Burbank Parke Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 76.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.478 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to maintain skin integrity were implemented per the resident's care plan. This affected one (Resident #50) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypoxemia, severe dementia, delusional disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was rarely understood, was receiving hospice services, and was dependent for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #50's physician orders for September 2024 revealed an order dated 10/17/23 for soft elbow pads implemented daily for skin protection. Review of Resident #50's care plan revealed Resident #50 had actual or potential for alteration in skin integrity related to diagnoses and resistance to care. An intervention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented as required for Resident #65. This had the potential to affect ten residents (#55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, and #64) that resided on the same hall as Resident #65. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, angina pectoris, major depressive disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 was severely cognitively impaired and required maximal assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the physician's orders for July 2024 revealed Resident #65 did not have a urinary catheter. Review of the physician orders dated 07/22/24 revealed that Resident #65 was ordered one gram of ertapenem sodium (antibiotic) for extended spectrum beta-lactamase…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate hand hygiene and glove use when completing pressure ulcer treatments. This affected one of three residents (Resident #24) for pressure ulcer dressing changes. The census was 72. Findings Included: Review of the open medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date 03/13/23. Diagnoses included diabetes type 2 and Stage 4 pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss). Review of the physician orders for July 2024 revealed a treatment to cleanse sacrum with normal saline, apply collagen sheet to wound bed, Skin prep peri wound and cover with border gauze dressing. Observation of Resident #24's dressing change on 07/26/24 at 9:31 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #303 and State Tested Nurses Assistant (STNA) #366 revealed LPN #303 and STNA #366 both used hand sanitizer as they entered the room. LPN #303 setup the supplies needed for the dressing change. LPN #303 removed the old dressing and discarded the dressing and the gloves she was wearing. LPN #303…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred in a safe manner and in accordance with the plan of care in order to prevent injury. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for assistance with activities of living (ADLs). The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/26/21 with diagnoses included hemiplegia, cerebral infarction, aphasia, diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, intervertebral disc degeneration, major depressive disorder, and aftercare joint replacement surgery. Review of the physician order for Resident #10 dated 10/20/23 revealed the resident was a stand-pivot transfer with assistance of one staff using hemi-walker for transferring and could use a mechanical lift as needed every shift for transfers. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 01/18/24 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure cold, perishable food (milk) was maintained a proper temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents in the facility. Findings include: Interviews on 12/27/23 between 9:28 A.M. and 11:01 A.M. with Residents #34, #42, and #66 complained of the food temperatures of the meals when they received them in their rooms. Observation on 12/28/23 at 11:44 A.M. of tray line services for halls trays revealed three silver, open meal carts set up with meal trays that had pre-poured beverages including milk. Observation on 12/28/23 at 12:38 P.M. of the last tray served for the hall meal trays. At this time the test tray was preformed and revealed the beef stew and green beans very warm to hot and tasted very good. The pre -poured glass of milk tempted at 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview at this time with Dietary Manager (DM) #836 stated the milk should be colder. Reviewed policy Food Preparation and Service revised November 2022 revealed food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute, and serve food in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary nursing unit refrigerator and failed to ensure milk was stored safely to maintain proper temperature during meal service. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/28/23 between 8:16 A.M. and 8:28 A.M. of the nursing unit refrigerator on the 700 and 800 hall revealed in the freezer a large brownish frozen food splatter and in the refrigerator various food splatter and a black residue on the inside back wall. Interview at this time with Dietary Manager (DM) #836 verified the observations. 2. Observation on 12/28/23 at 8:38 A.M. of Registered Dietitian (RD) #805 passing breakfast trays on the 500 hall. Observed on the beverage care a gallon of opened milk sitting out on the cart. Interview at this time with RD #805 verified the observation and stated they take the milk out of the refrigerator on unit and it was usually out for about hour while meal trays were being passed. RD #805 stated then the milk was put right back into the refrigerator after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were complete and accurate. This finding affected four (Residents #15, #50, #51, and #64) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with anxiety disorder, depression and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #15's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/30/23 to admit to hospice services with a diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] under Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs did not reflect the resident was receiving hospice services. Interview on 12/27/23 at 4:44 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) MDS #801 confirmed Resident #15's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] did not reflect the resident's hospice services. 2. Review of Resident #15's medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate serving sizes were served for the pureed meal. This affected two residents (#3 and #39) but had the potential to affect all 10 residents (#1, #3, #9, #12, #19, #23, #36, #39, #47, and #55) residents who received pureed diet. The facility census was 66. Finding included: Review of menu and menu spreadsheet dated 12/28/23 revealed for the pureed meal was #6 scoop serving for the pureed beef stew, #16 scoop serving for the pureed green beans, and #30 scoop serving for the pureed biscuit. Observation on 12/28/23 at 11:44 A.M. of tray line service revealed grey handled scoops placed in each of the pureed beef stew, pureed green beans, and pureed biscuits. Observed at 11:57 A.M. of [NAME] #885 prepare a pureed meal using the gray handled scoop for each pureed item, one serving each, and placed on the tray on the second meal cart for hall trays. Observed at 12:04 P.M. [NAME] #885 prepare another pureed meal using the gray handled scoop for each pureed item, one serving each, and placed on tray on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's sacral pressure ulcer wound dressing was in place. This finding affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis, depression and anxiety. Review of Resident #15's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/17/23 to cleanse the area to the coccyx with normal saline, apply a collagen sheet to the wound bed, apply calcium alginate, apply skin prep to the peri wound and cover with a silicone super absorbent border foam dressing three times a week and as needed every Monday, Wednesday and Friday for wound care. Review of Resident #15's wound progress note dated 12/13/23 revealed the resident had a stage four full thickness coccyx pressure wound which measured 2.6 cm (centimeters) by 0.9 cm by 1.1 cm with 10% slough and 90% granulation tissue.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51's fall interventions were implemented according to the physician orders and care plans. This finding affected one (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #51's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/29/22 to keep the bed in the lowest height when in bed and an order dated 12/04/23 for a perimeter mattress to the bed for safety. Review of Resident #51's Fall Investigation form dated 11/21/23 revealed the State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) found the resident on the floor by the bed. The resident could not state what he was doing. The fall interventions listed included a non-skid floor mat at the bedside and a low bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAG HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $974K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH