Union City Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 71% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 33.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served and handled in a manner to prevent contamination. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 38.Findings include:1. Observation on 05/06/26 at 11:40 A.M. revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #244 wore gloves to scoop up pasta shells and green beans. DM #244, while wearing the same gloves she touched serving utensils and plates with, picked up a slice of garlic toast with the gloved hand and put it on the lunch plates. Interview on 05/06/26 at 11:59 A.M. with DM #244 confirmed she should have used kitchen tongs to pick up the bread slices and place on the plate rather than the gloved hands she used to touch serving utensils and plates. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure, generalized muscle weakness, contracture, dysphasia, major depressive disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident representative interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care conferences were conducted. This affected four residents (#3, #7, #9, and #22) out of twelve residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 38.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, repeated falls, cognitive communication deficit, generalized weakness, Type II diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact, required set-up assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs), and touch assistance for transfers. Record review of care plan conferences revealed the facility held a care conference for Resident #7 on 04/30/25. The next documented care conference was on 03/18/26. Interview on 05/05/26 at 1:45 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of resident personal needs accounts and receipts, the facility failed maintain an accurate accounting of resident funds. This affected three (#6, #10, and #8) of three residents reviewed for resident personal funds accounts. The facility census was 38. Findings include:1. Medical record review for Resident #6 revealed an admission dated of 01/09/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 revealed the resident was assessed with intact cognition and required set up assistance for eating and bed mobility, and moderate assistance for toileting and transfers. Review of the facility's petty cash receipts for Resident #6 revealed a transaction from the resident needs fund, dated 03/13/26 for $5.71. Further review of the receipts revealed the resident's initials and staff initials were of similar handwriting. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of significant weight loss. This affected one (#20) out of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 38.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 02/12/19 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and heart failure.Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/25/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required partial/moderate staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers, was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, and required set-up assistance with eating. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #20 had a significant weight loss and was not on a physician prescribed weight loss program. Review of Resident #20's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/10/24 for weekly weights and an order dated 12/11/25 for a no added salt, carbohydrate-controlled diet, with regular texture and thin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary and a recapitulation of stay upon resident discharge. This affected two (#41 and #44) residents out of three reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 38.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 05/12/25 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, delusional disorders, hypertension, and unspecified psychosis. Resident #41 transferred to another nursing facility on 02/03/26. Review of Resident #41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/20/25, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was independent with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and bathing. Review of Resident #41's nursing note dated 01/14/26 at 1:51 P.M. revealed a care conference was held with the resident's Guardian via telephone. The note revealed and update was provided on transfer status,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans to address resident needs. This affected two (#31 and #35) residents out of twelve residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 38.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 08/23/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and major depression.Review of Resident #31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/05/26, revealed the resident was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, was independent with bed mobility and transfers, required supervision with toilet hygiene, and required partial/moderate staff assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #31's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/27/26 for Zoloft (antidepressant) 50 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth every evening for depression.Review of Resident #31's care plans revealed no documentation to support the facility developed a comprehensive person-centered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure referrals to specialized medical professionals to address impaired hearing were arranged as recommended. This affected one (#9) of one residents reviewed for hearing loss. The facility census was 38. Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 12/02/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #9 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #9 was coded with highly impaired hearing without hearing devices and was assessed as requiring set up assistance for eating and toileting, and was independent for bed mobility and transfer. Review of the plan of care for Resident #9 revealed the resident presented with a sensory impairment which may adversely affect…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, fall investigation document review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete neurological evaluations for residents following unwitnessed falls. This affected one (#1) resident out of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 38. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 10/08/13 with medical diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, Alzheimer's disease, and aortic aneurysm. Review of the Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/24/26, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, required substantial/maximum assistance for transfers and bed mobility with no ambulation noted, and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 sustained a fall with major injury. Review of Resident #1's fall investigation report dated 01/17/26 revealed the resident had an unwitnessed fall and was found on the floor on the side of the bed. The report revealed Resident #1 was unable to recall what happened and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure collaboration with a hospice provider for development and implementation of a resident's plan of care. This affected one (Resident #35) of one residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 38.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 03/06/26 with medical diagnoses of bipolar disease, schizophrenia, dementia, abnormal weight loss, and anxiety. Review of Resident #35's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/29/26, the resident was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, required supervision with transfers, bed mobility, and eating, and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #35 received hospice services. Review of Resident #35's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/24/26 to refer the resident to hospice. Further review revealed no other hospice orders. Review of Resident #35's nursing note dated 04/23/26 at 10:29 A.M. revealed a care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a manner to prevent contamination. This affected two ( #18 and #32) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 38.Findings include:1. Medical record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 06/03/24 with diagnoses included but not limited to severe bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18 dated 03/13/26 revealed the resident had intact cognition, required set up assistance for eating, and was independent with toileting, transfers, and bed mobility.Review of active physicians orders for Resident #18 revealed an order dated 12/15/24 for cholecalciferol tablet 1000 units with instructions to give one (1) tablet by mouth every day for vitamin supplement; an order dated 07/30/24 for docusate sodium oral capsule 100 milligrams (mg) with instructions to give 1 capsule by mouth daily for constipation; an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAG HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $349K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH