Westerwood Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 226 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 61.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were made aware of which skilled services were ending. This affected three residents (#84, #85, and #86) of three residents reviewed for advanced beneficiary notices. The facility census was 55. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute cystitis, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage dated 10/10/25 revealed Resident #84's skilled nursing services would end on 10/10/25 but did not specify which services. 2.Record review revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of left femur fracture, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness. Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage revealed Resident #85's skilled nursing services would end on 12/19/25 but did not specify which services. 3.Record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for skin conditions. This affected one resident (#4) of two residents reviewed for skin assessment accuracy. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 08/02/21 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, type II diabetes, and stage III chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/20/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #4 was dependent on facility staff for all care including eating, personal care and hygiene, turning and positioning, and with transfers and mobility.Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 had a facility-acquired skin tear to his left shoulder. The skin tear was identified on 12/16/25. The skin tear remained active through the duration of the survey.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Resident (#10) was assessed and monitored for bruising, Resident (#35) had on compression stockings for edema. This affected two residents (#10, #35) of the four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 55.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to Parkinson's disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, depression, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, glaucoma, anxiety disorder, cardiac defibrillator, and anemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Additionally, the MDS revealed Resident #35 required substantial to maximum assistance with upper and lower body dressing to include personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 10/09/25 revealed a focus of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (#35) received the proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities. This affected one resident (#35) of the one resident reviewed for communication and sensory. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to Parkinson's disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, depression, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, glaucoma, anxiety disorder, cardiac defibrillator, and anemia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Additionally, the MDS revealed Resident #35 required substantial to maximum assistance with upper and lower body dressing to include personal hygiene.Review of an order dated 10/01/25 hearing aid- assist to place in ear(s) every morning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of physician orders, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure alternating air mattresses were on the ordered settings. This affected one resident (#72) of three residents reviewed for risk of pressure ulcer. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, spinal stenosis if the lumbar region, and monoplegia of right lower limb. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed 11/25/25 revealed Resident #72 had moderately impaired cognition, no behaviors, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and had a pressure reducing device in place for her bed. Review of a care plan dated 12/25/24 revealed Resident #72 was at risk for skin breakdown related to weakness, decreased mobility, bowel and bladder incontinence, use of a wheelchair, and diagnoses of chronic venous insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, monoplegia, and urine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of physician orders, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the correct diet texture. This affected one resident (#52) of four residents who were ordered a pureed diet. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. Review of a care plan dated 12/02/25 revealed Resident #52 had potential for nutrition and/or hydration issues related to obesity, history of edema, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension; dysphagia requiring a pureed diet. The goal was to maintain adequate nutritional status. Interventions included but were not limited to regular diet with pureed texture and nectar thickened liquids. Review of a physician's order dated 07/24/25 revealed Resident #52…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record. This affected one resident (#75) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/12/26, a discharge to the hospital date of 01/22/26 and diagnoses including stage 4 adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction with metastasis, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Review of Resident #75's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #75's MDS revealed the resident required a walker and wheelchair for mobility, partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with bathing/showering, transfers and bed mobility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy, the facility failed to have a treatment order in place for a burn abrasion for one resident (#10) out of three residents reviewed for treatment orders for skin alterations on admission. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10, revealed an admission date of 04/19/25 and a transfer to the hospital date of 05/03/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to inflammatory polyarthropathy, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, adult failure to thrive, lower back pain and burn of unspecified degree of upper back, subsequent encounter. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14. The resident was assessed to require supervision or touching assistance with toilet hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe self, and transfers with independent with bed mobility. Review of the plan of care dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was transferred in a safe manner and as per the resident's plan of care and facility policy with two staff via a mechanical (Hoyer) lift to prevent a potential accident. This affected one resident (#10) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 07/12/2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spinal stenosis lumbar region, and dementia. Review of the plan of care dated 07/26/2023 revealed Resident #10 had an activity of daily living (ADL), self-care performance deficit related to decreased mobility, weakness, memory loss/confusion, and required assistance for ADLs and mobility needs. Interventions included providing two staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with activities to meet their needs. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 07/10/23 with diagnoses which included nuerolyptic parkinsonism, dementia, depression, bipolar II disorder, anxiety disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia, cognitive communication deficit, drug induced movement disorder, and dorsalgia (back pain). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/18/24, revealed Resident #32 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment. Resident #32 required a varied amount of assistance which ranged from minimal to total dependence on staff to complete Activities of Daily Living. Review of Resident #32's Activities Assessment, dated 02/09/24, revealed the resident enjoys watching the news, watching Cleveland…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNITED CHURCH HOMES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH