Marion Pointe

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 40.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly store, label, and date food in the kitchen. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 38. Observation on 12/08/25 at 8:01 A.M. of the dry storage revealed a bag of oats and honey granola that was opened and undated, a bag of pasta noodles that was opened and undated, and a loaf of bread that was opened and undated. Interview on 12/08/25 at 8:03 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #242 verified the granola, pasta, and bread had been opened and was not dated. Observation on 12/08/25 at 8:04 A.M. of reach in refrigerator #1 revealed the inside of the refrigerator was coated in unidentifiable liquids and food crumbs. Inside of refrigerator #1 was a bottle of barbeque sauce that was opened and undated, a bag of mozzarella that was opened and undated, a bottle of cranberry juice that was opened and undated, and a bottle of thickened apple and orange juice that were both opened and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a clear advanced directive, and failed to ensure the advanced directive in the electronic medical record (EMR) and in the paper chart matched. This affected one Resident (#41) of 38 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 38. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/25/24. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, major depressive disorder, and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #41's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #41's care plan with a last revision date of 09/04/25 revealed Resident #41 and or the responsible party had chosen for Resident #41 to be a full code with interventions including to call emergency services for emergency help, if needed, offer information and discuss the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the temperature inside of the facility remained between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (DF). This affected three residents (#9, #10, and #33) of seven residents reviewed for facility temperature. The facility census was 38. Observation on 12/10/25 at 2:32 P.M. of the 200 hallway revealed it felt cold in the facility.Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 08/10/23. Diagnoses included epilepsy, dementia with mood disturbances, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had moderately impaired cognition. Furthermore, Resident #9 was dependent for toilet hygiene, personal hygiene, and shower hygiene.Interview on 12/10/25 at 2:40 P.M. with Resident #9 revealed he felt it was cold in his bedroom. Concurrent interview with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #214…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to comprehensively treat residents after a fall. This deficient practice affected one (Resident #27) of three resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 38.Review of Resident #27 medical record revealed an admission date of 5/21/25 and medical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with late onset, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia with moderate mood disturbance and agitation, anxiety, psychotic disorder with delusions, glaucoma, hypertension, muscle weakness, abnormal gait and mobility, repeated falls, and personal injury in unspecified motor-vehicle accident.Review of Resident #27 Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was at risk for falls. Review of Resident #27 care plan last updated 12/9/25 revealed a risk for fall related to confusion related to the dementia process, impaired balance, impaired mobility, non-compliance with mobility aide,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to properly store medication in a safe manor. This affected one (#15) resident reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 38. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, chronic kidney disease, and dementia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) on 09/25/25 revealed Resident #15 had impaired cognition. Resident #15 required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan dated 07/21/25 revealed Resident #15 prefers to provide his own personal care and is resistant to staff assistance and refuses assistance when offered. Interventions included assisting with functional abilities as requested. Review of the Self Medication Program Assessment of Skills dated 09/30/25 revealed Resident #15 presents a danger to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct portions during meal service and further failed to ensure liquids were thickened per the physician's orders. This affected three (#37, #38 and #18) of three residents revealed for diets to meet the resident needs. The facility census was 38. 1. Review of Resident #37 ' s medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/17. Diagnoses included esophageal varices without bleeding, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, and functional dyspepsia. Review of Resident #37 ' s physician orders revealed a diet order for a regular diet, pureed texture, with thin liquids. Review of Resident #37 ' s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 required a mechanically altered diet. Review of Resident #37 ' s care plan dated 10/10/25 revealed Resident #37 had an altered nutritional status as evidenced by the need for a mechanically altered diet with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This affected one (#15) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 38. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, chronic kidney disease, and dementia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) on 09/25/25 revealed Resident #15 had impaired cognition. Resident #15 required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs)Review of the care plan dated 07/21/25 revealed Resident #15 prefers to provide his own personal care and is resistant to staff assistance and refuses assistance when offered. Interventions included assisting with functional abilities as requested. Review of the Self Medication Program Assessment of Skills dated 09/30/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents who receive food from the facility. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Observation on 09/03/25 from 8:45 A.M. to 8:50 P.M. of the kitchen dry storage area revealed one case of fudge rounds stored on the floor and four plastic grocery bags containing fruit-flavored cereal on the floor. Observation of the reach-in freezer revealed seven bags of unidentified product open and not dated.Interview on 09/03/25 at 8:47 A.M. with Dietary Staff (DS) #242 revealed the unidentified products in the reach-in freezer were fried chicken, chicken patties, chicken cordon bleu, sausage patties, hamburger patties, diced chicken, and vegetables. DS #242 verified the bags were not labeled or dated when opened and verified the case of fudge rounds and the four bags of cereal were on the floor.Review of the undated policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revealed food in designated dry storage areas are raised off the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities per their interests. This affected one (#38) of one residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 08/26/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to senile degeneration of the brain, type two diabetes, other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, visual hallucinations, major depressive disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty walking, abnormal posture, schizoaffective disorder, mixed obsessional thoughts and acts, and anxiety disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident's activity preferences included it was very important to the resident to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read, be around animals such as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a dependent resident. This affected one (#11) of four residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 09/25/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, vascular dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment and was assessed as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #11's current care plan revealed a focus area for alteration in urinary elimination related to urinary incontinence. Interventions included to check the resident every two hours and assist with toileting as needed. Observation on 09/04/25 from 3:10 P.M. to 4:15 P.M. revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAG HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $455K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH