No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Trinity Community At Fairborn

789 Stoneybrook Trail, Fairborn, OH 45324 · Non profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (937) 878-0262 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 878-0262 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1340 Spangler Rd · (937) 343-0200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7617 Dayton Springfield Rd · (937) 863-0045 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
IGA2.4 mi
7581 Dayton Springfield Rd · (937) 864-7359 · Call to confirm hours
Park
600 Roehner Dr · (937) 754-3090 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1611 Armstrong Rd · (937) 878-7971

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.9%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.5%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.2%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.6%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.7%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.0%CMS range 35.9–60.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.0–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 5.0–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
56.3%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 84.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-01-12)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, an interview with the pest control provider, review of pest control invoices, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This affected three (Residents #62, #70, and #71) of six residents sampled for pest control and had the potential to affect all 21 residents living on the 400-Hall. The facility census was 84.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, chronic combined congestive heart failure, end stage renal disease, unspecified dementia, and unspecified anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain communication for dialysis services and failed to ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed. This affected Resident #62, the only resident at the facility who received dialysis services. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, chronic combined congestive heart failure, end stage renal disease, unspecified dementia, and unspecified anxiety.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander.Review of the care plan dated 07/01/24 revealed Resident #62 had renal insufficiency related to stage IV chronic kidney disease. Interventions included hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free were free from abuse. This affected one (Resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 12/24/24 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 12/30/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the care plan for Resident #17 dated 03/06/25 revealed the resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) deficit related to altered respiratory status, deconditioning, and decreased endurance and frequently refused showers. Interventions included permission to receive a shower at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported immediately to the state agency. This affected one (Resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 12/24/24 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 12/30/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the care plan for Resident #17 dated 03/06/25 revealed the resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) deficit related to altered respiratory status, deconditioning, and decreased endurance and frequently refused showers. Interventions included permission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, interview with the local Health Department staff, review of facility policies, review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of Ohio Department of Health's (ODH) guidance for reporting infectious diseases, the facility failed to develop and implement effective infection control procedures which included when and to who potentially communicable diseases should be reported, failed to ensure the local Health Department was notified in a timely manner of a facility gastrointestinal illness (GI) outbreak and failed to track the residents and employees who developed GI related symptoms as part of their infection surveillance plan. This affected 13 Residents (#24, #22 #10, #35, #68, #66, #27, #02, #59, #07, #61, #237, #236, and #11) but had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of a list of residents with GI related symptoms provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) included the following: Resident #24 on 02/12/25, Resident #22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, facility protocol, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician or the non-physician practitioner (NPP) for residents with change in conditions. This affected three Residents (#05, #70, and #71) reviewed for changes in condition. The facility census was 88. Findings Included: 1) Review of medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date on 05/26/20. Diagnosis included obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, adult failure to thrive, Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease stage two, orthostatic hypotension, essential hypertension, dementia, history of transient ischemic attack, and nonrheumatic aortic stenosis. Review of Resident #05's blood pressure monitoring revealed the following blood pressures documented: On 06/28/24 at 7:52 A.M., a blood pressure (B/P) reading of 185/77 (elevated) millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg) was recorded. On 06/28/24 at 7:52 A.M., a B/P 185/77 mm/Hg was recorded. On 07/15/24 at 8:41 A.M., a B/P 184/76…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) when a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was issued to a resident under a Medicare stay and the resident did not discharge. This affected one Resident (#77) out of the three residents reviewed for ABN. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 12/18/24 with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, and anemia. Review of the NOMNC indicated the last covered day was 01/07/25 and Resident #77 signed the NOMNC on 01/03/25. Review of the resident census information revealed Resident #77 was listed as private pay on 01/08/25 and 01/09/25. Review of the progress noted from 01/08/25 and 01/09/25 revealed no documentation that Resident #77 was notified of a last covered date (LCD) of 01/07/25 or the cost to remain in the facility. Review of the care plan for Resident #77 dated 01/13/25, revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and safe environment. This affected three Residents (#13, #64, and #08) out of three Residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anemia, heart failure, hypertension, ortho static hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 dated 01/28/25, revealed he had impaired cognition. Resident #13 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation of Resident #13's room on 02/18/25 at 12:05 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 598, revealed the resident's bed had soiled sheets with stains and food crumbs all over it. The center of the mattress dipped inward. CNA #598 pulled the corner of the sheet off the mattress to reveal a severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) following a significant change in residents' condition. This affected two Residents (#10 and #41) out of two residents reviewed for a PASRR. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed she was admitted to 10/13/21. Her diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hepatic failure, gastroparesis, contracture of muscle, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, and pseudobulbar. Resident #10 was admitted to hospice care at the facility on 04/23/24. There was no correlating PASRR associated with the admission to Hospice. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 is cognitively impaired. Interview with the Social Worker (SW) #523 on 02/19/24 at 3:15 P.M., verified the facility failed to complete a Significant Change PASRR on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with quarterly care conferences. This affected two Residents (#08 and #64) out of the two residents reviewed for care conference. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included tachycardia, obstructive sleep apnea, epilepsy, impetigo, major depressive disorder, diffuse traumatic disorder, anemia, chronic respiratory failure, and endometriosis. Review of the Inter Disciplinary Team (IDT) Care Conferences, revealed Resident #08 had care conferences on 09/13/24, and 01/21/25. The resident had no documented care conferences for the two remaining quarters of the past year. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/01/25, revealed Resident #08 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview with Social Worker (SW) #523 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's suprapubic urinary catheter was changed according to physician orders. This affected one Resident (#79) of the three residents review for foley catheters. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date on 10/30/24. Diagnoses included dementia, hydronephrosis with renal and urethral calculous obstruction, calculus of gall bladder without obstruction, and chronic kidney failure. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #79 dated 11/06/23, revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #79's care plan dated 10/31/24, revealed Resident #79 had a suprapubic catheter related to obstructive uropathy. Interventions were to monitor for signs and symptoms of infection and change catheter as ordered and as needed. Review of a physician order dated 12/18/24, revealed Resident #79 was ordered to have the suprapubic catheter 14 French with 10 milliliter (mL) balloon changed every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of facility standing orders, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected one Resident (#05) of the five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date on 05/26/20. Diagnosis included obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, adult failure to thrive, Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease stage two, orthostatic hypotension, essential hypertension, dementia, history of transient ischemic attack, and nonrheumatic aortic stenosis. The resident was cognitively impaired. Review of a physician order for Resident #05 dated 09/04/24, revealed the resident was ordered Midodrine tablet five milligrams (mg) one tablet in the morning for hypotension (low blood pressure) and to hold for systolic blood pressure (B/P) above 120 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). The Midodrine was discontinued on 12/18/24. Review of plan of care dated 01/08/25, revealed that Resident #05 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were stored properly. This affected one Resident (#26) out of the three residents reviewed. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, essential primary hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), obstructive sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, bradycardia, depression, and obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #26, dated 01/31/25, revealed he was cognitively impaired, and the resident was dependent on staff for medication administration. Observation of Resident #26's room on 02/18/25 at 10:51 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #680 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 598, revealed a half full bottle or over the counter (OTC) bottle Pepto Bismol on the resident's table. LPN #680 verified the bottle of Pepto Bismol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This affected Resident (#13) and had the potential to affect all 23 Residents living on the 200 unit. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anemia, heart failure, hypertension, ortho static hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and aphasia. Resident #13's room was located on the 200-hall. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 dated 01/28/25, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Observation of Resident #13's bed on 02/20/25 at 2:50 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #511 revealed the resident's bed had active gnats flying around the bed. Resident #13's bed had food crumbs, and the bed was soiled. Interview at the same time with CNA #511 verified the condition of Resident #13's bed. 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview ,record review, facilities investigation review, and policy review, revealed the facility failed to implement abuse policies to report allegations of resident abuse. This affected one resident, (Resident #25) of three residents reviewed for reporting abuse . The total facility census was 86. Findings Include: Record review of alleged victim Resident #25 revealed the resident was admitted to the attached skilled living facility on 11/19/20. The resident had a legal guardian and resided on the skilled living unit. Diagnoses for Resident #25 included age related physical debility, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, dementia, psychosis, communication deficit, depressive disorder, muscle weakness, intellectual disabilities, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required maximum assistance of one for transfers and mobility. Review of the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility investigation report, and policy review, revealed the facility failed to report allegations of abuse. This affected one resident, (Resident #25) of three residents reviewed for reporting abuse. The total facility census was 86. Findings Include: Record review of alleged victim Resident #25 revealed the resident was admitted to the attached skilled living facility on 11/19/20. The resident had a legal guardian and resided on the skilled living unit. Diagnoses for Resident #25 included age related physical debility, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, dementia, psychosis, communication deficit, depressive disorder, muscle weakness, intellectual disabilities, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required maximum assistance of one for transfers and mobility. Review of the State Reportable Incident, (SRI) dated 06/06/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of medication changes. This affected one (Resident #84) of three residents reviewed for notifications. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 07/22/23 and discharge date of 08/24/23. Diagnoses including but not limited to lobar pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #84 required extensive assistance for activities of daily living, supervision for ambulation, and was independent for eating. Review of physician orders revealed an order for Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime was decreased to seroquel 12.5 mg on 08/18/23 and Zoloft 25 mg was discontinued on 08/18/23. Review of the progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the admission agreement was signed or explained to the resident or resident's representative. This affected one (Resident #84) of three residents reviewed for admission agreements. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 07/22/23 and discharge date of 08/24/23. Diagnoses including but not limited to lobar pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #84 required extensive assistance for activities of daily living, supervision for ambulation, and was independent for eating. Review of the admission agreement for Resident #84 revealed the agreement was not signed by the resident or resident's representative. Interview on 03/04/24 at 12:41 P.M. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and local health department personnel interview, review of the facility policy, and review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to properly isolate residents placed in transmission-based precautions (TBP) per CDC guidelines for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections to potentially prevent the spread of COVID-19. This affected four (#74, #68, #25, and #12) of eight residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions and infection control practices. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #62 revealed admission date 11/04/21. Resident #62 was fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and had received a COVID-19 booster vaccine on 11/18/21. Medical diagnosis included chronic diastolic heart failure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and COVID-19. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the Ombudsman of a transfer or discharge from the facility. This affected two (#79 and #330) out of two residents reviewed for discharge notification from the facility. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: Review of medical record for Resident #79 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnosis included metabolic encephalopathy, acute neurologic, rhabdomyolysis, pleural effusion, dementia with behavioral disturbance, essential primary hypertension, diabetes mellitus 2, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and history of malignant neoplasm of prostate. Review of the five day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/15/21 revealed Resident #79's cognition was not assessed. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #79 revealed his assistance from staff was not assessed. Review of the Resident #79's nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify residents of the facility bed hold policy prior to discharge from the facility. This affected two (#77, # 330) out of two residents reviewed for the bed hold policy. Facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #79 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnosis included metabolic encephalopathy, acute neurologic, rhabdomyolysis, pleural effusion, dementia with behavioral disturbance, essential primary hypertension, diabetes mellitus 2, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and history of malignant neoplasm of prostate. Review of the five day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/15/21 revealed Resident #79's cognition was not assessed. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #79 revealed his assistance from staff was not assessed. Review of the Resident #79's nurse's progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) was in place for Resident #47 and #48. This affected two (#47 and #48) out of two residents reviewed for PASARR status. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hyperkalemia, heart failure, pressure ulcer of left buttock, essential primary hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #48 quarterly minimum data sheet (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed resident scored a 13 on her brief interview for mental status (BIMS) indicating she has intact cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #48 required extensive assistance from facility staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #48 required supervision from staff with eating. However, Resident #48 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address resident care needs including medical skin condition, a resident's medical diagnosis and a resident's smoking. This affected three (#15, #61 and #47) of twenty-three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Record review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 01/12/21. Admitting diagnosis included atrial fibrillation, acute on chronic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage four, dementia with behaviors, unspecified psychosis, anxiety, depression and cerebral arthrosclerosis. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 10/13/21 revealed a brief interview mental status (BIMS) of three out of 15 indicating severely impaired cognition, no documentation of mental status change, inattention, or altered level of consciousness. There is documentation in section C of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure palm protectors were placed on a resident with limited range of motion per the physician order. This affected one (#21) of two reviewed for range of motion. Facility census was 81. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 03/02/12. Diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's Disease, aphasic, and paraplegic. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was rarely/never understood. Resident #21's functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toilet use. Resident #21 had impairment on one side of her upper extremities. Review of Resident #21's physician orders dated 07/14/21 revealed to don palm protectors in the mornings and doff in the evenings. Review of the electronic charting from 09/01/21 through 01/05/22 revealed there was no charting regarding the palm protectors were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's laboratory (lab) work was completed per the physician orders. This affected one (#15) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/12/21 with diagnoses which included dementia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary edema, chronic respiratory failure, anemia, Barrett's esophagus, hypovolemia and cerebral atherosclerosis. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of three out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive decline. The MDS revealed the resident required total dependence with two assists for transfers, and total dependence with one assist for toileting. The resident required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility personal hygiene and dressing. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a residents meal was provided per the residents order and meal ticket. This affected one (#26) of three residents reviewed during the lunch observation. The census was 81. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 07/01/19. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, below the knee amputation, schizophrenia, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Resident #26 functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility and toilet use, total dependence for transfers, and supervision for eating. Resident #26 was coded for impairment to one side of upper and lower extremities. Review of physician orders dated 11/02/21 revealed Resident #26's revealed the resident diet was regular diet, mechanical soft, with ground meat textured, regular to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an assistive device was provided to a resident during a meal. This affected one (#26) of three resident's reviewed for adaptive equipment during the annual survey. Facility census was 81. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 07/01/19. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, below the knee amputation, schizophrenia, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Resident #26 functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility and toilet use, total dependence for transfers, and supervision for eating. Resident #26 was coded for impairment to one side of upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident #26's physician orders from 09/01/21 through 01/10/22 revealed there was no physician order for adaptive equipment. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, home-like environment. This affected one (#48) out of three residents reviewed for a clean environment. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hyperkalemia, heart failure, pressure ulcer of left buttock, essential primary hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #48 quarterly minimum data sheet (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored a 13 out of 15 on her brief interview for mental status (BIMS) indicating she has intact cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #48 required extensive assistance from facility staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #48 required supervision from staff with eating. However, Resident #48 was totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician received and responded to a resident medication not being available for administration. This involved one (#12) of three sampled residents reviewed for physician notice. Facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed and admission date of 02/09/14, with diagnoses included: degenerative joint disease, hypertension, cerebral vascular accident, seizure disorder, dysphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, paraplegia, anemia, neurogenic bladder, venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the physician order, dated 04/02/19, revealed Resident #12 was to receive Lyrica 100 milligrams (mg) once a day for seven days. On the second week the Lyrica 100 mg was increased to twice a day, 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. for seven day. On 04/18/19 the Lyrica was to be increased to 150 mg and given three times a day, 8:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M. and 4:00 P.M., for the next seven days. On 04/26/19, the physician ordered the Lyrica to be increased to 200…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were issued Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) notices upon discharge from Medicare Part A Services with benefit days remaining when they continued to reside in the facility. This affected two (#67 and #68) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a re-entry date of 04/07/19. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, congestive heart failure, and cerebral infarction. Review of 30 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, extensive assistance was required with bed mobility, transfers, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of Notice of Medicare Non-coverage dated 05/06/19 revealed Medicare Part A Skilled Services would end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of facility submitted self reported incidents (SRIs), and review of facility policy, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the facility policy on reporting allegations of verbal abuse. This affected three (#16, #21, and #80) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 79. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, supervision was required with bed mobility, transfers, eating, and extensive assistance was required with toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #16 did not require any mobility devices. Review of care plan dated 11/04/15 revealed Resident #16 required a Alzheimer/dementia special care unit related to dementia. On 01/30/17, Resident #16 was moved to a behavior unit due to increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of facility submitted self reported incidents (SRIs), and review of facility policy, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to report allegations of verbal abuse to the state agency. This affected three (#16, #21, and #80) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 79. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, supervision was required with bed mobility, transfers, eating, and extensive assistance was required with toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #16 did not require any mobility devices. Review of care plan dated 11/04/15 revealed Resident #16 required a Alzheimer/dementia special care unit related to dementia. On 01/30/17, Resident #16 was moved to a behavior unit due to increased behaviors.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices were provided timely upon hospitalization. This affected two (#21 and #34) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-entry date of 04/11/19. Diagnoses for Resident #21 included dementia and schizophrenia. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed intact cognitive skills for daily decision making and supervision was required with all activities of daily living (ADLs) except for limited assistance with personal hygiene. Review of social service progress note dated 03/26/19 at 1:00 P.M., revealed Resident #21 was transported to the hospital for evaluation related to increased violent outbursts. Review of nursing progress note dated 04/11/19 at 7:59 P.M., revealed Resident #21 was readmitted to the facility. Review of notification of available bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). This affected one (#34) of four residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-entry date of 10/01/17. Diagnoses for Resident #34 included dementia with behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction, and contracture left hand. Review of significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, total dependence was required with transfers, toileting, personal hygiene, extensive assistance was required with bed mobility and eating. Review of care plan dated 11/28/16 revealed Resident #34 required extensive assistance with daily care, mobility, and was developing a contracture to the left hand. Review of intervention initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care and treatment to non-pressure skin condition. This affected one (#34) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-entry date of 10/01/17. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction, diabetes, skin cancer, and open scalp wound. Review of significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, total dependence was required with transfers, toileting, personal hygiene, extensive assistance was required with bed mobility and eating. Review of care plan initiated 11/22/16 revealed Resident #34 was admitted with an open wound to the scalp from past surgery and frequently scratches and digs at the open wound and extremities. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance to the physician's orders. This involved one (#12) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication availability. Facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed and admission date of 02/09/14, with diagnoses included: degenerative joint disease, hypertension, cerebral vascular accident, seizure disorder, dysphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, paraplegia, anemia, neurogenic bladder, venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the physician order, dated 04/02/19, revealed Resident #12 was to receive Lyrica 100 milligrams (mg) once a day for seven days. On the second week the Lyrica 100 mg was increased to twice a day, 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. for seven day. On 04/18/19 the Lyrica was to be increased to 150 mg and given three times a day, 8:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M. and 4:00 P.M., for the next seven days. On 04/26/19, the physician ordered the Lyrica to be increased to 200 mg three times a day: 8:00 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNITED CHURCH HOMES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WARD, STACIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/23/2011
BROWNFIELD, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2014
GREEN, CATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2014
HENRY, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2014
KUTSCHBACH, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2014
SHEIDLER, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2014
DANIEL, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2011
DIBLE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/29/2016
RENNER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/27/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$636K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 8%Medicare 4%Other / private 88%

This home reported $636K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$325per resident / day
operating cost
$9,879per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$284per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365979. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next