Trinity Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 172 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 84.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, facility protocol review, and hospital record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards when they failed to hold blood pressure medications and notify the doctor of a low blood pressure for Resident #77. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #77 was hospitalized with diagnoses of hypotension, acute kidney injury, and altered mental status. Resident #77 had an elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) level of 110 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl), and elevated creatinine level of 3.22 mg/dl, and a hospital emergency room triage blood pressure of 80/36 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). This affected one (Resident #77) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Record review of Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 03/02/24 with an admission to the hospital on [DATE] and a readmission to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #77 had pertinent diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 79 residents in the facility. The facility identified two residents (21 and #137) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen's reach in coolers on 03/31/25 at 8:25 A.M. revealed the following: a. a plastic tub of yogurt, opened and partially used, with no open date b. a bag of spinach with an open date of 03/20 c. two packages of lunch meat, opened and not dated d. a bag of hotdogs, opened, not sealed, not dated e. a plastic container of cheese slices, not labeled, not dated f. a bag of garlic cloves, opened, partially used, not dated g. a plastic container of chickpea patties, not labeled, not dated, and the cover was not properly affixed to the container Interview at the time of the observation, [NAME] #357 verified the yogurt was not dated, the spinach was outdated, lunch meat was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure trash cans in the kitchen food preparation areas were covered. This had the potential to affect 79 residents in the facility. The facility identified two residents (#21 and #137) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Observation on 03/31/25 at 8:30 A.M. revealed a trash can in the food preparation area by the stove was not covered. Interview at the same time, [NAME] #357 verified the trash can did not have a lid. [NAME] #357 stated she looked for a lid and was not able to locate one. Observation on 04/02/25 at 11:47 A.M., the trash can in the food preparation area remain uncovered. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Safety-Director of Food and Nutrition Services' Responsibilities, dated 2019 revealed the director of food and nutrition services assures sanitary conditions are maintained in food storage, preparation, and serving areas and proper waste disposal methods.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer residents for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two services after a significant mental health change. This affected one (56) of the six residents reviewed for PASARR. The census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions, and mood disorder. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 02/18/25 for Resident #56 revealed a score of 12, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively intact. Review of Resident #56's medical records revealed the following mental health diagnoses were not included in her current PASARR application: bipolar disorder (02/27/25), Mood Disorder (09/06/24), and Psychotic Disorder with Delusions (09/06/24). There was no documented evidence that an initial or significant change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission. This affected three (#29, #54, and #139) of the 12 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 02/27/25. Diagnoses included acute on chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, prostate cancer, and hypothyroidism. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had intact cognition. The resident required supervision for eating, and was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the care plans revealed a baseline care plan was initiated on 03/11/25. Interview on 04/01/25 at 2:57 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #417 verified Resident #29…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were monitored and recorded. This affected one (#77) of the seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77, revealed an admission date of 01/16/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, and Coronavirus (COVID-19). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #77 had severe cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the documentation for Nutrition Amount Eaten from 03/21/25 through 04/02/25 for Resident #77, revealed the dinner time meal intakes were not documented for dinner with the exception of 03/25/2025. Interview on 04/02/25 at 10:30 AM with the Dietician Tech (DT) #345 confirmed Resident #77's dinner…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate records for supplemental orders. This had the potential to affect one (77) of the seven residents reviewed for resident orders. The census was 81. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77, revealed an admission date of 01/16/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, and Coronavirus (COVID-19). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #77 had severe cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of physician orders for Resident #77 dated 01/18/25, revealed the resident was ordered Ensure (supplement) with meals. Review of the weights documented for Resident #77 revealed a weight change of 5.37 percent (%). A documented weight on 02/13/25 revealed her weight to be 201.00 lbs. and on 03/10/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected one (#20) of four residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 04/11/19. Diagnoses included unspecified Alzheimer's disease, pseudobulbar effect, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #20's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/07/22 for the narcotic pain medication oxycodone five (5) milligrams (mg), to give 2.5 mg by mouth twice daily for knee pain. Review of a progress noted dated 06/30/23 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #23 administered oxycodone 5 mg instead of oxycodone 2.5 mg to Resident #20. Interview on 08/21/23 at 1:59 P.M., LPN #23 verified she had made a medication error on 06/30/23 when she gave Resident #20 a double dose of oxycodone by mistake. LPN #23 stated she thought she was administering Resident #20's 5:00 P.M. dose of oxycodone 2.5 mg and 6:00 P.M. dose of the antianxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored properly in medication carts. This affect one (#65) of eleven residents on the D-Hall with active prescriptions for the pain medication Tylenol 500 milligram (mg) tablets. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had primary diagnosis of unspecified rheumatoid arthritis. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed a physician order dated 01/18/23 for the pain medication acetaminophen (Tylenol) 500 mg, one tablet by mouth three times daily for pain. Observation on 08/21/2023 from 8:48 A.M. to 8:51 A.M. revealed, in the top drawer of the D-Hall medication cart, a large plastic drinking cup labeled Tyle 500 with marker on the outside of the cup. Observed inside the cup was an unspecified, but numerous, quantity of round white tablets, and the tablets were marked with M2A4 57344. Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to offer residents influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. This affected five residents (#17, #29, #78, #330, and #339) of seven residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/18/22. Diagnosis included chronic kidney disease, encephalopathy, and peripheral vascular disease. Further review of Resident #17's medical record revealed no evidence the resident was offered a pneumonia or influenza vaccine. Review of the influenza and pneumonia vaccine section of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was coded as not assessed. 2. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/02/22. Diagnosis included neoplasm of the colon, acute kidney injury, and intellectual disability. Further review of Resident #29's medical record revealed no evidence the resident was offered a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided dignity when a resident was called a feed. This affected one resident (#25) of 18 residents reviewed. The facility identified 17 residents who were dependent for eating. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 01/17/20. Diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, scoliosis, chronic pain, anemia, underweight, body mass index (BMI) 19.9 or less, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, malaise, muscle weakness, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had impaired cognition. There were no documented behaviors. The resident required limited assistance of one staff member for eating. Review of the plan of care dated 03/03/22 revealed the resident had an Activity of Daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,932 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,932 — penalty dated 2024-04-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNITED CHURCH HOMES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 43 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $784K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH