Parma Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 75.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-08-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of physician orders, review of the bowel movement (BM) log, review of the hospital discharge instructions, review of the medical records, review of the facility policy Bowel Management and Treatment and interviews with the Director of Nursing, Regional Nurse #625 and Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #626 the facility failed to provide appropriate care and treatment of constipation for one resident (Resident #53) who had an established diagnoses of constipation and physician orders to prevent exacerbation of the constipation. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 03/02/22 when Resident #53, who had not had a bowel movement for four days, was not assessed for constipation and no treatment was provided by the facility. On 03/05/22 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #503 identified the lack of bowel movement, administered milk of magnesia (MOM), charted the MOM was ineffective but implemented no further bowel interventions. Resident #53 continued to have no bowel movement, except for a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of Resident #04, review of the medical records for Resident #04, Review of the current, online Medscape application titled Medscape Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, review of the facility policy titled Status Change in Resident Condition Notification, dated October 2017, and interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON), Physician #900 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #574, the facility failed to provide timely care and services for the monitoring and treatment of Resident #04s' hyperglycemia with a blood glucose level greater than 500 milligrams (mg) per deciliter (dL) for 12 hours. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 03/26/22 at approximately 10:51 A.M. when Resident #04, who was not previously diagnosed with diabetes, was noted to have excessive urination with incontinence (loss of urine control), high ketones (chemical derived from fat in the body when the body is unable to use glucose for energy and is an indicator of a life…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a facility investigation, hospital documentation review, resident and staff interview, review of a mechanical lift manufacturer instructions document, policy review, and review of facility corrective action documentation, the facility failed to ensure residents who required staff assistance and use of a mechanical lift for transfers were safely transferred without injuries. Actual harm occurred to Resident #53 on 09/03/25 when two staff members were transferring the resident from the bed to a wheelchair; during the transfer, one of the mechanical (Hoyer) lift pad straps was not properly secured to the lift by the staff members which caused the resident to slip out of the sling and fall to the floor. Subsequently, Resident #53 complained of pain and was transported to the hospital where imaging revealed the resident sustained a fractured pelvis.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bowel protocol was timely implemented as ordered. This affected one Resident (#76) of three residents reviewed for bowel management. The facility census was 76.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 11/06/25. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, a stroke, malnutrition, hemiparesis, epilepsy, type II diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Continued review of Resident #76's record revealed the resident was dependent on staff for toileting, showering, and transfers. The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder.Review of the plan of care for Resident #76 dated 11/18/25 revealed the resident had constipation. Interventions included recording bowel movement pattern and administering medications as ordered.Review of Resident #76's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/25/25 for Docusate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect 84 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#6) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 85. Findings include:Observation of lunch meal temperatures prior to service on 07/23/25 at 11:38 A.M. with [NAME] #214 using the facility digital thermometer revealed the two trays of breaded chicken patties temperatures were 165.2 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 167.0 F and the rice temperature was 200.0 F.Observation of lunch tray line service on 07/23/25 from 11:45 A.M. to 12:42 P.M. revealed the facility completed tray line pass. The cook was observed to run out of plates and began using divided dishes for the last three trays served. A test tray was served on the final cart. Observation of lunch test tray on 07/23/25 at 12:54 A.M. following completion of resident tray pass revealed temperatures were taken using the facility digital thermometer by Mobile Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This had the potential to affect 84 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#6) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 85. Findings include:Observations of the facility kitchen on 07/21/25 from 8:32 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #245 revealed the following concerns:a. There was a prep table for juice and coffee machines which included a sink built into the table. The plumbing under the sink was leaking into a plastic container on the floor.b. Observation in the dry storage room revealed various debris under racks including a pen and a package of instant coffee.c. The floors throughout the kitchen area were sticky and had various debris and crumbs. d. Spilled thickener powder was observed on a prep table holding the mixer.e. Additional prep tables had food debris and crumbs on the bottom shelves that held various supplies.f. Dried food splatter was noted on the kitchen equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of pest control company invoices, and facility policy review, the facility failed to effectively manage pests in the kitchen area. This had the potential to affect 84 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#6) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 85. Findings include:Observations of the facility kitchen on 07/21/25 from 8:32 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #245 revealed multiple flies throughout the kitchen area and dish machine areas.Interview on 07/21/25 at 9:00 A.M. with DM #245 confirmed the presence of multiple flies throughout the kitchen area.Review of the pest control company invoice dated 06/05/25 revealed the kitchen, dishwashing area, and dry goods storage area, received a general pest treatment, but it did not include house flies or fruit flies.Review of facility policy Pest Control dated March 2023 revealed pests would be controlled in and around all buildings to reduce any potential human health hazard. Common pests included flies.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for resident use to call for assistance. This affected one resident (Resident #91) of one resident sampled for call light placement. The facility census was 85.Findings include: A review of medical record for Resident #91 revealed an original admission date of 04/13/21 and a readmission date of 05/22/23. Significant diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety, major depressive disorder, cirrhosis of the liver, chronic hepatitis C, clostridium difficile, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #91 required substantial to maximum assistance with toileting, substantial to maximum assistance with showers and partial to moderate assistance for dressing. The MDS revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #6 received oral care and was shaved per his preference. This affected one resident (#6) out of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 85.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnosis including Huntington's disease, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, and unspecified lack of coordination.Review of the care plan for Resident #6 dated 03/27/25 revealed a goal he would be clean, dry, dressed, groomed and free of odors. Further review of the care plan revealed Resident #6 had a preference to be clean shaven.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was rarely or never understood, had short-term and long-term memory impairment, and was dependent upon staff for all ADLs. An interview on 07/21/2025 at 3:17 P.M. with a family member of Resident #6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a smoking assessment was completed for a resident who was smoking on the facility premises. This affected one (Resident #54) of one reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 85.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 07/14/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemarthrosis of the right knee, type two diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and dependence upon renal dialysis.Further review of Resident #54's medical record revealed no documented evidence that a smoking assessment was completed to determine the resident's capabilities and deficits to determine whether or not supervision was required.Review of the 07/14/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #54 revealed intact cognition. Resident #54 was noted to use a wheelchair, required supervision for mobility and moderate assistance with dressing, toileting and bathing.Review of the 07/14/25 care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure that infection control guidelines were followed during incontinence care for Resident #6. This affected one (Resident #6) out one resident observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 85. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an original admission date of 03/14/23 and a re-admission date of 12/20/24. Medical diagnoses included Huntington's disease, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, and unspecified lack of coordination.Review of Resident #6's care plan dated 04/17/24 revealed the resident required enhanced barrier precautions to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms related to the use of a feeding tube. Interventions included to ensure thorough cleaning and disinfection of surfaces and equipment, perform hand hygiene before and after glove use, regularly reinforce education to maintain compliance, use disposable gowns and gloves during high contact care activities, and remove…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation related to medication administration; ensure a clear and accurate reconciliation of controlled substances; ensure controlled medications were not administered without physician orders, and as needed medications were not removed from secured storage areas prior to being requested or needed by the residents. This affected seven (Residents #16, #5, #14, #40, #84, #85 and #79) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including mild intellectual disability, Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction (stroke), convulsions, pulmonary/heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, gastritis/colitis with esophageal reflux disease, high blood pressure/cholesterol, end stage kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, psychotic disorder, depression, anxiety,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration to Resident #40 and Resident #50 to prevent cross contamination of germs and failed to initiate isolation precautions for Resident #20 to prevent the spread of influenza. This affected two out of three residents observed during medication administration and one out of three residents reviewed for isolation precautions. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including rhabdomyolosis ( muscle injury where muscles break down), schizoeffective disorder, hypo-osmoality, alcohol abuse, anemia, osteoarthritis, lupus erythmatosis (body's immune system attacks tissues and organs), heart attack, low magnesium and potassium level, atrial-fibrillation, depression, Raynaud's syndrome, vascular heart disease, retinopathy, cataracts, urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE QUALITY CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $669K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH