Harding Pointe

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 47.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, review of water temperature logs, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurate and safe water management program to prevent the spread of legionella. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents.Findings include: Interview on 12/09/25 at 3:46 P.M. with Maintenance #146 confirmed the facility uses continuous water circulation to prevent growth of legionella. Maintenance #146 confirmed the hot water tanks are set between 110-120 degrees Fahrenheit and are checked quarterly to ensure water is set at a safe level. He confirmed the water tanks which supplied water to resident rooms were documented on the water temperature logs to read as follows: on 12/02/25 the water temperature in the tank read at 113 degrees Fahrenheit, on 08/11/25 at 115 degrees Fahrenheit, and on 06/06/25 at 114 degrees Fahrenheit.Observation on 12/09/25 at 3:50 P.M. of the hot water tanks supplying resident rooms with Maintenance #146 confirmed tanks were currently reading 108 degrees Fahrenheit and 110…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation the facility failed to ensure advanced directives located in resident records did not contain contradictory statuses. This affected four (Resident #3, Resident #28, Resident #5 and Resident #35) out of twenty residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, constipation, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, acute gastritis, persistent vegetative state, quadriplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, encephalopathy, and convulsions. Review of undated code status paperwork for Resident #5 revealed a standardized Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) form with the resident's name written at the top and Full Code CPR handwritten in the top right corner. A large X was placed over the comfort care text, creating conflicting documentation.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure vaccines were stored in a sanitary, safe and appropriate manner. This had the potential to affect 25 residents ( #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #10, #11, #16, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #32, #34, #37, #39, #40, #42, #43, #49, & #55) who consented to receive the SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccine. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Observation and interview conducted on 12/09/25 at 4:49 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Charge Nurse #136 revealed vaccines were stored in the front office refrigerator which was observed to not have a thermometer in the refrigerator. Numerous food items were observed in the same refrigerator, including cheese, tea, bologna, Pepsi, Dr. Pepper, root beer, and dressing packets (honey mustard, ranch, and sour cream). LPN #136 confirmed no thermometer was present in the refrigerator to ensure the correct temperature was maintained. Observation of the vaccines revealed the brand Comirnaty (COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA), lot number NH9993, expiration date 09/08/26. Four…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and a review of a facility policy, the facility failed to prepare the correct diet texture as ordered for the residents receiving pureed diets. This had the potential to affect six residents (Residents # 4, #7, #20, #25, #37, and #39) who were receiving pureed diet textures. The facility census was 48 residents. Findings include: Observation of the preparation of the pureed diet textures on 09/30/25 at 11:31 A.M. revealed after mechanically altering ham loaf to a pureed consistency, there were visible chunks, similar to the rind of the ham, in the pureed ham loaf. Observation of the mouthfeel of the pureed ham loaf on 09/30/25 at 11:31 A.M. revealed that there were chunks that were not uniformly smooth in the pureed ham loaf. An interview with Dietary [NAME] #114 on 09/30/25 at 11:31 A.M. confirmed that there were chunks, possibly from the ham rind that was not removed prior to the pureeing process, in the pureed ham loaf. Dietary [NAME] #114 revealed the correct texture for pureed diets would be a smooth uniform texture, similar to baby food.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide education and consent for the SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccine prior to administration. This affected four of six (Resident ##32, #28, #24 and #34) residents reviewed for immunizations. The census was 48.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/08/18. Diagnoses include other schizophrenia, bilateral age-related nuclear cataract, major depressive disorder recurrent severe without psychotic features, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia without mention of fluctuations, anxiety disorder, insomnia, dysphagia oral phase, obsessive-compulsive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, essential (primary) hypertension, unspecified asthma, chronic kidney disease and tachycardia. Review of Resident #32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 11/01/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. Review of Resident #32's immunization records…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a call light was maintained within reach for one resident (Residents #4) who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This affected two of seven sampled residents who were dependent on staff for ADLs. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 03/03/20 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and psychosis.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the assessment further revealed Resident #4 utilized a wheelchair, required maximum assistance with all Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), and required moderate assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure quarterly restraints assessments were completed for Resident #5. This affected one (Resident #5) out of one residents reviewed for restraint usage. The facility census was 48.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 08/01/05 with diagnoses including intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, constipation, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, acute gastritis, persistent vegetative state, quadriplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, encephalopathy, and convulsions.Review of the care plan dated 04/04/08 revealed Resident #5 required the use of a seat belt, shoulder harness, halo, and bilateral side rails. Restraints were required due to the diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Interventions included weekly skin assessments, releasing the belt every two hours for 15 minutes, quarterly and as-needed restraint assessments, and use of safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure consistent, timely investigation and availability of records reviewed for a death for Resident #52. The facility also failed to maintain required routine checks for Resident #34. This affected two of two residents (Resident #52 and #34). The census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed admission date of [DATE]. Resident #52 expired in the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses include paranoid schizophrenia, changes in bilateral retinal vascular appearance, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere unspecified severity with mood disturbance, major depressive disorder recurrent, elevated prostate specific antigen, abnormal results of liver function studies, essential (primary) hypertension, Type II Diabetes Mellitus without complications, gastro- esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, mixed hyperlipidemia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed ensure bilateral lower extremities braces were applied and documented. This affected one (Resident #5) out of one resident reviewed for receiving a functional maintenance programming. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 08/01/05 with diagnoses including intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, constipation, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, acute gastritis, persistent vegetative state, quadriplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, encephalopathy, and convulsions.Review of the care plan dated 04/16/25 revealed Resident #5 requires braces to the ankles/feet related to dysfunction and a diagnosis of quadriplegia. Interventions included applying and removing splints/braces per schedule.Review of the physician order dated 01/27/24 revealed bilateral ankle/foot braces to be applied for four hours in the morning and four hours in the evening as tolerated. The braces were ordered to prevent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review review, the facility failed to identify post traumatic stress disorder triggers for Resident #9 and #34. This effected two residents of two residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility's census was 48.Findings include: 1.Record review for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) generalized anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require self-care assistance due to impaired safety awareness and limited endurance. Review of the care plan of Resident #9 revealed he had a diagnosis of chronic PTSD related to a history of sexual abuse. Interventions were initiated on 07/31/24 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAG HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $665K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH