No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Harmar Place Nursing and Rehabilitation

401 Harmar Street, Marietta, OH 45750 · Non profit - Corporation · 86 certified beds · (740) 376-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$202,275 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $202,275 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-16)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
416 Front St · (740) 236-4131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
131 3rd St · (740) 373-2961 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
200 Butler St · (740) 885-8194 · Call to confirm hours
Park
305 Front St · (740) 453-4377 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
312 Franklin St · (740) 760-1333

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.8%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.9%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.2%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.3%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.091.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.481.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.9%CMS range 51.9–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.5–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.8–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
56.1%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-03)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of emergency responder record, hospital record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely, necessary and adequate care and services following an acute change in condition involving Resident #26. The facility failed to ensure changes in the resident's medical condition were timely identified and comprehensive and individualized interventions were implemented for Resident #26 when the resident was assessed to have a decline in health including tachycardia, shortness of breath, fatigue, and weakness. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death beginning on [DATE] when Resident #26 had increased weakness and need for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) during therapy treatment. On [DATE] and [DATE], Resident #26 continued to have shortness of breath and tachycardia during therapy treatments. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #337 saw Resident #26 on [DATE] after staff had concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to timely report and provide adequate, necessary and timely care for Resident #72 following a fall during a staff assisted transfer resulting in a delay of treatment for newly diagnosed compression vertebra fractures. This affected one resident (#72) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 71. Actual Harm occurred on 05/06/25 at approximately 9:00 A.M. when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #34 failed to notify the licensed nurse that Resident #72 sustained a fall during a staff assisted transfer resulting in a delay in treatment. The resident complained of back pain (intermittent, aching, moderate pain with protective body movements/posture associated with the pain) following the incident. However, the resident was not transferred to the hospital until 2:30 P.M. (five and a half hours after the incident) where he was diagnosed with and received treatment for compression fractures of his thoracic spine.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program to ensure fall interventions were implemented for Resident #28 and to ensure Resident #72 and Resident #75 were provided adequate assistance with transfers. This affected three residents (#28, #72, and #75) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 71. Actual Harm occurred on 05/06/25 at approximately 9:00 A.M. when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #34 was transferring Resident #72, who was a high risk for falls and increased risk of injury related to falls, to the toilet by herself without the use of a gait belt, the resident's knees buckled and the resident fell back into the wheelchair resulting in new compression fractures to the thoracic spine with associated increased complaints of intermittent, aching, moderate pain with protective body movements/posture. Findings include: 1. Closed medical record review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were properly assessed, monitored, and provided adequate nutrition to prevent weight loss. This affected three residents (#5, #7, and #69) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. Actual harm occurred on 01/29/25 when Resident #5, who required staff set-up assistance with meals was assessed to sustain a 12.1 pound severe weight loss (in approximately 30 days) as a result of the facility's failure to revise and/or implement comprehensive and individualized care plan interventions to address changes in the resident's nutritional status (decrease in oral intake) and impaired wound healing (of a Stage III pressure ulcer). On 12/26/24 Resident #5 weighed 157.4 pounds and on 01/29/25 the resident weighed 145.3 pounds without evidence the facility accurately assessed, monitored, and provided adequate nutrition/interventions timely to prevent the weight loss and support healing of the resident's pressure ulcer. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of Resident #58's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, unspecified psychosis, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, peripheral vascular disease, and osteoarthritis. A review of Resident #58's care plan, dated 12/28/21 revealed she had a care plan in place for being at risk for an alteration to skin integrity related to bladder incontinence, impaired cognition, and poor safety awareness. The goal was for her to have no new areas of skin breakdown. The interventions included skin inspections, preventative treatments as ordered, keep bony prominences from direct contact, encouraging/ assisting her with turning and repositioning with routine nursing rounds and as needed (PRN) for comfort as tolerated or as she would allow. Pillows were to be used to maintain positioning. A review of Resident #58's quarterly pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-07-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3, who had limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Actual harm occurred on 06/13/22 when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #196 identified Resident #3's left dominant hand had a decline in range of motion, the hand was more contracted and the nurse was unable to use an existing carrot splint as it caused the resident increased pain. The splint was subsequently discontinued. Prior to the decline there was no evidence staff were routinely providing passive range of motion for the resident. Following the identified decline, there was no evidence of a timely referral to therapy and no evidence any other interventions were implemented to attempt to prevent further decline of the left hand contracture. This affected one resident (#3) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 75. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of fall investigations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was properly positioned in bed when unattended resulting in an avoidable fall with major injury (hip fracture). Actual Harm occurred on 04/04/23 following a fall at 10:40 P.M. when the facility failed to ensure the resident was properly positioned in bed and left unattended resulting in the resident rolling out of bed and sustaining a hip fracture. This affected one resident (#48) of two residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left dominant side, tremors, left foot drop, bilateral hearing loss, diabetes, Foley catheter due to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #48's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/22/23 revealed the resident required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on daily staffing assignment review, time & attendance detail report review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they provided eight consecutive hours of registered nurse (RN) coverage a day. This affected all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.Review of the Report Time Sheets dated 09/01/25 revealed RN # 10 worked from 12:46 A.M. to 6:31 A.M. for a total of 5.75 hours. Review of the Report Time Sheets dated 09/01/25 revealed RN #30 worked from 5:36 A.M. to 8:22 A.M. for a total of 2.767 hours. RN #30 worked an additional six hours on 09/01/25 from 12:30 P.M. to 6:30 P.M There was no evidence RN #10 or RN #30 worked eight consecutive hours on 09/01/25. On 12/16/25 at 11:34 A.M., interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was not a RN in the building for eight consecutive hours on 09/01/25. The DON verified the consecutive time worked between RN #10 and RN #30 was only seven hours and 36 minutes. 2. Review of the Daily Staffing Assignment dated 11/27/25 revealed no evidence a RN was scheduled to work on this day. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This affected three residents (#13, #22, and #30) of four residents reviewed and had the potential to affect 45 residents. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) completed 05/02/25 revealed Resident #13's cognition remained intact, and she had other behaviors one to three days during the review period. Interview on 05/27/25 at 12:36 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #115 revealed Resident #13's room is really bad with gnats. CNA #115 stated she once opened the microwave in the kitchenette and gnats flew out at her. Interview on 05/27/25 at 1:00 P.M. with Resident #13 stated she would like to get rid of the gnats because they are everywhere and there isn't even food in my room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician and responsible party of a resident change in condition. This affected one resident (#72) of three residents reviewed. The census was 71. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #72 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis, paraplegia, cancer and anxiety disorder. Review of the Incidents By Incident Type dated 02/14/25 to 05/14/25 revealed Resident #72 had one fall during staff assist on 05/06/25. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bathing and dressing; required substantial-maximal assist with sit-to-stand, and was dependent on staff for chair/bed-to-chair transfers (the ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair or on side of the bed). The resident also had a fall prior to admission. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the water management (Legionella) control plan, review of the infection control log, review of CMS QSO memo, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to prevent the spread of infectious disease and failed to ensure infections were monitored for trends. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: 1. Observation of the laundry process on 02/25/25 at 8:01 A.M. with Laundry Assistant (LA) #542 revealed the LA goes to each of the four soiled linen rooms five times a day to collect laundry. Staff are supposed to put linens in bags and place the linens in the soiled linen room on each hallway. The facility doesn't mark the laundry, so she doesn't know what linens were isolation or enhanced barrier precaution (EBP). LA #542 reported she was told there was no more residents on isolation and the chemicals in the machine would kill everything, so the linens don't have to marked to indicate isolation. LA #542 confirmed she doesn't know what kills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the infection control log, medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were monitored and failed to ensure antibiotics met criteria for administration. This affected one resident (#184) of five residents reviewed for infections and had the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the building. Findings included: 1. Review of the infection control log dated 02/2024 to 02/2025 revealed no evidence the facility was monitoring antibiotics to ensure the antibiotic usage met criteria and failed to ensure a SBAR was completed. Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship (dated 06/13/23) revealed the Infection Preventionist (IP) would be responsible to lead the team and to conduct monitoring and reporting. All antibiotics orders would come with the following: A specific prescribing order with dose and duration, a progress note explaining the reason for antibiotic, and a culture and sensitivity if performed. The IP would ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, policy review, and review of a facility investigation, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of medications. This affected four residents (#40, #78, #184 and #187) of four residents reviewed for misappropriation of narcotic pain medications. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #187 revealed an admission date of 02/12/25. A BIMS score of 15 (intact cognition) was noted on a BIMS evaluation completed 02/17/25. He had a physician's order for Norco 5-325 milligrams every eight hours as needed for pain on 02/12/25. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #481 administered the Norco six times between 02/13/25 and 02/17/25 for a beginning pain level of either 1 or 2 (pain scale 1-10). However, review of the controlled substance record revealed RN #481 signed out seven doses of Norco pain medication for Resident #187. One dose had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, policy review, and review of a facility investigation, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of misappropriation of medications. This affected six residents (#187, #78, #184, #40, #6, and #26) of six residents reviewed for misappropriation of narcotic pain medications or secured antianxiety medications and had the potential to affect two additional residents (#6 and #26) identified with orders and administration of controlled substances. The facility census was 75. Findings include: On 02/18/25 the facility submitted a self reported incident (SRI) #257304 form to the State Survey Agency. It indicated on 02/17/25 residents had alleged that pain medications were not administered even though documented that they were. The category of allegation was listed as neglect. The alleged perpetrator was noted to be a facility nurse (Registered Nurse (RN) #481). Involved residents were noted to be Residents #40, #78, #184, and #187. The report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident's blood sugar level was above the parameters in which the physician wanted notified. They also failed to ensure the physician was notified of another resident's weight gain of more than three pounds in a day and/ or more than five pounds in a week who was having daily weights obtained for monitoring of congestive heart failure (CHF). This affected one resident (#5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and one resident (#28) of one residents reviewed for edema. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 10/31/22. Her diagnoses included adult onset (Type II) diabetes mellitus (DM), Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of Resident #5's physician's orders revealed she had an order in place to receive Lantus (slow acting insulin used to lower blood sugars) 100 units/ milliliter with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was included in their quarterly care conference to help develop an individualized plan of care for the resident as they desired. This affected one resident (#11) of one residents reviewed for care planning conferences. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, unspecified dementia, schizo-affective disorder, bipolar disorder, heart failure, and palliative care. Review of Resident #11's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech and adequate hearing. She was usually able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. She was assessed as being cognitively intact and was not known to display any behaviors or reject care. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for personal care received nail care timely. This affected two residents ( #61 and #73) of four reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL). Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of muscle, protein-calorie malnutrition, vascular disease, diabetes, kidney disease, anemia, and cervical disc disorder. Review of Resident #61's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #61's nursing note dated 02/11/25 revealed the resident required one on one assisting during activities of daily (ADL) care including bathing, dressing, and toileting. Review of Resident #61's ADL plan of care dated 06/12/24 revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing. This affected one resident (#66) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 06/16/24 and diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension, and stage four pressure ulcer. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 12/28/24 documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 11 (moderately impaired cognition). The resident was dependent upon staff for lower body dressing, required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with bed to chair transfers, and required partial/moderate assistance from staff with rolling in bed. The resident was unable to walk. The resident was noted to have a Stage 4 pressure ulcer present upon admission (Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of written staff statements from facility investigation, the facility failed to timely address pain. This affected three residents (#36, #78, #185) of three residents reviewed pain. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, dementia, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #36 had an order in place dated 09/24/23 for Tylenol oral tablet 325 milligrams (mg) give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for pain not to exceed 3000 mg per day. Review of a care plan dated 06/10/24 revealed Resident #36 had pain related to an old left arm fracture which left her with limited range of motion and chronic pain. Her goal was to verbalize satisfaction with her pain control regimen through the review date of 02/24/25. Interventions included assessing for cause of pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the appropriate treatment and services for depression. This affected one resident (#78) of two residents reviewed for behavioral care in a sample of 24. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 01/31/25 and diagnoses including depression, bipolar disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety disorder. A physician progress note on 01/31/25 stated the resident was admitted after a recent craniotomy for meningioma ( a tumor of the membranes surrounding the brain). The resident had physician's orders for an antidepressant medication daily (started 02/01/25) and an antianxiety medication three times daily (started 01/31/25). A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 02/04/25 documented a brief interview for mental status score of 15 (intact cognition). It also documented a mood score of 20 (20-27 indicates severe depression). Interview with Physical Therapy Assistant #315 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were responded to timely by the physician and/ or the physician provided a rationale as to why the pharmacy recommendations were not acted upon. This affected two residents (#5 and #36) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. Review of Resident #5's monthly medication regimen reviews documented under the progress notes of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident's medications had been reviewed for any irregularities monthly in the past 12 months. The medication regimen review completed on 08/22/24 noted an irregularity with the resident's prescribed medications and a recommendation was made to the physician for review. Review of Resident #5's consultation report dated 08/22/24 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure antihypertensive medications used in the treatment for hypertension were held as needed in accordance with the physician's orders. This affected one resident (#5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 10/31/22. Her diagnoses included essential hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #5's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Metoprolol Tartrate 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice a day for high blood pressure. The order included parameters to hold the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Review of Resident #5's medication administration record (MAR) for January 2025 revealed the nurses were documenting the resident's blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an anxiolytic medication on an as needed (prn) basis longer than 14 days, without the physician providing the necessary documentation required for an extended use. This affected one resident (#28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety disorder. Review of a consultation report for Resident #28 dated 07/17/24 revealed the consulting pharmacist noted an irregularity in the resident's medications when reviewing the resident's medications as part of a monthly medication regimen review. The pharmacist identified the resident had an order for Xanax 0.25 milligrams (mg) with directions to give one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for anxiety. The pharmacist asked the physician to please discontinue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (#66) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 06/16/24 and diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension, and stage four pressure ulcer. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 12/28/24 documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 11 (moderately impaired cognition). The resident was dependent upon staff for lower body dressing, required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with bed to chair transfers, and required partial/moderate assistance from staff with rolling in bed. The resident was unable to walk. The resident was noted to have a Stage 4 pressure ulcer present upon admission. (Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to initiate fall interventions and complete fall interventions as recommended. This affected three of three residents (Resident #69, #139 and #141) reviewed for falls. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #139 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, obstructive uropathy and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #139 was severely impaired for daily decision-making, had signs/symptoms of fluctuating inattention and disorganized thinking and required the use of a walker for ambulation. a. Review of the Fall Incident Report dated 01/06/24 revealed Resident #139 was lying on the floor with non-skid footwear in place and his walker beside him. A skin tear was noted to elbow, an abrasion to his left shoulder and he was assisted back to bed. The resident stated he got dizzy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate accommodations to prevent possible resident exposure to a known pet allergy. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #69) of one resident identified as having a pet allergy. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, macular degeneration, weakness, dizziness and anxiety. The resident record indicated an allergy to cats. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making. On 03/12/24 at 6:10 A.M., interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 stated the facility has cats and they get on everything. LPN #13 did not know if there were any residents allergic to cats. On 03/12/24 at 6:12 A.M., observation revealed a facility cat was walking in the television/dining area on the 100 Hall. On 03/12/24 at 6:25 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were accurate for immunizations. This affected two (Resident #69 and #101) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, cardiomegaly and cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was offered and refused the influenza vaccine. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence Resident #69 was offered the influenza vaccine or had received education regarding the risks or benefits of the vaccine. On 03/13/24 at 8:01 A.M., interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #69 was not offered or received an influenza vaccination in 2023. On 03/27/24 at 10:31 A.M., the DON verified via electronic mail that the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was inaccurate for refusal of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications were not administered as a fall intervention. This affected one (Resident #141) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #141 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, unspecified dementia, anxiety and a high fall risk. Review of the admission Physician Orders dated 03/03/24 revealed Resident #141 received Seroquel (antipsychotic) 12.5 milligrams (mg) daily. Review of the Incident Report dated 03/10/24 revealed staff had toileted Resident #141 and put her to bed at 8:15 P.M. and at 8:30 P.M. the resident was heard yelling. Resident #141 was on the floor in her room and was crawling on her hands and knees in the hallway yelling at another resident to help her up. The immediate action was to assist her to the wheelchair and administer a one-time 25mg dose of Seroquel.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents who ate food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 03/12/24 between 10:00 A.M. and 10:23 A.M. , observation of the kitchen revealed the following: 1. The dry storage area had a small window with a window sill that was covered with approximately 30 to 40 small black/brown insects. The insects were dead and two dead bugs were observed on top of a can of condensed milk that was being stored on a shelf underneath the window. 2. The dish room had four black/brown insects with wings that were dead under the storage area and dish table. 3. The opposite end of the dish room contained three carts containing clean coffee pots, 20 clear plastic drinking glasses, various pots and pans and two sets of goggles, three nosey cups and nine water pitchers. A stand up fan was positioned against the back wall and was blowing on the carts with the clean dishes. The fan screen was observed to have dust tendrils adhered to the fan screen and were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to administer immunizations as required. This affected two (Resident #69 and #101) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, cardiomegaly and cerebral infarction. Review of the Physician Order Summary dated 05/23/22 revealed Resident #69 may have the annual influenza vaccine per facility policy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was offered and refused the influenza vaccine. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence Resident #69 was offered the influenza vaccine or had received education regarding the risks or benefits of the vaccine. On 03/13/24 at 8:01 A.M., interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #69 was not offered or received an influenza vaccination in 2023. The DON stated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to choose schedules and make choices about showering/ bathing. This affected one of three residents reviewed for choices (#4). The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 06/17/23 and a diagnosis of fracture of right femur (prior to admission). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 06/23/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS further indicated the resident required extensive assistance from one staff for transfers, walking, locomotion, personal hygiene, and bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 06/18/23 revealed Resident #4 had an activities of daily living self care performance deficit related to recent right femur fracture. It stated the resident preferred a shower and required extensive assistance from staff with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure transfer information was documented in the resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#75) of one reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of large intestine, abdominal aortic aneurysm, dysphagia, stage two pressure ulcer, cachexia cancer, kidney failure, respiratory failure, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and sleep apnea. Review of progress notes dated 05/12/23 revealed the Nurse Practitioner was visiting and noticed a large amount of blood from the rectum. New orders were received to send the resident to the emergency room. Report was called to the emergency room and the resident's son was notified. Further review Resident #75's medical record revealed no documented evidence the required transfer information was provided to the hospital. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided with transfer notice as required for a facility initiated transfer. This affected one resident (#75) of one reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of large intestine, abdominal aortic aneurysm, dysphagia, stage two pressure ulcer, cachexia cancer, kidney failure, respiratory failure, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and sleep apnea. Review of progress notes dated 05/12/23 revealed the Nurse Practitioner was visiting and noticed a large amount of blood from the rectum. New orders were received to send the resident to the emergency room. Report was called to the emergency room and the resident's son was notified. Further review of Resident #75's medical record revealed no documented evidence the required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's shower schedules, observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for personal care received the assistance they needed with washing their hair and trimming their fingernails. This affected two residents (#4 and #129) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #129's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic neck/ back pain, and neuropathy. A review of Resident #129's care plans revealed he had an activities of daily living (ADL's) self care performance deficit that was initiated on 07/20/23. The care plan interventions indicated he was to have a bed bath, until cleared to shower, two to three times a week in the afternoon. He required a one to two person assist with bathing. A review of Resident #129's Kardex (care information used by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received audiology/optometry services timely when needed. This affected two residents (#12 and #50) of two residents reviewed for vision/ hearing. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and vision impairment. A review of Resident #50's ancillary service consent form dated 05/25/23 revealed the resident consented to receive optometry services from the facility's contracted optometrist while residing in the facility. A review of Resident #50's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident's vision was adequate with the use of corrective lenses. A review of Resident #50's active care plans revealed the resident had impaired vision function related to not having her eyes dilated for quite some time and her prescription had changed. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with significant weight loss received timely interventions as recommended by the dietetic technician. This affected one of five residents reviewed for nutrition (#31). The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 12/14/22 and diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Parkinson's disease, and diabetes. The resident weighed 90.4 pounds upon admission on [DATE]. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 04/28/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. It stated the resident was 62 inches tall, weighed 92 pounds, had no weight loss, and required extensive assistance from staff with eating. The resident had a plan of care in place, revised 07/13/23, which stated the resident had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to advanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received timely dental services. This affected one resident (#50) of two reviewed for dental. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and vision impairment. A review of Resident #50's census revealed the resident primary insurance was Medicare until 06/16/23 she was switched to Medicaid. A review of Resident #50's ancillary service consent form dated 05/25/23 revealed the resident consented to receive dental services from the facility's contracted dentist while residing in the facility. A review of Resident #50's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was edentulous. The resident was not assessed to have broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures. A review of Resident #50's active care plans revealed the resident had upper and lower dentures. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship policy and procedure for antibiotic use. This affected two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (#18 and #30). The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 10/14/20 and a diagnosis of dementia. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 05/24/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of nurses progress notes on 04/12/23 at 3:15 P.M. revealed Resident #18 returned to the facility in stable condition. New medication orders received following procedure and hospital to call facility to schedule follow up appointment within the next few days (procedure not specified in nurses notes). Record review revealed a physician's order on 04/12/23 for an antibiotic (Keflex) 250 milligrams twice daily for post op prophylaxis. There was no stop date for the antibiotic. Review of a fax cover sheet addressed to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of immunization records, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for a resident who refused both. This affected one of one residents who refused the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations in a sample of five (#18). The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 10/14/20. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 05/24/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the immunization records for Resident #18 revealed both the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations had been refused (no dates). Record review revealed the resident/responsible party had been offered the influenza vaccine with education on 10/28/20 with it being declined at that time. There was no evidence the flu vaccine was offered with education annually. There was no evidence when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of immunization records, personnel records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and staff were provided with education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine and failed to have policies/procedures in place regarding COVID-19 vaccines for residents. This affected one of five sampled residents (#18) and one of one staff reviewed. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Five residents were reviewed for COVID-19 vaccines. Four had received the initial doses and had received a recent annual booster. Resident #18, however, had refused the COVID-19 vaccines. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 10/14/20. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 05/24/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the immunization records for Resident #18 revealed the COVID-19 vaccine had been refused by the resident on 12/23/20 and 04/20/22. There was no evidence education had been provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity by providing residents with knives at mealtime. This affected 14 of 14 residents (Residents #1, #3, #6, #21, #22, #23, #25, #26, #29, #36, #38, #42, #48, and #74) who resided on The Haven (a dementia care unit). Findings include: Observation of The Haven's meal service on 07/26/21 at 11:50 A.M. revealed resident's meal trays were delivered. Observation of Residents #1, #3, #6, #21, #22, #23, #25, #26, #29, #36, #38, #42, #48, and #74's meal trays revealed no knives on the resident trays. Observation of The Haven's meal service on 07/28/21 at 8:29 A.M. revealed resident's meal trays were delivered and there were no knives on the trays. At the time of the observation, interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #143, STNA #202, and Registered Nurse (RN) #165 verified the lack of knives and these staff obtained knives from a cabinet drawer to butter resident's bread. Observation of The Haven on 07/28/21 at 12:07 P.M. revealed STNA #202 stated to Resident #22 let me get a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure resident plans of care addressed resident's needs in the areas of activities, skin non-pressure, dementia care, eating, and device usage. This affected six of 18 sampled residents (Resident #4, #22, #44, #46, #67, and #274) whose care plans were reviewed. The census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behaviors, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes, stage four kidney disease, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, hypomagnesemia, polyosteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder single episode. Review of Resident #22's annual minimum date set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident 322's speech was clear, she was usually understood, and she usually understands others, her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #22 had minimal depression,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide meaningful activities to all residents. This affected four (Residents #18, #22, #44, and #67) of six residents reviewed for activities. The census was 74. Findings Include: 1. Observations from 07/26/21 at 11:00 A.M. to 08/02/21 at 3:30 P.M. revealed no group activities or activities outside of his room were offered to Resident #18. He remained in his bed the vast majority of the time. Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were Alzheimer's disease, hypertensive retinopathy, dermatochalasis, chronic gastritis with bleeding, diverticulitis, iron deficiency anemia, metabolic encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, dementia,unspecified psychosis, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was five, which indicated he had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the pharmacy failed to ensure controlled drug records were maintained and periodically reconciled for accuracy. This affected one (Resident #52) of two residents reviewed for controlled substances. The census was 74. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including complex regional pain syndrome I, osteoarthritis, and a history of COVID-19. Review of the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) dated July 2021 revealed Resident #52 was administered Ultram 50 milligrams (mg) three times a day and Lyrica 75 mg twice a day for pain. The medications were documented as administered on 07/11/21. Review of the Individual Certificate of Disposition for Control Drugs dated 07/05/21 through 07/13/21 revealed Ultram was administered at 8:00 A.M. and 12:06 P.M A single dose of Ultram 50 mg was documented as wasted/refused on 07/11/21 with no time documented. There was no account of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a living environment free from needing repair. This affected seven (Residents #5, #7 #19, #22, #47, #48, and #67) of 74 residents in the facility. Findings Include: 1. Observations on 07/27/21 between 10:30 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. revealed the following issues in Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #19, and Resident #47 rooms: chunks of dry wall missing from the wall behind Resident #5 and Resident #47 door (cased by the door handle), and large black marks and chunks of dry wall missing from the back wall of Resident #7 and Resident #19 room. Interview with Maintenance Staff #108 on 08/02/21 at 4:50 P.M. confirmed the chunks of drywall missing in all four resident's rooms. He stated the facility uses an electronic maintenance system to report and confirm work completed. He confirmed all staff have access to it, and items that need to be fixed in the rooms could/should be reported by the direct care staff; the maintenance staff are not in each resident's room each day. Depending on the item that needs to get fixed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents had comprehensive assessments in the areas of activities, potential restraint use, and residing on a dementia unit. This affected two of 18 residents (Resident #22 and #67) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident # 67's medical record revealed she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: senile degeneration of brain, palliative care. dementia without behaviors, essential hypertension, insomnia, malignant neoplasm of breast, anxiety, and over active bladder. Review of Resident #67's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #67's speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, her cognition was severely impaired, and she had minimal depression. Resident #67 had delusions, other behaviors that occurred one to three days during the assessment period that did not impact her or other residents care, and she wandered four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and observation the facility failed to maintain a resident's ability to eat. This affected one of five sampled residents (Resident #46) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: atrial fibrillation, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, malignant neoplasm of breast, acquired absence of right breast, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed her speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, her cognition was moderately impaired, and she had mild depression. Resident #46 had no indicators of psychosis, no behaviors, and did not reject care. Resident #46 was independent with set up help to eat. Resident #46 had no difficulty chewing, her partials (dentures) fit, she had significant unplanned weight gain that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving medications with blood thinning properties had a means in place to prevent bruising. This affected one of six residents (Resident #22) reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behaviors, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes, stage four kidney disease, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, hypomagnesemia, polyosteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder single episode. Review of Resident #22's annual minimum date set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident # 22's speech was clear, she was usually understood, and she usually understands others, her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #22 had minimal depression, had delusions, other behaviors one to three days during the assessment period that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper supervision was provided to a resident that was a high fall risk. This affected one (Resident #28) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 74. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were hemiplegia and hemiparesis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, atrial fibrillation, dysarthria, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease (stage III), morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. The assessment was completed on 05/25/21. Review of Resident #28's medical records revealed on 06/23/21, staff heard her yelling from her bathroom. When they responded, they found Resident #28 face down on the ground. She stated she was leaning forward to wipe and fell off the toilet; causing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement nutritional recommendations/interventions for residents who lost a significant amount of weight. Also, the facility failed to monitor significant weight loss and then did not provide meals as indicated on the menu to a resident. This affected three of five residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents #18, #46, #274). The census was 74. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were Alzheimer's disease, hypertensive retinopathy, dermatochalasis, chronic gastritis with bleeding, diverticulitis, iron deficiency anemia, metabolic encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, dementia,unspecified psychosis, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was five, which indicated he had a severe cognitive impairment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, activity calendar review, and memory brochure the facility failed to ensure residents who were diagnosed with dementia received memory care to support the resident's well-being. This affected two of three sampled residents (Resident #22 and #67) reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behaviors, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes, stage four kidney disease, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, hypomagnesemia, polyosteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder single episode. Review of Resident #22 annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident # 22's speech was clear, she was usually understood, and she usually understands others, her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #22 had minimal depression, had delusions, other behaviors one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure an identified drug irregularity was addressed by the physician that included the rational for rejecting the recommendation. This affected one of six sampled residents (Resident #67) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: senile degeneration of brain, palliative care. dementia without behaviors, essential hypertension, insomnia, malignant neoplasm of breast, anxiety, and over active bladder. Review of Resident #67's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #67's speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, her cognition was severely impaired, and she had minimal depression. Resident #67 had delusions, other behaviors that occurred one to three days during the assessment period that did not impact her or other residents care, and she wandered four to six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate justification for the use of anti-psychotic medications. This affected two (Residents #10 and #67) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 74. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were Alzheimer's disease, melanoma in right ear, anxiety disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was four, which indicated he had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment was completed on 04/20/21. Review of Resident #10 medical records revealed he was prescribed Zyprexa (since 12/05/17), with dosages changing over time and the justification changing as well. From 04/12/18 to 03/09/21, he was prescribed and administered Zyprexa five milligrams (mg) for vascular dementia with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, medication administration guidance review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was not 5% or greater. There were 32 opportunities for error with three actual errors resulting in a 9.38 % medication error rate. This affected three (Resident #15, #30 and #59) of five residents observed during medication administration. The census was 74. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the brain and major depressive disorder. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated July 2021 revealed to administer Potassium Chloride (KCL) 20 miliequivalents (mEq) extended-release twice a day for hypokalemia (low potassium level). On 07/27/21 at 3:29 P.M., observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #119 placed a KCL extended-release 20 mEq in 15 ml of water in a medication cup, dissolved the tablet which formed into a slurry and mixed it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure documentation in a resident's record was accurate. This affected one of 18 sampled residents (Resident #22). Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behaviors, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes, stage four kidney disease, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, hypomagnesemia, polyosteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder single episode. Review of Resident #22 annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #22's speech was clear, she was usually understood, and she usually understands others, her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #22 had minimal depression, had delusions, other behaviors one to three days during the assessment period that did not impact the resident or other residents, she did not reject care, and she wandered. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, hospice contract review, and medical record review the facility failed to maintain hospice communication in the resident's medical record. This affected one of one sampled resident's (Resident #67) reviewed for hospice. Findings include: Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: senile degeneration of brain, palliative care, dementia without behaviors, essential hypertension, insomnia, malignant neoplasm of breast, anxiety, and over active bladder. Review of Resident #67's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #67's speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, her cognition was severely impaired, and she had minimal depression. Resident #67 was on hospice. Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed there were no hospice notes available for review. Interview of the Director of Nursing on 08/02/2021 at 1:30 P.M. revealed the hospice notes were not available…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices during a dressing change. This affected one (Resident #47) of one resident observed for a dressing change. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including a Stage II pressure ulcer to the right heel and osteomyelitis. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated 07/26/21 revealed daily treatments to the right heel included the following: cleanse right heel with soap and water then saline wound wash, pat dry, apply the ordered dressing, cover with gauze then wrap with kerlix. On 07/29/21 between 2:20 P.M. and 2:41 P.M., observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #123 complete Resident #47's right heel dressing change revealed the following: LPN #123 gathered supplies, washed her hands, applied gloves, and placed a clean towel on the bed under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-03-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, policy review, review of employee personnel files, and review of facility investigation reports, the facility failed to implement their abuse/misappropriation policy related to screening by failing to attempt to obtain information from current or previous employers regarding work history prior to hiring employees to provide services in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 75 of 75 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property (dated 03/30/12 and revised last on 10/10/24) revealed residents have the right to be free from abuse, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Misappropriation was defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. The policy included screening procedures for prospective employees. It stated the facility would attempt to obtain information from previous or current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$202,275 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $45,318 — penalty dated 2025-05-16
  • $156,957 — penalty dated 2025-03-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNITED CHURCH HOMES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.9-2.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.3-2.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BOULTON, SUSANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/21/2016
ANADEIN, KATHRYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2015
BROWNFIELD, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2010
BUSCH, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2010
CRAMTON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2014
DANIEL, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2011
ELLIS, SUZANNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2007
GREEN, CATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2010
HART, RALPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2015
HENRY, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2006
LAWRENCE, CATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2012
LINDAHL, SANDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2014
MALLOTT, PHILLIPIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2012
MIKESELL, ALANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2006
SHEIDLER, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2008
STEWART, ENOSIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/04/2012
SZILAGYI, SYLVIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2013
TUSSING, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2015
HACKETT, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/27/1986
HURWITZ, GLORIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/07/2013
MOONEY, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/10/2012
RENNER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/27/2014
WEISBRODT, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/09/1989
WICKERSHAM, CHERYLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/10/1993
YOUNG, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/04/2005
UNITED CHURCH HOMES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$644K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 42%Medicare 17%Other / private 41%

This home reported $644K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$333per resident / day
operating cost
$10,121per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next