (Residents R2, R3 and R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse: Protection from Abuse last reviewed 6/1/23, informed the resident has right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Misappropriation is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful (temporary or permanent) use of resident's belongings or funds without the resident's consent. Our facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff members from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, resident record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for one of four residents (Resident R2). Findings include: Based on a review of facility policy titled Environmental Services, Clean, Safe and Orderly Environment last reviewed 6/1/23, informed the exterior and interior of the facility will be maintained in clean, safe and orderly manner. Based on review of facility policy titled Maintenance Administration last reviewed 6/1/23, informed the maintenance department will maintain documentation to evidence preventative safety measures are implemented, maintain a log with daily checks, and makes rounds daily. Review of Resident R2's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Current diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a central nervous system disorder that affects movement), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents were aware of unrestricted visitation. Findings include: During an observation on 1/6/24, at 9:30 a.m. a stack of papers titled Family/Visitor Information were placed on the table with the visitor sign-in book. On this document was the following information: Visitor Information: Visitation Hours: -Monday - Friday 8AM-8PM (Enter through the front doors) -Saturday & Sunday 8AM-8PM (front doors lock at 1:00 PM; use ambulance entrance after hours). Further review of the document failed to reveal information relating the availability of 24 hour visitation. During an interview on 1/6/23, at approximately 2:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to ensure that the residents were aware of unrestricted visitation. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident Rights.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of pressure ulcers for five of nine residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/3/23, included the diagnoses of Myelodysplastic syndrome (group of cancers where immature blood cells do not mature or become healthy blood cells) and lymphedema (the build-up of fluid in soft body tissues) high blood pressure. Review of Section GG: Functional Abilities and Goals indicated that Resident R1 had range of motion impairments of one upper and one lower extremity. Review of Section M: Skin Conditions, indicated Resident R1 had three Stage II pressure ulcers (partial-thickness skin loss with exposed middle layer of skin). Review of a physician's order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents, personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker for one of two employees (Employee E1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Social Services Administration dated 6/1/23, indicated the following: A qualified social worker is defined as an individual who meets, at a minimum, one of the following qualifications: 1. A bachelor's degree in social work, or 2. A bachelor's degree in human services field. 3. A bachelor's degree in social work or a bachelor's degree in a human services field including but not limited to sociology, special education, rehabilitation and counseling, and psychology. 4. One year of supervised social work experience in a health setting working directly with individuals. Review of the facility provided job description for the Social Services Director included the educational requirement of a bachelor's degree in social work or a related field. Review of the personnel record for Social Services Director (SSD) Employee E3 revealed that SSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of staff interview and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for 16 of 38 staff members reviewed (E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, and E16). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Staff Development dated 6/1/23, indicated All employees receive Inservice annually and as needed. Annual training will include Psychosocial Needs, Dementia, Trauma Informed Care, and Substance Use Disorder. During nine staff interviews conducted on 11/19/23, between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. the following was indicated: Nurse Aides (NA) Employees E1 and E2 stated they had just begun working at the facility within the previous few days, and had not been provided behavioral health or dementia training from the facility. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3 stated she had received dementia training at a previous facility she worked at, but not from the current facility. LPN Employee E4 stated she had not received behavioral health or dementia training from the facility. NA Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Facility Assessment. Findings include: A review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 1/23/26\, revealed the facility did not complete the template to indicate accurate information on: In the section titled Services and Care included the provision of ventilator care (a machine that helps or breathes for a patient who can't breathe adequately on their own) and hypodermoclysis (administration of fluids into the tissue under the skin). In the section titled, List of Key Personnel were the previous Nursing Home Administrator and the previous Director of Nursing. In the section titled Physical Resources failed to include crash carts (carts maintained with equipment used in emergencies) or AEDs (automated external defibrillator, a portable medical device that analyzes heart rhythms and delivers an electric shock to restore normal heart function). During an interview on 2/5/26, at approximately 11:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$256,250 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $245,057 — penalty dated 2026-04-16
  • $11,193 — penalty dated 2025-03-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WECARE CENTERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • KJA PINNACLE LLC — private equity · 25.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • EMSIR LLC — private equity · 5.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MONROEVILLE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2024
KJA PINNACLE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
GRINSPAN, ARYEHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
KORN, ELIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
WIELGUS, GEDALIAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
KORN, MIRIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2024
GPH MONROEVILLE LPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
HILL, CODYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
ZDRALE, NIKOLAIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
WECARE HCC LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
FINN, NICHOLASIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2026
LINAM, KIMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2026
RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2026
SCHWARTZ, ALANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
DRUMM INTERMEDIARY SUB CO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
DRUMM MERGER COOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
DRUMM MERGER CO SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
FILLMORE STRATEGIC INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
PA 3 SIX MASTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
PEARL SENIOR CARE, LLC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT BOARDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-31.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 2%Other / private 10%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$391per resident / day
operating cost
$11,878per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$296per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395670. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next