Strongsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, medical record review, review of local police report, resident, family, and staff interviews, local police detective interview, review of the National Weather Service forecast, review of the facility Elopement Policy and Procedure, review of camera footage, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #37, who had a diagnosis of dementia, post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and severe cognitive impairment, from leaving the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious harm, injury, or death when Resident #37 was seen (by camera footage) on 11/23/24 at 11:07 P.M. standing inside the facility in front of the main door when a visiting family member entered from outside, punched in the door code and let Resident #37 out of the building without notifying staff. The resident's whereabouts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, record review, review of an employee personnel file, review of video surveillance, review of a policy report, review of facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1, a resident with cognitive impairment, was free from staff to resident abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #813 physically abused the resident while providing care. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual physical and psychosocial harm as a result of the physical abuse incident which occurred on 10/29/24 at approximately 9:30 P.M. when CNA #813 took Resident #1 to the bathroom and the CNA could he heard hitting (audio of skin to skin contact sounding like two smacks) could be heard on the surveillance video and the resident was heard crying out. Continued video surveillance showed CNA #813 coming out of the bathroom with Resident #1 and putting the resident back…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure proper implementation of required infection control practices. Specifically, the facility did not ensure staff consistently followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents with indwelling devices, did not properly don and doff required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when caring for a resident on droplet isolation for COVID 19, did not use appropriate protective clothing during laundry handling, and did not maintain required procedures to prevent the growth of Legionella bacteria within the facility's water system. These deficient practices affected two residents (Residents #24 and #53) and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 95.Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 04/02/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the left dominant side,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-16 · tag F0887 — widespread
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, review of staff education, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Regulatory Update dated 05/31/23 titled Educate and Offer and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to educate/offer all eligible staff the COVID 19 vaccination. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents residing at the facility.Findings include:During an interview on 06/15/26 at 9:04 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #494 stated the fall of 2024 was the last time the facility educated/offered the staff the COVID-19 vaccine.During an interview on 06/15/26 at 10:10 A.M., Infection Preventionist (IP) Registered Nurse (RN) #604 confirmed facility staff were not educated/offered the COVID-19 vaccine in 2025 or 2026 and revealed she did not know she was supposed to. Review of staff education related to COVID-19 on 06/15/26 at 11:58 A.M. with IP RN #604 for 2025/2026 confirmed staff were not educated on COVID-19 vaccine benefits, risks and potential side effects.During an interview on 06/16/26 at 2:03 P.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-16 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate comprehensive assessments were completed as required. This finding affected three residents (Residents #107, #109 and #111) and had the potential to affect all six residents (Residents #103, #105, #107, #108, #109 and #111) who were transferred to the facility from a sister facility following a fire. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #111's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 03/13/26 as a transfer from a sister facility with diagnoses including paraplegia, essential hypertension and legal blindness. Review of Resident #111's medical record revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] with a description of Inactivation of Entry. The MDS did not have evidence that the home conducted a comprehensive, accurate, and standardized assessment of the resident's functional capacity. Telephone interview on 06/15/26 at 12:27 P.M. with Medicaid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed timely. This finding affected three (Residents #107, #109 and #111) and had the potential to affect all six residents (Residents #103, #105, #107, #108, #109 and #111) who were transferred to the facility from a sister facility following a fire. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #111's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 03/13/26 as a transfer from a sister facility with diagnoses including paraplegia, essential hypertension and legal blindness. Review of Resident #111's medical record revealed the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] with a description of Inactivation of Entry. The MDS did not reflect the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial conditions. This included identifying the resident's strengths and needs to maintain or improve the resident's overall status using the appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care planning conferences were completed at least quarterly. This affected two (Residents #10 and #111) of five residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, bipolar disorder and essential hypertension.Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed a care conference was conducted on 09/30/25.Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed a care conference was conducted on 02/20/26.Review of Resident #10's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment.Telephone interview on 06/14/26 at 10:32 A.M. with Resident #10's family member revealed she had missed the care conference and tried to reschedule, but the facility had never returned her phone calls. Telephone interview on 06/15/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate care plans were initiated and updated for two residents (Resident #20 and #24) of 25 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 95.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 04/02/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the left dominant side, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the physician order for Resident #24 dated 12/15/25 revealed an order for Foley (indwelling) urinary catheter due to obstructive uropathy. An additional order dated 01/06/26 included Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP): Gloves and gown to be worn when providing dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene care, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting.Review of the Annual Minimum Data System (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, hospital records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate immediate care was provided to Resident #84 following a fall. Staff moved the resident despite her complaints of pain and before notifying the physician or Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) for further direction. Resident #84 was later found to have sustained multiple fractures. This affected one resident (Resident #84) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Record review for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 10/24/24. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and muscle weakness.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 was rarely or never understood. Resident #84 used a wheelchair for mobility, required supervision or touch assistance for meals, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded and insulin vials were appropriately dated and discarded as appropriate. This finding affected two (Residents #4 and #19) of two residents identified during the audit of three medication administration carts. The facility census was 95.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, essential hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus without complications.Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/09/26 (discontinued 03/10/26) for Lantus long-acting insulin inject 10 units subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes; an order dated 03/10/26 (discontinued 04/20/26) for Lantus long acting insulin inject 10 units subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes; and an order dated 5/07/26 for Glargine Solostar (Lantus) long acting insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor resident preferences for getting out of bed. This affected one (Resident #37) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The census was 87.Findings Include:Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mild protein calorie malnutrition, infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee, acute and chronic respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, pulmonary hypertension, encephalopathy, anemia, atrial fibrillation, cardiomegaly, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, other bacterial infections of unspecified site, dysphagia, pneumonitis, and diverticulitis of intestine. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/02/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #37's MDS assessment, section GG, dated 08/02/25, revealed she needed substantial/maximum physical assistance to perform…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of the facility's' payroll-based journal (PBJ) data, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents. This affected seven residents (#1, #6, #8, #34, #49, #76, #82) of eight residents reviewed for sufficient staffing and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/28/22 and a discharge date of 03/05/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis, right below the knee amputation, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, diabetes and chronic pain. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. He was continent of bowel and bladder, independent in eating, oral and personal hygiene and required supervision for toileting and showering. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was not at risk for falls.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,254 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-11-14
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-11-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE QUALITY CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $412K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH