Avenue At Macedonia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely and necessary care/treatment for Resident #100 and Resident #102 following identified changes in condition. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 10/09/24 when Resident #100, who was severely cognitively impaired was noted by direct care staff (Certified Nursing Assistant 3249) to be favoring her right side, had bruising noted and wasn't right without evidence a licensed nurse assessed the resident or provided necessary intervention. On 10/11/24 licensed staff documented Resident #100 was sitting awkwardly in her chair and guarding her upper right side thigh area. Between 10/11/24 and 10/14/24 the resident exhibited signs of increased pain (facial grimacing and guarding of the leg) with an inability to obtain an x-ray of the area (due to positioning issues). On 10/14/24 (five days after the initial change was identified) the resident was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a right hip fracture which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #54) did not develop an unstageable pressure ulcer of the sacrum. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #54 who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation following surgery for a left hip fracture developed a sacral pressure ulcer that was not identified until it was unstageable. This affected one resident (Resident #54) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/16/18 and diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and urinary incontinence. Review of Resident #54's physician orders dated, 03/16/18, revealed turn and reposition frequently while in bed as tolerated every shift. Review of Resident #54's care plan dated 03/17/18, revealed Resident #54 had the potential for pressure ulcers, skin breakdown related to Alzheimer's disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement and follow transmissions based precautions (TBP) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) as required. This affected three residents (Residents #5, #73 and #195) of five reviewed for TBP. The facility identified four residents (Residents #52, #60, #64 and #72) on droplet TBP and 14 residents (Residents #2, #3, #5, #6, #12, #14, #30, #39, #41, #46, #56, #69, #80 and #89) on EBP. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 06/13/23. Diagnoses included diabetes, hypertension, depression, dementia and kidney disease. Review the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #73 required setting up for eating, partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene and substantial or maximum assistance for toileting and showering. Review of the progress note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain documentation the COVID-19 vaccine was offered to residents and residents were provided education regarding the benefits and risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine annually. This affected four Residents (Residents #1, #31 #42 and #76) of five reviewed for immunizations. The census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/11/21. There was no evidence Resident #1 had been offered or educated regarding the COVID-19 vaccination within the past year. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 09/04/19. There was no evidence Resident #31 had been offered or educated regarding the COVID-19 vaccination within the past year. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 07/30/20. There was no evidence Resident #42 had been offered or educated regarding the COVID-19 vaccination within the past year. Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 04/14/23. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for Residents #6 and #8. This affected two residents (#6 and #8) of five observed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/29/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (disease that affects the central nervous system which causes numbness, weakness, difficulty walking, vision changes and other symptoms) and contractures. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment. She was dependent on staff for oral care and hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 06/07/19 for Resident #6 revealed she had self-care performance deficit for activities of daily living related to limited mobility and contractures. Interventions revealed she was dependent on one staff for activities of daily living and the staff were to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 12/19/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and gastrostomy. Observation of Resident #41's room on 02/25/25 at 8:23 A.M. revealed there was yellowed dried enteral feeding on the floor and on the feeding tube pole. Observation on 02/25/25 at 9:58 A.M. revealed yellow dried enteral feeding on the floor by Resident #41's bed and on the feeding tube pole. Observation of Resident #41's room on 02/25/24 at 1:25 P.M. revealed the trash can was empty with no trash bag liner currently in place and there was thick yellow dried enteral feeding on the bottom of the can. There was dried tube feeding also noted to Resident #41's tray table, the bottom of the tray table, on the floor under the tube feeding pole and on the tube feeding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed as required and/or accurate. This affected two (Resident #79 and Resident #197) of 27 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date 07/08/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anxiety and hypertension. Resident #79 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #79's MDS assessments revealed she had a quarterly assessment on 10/01/24. There were no assessments completed after that date. Interview on 02/25/25 at 10:37 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #526 verified she had not completed a discharge return not anticipated MDS assessment for Resident #79 after she was discharged and did not return to the facility. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #197 revealed an admission date of 07/15/24 with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services for incontinence care, oral hygiene, and feeding assistance. This affected three (Residents #6, #56 and #59) out of four residents reviewed for ADL assistance. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/29/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (disease that affects the central nervous system which causes numbness, weakness, difficulty walking, vision changes and other symptoms) and contractures. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for oral care and hygiene. Review of Resident #6's care plan dated 12/01/24 revealed she had self-care performance deficit for activities of daily living related to limited mobility and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure Vancomycin (antibiotic) levels were monitored. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #195) of one resident reviewed for Vancomycin administration. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #195 revealed an admission date of 02/19/25 with diagnoses including bacteremia and streptococcal polyarthritis (inflammatory joint condition). Review of the physician's orders for Resident #195 for February 2024 revealed an order for Vancomycin intravenous solution 500 milligrams (mg), use 1.75 grams intravenously every 12 hours at 8:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. for 22 days dated 02/20/25. There were no laboratory orders to monitor for Vancomycin levels to ensure appropriate levels and efficacy. Observation and interview on 02/25/25 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #556 administering Vancomycin to Resident #195. After administration, LPN #556 was unable to state how the facility was monitoring the Vancomycin serum levels. Interview on 02/26/25 at 11:10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received recommended ancillary services. This affected one resident (Resident #47) of three reviewed for vision and hearing. The census was 88 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 05/30/22. Diagnoses included kidney disease, diabetes, heart failure, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact. Resident #47 required set up help for eating and oral hygiene, partial to moderate assistance for showering and personal hygiene and was dependent for toileting. Resident #47's vision was adequate and she did not have corrective lenses. Interview on 02/24/25 at 9:43 A.M. with Resident #47 revealed she had a cataract and the facility had not assisted her in setting up an appointment for surgery. Review of the optometrist note dated 03/13/24 revealed Resident #47 had cataracts which were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's enteral feeding was delivered per the physician's orders. This affected one (Resident #15) of one resident reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 12/13/22 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (condition that affects movement and posture) and gastrostomy status. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was dependent on staff for eating and received 51 percent (%) of his total calories through tube feeding. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #15 revealed an order for enteral feeding at 70 milliliters (mL) per hour, up at 11:00 P.M. and down at 11:00 A.M. dated 02/20/25. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2025 for Resident #15 revealed the nurse had documented on 02/25/25 for the 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure safety measures were in place to prevent a fall. This affected one resident (#107) of three residents (#5, #31 and #197) reviewed for falls. The census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #197 revealed an admission date of 07/15/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, essential hypertension and dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #197 was cognitively impaired and was dependent for transfers. Review of Resident #197's care plan dated 07/26/23 and last revised on 01/13/25 revealed a goal to minimize risks for falls and to minimize injuries related to falls. Interventions included implementing preventative fall interventions/devices and to rearrange furniture. Review of the fall investigation dated 01/05/25 timed 6:27 P.M. revealed Resident #197 was observed with head, shoulders and torso…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,140 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $23,140 — penalty dated 2024-11-14
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-06 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE QUALITY CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH