Avenue At Brooklyn

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 103.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) report, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to timely identify and provide adequate and necessary care for Resident #104, who experienced an acute change in condition. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm/death beginning on [DATE] when the facility failed to recognize and failed to timely and adequately respond to Resident #104's report of a low blood glucose level. On [DATE], at 12:18 A.M., Resident #104, who was known by staff to be a brittle diabetic, activated her call light and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 636 responded. Resident #104 reported she needed a snack because her blood glucose level was low. CNA #636 reported she gave Resident #104 a snack and got side-tracked and did not report the change of condition to the nurse on duty, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #637. CNA #636 did not round on Resident #104 after providing the snack. LPN #637 revealed she had last seen Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of a Prehospital Care Report Summary/EMS Run report, review of the American Heart Association Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) guidelines, facility policy review, interview with Emergency Medical Service (EMS) staff, staff interview and family interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff provided effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure crash carts (a cart that holds equipment and includes a backboard, a hard, flat surface to facilitate effective chest compressions and an ambu bag, used to provide mechanical ventilation) in emergency resuscitation efforts were readily available and accessible during a cardiac emergency. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm/subsequent death when staff failed to initiate effective CPR for Resident #101 who experienced a cardiac emergency on [DATE]. At the initiation of the cardiac emergency, Resident #101 ' s family was with the resident in her room and yelled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Run report, review of the Health Care Summary, facility policy review, staff interview, physician interview and nurse practitioner (NP) interview, the facility failed to timely identify and provide adequate and necessary care for Resident #100, who experienced an acute change in condition. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm/serious health outcomes and potential for death beginning on 06/20/24 when the facility failed to recognize and adequately and timely respond to a decline in Resident #100's condition. Beginning on 06/20/24, Resident #100 was observed to have difficulty swallowing and his diet was downgraded to pureed. The physician was not notified of this change in condition. On 06/21/24 and 06/22/24, Resident #100 had poor oral intakes with no nursing assessments or monitoring completed and no evidence the physician was notified. On 06/22/24, at approximately 7:30 A.M., State Tested Nursing Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. This affected three residents (#30, #31, and #87) of three reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, repeated falls, hypoxemia, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, impaired on both sides of her lower extremities, and required assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 05/07/25 revealed Resident #30 had an ADL self-care deficit with interventions that included staff to assist with completion of needs throughout the day. Observation on 05/14/25 at 8:07 A.M. revealed Resident #30 laying in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to have less than 5 percent (%) medication error rate. Three errors out of twenty-nine opportunities were observed resulting in an error rate of 10.34 %. This affected three residents (#5, #35, and #107) of five residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 02/16/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, stage three chronic kidney disease (CKD), and hypertension (HTN). Review of the physician orders for May 2025 revealed an order for Aspirin 81 milligram (mg) delayed release (delayed release refers to medication designed to release the active ingredients at a time later than immediately after administration) to give 1 tablet in the morning for thrombosis and do not crush. Observation on 05/15/25 at 7:38 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #712 revealed she placed an Aspirin 81 mg chewable tablet in the medicine cups with other medications then proceeded to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#5) out of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/20/25 and diagnoses included but not limited to epilepsy, fracture of left femur, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and adult failure to thrive. Review of the physician orders for May 2025 revealed an order for Phenobarbital tablet 32.4 milligram (mg) give 1 tablet in the morning for seizures and Phenobarbital 32.4 mg give 2 tablets at bedtime (HS). a. Review of Resident #5's May 2025 medication administration records (MARS) revealed a total of nine missed morning doses for Phenobarbital 32.4 mg. On 05/02/25, 05/03/25, 05/04/25, 05/10/25, 05/11/25, 05/12/25, 05/15/15, 05/22/25, and 05/24/25 the MAR was coded #9, which means to see nurses' note. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed there was not a nurses notes on 05/01/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy and procedures revealed the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and nursing unit refrigerators were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents except one resident (#33) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Observations during initial tour of the kitchen on 02/03/25 between 9:42 A.M. and 10:06 A.M. with Mobile Dietary Manager (MDM) #450 revealed: • Dry storage area under the rack against wall had a large container of cooking oil, on the floor underneath was a large oil spill. • Observed various food debris on top of the oven, an oven mitt on the floor behind and between the oven and steamer. • The deep fryer had various food crumbs on it, an old french fry in one of the baskets, the outside of the deep fryer had grease stains running down. • The floor under the steamer and deep fryer had a brownish substance and food crumbs • The two set of shelves under the steam stable facing the stove area had various crumbs/food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the outside dumpster area was maintained in a sanitary manner free from debris. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Observation on 02/05/25 at 10:06 A.M. of the outside dumpsters revealed two dumpsters, both with the lids opened. There was a large clear trash bag of trash on the ground next to the dumpster closer to the door to the building. Observed on the ground around and between the dumpsters was a moderate amount of various trash including an empty cigarette package, several used latex gloves, etc. Interview on 02/05/25 at 10:08 A.M. with Mobile Dietary Manager (MDM) #450 verified the observation. MDM #450 stated maintenance was responsible for maintaining the dumpster area. Reviewed policy Trash Handling, undated revealed outside dumpsters and surrounding area are to be kept clean and [NAME] of debris.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0847 — widespread
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility arbitration the facility failed to ensure its arbitration agreement contained all required information. This affected all residents. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the facility's admission packet revealed its arbitration agreement and requirements were contained on pages nine and ten of the facilities admission agreement that authorized the facility to provided care and services required to be admitted to the facility. Review of the facility's arbitration agreement revealed that the agreement does not state that the resident or resident representative may communicate with federal, state, or local officials, including but not limited to, federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health department employees, and representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Interview with Corporate Nurse (CN) #999 on 02/05/25 at 10:25 A.M. verified the agreement does not state that the resident or resident representative may communicate with federal, state, or local officials,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0848 — widespread
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of facility arbitration agreement revealed the facility failed to provide a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring both the resident or the resident representative, and the facility agree on the selection of a neutral arbitrator, and that the venue is convenient to both parties. This affected all residents. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the facility's admission packet revealed that an arbitration agreement was within the packet and located on pages nine and ten within the general admission agreement required for admission/treatment from the facility. Review of resident medical records during the survey revealed admission agreements and subsequently arbitration agreements were signed by all residents residing in the facility. Review of the Who Will Conduct Arbitration subsection of the arbitration agreement revealed C. The arbitration shall be conducted by the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). Information regarding NAF and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0699 — pattern
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents who are trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice residents in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. This affected five residents (#8, #43, #80, #98 and #303) of five residents residing in the facility with diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, PTSD and irritable bowel syndrome. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired and was independent for completing activities of daily living (ADLs). 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a referral for an appointment to ear, nose, and throat (ENT) was made timely for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) of two residents reviewed for vision and hearing. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an initial admission date of 10/23/23. Diagnoses included type I diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic (poly) neuropathy, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, type I diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, type I diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia without coma, chronic pancreatitis, hypotension, cardiomegaly, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and epilepsy. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure consistent communication between the facility and dialysis with the dialysis communication forms. This affected one resident (#12) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an initial admission date of 10/23/23. Diagnoses included type I diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic (poly) neuropathy, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, type I diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, type I diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia without coma, chronic pancreatitis, hypotension, cardiomegaly, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and epilepsy. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$56,301 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $18,704 — penalty dated 2025-06-02
• $37,597 — penalty dated 2024-08-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE QUALITY CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH