Parkvue Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a splint was worn as ordered. This affected one (#3) of one resident reviewed for splints. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 08/12/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 03/04/26 revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #3 had an impairment on the right side and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan dated 08/13/25 revealed Resident #3 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to hemiplegia. Interventions included for the resident to wear a right hand splint as ordered, to monitor skin when donning and doffing the splint. Further review of the care plan revealed Resident #3 had left cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with right side hemiplegia.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights functioned properly. This affected one (#13) of one resident reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/10/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #13 required supervision with toileting and transferring. Review of the care plan dated 07/11/25 revealed Resident #13 was at risk for falls related to impaired mobility. Interventions included encouraging non-skid footwear when out of bed and keeping frequently needed items within reach. Further review of the care plan revealed Resident #13 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to generalized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the satellite kitchens on each unit in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/28/24 at 8:43 A.M. in the Ogontz satellite kitchen revealed in the freezer there was an undated package of frozen pancakes with ice buildup, and an undated partially frozen drink with a straw inside the cup. In the refrigerator there was an undated cup of fruit and undated cheese. Inside the bottom of the freezer there was a buildup of food and spills of food on the bottom of the freezer. There were drips of food on the outside of the refrigerator/freezer unit. Further observations revealed the handwashing sink faucet handles would not move or turn on. There were hardwater stains on on the outside of the dishwasher. Continued observation revealed the microwave had a build up of dried food on the sides and inside top of the microwave. Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure carpets were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner throughout the facility. This affected all residents. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observations on 10/28/24 beginning at 7:45 A.M. revealed the carpets throughout the halls and common areas on all four units were heavily stained in multiple spots throughout all four of the units. Interview on 10/29/24 at 3:54 P.M., the Director of Environmental Services (DES) #491 revealed the carpets were cleaned professionally once per year and were last cleaned in September of 2024. DES #491 revealed the facility cleaned spots on the carpet everyday. DES #491 verified there were multiple stains throughout the four units that kept coming back even after the area was cleaned. DES #491 revealed the facility planned to replace the carpet on one of the four units. Interview on 10/29/24 at 4:48 P.M., the Administrator verified the numerous carpet stains. The Administrator stated the facility had planned to replace the carpet with vinyl planks on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0920 — pattern
  Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on dining observations, staff interview, and review of the facility census, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate space in the dining room for 17 residents (#8, #18, #24, #31, #37, #39, #41, #47, #48, #49, #51, #52, #55, #59, #63, #70, and #178) currently residing on the secured unit. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observation on 10/28/24 at 12:13 P.M. during the lunch meal revealed there were 15 residents seated in the dining room located on the secured unit. The dining room contained four square tables, one of which was up against a wall/counter. There were no open seats left in the dining room. Further observation during the lunch meal revealed Resident #41 was seated at a table designated for residents who required assistance with feeding and was actively being fed by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #338. STNA #351 then brought a 16th resident (Resident #18) to the dining area. STNA #338 moved Resident #41 to a sitting area while Resident #18 sat in Resident #41's place at the table. STNA #338 proceeded to feed Resident #41 in the sitting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff, family and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to safely transfer Resident #42 resulting in a fall. This affected one (#42) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 80. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 had an admission date of 12/20/23 and a readmission date of 01/13/24. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, discitis lumbar area, type two diabetes mellitus, radiculopathy lumbar region, low back pain, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. The resident had no prior falls. Review of a fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at risk for falls. Review of the care plan dated 01/06/24 for Resident #42 revealed the resident required moderate/maximal assistance of one to two staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-28 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on personnel files review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) received 12 hours of annual training. This affected one (#759) out of five STNA personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #759 revealed a hire date of 03/25/20. Continued review revealed STNA #759 completed eight hours of continuing education in 2021. Further review revealed STNA #759 completed five hours of continuing education in the last 12 months. Interview on 03/24/22 at 1:45 P.M. with the Human Resource Manager #773 confirmed STNA #759 did not complete 12 hours of annual training. Further interview revealed STNA #759 was a current employee and had no gaps in his employment since his hire date.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and review of facility policy, the facility failed to secure potentially hazardous chemicals on the the secured memory care unit and C pod. This affected two (#55 and #178) out of two residents reviewed for accident/hazards and had the potential to affect five (#3, #10, #33, #55 #68, and #372) additional residents identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independently mobile who reside on the secured memory care unit. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted on [DATE] and a readmission date of 08/25/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision for ambulation, and had wandering behavior.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) received training and competencies when caring for residents with dementia. This affected one (STNA #759) out of eight personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect 40 (#372, #28, #55, #3, #59, #27, #68, #47, #11, #6, #38, #8, #33, #14, #35, #43, #53, #39, #17, #34, #20, #5, #60, #24, #61, #64, #2, #63, #69, #54, #31, #19, #36, #71, #49, #7, #57, #1, #16 and #62) residents in the facility diagnosed with dementia who STNA #759 provided care. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #759 revealed a hire date of 03/23/20. Further review revealed STNA #759 completed training for the care of residents with dementia on 04/25/20. Review of STNA #759's personnel file revealed there was no further training or competencies on the care of residents with dementia was documented. Interview on 03/24/22 at approximately 3:15 P.M. with the Human Resources Manager #773 confirmed STNA #759 did not complete any training or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure kitchen areas were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and failed to ensure food was labeled/dated appropriately. This had the potential to affect 72 out of 74 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen, the facility identified two (#21 and #70) residents who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. The following concerns were noted during the initial kitchen tour conducted on 03/21/22 between 7:25 A.M. and 7:55 A.M. Observation at 7:25 a.m. a black substance on the ceiling, air vents and light fixtures over the preparation tables Interview with the Dining Services Assistant (DSA) #739 at 11:10 A.M. revealed cooks were responsible for cleaning the kitchen. DSA #739 verified the black substance on ceiling and light fixtures stating she did not know what the substance was but that it looked like duct. 2. The following concerns were noted during the initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNITED CHURCH HOMES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 40 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $603K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH