Avenue Care And Rehabilitation Center, The
4120 Interchange Corporate Center Road, Warrensville Heights, OH 44128 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (216) 896-9900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $34,146 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 50.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.5% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.6% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.4% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.4%CMS range 44.0–74.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.7–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.4–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, closed medical record review, review of the local police report, staff interviews, review of the National Weather Service forecast, review of the facility Elopement Policy and Procedure, review of Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation Policy and Procedure, and review of camera footage, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #95, who had diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, malnutrition, and adult failure to thrive and severe cognitive impairment, from leaving the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm leading to death beginning on [DATE] at approximately 8:40 P.M. when Resident #95 was last seen inside the facility. On [DATE] at 9:30 P.M., [DATE] at 12:36 A.M. and [DATE] at approximately 4:00 A.M. staff identified Resident #95 was not in the facility but failed to take sufficient action to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #94 was provided a safe transfer via mechanical lift to prevent a fall with injury. This affected one resident (#94) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility identified 20 additional residents (#11, #14, #17, #18, #24, #26, #27, #32, #33, #36, #41, #46, #47, #49, #55, #71, #75, #82, #84, and #92) who required a mechanical lift for transfers. The facility census was 87. Actual Harm occurred on 04/19/24 when Resident #94, who was a bilateral above the knee amputee, exhibited balance deficits, was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for transfers sustained a fall during a staff assisted mechanical (Hoyer) lift transfer. At the time of the incident, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #605 and STNA #617 were transferring Resident #94 from the bed to the chair. After placing Resident #94 in the chair, the staff removed the bottom half of the mechanical lift sling, and Resident #94 began sliding to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #84 was free from significant medication error. Actual Harm occurred on [DATE] at 12:00 P.M. when Resident #84 who received Hospice services was administered 5 milliliters (ml) of Morphine Concentrate 20 milligrams (mg) per ml by mouth which equaled 100 mg medication, ten times the amount ordered, resulting in a medication overdose. Resident #84 was monitored by the facility nurses for respiratory distress and failure and was administered Narcan for respiratory distress on [DATE] at 7:03 P.M. This affected one resident (Resident #84) out of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung, secondary neoplasm of the brain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #84 expired at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0839 — widespreadEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the Ohio e-licensure verification website, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had an active nursing license. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83.Findings include: Interview on 12/09/25 at 9:12 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the former Director of Nursing (DON) had resigned and Registered Nurse (RN) #256 assumed the role of Interim DON in October 2025.Review of the Ohio e-licensure verification website (https://elicense.ohio.gov/oh_verifylicense) on 12/10/25 at 7:11 A.M. revealed Interim Director of Nursing (DON)/RN #256's license was inactive, it had lapsed, with a listed expiration date of 10/31/25. Interview on 12/10/25 at 9:42 A.M. with Interim DON/RN #256 revealed she had been the Interim DON since October 2025 following the previous DON's resignation. Interim DON #256 stated her nursing license was current and she exited the room.Review of the Ohio e-licensure verification website on 12/10/25 at 10:20 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the Interim DON/RN #256's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and review of photographs, the facility failed to ensure timely colostomy care was provided to residents. This affected one resident (#73) of one resident reviewed for colostomy care. The facility identified only one resident (#83) in-house with an ostomy. The facility census was 83.Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date 11/03/25. Diagnoses included rectal cancer and enterostomy (surgical opening from the intestine through the abdominal wall to allow drainage of intestinal contents).Review of the care plan dated 11/10/25 revealed Resident #73 had an ileostomy related to colon cancer. Interventions included for staff to assist Resident #73 with toileting needs as needed, check and change on care rounds and as needed, and to complete ostomy care per orders.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had intact cognition and had an ostomy for stool elimination. Review of Resident #73's current physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided for four residents (Resident #34, #40, #43 and #84) of four residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 83.Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 09/21/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and dementia. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was rarely or never understood. Resident #43 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, had impairment to one side of the upper and lower extremities, used a wheelchair for mobility, was dependent for toileting hygiene, chair/bed to chair transfers, and wheelchair mobility. Review of the care plan initiated 07/16/22 and revised 08/25/25 for Resident #43 revealed Resident #43 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to check for incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the facility assessment, the facility did not ensure staffing levels were sufficient to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable well-being of the residents. This affected four current Residents (#26, #34, #40, and #43) and one former resident (#84) of five residents reviewed for sufficient staffing and had potential to affect an additional 79 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/28/18 with medical diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia affecting left side, aphasia (difficulty speaking), type two diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia and adjustment disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26's cognition was moderately intact. Resident #26 was dependent on staff for toilet hygiene and did not attempt to transfer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices while providing care to Resident #40 who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected one resident (Resident #40) of one resident observed for EBP and had the potential to affect an additional 41 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #6, #7, #8, #11, #15, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #26, #27, #28, #29, #31, #34, #35, #36, #39, #41, #43, #44, #46, #51, #55, #56, #59, #60, #61, #66, #75, #76, #77, #78, #81, and #83) who resided on the upper floor. The facility identified 19 residents (Resident #10, #11, #14, #17, #18, #20, #38, #39, #40, #45, #50, #53, #54, #56, #60, #66, #73, #74, and #75) as requiring EBP. The facility census was 83. Findings include:Record review for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 04/12/24. Diagnoses included unspecified hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side and spinal stenosis of the cervical region. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure timely notification to the physician when Resident #67 displayed a change of condition from his baseline. This affected one resident ( Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Record review for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 09/10/25 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the colon, malignant neoplasm of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct, neoplasm related pain, and encounter for palliative care. Resident #67 was admitted to hospice for malignant neoplasm of the colon per physician order dated 09/24/25. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of Resident #67's plan of care, date revised 10/01/25, revealed Resident #67 had a diagnosis of depression. Interventions included arrange for psychiatry consult and follow up as needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14 was free of sexual abuse from another resident (Resident #86). This affected one (Resident #14) of three residents reviewed for sexual abuse. The facility census was 93. Findings include:Review of the medial record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 07/03/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right dominant side, chronic respiratory failure and paranoid schizophrenia (condition that includes paranoia, delusions and hallucinations).Review of Resident #14's care plan revealed it was originally dated 07/03/23. There were no updates to her care plan noted after 09/16/25. She was noted to have a communication problem and self-care deficit both related to impaired cognition.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had highly impaired vision, highly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of staffing schedules and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents currently residing in the facility. The census was 87.Findings include: Review of the nursing staff information and staff schedules for 06/28/25 and 07/04/26 revealed no RNs were present working in the facility during those days.On 08/13/25 at 3:15 P.M., interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) #890 verified the facility did not have an RN on duty on 06/28/25 and 07/04/26.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00161573 (1254625), Complaint Number OH00164532 (1254632), and Complaint Number OH00166711 (1254468).
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and safe environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87.Findings included:Observation during an environmental tour conducted on 08/06/25 between 1:00 P.M. and 1:55 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #748 revealed carpeted areas throughout resident rooms and common areas were noted with stains and debris, the room occupied by Resident #59 had a two-inch long hole in the wall, the air conditioning cover in Resident #124's room was dislodged and on the floor, the wall trim on the bathroom door in Resident #31's room was half secured to the wall, the outlet for the telephone line in Resident #25's room was broken in half, the supplemental tube feeding poles used by Resident #19 and Resident #72 had residual dried tube feed on the pole and base, the private bathroom used by Resident #33 had multiple brown stains on the tub floor, the pillowcases and blankets on Resident #27's bed were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to revise the care plans as required and failed to ensure resident care planning conference were held as required. This affected four (#72, #25, #29, and #59) of seven residents reviewed for care plans and care planning conferences. The facility census was 87. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side after a stroke, aphasia (the inability to speak) after a stroke, osteomyelitis of vertebrae of the sacral and sacrococcygeal region, diabetes, high blood pressure, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and Alzheimer's disease with early onset.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was rarely/never understood, was dependent on staff for all aspects of care, had a Stage IV pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure outdated drinks and food and beverage additives were stored in a manner to prevent spoilage. This had the potential to affect four ( #3, #28, #70, and #77) of four residents identified by the facility as receiving on thickened liquids. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Observation during a tour of the facility on 08/06/25 from 8:40 A.M. to 9:35 A.M. revealed two 46 ounce containers of nectar thickened orange juice were found in the [NAME] panties on the units. There was no date written on them to show when they had been opened. The use by date was June 2025. Further observation revealed eight individual thick and easy instant food and beverage thickener packets with a use by date of 10/29/23 found in the [NAME] pantries. On 08/06/25 at 9:41 A.M., Regional Director of Clinical Operations #808 verified the two containers of outdated nectar thickened orange juice and the eight outdated thick and easy instant food and beverage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This affected five (#1, #6, #30, #105, and #112) of 33 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis, malignant neoplasm of left kidney, end stage renal disease, and dependance on renal dialysis. Review of the hospital admission referral packet dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was an end stage renal disease patient on a dialysis regimen with a Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday schedule. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment, required hemodialysis, and required maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, showers, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the physician orders for [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had orders for atorvastatin calcium 10 milligrams (mg), donepezil five (5) mg,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a dignified dining experience. This affected two (#25 and #95) out of three reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/18/24 and diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with proliferative diabetic retinopathy with traction retinal detachment involving the macula, bilateral, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and depression.Review of Resident #95's care plan revised 04/16/25 included Resident #95 had a self care deficit related to weakness, ESRD with hemodialysis, blindness to both eyes and limited mobility. Resident #95 would maintain the highest level of independence possible through the review date. Interventions included to provide eating set up and supervision.Observation on 08/05/25 at 8:44 A.M. of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, review of an invoice, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bed was appropriate to accommodate his height and weight and failed to ensure call lights were within reach for resident use. This affected three (#76, #44, and #95) out of seven residents reviewed for appropriate accommodation of needs. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/22/24 and diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and pain. Review of Resident #76's height dated 02/22/24 revealed he was 81.0 inches (six (6) feet nine (9) inches) tall. Review of Resident #76's care plan dated 03/06/24 included Resident #76 had an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to muscle spasms, muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis. Resident #76 would remain free of complications related to fracture, such as contracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's family or responsible party were notified of changes in condition. This affected one (#6) of two residents reviewed for change in condition. The census was 87.Findings include:Record review for Resident #6 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, diabetes mellitus II and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Review of Resident #6's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a nurse note dated 02/14/25 at 6:57 P.M. that Resident #6 was ordered to be sent to the hospital. There was no indication the family was notified. Further review revealed a note dated 02/19/25 at 4:10 P.M. that Resident #6 returned to the facility. There is no indication the family was notified.Review of Resident #6's EMR revealed a nurse note dated 02/26/25 at 2:29 P.M. that Resident #6 was ordered to be sent to the hospital. There was no indication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Notices of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNCs) were provided to Medicare Part A beneficiaries prior to the discontinuation of skilled services in a timely manner. This deficient practice affected two (#110 and #111) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 87. Findings included:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included alcohol abuse, metabolic disorder, and high blood pressure.Review of the NOMNC presented to and signed by Resident #110 on 05/08/25 revealed the notice indicated his skilled physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy services would end on 05/08/25. This provided no advance notice.2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a right femur fracture, type II diabetes, and high blood pressure.Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of self-reported incidents, review of discharge notices, and review of a policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to return to the facility following a hospitalization and failed to ensure documentation of the need for discharge was reflected in the medical record to establish the need for discharge from the facility. This affected three residents (#18, #26 and #89) out of five residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson’s disease, borderline intellectual functioning, and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired and required the assistance of one staff member for completing activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the discharge notice issued on 07/31/25 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of an Ombudsman notification log, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalizations as required. This affected three (#6, #17, and #24) of five residents reviewed for discharges. The census was 87. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #6 revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, diabetes mellitus II, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) from 01/11/25 to present revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the EMR revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 03/07/25. Resident #6 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the EMR revealed Resident #6 was sent to the hospital 06/10/25 and returned 06/12/25. Review of the Ombudsman Notification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was conducted for Resident #64 following a significant change as required. This affected one (#64) of one residents reviewed for hospice services. The census was 87.Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, seizures, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of the hospice revocation form signed by Resident #64 on 04/24/24 revealed hospice services would be discontinued on 04/25/24 due to the resident's health improving and no longer meeting criteria to receive hospice services. Further review of Resident #64's medical record revealed the resident experienced a medical decline in 04/25/24 and was again receiving hospice services.Review of the MDS assessments for Resident #64 revealed no significant change assessment was completed following the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the appropriate state agency, the Ohio Department of Mental Health (ODMH), of a significant change in a resident's mental health condition, as required. This deficient practice affected one (#38) of two residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR). The facility census was 87.Findings included:Medical record review revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia of the left side and aphasia.Review of the most recent psychiatric consult note dated 08/11/25 revealed Resident #38 had diagnoses of delusional disorder, dementia, and major depressive disorder. These diagnoses reflected onset dates of 06/29/23 and 07/02/23 respectively, as documented throughout the medical record.Review of PASRR records for Resident #38 revealed a PASRR was completed during the initial admission on [DATE]. No additional PASRR evaluations were completed during the resident's stay to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an initial baseline care plan was initiated within 48 hours of admission as required. This affected one (#105) of four residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 87.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, end stage renal disease dependent on hemodialysis, diabetes, a stroke, and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. The resident was admitted to hospice on [DATE] with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease after refusing to attend any further dialysis treatments. Resident #105 died on [DATE]. Review of Resident #105's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required dialysis treatments three times a week. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #105…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident finger nail care was provided in an adequate manner. This affected one (#29) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/21/21 and a re-entry date of 08/15/22. Resident #29's diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, anxiety disorder, and embolism and thrombosis of unspecified parts of the aorta. Review of Resident #29's care plan revised 03/25/25 included Resident #29 was resistive to care related to dementia and refused personal hygiene care and ADL management including showers. Resident #29 would cooperate with care through the next review date. Interventions included to give a clear explanation of all care activities prior to and as they occurred during each contact; if possible negotiate a time for ADLs so Resident #29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to initiated orders timely and timely implement interventions for treatment of edema. This affected one (#88) of two residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 87. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute upper respiratory infection, and shortness of breath (SOB).Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 was cognitively intact. She required partial to moderate assistance for toileting, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. She required substantial to maximal assistance to shower, for lower body dressing, and donning and doffing footwear.Review of the current care plan for Resident #88 revealed a focus area of edema to bilateral lower extremities with interventions to apply ACE (compression)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's unstageable pressure ulcer to the coccyx was accurately identified and treated timely. This affected one (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/14/25 and diagnoses included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and unspecified intellectual abilities.Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #31 required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and bathing. Resident #31 required partial to moderate assistance for dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #31 had an indwelling catheter and was occasionally incontinent of bowel. Resident #31 did not reject care during the seven-day assessment look-back period.Review of Resident #31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of fall investigations, review of an incident log, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure thorough fall investigations were completed, resident care plans were revised to reflect current fall interventions, and fall interventions were in place as ordered. This affected three (#20, #24, and #25) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/03/23 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic respiratory failure, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was assessed by staff as severely cognitively impaired. The resident had a functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) to both sides of the upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with timely incontinence care. This affected two (#5 and #77) of four residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The census was 87. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/19/22 and diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and type two diabetes mellitus without complications.Review of Resident #5's care plan revised 06/19/24 included Resident #5 had bowel and bladder incontinence related to decreased mobility, use of diuretic therapy, and cognitive impairment. Resident #5 would establish an individual bowel and bladder routine. Interventions included bowel protocol as ordered; briefs, depends or pantiliners when out of bed; check for incontinence every two hours and as needed; and toileting per request and as needed.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident oxygen tanks were stored in a secured manner. This affected three (#57, #75, and #30) of 45 residents who resided on the first floor of the facility. The facility census was 87.Findings include: 1. On 08/06/25 at 1:25 P.M., observation with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #748 revealed one free standing oxygen tank not properly chained or supported in a proper cylinder stand or cart in Resident #57's room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 08/07/25 at 12:34 P.M., observation made during the tour of the facility with MS #748 revealed one free standing oxygen tank not properly chained or supported in a proper cylinder stand or cart in Resident #75's room.3. On 08/07/25 at 12:54 P.M., observation made during the tour of the facility with the MS #748 revealed one free standing oxygen tank not properly chained or supported in a proper cylinder stand or cart in Resident #30's room.Interview with MS #748 verified the unsecured oxygen tanks in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic medication was administered as ordered. This affected one (#102) of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The census was 87.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 05/01/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the left lower limb, pain in the left and right legs, anxiety disorder, and glaucoma. The resident discharged against medical advice (AMA) to an independent living facility on 07/22/25. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/08/25, revealed Resident #102 had intact cognition. The resident required supervision or touching assistance for dressing and mobility, used a walker and a wheelchair, and was occasionally incontinent.Review of Resident #102's physician orders for June 2025 revealed the resident was ordered a urinary analysis (UA) collection one time only for possible urinary tract infection (UTI) on 06/07/25 at 8:00 P.M.; the medication to treat UTI symptoms Pyridium oral tablet 100 milligrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory values as ordered and failed to notify the physician of laboratory results as required. This affected one (#59) of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The census was 87.Findings include:Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/20/17 and a re-entry date of 04/10/25. Resident #59's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side.Review of Resident #59's care plan dated 11/05/24 included Resident #59 had a suprapubic catheter related to obstructive uropathy diagnosis. Resident #59 would remain free from catheter related trauma through the review date. Interventions included to monitor, record, and report to the physician signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection such as pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness etcetera; and monitor for signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized when providing care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions and failed to handle contaminated items in a safe manner. This affected one (#95) of two residents observed for infection control precautions. The facility census was 87.Findings include: Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/18/24 and diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with proliferative diabetic retinopathy with traction retinal detachment involving the macula, bilateral, end stage renal disease, and depression.Review of Resident #95's care plan revised 04/15/25 included Resident #95 required enhanced barrier precautions to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) related to hemodialysis. Resident #95's enhanced barrier precautions would be maintained through the review period. Interventions included to use disposable gowns and gloves during high contact care activities.Observation on 08/05/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure residents received COVID immunizations as requested. This affected three (#66, #86, and #55) of the eight residents reviewed for COVID immunizations. The census was 87. Findings include:1. Review of the COVID-19 vaccine informed consent form for Resident #66 revealed the form was reviewed verbally and was dated 10/28/24; however, the form did not specify if Resident #66 consented or refused the vaccine.Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed a COVID-19 vaccine had not been given since 05/23/23.2. Review of the COVID-19 vaccine informed consent form dated 02/20/24 for Resident #86 revealed verbal consent to receive the vaccine was provided by the power of attorney (POA). Review of the medical record revealed Resident #86 never received a COVID-19 vaccine.3. Review of the COVID-19 vaccine informed consent form dated 10/28/24 for Resident #55 revealed verbal consent to receive the vaccine was provided by the resident. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed a COVID-19 vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure side rails were securely attached and in place to prevent resident entrapment or other accidents. This deficient practice affected three (#50, #55, and #79) of 22 residents who utilized side rails for safety. The census was 87.Findings included:Observation during an environmental tour conducted on 08/06/25 between 1:00 P.M. and 1:55 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #748 revealed the side rails on the beds of Resident #50, Resident #55, and Resident #79 were not secure, were extremely loose, and were not tightly affixed to the sides of the beds.Interview with MS #748 at the time of discovery confirmed the side rails were loose and not securely attached to Resident #50, Resident #55, and Resident #79's beds.Review of the undated manufacturer's instructions for the bed rails utilized by Resident #50, Resident #55, and Resident #79 revealed after any adjustments, repair or service and before use, make sure all attaching hardware is tightened securely.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on closed record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to report an incident of neglect involving Resident #95 to the State Agency as required. This affected one resident (#95) of four residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #95's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 12/18/24 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, malnutrition and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of a social service progress note, dated 12/19/24, revealed Resident #95 admitted to the facility for short term rehabilitation services after a recent hospitalization. She was a full code status (advance directives) and her discharge plan was to return to her private residence where she lived alone. The note indicated Resident #95 received support from her brother. Resident #95 used a cane and a walker at home. The note indicated Resident #95 was a questionable historian who seemed confused. Review of Resident #95's care plan, initiated on 12/23/24 revealed the resident was identified to be a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident bathing preferences were honored. This affected four (Residents #21, #29, #34, and #58) of six residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility also failed to ensure residents preferences regarding transfer in and out of bed were honored. This affected two (Residents #21 and #65) of six residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 91 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. Review of the care plan for Resident #21 dated [DATE] the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions included the following: provide assistance by staff with bathing/showering two times a week and as necessary, provide assistance by staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to offer/provide timely incontinence care. This affected two (Residents #16 and #65) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 91 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 11/19/15 with a readmission date of 05/14/21 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and Alzheimer disease with late onset. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #16 dated 04/23/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, had impairment to one side upper and lower extremity, used a wheelchair, required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, was dependent with transfers, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan for Resident #16 dated 04/25/23 revealed the resident had bowel and bladder incontinence related to dementia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer medications to Resident #52 without verifying that he ingested all the medications. This affected one resident (#52) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 05/02/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, asthma, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the physician's order dated 05/03/22 revealed an order to administer vitamin B12 (supplement)1000 micrograms (mcg) daily in the morning to Resident #52. There also was an order dated the same date that Resident #52 may not self-administer his medications. Review of physician's order dated 11/29/22 revealed an order to administer metoprolol succinate (antihypertensive) 25 milligrams (mg) in the morning, and multivitamin daily to Resident #52. Review of physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an open bottle of a controlled drug level two substance brought from home was handled properly to ensure accurate administration, failed to ensure accurate orders for a controlled drug level two substance were documented in Resident #84's medical record and failed to ensure verification of orders of a controlled drug level two substance with Resident #84's physician upon admission to the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #84) out of five reviewed for appropriate procedures followed for controlled drug level two substances. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung, secondary neoplasm of the brain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #84 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #84's Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, review of the facility assessment, review of facility policy and interviews with facility and hospital staff, the facility failed to ensure Resident #82 was allowed to return to the facility following a hospitalization for a psychiatric evaluation. This affected one resident (#82) of three residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 06/09/23 and diagnoses including schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, and cirrhosis of the liver. Resident #82 was his own responsible party and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] for a psychological evaluation after displaying aggressive behaviors towards staff on 08/22/23. Resident #82's payer source was Medicaid. Review of Resident #82's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/22/23, revealed Resident #82 had intact cognition. The assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of Resident Council minutes, the facility did not ensure foods were discarded prior to spoilage, foods were free from ice buildup in the freezer, and scoops were stored outside of bulk food bins. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#28 and #71) that received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation on 05/21/23 from 8:14 A.M. to 8:45 A.M., initial tour of the kitchen revealed a large white bin labeled puree thickener with two Styrofoam cups inside, six containers of molded strawberries in the walk-in refrigerator, ice buildup on two boxes of sliced pepperoni in the walk-in freezer, and 12 bowls of cut fruit (dated 05/17/23) on the tray line for breakfast service that contained molded fruit. On 05/21/23 at 8:32 A.M., interview with Dietary Aide #552 verified there were two Styrofoam cups inside the bin of puree thickener and there were six containers of molded strawberries in the walk-in refrigerator. On 05/21/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed accurately. This affected three residents (#26, #29, and #33) of 25 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 10/18/11. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, dysphagia, and aphasia. Review of the care plan dated 11/01/21 revealed Resident #26 had an activity of daily living (ADL) deficit related to hemiplegia, impaired balance, and limited mobility. Intervention included bilateral half side rails to bed for mobility and positioning. Review of the physician orders for Resident #26 revealed an order dated 12/06/22 for bilateral half side rails to bed for mobility and positioning. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for Resident #277. This affected one resident (#277) of three residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #277 revealed an admission date of 05/05/23. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, hypertension, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Review of the Nursing - admission Care Plan - V 3 dated 05/08/23 revealed Resident #277 required transfer assist of one person. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #277 required extensive assistance of two people for transfers. Review of the care plan initiated 05/05/23 and revised 05/23/23 revealed Resident #277 had a plan of care for a Hoyer (mechanical) lift transfer with assist of two people (added 05/23/23) and a plan of care for a one person assist with transfers (added 05/05/23). On 05/23/23 at 8:12 A.M., interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Residents #5 and #56. This affected two residents (#5 and #56) of two residents who were reviewed with bilateral amputations. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/29/22. Diagnoses included acquired absence of right leg below the knee, acquired absence of left leg above the knee, peripheral vascular disease, and acute and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact, required extensive assist of two or more personnel for bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, and required total dependence of two or more personnel for transfers. Review of the progress notes for Resident #5 revealed a nursing note from 01/03/23 at 5:27 P.M. that revealed that resident was able to move all extremities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided adequate and timely assistance with activity of daily care to meet their total care needs. This affected three residents (#25, #61, and #277) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 03/07/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder, hemiplegia/hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for personal hygiene and bed mobility. Review of the shower sheets for April and May 2023 revealed Resident #25 received 14 showers during the two months. Staff had documented on the shower sheets six times indicating the resident needed toenails trimmed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered for Resident #329 and failed to maintain adeqauate infection control practices during wound care to prevent the spread of infection to the resident. This affected one resident (#329) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #329 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including closed fracture of left femur with routine healing, diabetes mellitus type two, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage three, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 04/25/23 revealed Resident #329 had pressure ulcers related to a left hip surgical incision line and immobility. Interventions included barrier cream as ordered; to encourage and assist to reposition with care rounds and as needed; to float heels while in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance to Resident #277 during a Hoyer (mechanical) lift transfer. This affected one resident (#277) of three residents reviewed for falls/accidents. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #277 revealed an admission date of 05/05/23. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, hypertension, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Review of the Nursing - admission Care Plan - V 3 dated 05/08/23 revealed Resident #277 required transfer assist of one person. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #277 required extensive assistance of two people for transfers. On 05/23/23 at 7:12 A.M., observation of Resident #277 revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #502 transferring Resident #277 using a Hoyer lift device. No other staff were present in the room at the start of the transfer. STNA #502…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document completed treatments provided for Residents #5 and #56. This affected two residents (#5 and #56) of two residents whose medical records were reviewed related to treatments. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/29/22. Diagnoses included acquired absence of right leg below the knee, acquired absence of left leg above the knee, peripheral vascular disease, and acute and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact, required extensive assist of two or more personnel for bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, and required total dependence of two or more personnel for transfers. Review of the care plan dated 12/30/22 revealed Resident #5 had a left above the knee and a right below the knee amputation. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided the hand splint for Resident #45 per his restorative program. This affected one out of one resident reviewed for restorative services. Findings include: Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (stroke) with right sided hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), schizophrenia, dementia, heart disease and kidney disease. A plan of care initiated on 02/02/18 indicated Resident #45 had an activity of daily living self-care deficit related to his disease process. The interventions included to provide a physical and occupational therapy evaluation and treatment per physician orders. Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated he was alert and oriented with intact cognition. A review of Resident #45's Restorative Rehabilitation Program Recommendation form dated 07/03/19 indicated staff were to apply Resident #45's hand splint to his right hand at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record accurately reflected medication administration for Resident #36, supplement intake for Resident #64, and use of an orthotic device for Resident #72. This affected three of 23 resident records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes and hypertension. Review of weights indicated Resident #64 weighed 283 pounds on 02/21/19 and 249.4 pounds on 05/17/19. A dietary progress note dated 05/20/19 indicated the resident was readmitted from the hospital on [DATE]. She had a significant weight loss over 30 day. The dietician added Boost Glucose Control 237 milliliters (ml) once daily and ordered weekly weights. Resident #64 had a physician order dated 05/24/19 for glucose control supplement two times a day, and staff were to record the percent (%) consumed. On 05/30/19, the supplement was increased to four times daily. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment for Resident #33 and Resident #28 and failed to complete a dressing change for Resident #72 in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination. This affected two of two residents reviewed for respiratory equipment and one of two residents reviewed for dressing changes. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 02/26/17 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels), Alzheimer's disease, and schizophrenia. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #33 required extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Observation of Resident #33's room on 08/19/19 at 9:30 A.M. revealed the breathing treatment/nebulizer mask was laying on the top dresser. The nebulizer mask was observed without any protective covering to prevent contamination. Interview and observation with License Practical Nurse (LPN) #9 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-08-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted nursing staff information was up to date as required. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Observation of the posted nursing staff information on 08/11/25 at 6:20 A.M. revealed the posting was dated 08/08/25, three days prior to the date of observation.Interview with the Administrator on 08/11/25 at 6:25 A.M. confirmed the nursing staff posting was not current.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$34,146 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-01-10
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-04-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE QUALITY CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROGRESSIVE INTERCHANGE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/31/2009 |
| FLANK REAL ESTATE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 29% | since 01/31/2009 |
| MIKE FLANK TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 21% | since 09/09/2022 |
| GREENBURG, STEVE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 27% | since 01/31/2009 |
| SHILLER, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/31/2009 |
| PROGRESSIVE QUALITY CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/31/2009 |
| AGARWAL, RAJESH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2011 |
| FLANK, EITAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/31/2009 |
| LESHER, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/21/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $431K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366394. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.