No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sugar Creek Care Center

351 Causeway Drive, Franklin, PA 16323 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 148 certified beds · (814) 437-0100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 437-0100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
150 Prospect Ave · (814) 437-1312 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
102 E Atlantic Ave · (814) 437-9115 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
317 Grant St · (814) 432-2158 · Call to confirm hours
Park
240 Atlantic Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
443 Sugarcreek Dr · (814) 432-8664

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.0%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.3%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.1%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.9%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine35.5%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.5%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.931.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.371.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.6%CMS range 37.7–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 7.4–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified69.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting59.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.3–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
46.9%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 101.2 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding showers for four of four residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Bath, Shower/Tub dated 1/20/26, indicated Documentation: The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed. The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath. Review of facility policy entitled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting dated 1/20/26, indicated Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs [activities of daily living] independently. including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/14/15, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid produces low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding physician's orders for a gastrostomy (G-tube-tube placed in the stomach for feedings and fluids) for one of three residents reviewed with a G-tube. (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Telephone Orders dated 6/4/25, indicated the order must be recorded in the residents clinical record . Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/21/25, with diagnoses that included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (most severe type of cerebral palsy causing severe stiffness and poor control of all limbs, trunk and face due to brain damage), intellectual disabilities, and diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin). Review of Resident R1's nurse's notes dated 12/01/25, indicated that the G-tube was flushed with a 50/50 mix of hydrogen peroxide and water as instructed. Review of Resident R1's current physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, clinical and facility records, resident and staff interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bath/shower as resident preference for four of 13 residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, and R4) and failed to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being by not serving meals in the dining room and having group activities for six of 13 residents (Residents R1, R4, R6, R7, R8, and R9). Findings include:No facility policy was provided for showers.Review of a facility policy entitled Coronavirus Disease dated 6/04/25, indicated The interdisciplinary team reviews an outbreak to see if they should refrain from communal activities. This should be reviewed on a daily basis so it can be lifted as soon as the spread of the infection is determined to have slowed. Resident's R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/05/20, with diagnoses that included spastic hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side (a neuromuscular condition causing constant muscle contractions on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility admission process and policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one of two residents observed related to incontinence care (Resident R1).Findings include: Facility provided documentation of the facility ' s admission packet revealed that a resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity. Resident rights - The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section. A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident ' s individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. Facility policy entitled, Perineal Care, dated 6/04/25, indicated the purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User ' s Manual 2025 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards for repositioning and pressure relief for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R1 and R5), and incontinence care for one of two residents observed (Resident R1). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Repositioning dated 6/04/25, indicated Repositioning is a common, effective intervention for preventing skin breakdown, promoting circulation, and providing pressure relief. and Repositioning is critical for a resident who is immobile or dependent upon staff for repositioning. Facility policy entitled, Perineal Care, dated 6/04/25, indicated the purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and records, observations, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for one of one test trays completed. Findings include:A facility policy entitled, Meal Service Line dated 6/4/25, revealed Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance, and will be placed on trays in an attractive manner as near to the time of actual tray service as possible. This is done to ensure acceptable temperatures of food when the tray is served to the resident. Resident council and food committee minutes from 8/5/25, and 10/13/25, indicated that a toasted cheese sandwich was cold and that lunch and dinner trays on the unit are being served up to 45 minutes late. During an interview on 11/5/25, at 12:30 p.m. Resident R6 who resides on 600 Hall indicated his/her food is often served cold. Review of temperature logs completed by kitchen staff on 11/5/25, revealed the following lunch meal temperatures: Pork 170 degrees Fahrenheit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination during completion of incontinence care (care provided for someone who has lost control of their bladder and/or bowel movements) for two of two residents observed (Residents R1 and R5). Findings include:Review of facility policy entitled Perineal Care dated 6/4/25, indicated Steps in the procedure . discard disposable items into designated containers. Review of facility policy entitled Diarrhea and Fecal Incontinence dated, 6/4/25, indicated Disposable items soiled with feces (i.e., disposable briefs .) must be handled as so to prevent contamination of the environment with feces. Observations on 11/5/25, at 1:45 p.m. revealed Nursing Assistant (NA) Employee E1, NA Employee E2, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3 completing incontinence care for Resident R1. During incontinence care NA Employee E2 removed resident R1 ' s pants and brief (a disposable incontinence pad) which was soiled (contained urine and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and resident Pennsylvania Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R19). Findings include:A facility policy entitled Advanced Directives dated [DATE], indicated that the plan of care for each resident is consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. Resident R19's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - happens when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and causes heartburn), diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and high blood pressure. Resident R19's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated [DATE], for Full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident privacy during medication administration for one of six residents observed (Resident R107).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Dignity dated 6/4/25, indicated Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. And Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. During observation of medication administration for Resident R107 on 8/27/25, at 1:33 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E2 was administering medications through Resident R107's G-Tube (a tube placed in the stomach to provide nutrition). Resident R107's night gown was pulled up exposing his/her legs, incontincence care product, and stomach. Resident R107 was able to be viewed from the hallway. LPN Employee E2 failed to close the residents' door and/or pull the privacy curtain while administering medications through Resident R107's G-Tube. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day); failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital; and failed to complete a discharge summary for four of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R103, and R105). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled “Bed-Holds and Returns” dated 6/4/25, indicated “All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility bed-hold policies… at the time of transfer…” Review of facility policy entitled “Discharge Summary and Plan” dated 6/4/25, indicated that when a facility anticipates a resident’s discharge to a private residence, another nursing care facility a discharge summary and a post-discharge plan will be developed which will assist the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and/or revise resident care plans to reflect resident's current condition for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R38).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plan Completion, Updating, Reviews, and Auditing Compliance Process dated 6/2/25, revealed that care plan reviews are required to be an interdisciplinary review and goal setting for each resident. Resident R38's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/19/25, with diagnoses that included Cellulitis of Left Lower Leg (a skin infection caused by bacteria, most commonly affecting the lower legwith symptoms incluing swelling, pain, warmth, and redness), diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R38's care plans on 8/28/25, revealed a focus or problem initiated on 6/30/25, Resident is on enhanced barrier precautions related PICC line and wounds. Clinical record progress notes revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the opportunity for potential unauthorized access of medications and failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for two of three medication carts reviewed (Medication carts 400 and 600).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medication dated 6/4/25, indicated The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container, During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse., and The cart must be clearly visible to the personal administering medications. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Aspart Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Victoza must be used within 30 days after opening or be discarded even if some medicine is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, resident council minutes, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide dental services in a timely manner for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R97). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Dental Services, dated 6/4/25, revealed Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. residents will be referred for dental services within 3 days. If the referral is not made within 3 days, documentation will be provided regarding what is being done to ensure that the resident is able to eat and drink adequately while awaiting dental services; and the reason for the delay. Resident R97's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/6/19, with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction (stroke-blood flow to the brain is interrupted), and hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormones). Review of Resident R97's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards, facility job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice to ensure physician orders were entered into point click care (PCC-a healthcare software used to track and administer healthcare operations in a long-term care facility) upon admission to ensure timely medication availability and timely medication administration for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards 21.11. General functions of the Registered Nurse (RN) (a)(4) stated, Carries out nursing care actions which promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals and (b) The RN is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care delivered and (d) The Board recognizes standards of practice and professional codes of behavior, as developed by appropriate nursing associations, as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to enter physician's orders timely resulting in a delay in treatment for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Administering Medications 5/9/25, indicated, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/4/23, with diagnoses that included idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (a lung disease that causes irreversible scarring in the lungs), sleep apnea (breathing starts and stops during sleep), and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Resident R1's clinical record revealed he/she returned to the facility from the hospital on 6/12/25, at 4:15 p.m. His/her medication orders were not placed into point click care (PCC-a healthcare software used to track and administer healthcare operations in a long-term care facility) for floor nurses to be alerted when scheduled medications were due to be administered or for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC-a thin soft flexible tube placed in the vein of the upper arm also called an IV to deliver fluids and medications) dressing changes for two of three residents reviewed with PICC lines in the treatment record. (Residents R1 and R2) Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Peripheral and Midline IV Dressing Changes dated 5/9/25, indicated Change the dressing if it becomes damp, loosened or visibly soiled and at least every 7 days . Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/24/24, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), cellulitis (and infection of the skin), and diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin). Review of Resident R1's physician's orders for May 2025, revealed an order dated 5/5/25, to change PICC line dressing weekly. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility infection control program and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) was qualified with specialized training in infection prevention and control from 4/10/25 to 5/25/25. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Infection Preventionist dated 5/9/25, indicated The Infection Preventionist has obtained specialized IPC training beyond initial professional training . and Evidence of training is provided through a certificate of completion . Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E2's daily timecard revealed he/she worked as the facility's IP from 4/16/25, to 5/21/25. Upon request, the facility was unable to produce a certificate of completion for the IP specialized training for RN Employee E2. During an interview with Regional Clinical Director Employee E1 on 6/17/25, at 11:00 a.m. he/she revealed that RN Employee E2 started covering the IP position in the facility when the former IP left the position on 4/9/25, and he/she continued covering the position until the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication was obtained and provided as ordered by the physician for one of 10 residents reviewed for medications (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated 5/09/25, indicated Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as perscribed. Review of Resident R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/05/20, with diagnoses that included Rheumatoid arthritis, pain in shoulder and chronic pain. Review of Resident R3's clinical recorded revealed a physician's order dated 5/17/25, for Oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) 5 milligrams one tab every six hours while awake for pain. Review of Resident R3's May 2025 Medication Administration Record revealed that Resident R3's Oxycodone was not administered for three doses on 5/18/25, for three doses on 5/19/25, and one dose on 5/20/25. During an interview on 5/22/25, at 12:05 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and/or revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current necessary care and services for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 5/09/25, revealed that each resident's care plan describes the services that will be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; which specialized services are responsible for each element of care; assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's condition change; and the interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/24, with diagnoses that included muscle wasting, depression, diabetic foot ulcer, with Parkinson's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49 and Title 55: Professional and Vocational Standards, clinical records, facility staffing, and facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient staff with the appropriate skill sets to provide nursing services including timely medication administration, and post-fall assessments for three of eight residents reviewed (Residents R5, R7, and R8). Findings include: Review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards 21.145 a. Prohibited Acts revealed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) may not administer medications or fluids via arterial lines. Review of Pennsylvania Code Title 55. Additional Assessments 2800.225 revealed an LPN, under the supervision of a Registered Nurse (RN), or an RN shall complete additional written assessments for each resident. A facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated 5/09/25, indicated that staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that mediations are administered without unnecessary interruptions, and that medications are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility documents and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents receive appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Behavioral Health Services dated 5/09/25, indicated behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care, and residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/24, with diagnoses that included muscle wasting, depression, diabetic foot ulcer, with Parkinson's disease (age-related degenerative brain condition, meaning it causes parts of your brain to deteriorate, and is best known for causing slowed movements, tremors, balance problems and more) being documented throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication was obtained and provided as ordered by the physician for two of two residents reviewed for medications (Residents R1 and R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Medication Orders Controlled Substance Prescriptions dated 5/01/24, indicated If a new prescription is not obtained by the pharmacy before the medication would be due again, the facility is notified. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/13/23, with diagnoses that included Psychotic disorder with delusions (a mental disease that include delusions a false belief based on an incorrect interpretation of reality), and Anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone). Review of Resident R1's clinical recorded revealed a physician's order dated 9/11/24, for Ativan, Benadryl, Haldol, Reglan (ABHR-combined medications for topical application) gel apply to wrist topically four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in two of two unit refrigerators reviewed (East Unit and [NAME] Unit). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Use and Storage of Food and Beverage brought in for Residents dated 5/1/24, revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of all food including food and fluids brought to residents by family and other visitors. Additionally, the facility procures food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by federal, state, or local authorities. This includes storage, preparations, distribution, and serving food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. A facility policy entitled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Food Handling dated 5/1/24, revealed Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. Observations on 9/19/24, at approximately 9:45 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a foley catheter (tubing inserted into the bladder to help drain urine from the bladder) was emptied and the amount was documented every shift per physician's orders for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R21) Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 5/1/24, revealed Observe the resident's urine level for noticeable increases or decreases. If the level stays the same or increases rapidly, report it to the physician or supervisor. Follow the facility procedure for measuring and documenting input and output. Resident R21's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/27/23, with diagnoses that included retention of urine (bladder does not empty completely), heart failure, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R21's physician's orders dated 6/01/24, revealed an order to empty the foley catheter every shift and document the amount. Review of R21's Treatment Administration Record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate tracking and safe disposition of controlled medications for one of three closed records reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR87). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, entitled Discarding and Destroying Medications, dated 5/1/24, revealed Schedule II, III, and IV (non-hazardous) controlled substances will be disposed of in accordance with state regulations and federal guidelines regarding disposition of non-hazardous controlled medications. The medication disposition record will contain the following information: a. The resident's name; b. Date medication disposed; c. The name and strength of the medication; d. The name of the dispensing pharmacy; e. The quantity disposed; f. Method of disposition; g. Reason for disposition; h. Signature of witnesses. Review of Resident CR87's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on 6/17/24. Resident CR87 ceased to breathe on 6/24/24. Review of Resident CR87's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free from significant medication errors for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R75). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated, 5/1/24, indicated Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders including any required time frame. and The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review Resident R75's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/20/24, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition that causes by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone). Review of Resident R75's physician's orders revealed, an order dated 6/20/24, for Humalog…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store Schedule II-V medications in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in one of two medication rooms reviewed (West medication room) and failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of two medication rooms reviewed (West medication room). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Storage of Medications dated 5/1/24, revealed that Schedule II-V controlled medications are stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments. Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated 5/1/24, revealed that When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Observation of drug storage on 9/17/24, at 11:35 a.m. of the [NAME] medication room refrigerator revealed an open multi-dose vile of Tubersol (a solution used for tuberculosis testing upon admission and employment) with no date indicating when the vile was open. Further observation of the refrigerator revealed a shelf with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that a Registered Nurse (RN) conducted initial and/or follow up resident wound assessments for two of two residents with wounds (Residents R33 and R92). Findings include: Review of the Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State Chapter 21, State Board of Nursing, dated 7/29/23, indicated that under Responsibilities of the RN, 21.11, General Functions. (a) The registered nurse assesses human responses and plans, implements, and evaluates nursing care for individuals or families for whom the nurse is responsible, and (b) The registered nurse is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care delivered. The 21.141 Definitions, Practice of practical nursing revealed The performance of selected nursing acts in the care of the ill, injured or infirm under the direction of the licensed professional nurse, a licensed physician or a licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to fully complete the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letter for one of four residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR1). Findings include: Review of Resident CR1's closed clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/17/23, with diagnoses that included stroke, dementia, intestinal hemorrhaging, low red blood cell count, low platelet levels, and muscle wasting. The clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 4/25/23, to admit to Hospice services. Further review of Resident CR1's closed clinical record revealed payor sources Medicare part B, AETNA Medicare, and Private Pay. Review of a NOMNC indicated that verbal notification was issued to Resident CR1's representative on 3/29/23, and that written confirmation of understanding, and receipt of the notice was provided to Resident CR1's representative on 3/30/23, that indicated Medicare services would end on 4/01/23. There was no documented evidence that Resident CR1's representative was notified that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day) upon transfer for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R78). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Bed Hold Policy dated 3/2023, indicated that at the time of discharge to hospital the resident or responsible party should be given the bed hold information. The policy also indicated a bed hold authorization form should be completed. Review of Resident R13's clinical record revealed an initial admission date of 3/8/23, with diagnoses that included Dementia (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to think logically), depression, Chronic respiratory failure (a condition were your lungs don't exchange air properly), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and diabetes. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the MDS assessment accurately reflected the status for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R54). Finding include: Review of MDS instructions for section O0100 indicated that if Hospice services were provided while a resident of this facility and in the last 14 days to code 2 (While a Resident), in Section O0100K. Review of Resident R54's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/20/18, with diagnoses including dementia, high blood pressure, difficulty walking and swallowing, and muscle weakness. The clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 8/13/23, to admit Resident R54 to Hospice. Review of a Significant Change MDS with a reference date of 8/22/23, under Section O0100K, lacked coding to identify that Resident R54 received Hospice services while a resident at the facility. During an interview on 10/19/23, at 11:27 a.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate the necessary clinical condition for the use of urinary catheter (tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag) for one of 21 residents (Resident R8). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Catheter: Indwelling Urinary-Insertion and care of, dated 3/2023, indicated that a physician must provide written justification of the need for catheterization. Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/2/19, with diagnoses that included, Alzheimer disease (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to think logically), hypokalemia (a condition where you have low potassium level), hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed a physician's telephone order dated 10/16/23, to reinsert foley catheter. Resident R8's clinical record lacked evidence of necessary clinical condition for the use of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication had clinical rationale identified for the use beyond the limitation of fourteen days for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R31 and R50). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Psychotropic Drug Management dated 3/2023, indicated PRN orders for psychotropic medications (antipsychotic, anxiolytic, antidepressant and sedative/hypnotic) will be limited to 14 days unless the physician identifies the rationale to extend the medication beyond 14 days. Resident R31's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/20/2020, with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Dementia (a disease of the brain that affects decision making, memory, mood and behavior), atrial fibrillation (the heart's upper chambers beat out of coordination with the lower chambers causing an irregular heart rate and poor blood flow),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-20 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to display the Department of Health (DOH) Hotline (toll-free telephone number) number in a prominent/accessible location for residents, resident representatives, and other visitors to observe and access in the facility. Findings include: Observations throughout the facility on 10/19/23, at approximately 12:05 p.m. with the Nursing Home Administrator revealed that the DOH Hotline phone number was not posted for residents, resident representatives, and other visitors. During an interview on 10/19/23, at 12:05 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to display the DOH Hotline phone number for residents, resident representatives, and other visitors. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WECARE CENTERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • EMSIR LLC — private equity · 10.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • KJA UPMC4 LLC — private equity · 40.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SCS HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2024
EMSIR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2024
KJA UPMC4 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2024
GRINSPAN, ARYEHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2024
KORN, ELIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2024
WIELGUS, GEDALIAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2024
RODGERS, CATHERINEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
SCHWARTZ, ALANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/01/2024
WECARE HCC LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
BUSH, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
3SSS 3 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
BROSSIER COMPANIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2025
CRESTVIEW 360 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
CRESTVIEW 720 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
KJA UPMC4 PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
LEGACY 360 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
PA 4 HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
PA 4 PROP 1 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
PEN MED LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
S C PROP 1 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
SCHWARTZ FAMILY DYNASTY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
KRUTOWSKY, STEPHENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
STEWART, TREVORIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-36.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 3%Other / private 15%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$438per resident / day
operating cost
$13,300per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$321per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395777. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next