Jag Healthcare Mansfield
50 Blymyer Avenue, Mansfield, OH 44903 · For profit - Corporation · 66 certified beds · (419) 774-5100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $130,240 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-15)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.0% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.0%CMS range 33.1–62.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.5–13.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.3–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 60.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility billing records, emails, invoices and past due notices, review of bank statements, review of the facility assessment, Nursing Home admission Agreement, facility policy and procedures, and interviews with residents/family, staff, vendors, and company personnel, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid in a timely manner to prevent the actual and potential interruption in services and to meet the total care needs of all residents admitted to and/or retained in the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 04/01/24 when the identified lack of financial solvency placed all facility residents at risk for serious harm, injury, hospitalization, displacement due to the actual and potential interruption in utility and/or outside service providers. Financial concerns were identified and included, but were not limited to delinquent balances owed to the water company…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, review of the Facility Assessment (FA) and review of staffing reports, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to meet resident needs as identified in the FA. This had the potential to affect all 57 residents in the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Interview with Resident #43 on 06/23/25 at 12:07 P.M. revealed the facility had several call offs over the weekend resulting in him not getting a shower. Observation on 06/23/25 at 12:07 P.M. revealed Resident #43 had body odor and oily hair. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 05/19/25. Diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus II, complete traumatic amputation at level between left hip and knee and right hip and knee, chronic kidney disease stage three and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #43 required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene and substantial/maximal assistance from staff for showers and bathing. Review of the functional abilities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-01 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to serve an appropriate amount of meat (protein) with the lunch meal. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Observation on 06/25/25 at 11:33 A.M. of the food service tray line revealed [NAME] #245 was serving residents meals. Observation revealed there were noodles in one pan and gravy with small chunks of beef in another pan. Observation revealed [NAME] #245 was placing the noodles with a four ounce scoop on each residents plate. The beef and gravy was served with a six ounce scoop. Observation revealed when [NAME] #245 placed the meat with gravy on each plate, some plates received one piece of stew meat, some had two and some had three pieces of meat. The pieces of meat varied in size from approximately one inch by one inch size pieces to 1/2 inch by 1/2 inch size pieces. [NAME] #245 confirmed the sizes of the pieces of meat and revealed, We are given two little bags of beef stew meat for all the residents. [NAME] #245 revealed the pieces of meat were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were disposed of and not stored with other food items used for resident meals. This had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: Observation on 06/23/25 at 8:10 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #236 revealed in walk in cooler labeled #1 there were two metal containers, one with a bulk amount of sliced ham with an expiration date of 06/11/25 that was opened and partially used. A second bag that was in the container had a bulk amount of sliced salami, partially used with an expiration date of 06/14/25. A third bag had a bulk amount of sliced roast beef, partially used with an expiration date of 06/14/25. The second metal container had a second bag of sliced ham unopened with an expiration date of 06/19/25. Observation of the dry food storage area revealed a large container of barbeque sauce with approximately 1/4 container left with an expiration date of 05/19/25. DM #236 verified all expired foods. Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-01 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting sign-in documentation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have required Quality Assessment and Assurance quarterly meetings with required members. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the QAA sign in sheets revealed the facility had no documentation of QAA meetings for the first, second, and third quarters of 2024. The facility allowed viewing of fourth quarter QAA meeting documentation for 12/17/24 but there was no sign-in sheet for required members. Further review of the QAA sign-in sheets revealed the facility had a QAA meeting on 01/31/25 not attended by the Medical Director and another meeting on 02/28/25 not attended by the Director of Nursing or Infection Preventionist. Interview on 07/01/25 at 8:53 A.M. with the Administrator verified the facility had no documentation of quarterly QAA meetings prior the fourth quarter of 2024. The Administrator revealed the building was under new ownership beginning 11/01/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 06/13/25. Diagnoses included chronic pain, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and narcissistic personality disorder. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a physician order dated 06/20/25 revealed the resident had orders for contact precautions due to bilateral lower extremities wound infection. Review of a wound assessment report dated 06/20/25 revealed the resident had bilateral lower extremity venous ulcers. Review of a physician order dated 06/21/25 revealed to cleanse the bilateral lower extremities with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply ammonium lactate lotion to both lower leg topically, apply non-adherent dressing then a dry dressing over wounds, cover with tubular elastic dressing and wrap with elastic bandage daily and as needed for venous ulcer wound care. Observation on 06/24/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents on psychotropic medications were monitored for effectiveness and adverse consequences. This affected five (#47, #51, #19, #161, and #1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility identified 52 residents receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 57. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 09/04/24. Diagnoses included depressive disorder, dementia, anxiety, mood disorder, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a physician order dated 03/28/25 revealed orders for Zyprexa (antipsychotic) 2.5 milligrams (mg), one tablet twice a day by mouth for bipolar depression. An order dated 05/03/25 for Sertraline (antidepressant) 50 mg, two tablets by mouth in morning for vascular dementia with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate. This affected four (#26, #6, #5, and #30) of 20 reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The facility census was 57. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 07/29/24. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, dementia, Parkinsonism, and Type two diabetes mellitus. Review of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level Two assessment determination dated 12/15/22 revealed the resident met PASRR inclusion criteria for serious mental illness with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Section A1500 revealed the resident was documented as not having a serious mental illness by the state level two PASRR process. Interview on 08/08/24 at 11:28 A.M., MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #208 revealed Resident #26 transferred to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 01/27/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, depressive disorder, dementia, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the plan of care last revised 06/24/25 revealed the resident had no individualized interventions in place for bipolar disorder. Interview on 06/30/25 at 9:54 A.M., LPN MDS Nurse #208 verified Resident #51's care plan lacked interventions for bipolar disorder. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/09/23. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the plan of care last revised 06/24/25 revealed the resident had no care plan in place with individualized interventions for schizoaffective disorder. Interview on 06/30/25 at 4:02…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper assistance with personal hygiene and grooming tasks. This affected three residents (#43, #45 and #47) of 28 (#1, #2, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #15, #18, #19, #22, #28, #30, #35, #40, #42, #46, #51, #52, #53, #54, #57, #110, #161, #162 and #164) residents who required assistance from staff for activities of daily living. The census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 05/19/25. Diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus II, complete traumatic amputation at level between left hip and knee and right hip and knee, chronic kidney disease stage three and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission revealed Resident #43 required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene and substantial/maximal assistance from staff for showers and bathing. Review of the functional abilities prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the water temperature logs, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures between 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 120 degrees F. This had the potential to affect all residents except eleven residents (#5, #7, #10, #16, #20, #32, #33, #36, #39, #162, and #163) who the facility identified as dependent for mobility. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the water temperature reading logs revealed on 02/11/25 the water temperature in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was 121.8 degrees F. On 04/14/25 the water temperature in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was 123.1 degrees F, the water temperature in the dining hall was 134.6 degrees F, and the water temperature in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was 123.8 degrees F. On 04/28/25 the water temperature in the activities room was 123.3 degrees F. On 05/14/25 the water temperature in the dining hall sink was 130.9 degrees F and in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] the water temperature was 122…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to puree food items to a smooth texture with no chunks of food remaining. This had the potential to affect four residents, Resident #8, #20, #34, and #160, identified by the facility as receiving a pureed only diet. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Observation on 06/25/25 at 10:41 A.M. of processing pureed foods with [NAME] #247 revealed [NAME] #247 placed mixed vegetables in the food processor to puree the vegetables. When completed, [NAME] #247 placed the pureed vegetables in a metal pan and confirmed the vegetables were completed and ready to place on the steam table to serve. Observation revealed several visible small chunks throughout the pureed vegetables. Taste of the pureed vegetables revealed the chunks were the texture of several pieces of skin from the mixed vegetables that did not puree. [NAME] #247 confirmed the chunks of food in the pureed vegetables and confirmed that she was going to serve the residents the prepared pureed vegetables. Phone interview on 06/26/25 at 9:39 A.M. with Speech Therapist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of service provider quotes, the facility failed to maintain the function of the wheelchair automatic push pad door openers for the facility front entrance double doors. This affected 14 residents (#1, #6, #8, #15, #17, #19, #27, #28, #30, #37, #40, #43, #45, and #53) identified by the facility as independent with wheelchair mobility. The facility census was 57. Findings include Observations on 06/24/25 at 7:40 A.M., on 06/25/25 at 7:50 A.M., on 06/26/25 at 7:41 A.M., and on 06/30/25 at 7:45 A.M. revealed the wheelchair accessible push pads used to open the facility front entrance set of double doors were not in working order. Further observation revealed there was a doorbell outside of the facility by the outer set of exterior doors. Interview on 06/30/25 at 7:45 A.M., the Administrator verified the push pad buttons to open each set of the double doors were not working. Interview on 06/30/25 at 8:35 A.M., the Director of Maintenance (DOM) #278 revealed the openers for front door push pads were at the end of its life. DOM #278 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident code status was consistent throughout the medical record. This affected two (#26 and #110) of 20 residents reviewed for code status. The facility census was 57. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, dementia, Parkinsonism, and Type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) face sheet revealed the resident's code status was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A). Further review of the EMR revealed no physician signed DNR form. Review of a physician order dated [DATE] revealed the resident's code status was DNRCC-A. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident/family had chosen a DNRCC-A order. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to assure missing items were investigated and followed up on for one resident, (Resident #32), of three residents reviewed for missing items. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Record review for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 01/13/23. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #32 was dependent for bed mobility, chair/bed chair transfers, and wheelchair mobility. Telephone interview on 06/24/25 at 10:07 A.M. with Resident #32's family member revealed Resident #32 was missing blankets, clothing items, and stuffed animals. Resident #32's family member revealed it had been a while, between a month or two but they did let the staff know. Resident #32's family member revealed they could not remember the staff names. Interview on 06/25/25 at 9:25 A.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for one, (Resident #160) of eight reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Record review for Resident #160 revealed an admission date of 05/28/25. Diagnoses included heart failure, absence of right and left leg below the knee, obesity, diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, and low back pain. Resident #160 received hospice services. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #160 revealed Resident #160 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #160 required partial/moderate assistants with eating and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing and bed mobility. Resident #160 had an indwelling catheter and was occasionally incontinent of bowel. Resident #160 occasionally had pain and received scheduled and as needed (PRN) pain medications. Resident #160 had shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, review of the facility policy and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program designed to meet the interest and care needs of one resident (#16) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/02/25. Diagnoses included acquired absence of left leg below the knee, major depressive disorder, Diabetes Mellitus II with hyperglycemia and acquired absence of right foot. Review of Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating Resident #16 was cognitively intact. Resident #16 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, lower body dressing, shower/bathing self and toileting. Review of Resident #16's care plan dated 04/07/25 revealed it did not have a care plan for activities. Interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 06/13/25. Diagnoses included chronic pain, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and narcissistic personality disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a wound assessment report dated 06/20/25 revealed the resident had bilateral lower extremity venous ulcers. Review of a physician order dated 06/21/25 revealed to cleanse the bilateral lower extremities with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply ammonium lactate lotion to both lower legs topically, apply non-adhering dressing then a dry dressing over wounds, cover with an elastic tubular bandage and then wrap with and outer elastic bandage daily and as needed for venous ulcer wound care. Observation on 06/23/25 at 12:30 P.M. revealed Resident #110 had elastic bandages covering his bilateral lower extremities from below the knees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter for one resident, Resident #160 was addressed timely to include a physical assessment and reinsertion when Resident #160 removed the catheter. The facility also failed to notify the primary care physician of the catheter and failed to notify the primary care physician and Hospice provider of the results of a urinalysis timely that resulted in bacterial growth requiring treatment of an antibiotic. This affected one resident, Resident #160 and had the potential to affect an additional seven residents, Resident #5, #26, #35, #36, #40, #43, and #50 identified by the facility as having indwelling catheters. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Record review for Resident #160 revealed an admission date of 05/28/25. Diagnoses included heart failure, Absence of right and left leg below the knee, obesity, diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, and low back pain. Resident #160 received hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident with significant weight loss received timely follow up and the physician was notified. This affected one, (#30) of two residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Record review for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD), unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, and Type Two Diabetes Mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact. Resident #30 had a weight loss of five percent (%) or more in the last month or loss of 10 % or more in the last six months. Review of the care plan for Resident #30 dated 05/07/25 revealed Resident #30 had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problems related to ESRD, dialysis, low serum albumin levels, overweight, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review for Resident #160 revealed an admission date of 05/28/25. Diagnosis included heart failure, obesity, and diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #160 revealed Resident #160 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #160 required partial/moderate assistants with eating and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing and bed mobility. Resident #160 had shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion and when lying flat. Review of the care plan for Resident #160 dated 06/23/25 revealed Resident #160 utilized oxygen therapy related to congestive heart failure, shortness of breath and asthma. Interventions included oxygen settings two to five liters as needed or SP02 less than 90%. Review of the physician orders for Resident #160 revealed an order dated 05/29/25 for oxygen two to five liters as needed for shortness of breath or SPO2 less than 90 %. Observation on 06/23/25 at 10:08 A.M. revealed Resident #160…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). Two errors occurred for 31 observed opportunities for an error rate of 6.45%. This affected two residents (#12 and #161) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. This had the potential to affect an additional 10 residents (#3, #8, #11, #14, #16, #27, #28, #30, #43, and #57) who received insulin via insulin pen. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/02/24. Diagnoses include Alzheimer's disease, altered mental status, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #12's physician orders revealed an order for Cosopt Ophthalmic Solution 2-0.5%. Instill one drop in both eyes two times a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 04/07/25 and a discharge date of 06/02/25. Diagnoses included pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the physician orders dated 04/08/25 revealed an order for Lasix 20 milligrams, one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema or greater than three-pound weight gain in 24 hours, weigh daily in the morning, if greater than three-pound weight gain, give the as needed Lasix. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 05/01/25 through 06/02/25 revealed Resident #56 was not weighed per physician orders on 05/01/25, 05/12/25, 05/13/25, 05/16/25, 05/17/25, 05/18/25, 05/20/25, 05/21/25, 05/22/25, 05/26/25, 05/27/25, and 05/30/25. Further review of the MAR revealed on 05/03/25 the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all required personal protective equipment was available and used for residents on contact precautions, failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions as required, and failed to ensure residents were screened for tuberculosis infection as required. This affected four (#10, #30, #50, and #60) of five residents reviewed for infection control practices. The census was 41. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses include osteomyelitis of the shoulder, bacteremia, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance , klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, pseudomonas, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, atrial fibrillation, and fusion of spine. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered influenza vaccinations annually as required. This affected one (#40) of five residents reviewed for influenza vaccinations. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, dementia, anemia, delusional disorder, auditory hallucinations, and complete traumatic amputation of the left lower leg at the knee level. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. The resident was coded to not receive the influenza vaccination as it was not offered and the pneumococcal vaccination was coded as up to date. Review of Resident #40's vaccination documentated revealed the resident's the last documented influenza vaccination was dated 10/14/22. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and facility staff interview, the facility failed to offer the vaccination or obtain documentation of residents' SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) vaccination status for three (#10, #30, and #50) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses include osteomyelitis of the shoulder, bacteremia, extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance (ESBL), klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, pseudomonas, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, atrial fibrillation, and fusion of the spine. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #10's vaccination documentation revealed there was no documented COVID-19 vaccinations, history of vaccinations, or declination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered to residents unopened and failed to ensure residents had access to a private working telephone. This affected 11 residents (#14, #15, #23, #24, #18, #30, #35, #39, #41, #52 and #55) and had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/01/24 at 8:10 A.M. of Business Office Manager (BOM) #831's desk revealed a stack of opened resident mail addressed and belonging to Resident #15, #18, #30, #35, #39, #41 and #55 who currently reside in the facility. Interview on 04/01/24 at 8:35 A.M. with BOM #831 revealed Chief Executive Officer (CEO) #805 had opened the resident mail. Interview on 04/01/24 at 4:50 P.M. with CEO #805 revealed he opened resident mail, but only Medicaid and Medicare mail because he thought that was allowed. He stated he would open the envelopes and place them on BOM #831's desk. He denied reading the mail addressed to residents and stated he only opened the mail. Review of the undated facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the facility assessment, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of staff to meet the total care needs of all residents due to a hostile work environment and insufficient funds to maintain staffing agency contracts. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 03/26/24 at 8:36 A.M. with Scheduler #821 revealed with the use of agency staff, there was enough nursing staff as of this date but the facility was not paying the staffing agency bills and they would no longer be able to use agency staff as of 04/01/24. Scheduler #821 indicated the facility did not have enough of their own employed nurses to cover open shifts from 04/01/24 to 04/30/24. Interview on 03/26/24 at 9:45 A.M. with Chief Executive Officer (CEO) #805 revealed the facility had cash flow problems. CEO #805 revealed the facility had enough State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) but relied on agency staffing for open nursing shifts. Interview on 03/26/24 at 10:39 A.M. with Former Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) served as a full-time director of nursing (DON). This had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) form from 12/01/23 to 12/31/23 revealed the previous DON worked 7.50 hours on 12/01/23 and 6.75 hours on 12/02/23. Interview on 03/26/24 at 7:38 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility was without a DON from 12/03/23 to 03/18/24 when another (interim) DON was brought into the building. The Administrator confirmed the RN staff currently working in the building did not want to take on the role as a full-time DON. Interview on 03/26/24 at 1:10 P.M. with the current Interim DON confirmed her first day worked in the facility was 03/18/24. Interview on 04/03/24 at 11:40 A.M. with the Interim DON revealed her last date of work in the facility was scheduled to be 04/18/24 and she requested her staffing agency to provide her with a new assignment. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0825 — widespreadProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech-language pathology and occupational therapy. This affected 19 residents (#3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #12, #13, #14, #19, #20, #23, #26, #30, #37, #44, #51, #55, #106, #107 and #108) and had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the master therapy list revealed 20 residents were currently on therapy caseload/services including Resident #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #12, #13, #14, #19, #20, #23, #26, #30, #37, #44, #51, #55, #106, #107 and #108. Review of an email from Therapy Credit Manager #847 from the facility contracted therapy department dated 03/28/24 at 1:53 P.M. revealed this vendor had not heard from anyone (from the facility) regarding payment or a plan to get current. On 04/01/24 at 1:50 P.M. an interview with Therapy Credit Manager #847 revealed the facility was outside their contracted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy review, administrator agreement review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 03/26/24 at 7:38 A.M. with the Administrator revealed she began her employment with the facility on 03/20/23. During the interview she indicated she did not handle any financial aspects of the facility. The Administrator indicated the facility was a non-profit facility with a Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) #805 was responsible for the financial aspect of the facility including paying vendors. Interview on 03/26/24 at 9:45 A.M. with CEO #805 revealed the facility had cash-flow problems and the facility was on payment plans with multiple vendors. CEO #805 stated he handled the financial aspect of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure continuous evaluations were in place to verify financial obligations were met as planned to prevent a potential disruption in resident care and services through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee. This had the potential to affect all 56 facility residents. Findings include: A telephone interview on 04/01/24 at 1:41 P.M. with the Medical Director revealed he was not aware of the facility in arrears in payments. He denied concerns with residents having enough supplies, food, medications, or resident care. The Medical Director confirmed he had a quarterly Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting the week prior and the facility did not bring up any issues with the inability to pay vendors. The Medical Director stated he was not involved in the financial side of the facility. Interview on 04/01/24 at 4:06 P.M. with Chief Executive Officer (CEO) #805 revealed the facility had a cash flow issue due to changes in management. CEO #805 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with quarterly statements of their resident trust fund account. This affected eighteen residents (#15, #17, #20, #28, #30, #31, #33, #35, #36, #39, #41, #43, #44, #46, #47, #51, #53, and #55) of eighteen residents with resident fund accounts. Findings include: Review of the Trust-Current Account Balance form (resident trust funds) dated 04/01/24 revealed eighteen residents including Resident #15, #17, #20, #28, #30, #31, #33, #35, #36, #39, #41, #43, #44, #46, #47, #51, #53, and #55 were not provided quarterly balance statements from their resident trust fund account. Interview on 04/0124 at 10:01 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed quarterly statements identifying the balance on resident trust fund accounts were not provided to the residents. When questioned, she could not state when the last quarterly statements were issued to the resident/resident representatives. On 04/11/24 from 9:02 A.M. to 9:05 A.M. interviews with Residents #31 and #48 denied receiving quarterly resident fund statements. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monies in a resident fund account were finalized and dispersed within 30 days as required. This affected seven residents (#92, #93, #94, #95, #96, #97 and #98) of 12 discharged residents who the facility managed a resident fund account. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #92's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/15/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, need for assistance with personal care and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #92's progress note dated 12/14/23 at 10:07 P.M. indicated the nurse called the hospital and the resident was admitted for sepsis. The resident did not return to the facility. Review of the Trust-Current Account Balance form (resident fund accounts) dated 04/01/24 revealed Resident #92 had a resident fund balance of $40.00. Interview on 04/01/24 at 12:05 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #831 confirmed Resident #92's trust fund monies were not returned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents admitted to the facility were provided a description of the requirements and procedures for establishing eligibility for Medicaid, including the right to request an assessment of resources as well as information concerning Medicare and Medicaid eligibility and coverage. This finding affected 41 residents (#2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #11, #14, #21, #27, #34, #35, #45, #48, #104, #109, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #117, #118, #119, #120, #121, #122, #123, #124, #125, #126, #127, #128, #129, #130, #131, #132 and #133) of 100 residents whose records were reviewed for admission documentation. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #2's admission documentation revealed the resident and/or representative did not sign the Consent to Treatment and Other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure initial comprehensive assessments were completed timely and as required. This affected seven residents (#3, #5, #11, #22, #45, #130 and #133) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, diabetes and hypertension. Review of Resident #3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the assessment was in progress. Interview on 04/01/24 at 8:10 A.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #831 confirmed Resident #3's comprehensive assessment was not completed timely. 2. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure with acute cortical necrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension. Review of Resident #5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed quarterly as required. This affected four residents (#13, #33, #90 and #126) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, other lack of coordination and diabetes. Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the comprehensive assessment was in progress. Interview on 04/01/24 at 8:10 A.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #831 confirmed Resident #13's comprehensive assessment was not completed timely. 2. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle wasting and major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #90's discharge summary included the reconciliation of the resident's medications upon discharge. This affected one resident (#90) of one resident record reviewed for discharge. Findings include: Review of Resident #90's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 02/16/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, heart failure and anemia. Review of Resident #90's progress note dated 11/24/23 at 8:59 P.M. revealed the resident arrived at the facility alert times two with confusion. Review of Resident #90's progress note dated 02/16/24 authored by Social Service Designee (SSD) #828 revealed the resident was discharged to an assisted living by the wife and son. Hospice was updated. Review of Resident #90's Discharge Plan of Care form (Discharge Summary) dated 02/16/24 revealed the resident's medications were not reconciled to include the resident's current medications as well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident #29 food items as ordered/planned. This affected one resident (#29) of three residents reviewed for dietary services. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anemia and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase. Review of Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #29's physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/12/23 for a regular diet, pureed texture, thin liquids with no straw. The resident also had a physician's order, dated 01/26/23 for ice cream with all meals. Review of Resident #29's Nutritional Risk Assessment 10/15/23 revealed the resident was on a mechanical soft/thin liquids diet and continued Hospice services. Ice cream was offered at every meal with three ounces of med pass four times a day to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review,the facility failed to ensure a comfortable hot water temperatures were maintained throughout the facility. This affected nine (#37, #14, #18, #26, #27, #35, #36, #45 and #46) out of 15 residents sampled for the physical environment. Facility census was 46. Findings include: Observation of the shower room, across from the nursing station on Unit #1 was completed on 12/21/23 at 7:34 A.M. at which time the hot water temperatures in the sink was tested at 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Maintenance Director #26 went into the shower room with the surveyor at 7:40 A.M. and the hot water would not get any higher that 80 degrees F. Maintenance Director #26 confirmed the facility has been having issues off and on with the hot water temperatures. Interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #41 on 12/21/23 at 7:32 A.M. revealed the hot water temperatures in the shower room and residents rooms on Unit #1 are all over the place, sometimes to hot and sometimes cold. Interview with STNA #101 on 12/21/23 at 8:45 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident Personal Needs account (PNA) and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a residents personal funds were conveyed within 30 days upon the death of a resident. This affected one (#94) of 24 residents (Resident #94), whom have PNA accounts set up with the facility. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the facility PNA accounts identified Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #94 expired in the facility on [DATE], with a balance of $70.00 in her account. The balance was not conveyed to Resident #94's family until the check was written for [DATE]. Interview with the Business Office Manager (BOM) #91 on [DATE] at 2:28 P.M. confirmed she thought the requirement was for 60 days and therefore the balance was late getting returned to Resident #94's estate.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed to accurately reflect the resident's status. This affected one (#19) of 12 residents sampled during the survey. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record identified admission to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnosis including anxiety, chronic pain, morbid obesity and bilateral lower leg lymphedema. Resident #19 is cognitively intact and able to answer all questions and make needs known. Review of Resident #19's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified sections C and D were not completed with the residents input. Section C of the MDS assesses for cognition and Section D assesses for resident mood and behavior. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #96 on 08/16/22 at 7:39 A.M. confirmed that she completes the MDS assessments for the residents. RN #96 confirmed sections C and D on Resident #19's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to attend care conferences and/or meetings regarding their care. This affected one (#19) of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 12/25/21. Resident #19 had medical diagnosis including anxiety, chronic pain, morbid obesity, lymphedema and chronic foot infections. Resident #19 was identified as being cognitively intact. Review of Resident #19's medical record identified a care conference was held on 02/02/22 at which time Resident #19 and her husband attended. The record identified no additional meetings were held until 07/14/22. The care plan meeting notes identified the facility staff participated (dietary, social services and nursing manager) in the meeting; however, Resident #19 and her husband did not. The notes identified no evidence Resident #19 and her husband were invited to participate in the meeting. Interview with Resident #19 on 08/15/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a residents wound care was completed as physician ordered. This affected one (#19) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 12/25/21. Resident #19 had medical diagnosis including anxiety, chronic pain, morbid obesity, lymphedema and chronic foot infections. Resident #19 was identified as cognitively intact. Review of Resident #19's medical record identified on 06/30/22 the physician ordered clean open, seeping areas to the right lower leg, apply non-stick protective dressing and wrap with kerlix, change daily and as needed. Interview with Resident #19 on 08/15/22 at 10:25 A.M. revealed she has open, draining lymphedema to her right calf area. Resident #19 identified nursing staff are not putting a dressing on the area as the physician ordered. Resident #19 identified some nurses will do the dressing and others say it should be open to air and they do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications when the facility administered medications outside of the physician ordered parameters. This affected two (#1 and #42) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 04/20/22 with medical diagnosis including; cirrhosis of the liver with ascites, low blood pressure (BP) and malnutrition. Resident #1 was receiving hospice care for end of life since 05/13/22. Review of Resident #1's medication regimen for the month of August 2022 revealed the resident was ordered Midodrine HCL five mg three times a day. Further review of orders revealed the Midodrine HCL five mg was to be held if the systolic blood pressure (BP) was above 100 and the diastolic BP was above 70 (systolic BP is identified as the top number and diastolic BP is identified as the bottom number). Review of Resident #1's medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and review of maintenance report, the facility failed to provide a safe homelike environment for all residents. This affected three (#11, #31 and #42) out of 43 resident rooms observed during the survey. The facility census is 43. Finding Include: Observation on 08/15/22 at 10:34 A.M. of Resident #11's room revealed the wall behind resident's bed had two large areas of paint pealed off the wall and multiply gouged marks, revealing drywall. Observation on 08/15/22 at 10:58 A.M. of Resident #31's room revealed the air condition vents broken and missing. Observation on 08/15/22 at 11:00 A.M. of Resident #42's room revealed the air condition vents were broke and missing. Interview and observation on 08/16/22 at 2:26 P.M. with Maintenance Director #100 revealed housekeeping and nursing staff are to fill out maintenance forms, when they see areas in the facility that needs repaired. Maintenance Director #100 verified the air condition vents were broken in Resident #31 and #42's room and the wall in Resident #11's room had gouged walls and peeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, review of a maintenance task list and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to ensure a resident's room did not have an infestation of flies. This affected one (#36) out of 12 sampled residents for pest control. The facility census was 43. Finding include: Review of Resident #36's medical record identified admission to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnosis including; dementia, liver cancer with metastasis, major depression and Alzheimer's disease. Resident #36 started hospice services starting on 08/11/22 for end of life care. Observations of Resident #36 on 08/15/22 at 10:56 A.M. The observation revealed approximately five flies crawling on Resident #36's blankets and bed. Observations of Resident #36 on 08/16/22 at 6:47 A.M., 8:12 A.M. and 8:23 A.M. Resident #36 room was observed with multiple flies on or near the bed. Observation of Resident #36 on 08/16/22 at 10:21 A.M. with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food service equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner and resident food items were dated and labeled. This affected 66 of 67 residents who receive food from the kitchen (Resident #17 received nothing by mouth). The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/25/19 at 8:40 A.M. revealed a white substance on Cereal #1, Cereal #2, Cereal #3 and Cereal #4's cereal dispensers as well as a brownish substance with a hardened clear drip on the tip of the thickened juice dispenser. Observation on 08/25/19 at 8:46 A.M. revealed a white substance around the outside of the hot water dispenser as well as a brownish substance around the outside of the coffee dispenser. Interview with Dietary Manager #149 on 08/25/19 at 9:02 A.M. verified the above findings. 2. Observation of the station one refrigerator on 08/27/19 at 12:58 P.M. revealed resident food items which included mashed potatoes, meatloaf, vegetable stew and ranch dressing. All of these items were neither labeled nor dated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to notify the physician timely when Resident #58's had new onset of swelling/edema. This affected one (#58) of one resident reviewed for edema. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/05/19. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, difficulty walking, right femur stress fracture, Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib) and high blood pressure (HTN). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/31/19, revealed the resident had impaired cognition, required total dependence on one staff for transfers and extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #58's hospital documentation from 06/30/19 through 07/02/19 revealed no documented evidence of edema or swelling to the residents lower extremities prior to admission at the facility. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated 07/05/19, revealed orders for Lasix (a diuretic medication) 20 milligrams (mg)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a wheelchair cushion clean and in good repair for one (Resident #13) of 20 residents reviewed for maintenance and cleanliness of resident equipment and supplies. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/09/19, revealed Resident #13 had a severe cognitive impairment. Observations on 08/26/19 at 8:14 A.M., 08/26/19 at 11:31 A.M. and 08/26/19 at 2:17 P.M. revealed Resident #13's wheelchair cushion was dirty with apparent stains and had an eight inch rip along the seam and exposing the cushion. Interview on 08/26/19 at 2:25 P.M. with State-Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #98 confirmed Resident #13's wheelchair cushion was dirty with apparent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of facility's Self-Reported Incident, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for one (Resident #22) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: major depressive disorder and a history of falling. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/02/19, revealed Resident #22 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #22 was receiving hospice services and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI), dated 08/17/19, revealed it was an allegation of physical abuse. Resident #34 informed State-Tested Nursing Aid (STNA) #215 around 6:30 A.M. on 08/17/19 that she had smacked Resident #22's hand and had spilled her water at dinner the previous night. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of facility's Self-Reported Incident, review of medical records and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse for one (Resident #22) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: major depressive disorder and a history of falling. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/02/19, revealed Resident #22 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #22 was receiving hospice services and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI), dated 08/17/19, revealed it was an allegation of physical abuse. Resident #34 informed State-Tested Nursing Aid (STNA) #215 around 6:30 A.M. on 08/17/19 that she had smacked Resident #22's hand and had spilled her water at dinner the previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and review of the medical record, the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two (Resident #11 and #20) of 20 residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. The census was 67. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #11 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia and dementia. Review of Resident #11's care plan, dated 07/10/18, revealed he had broken teeth related to poor oral hygiene. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/06/19, revealed he was cognitively intact. The MDS also stated that Resident #11 had no broken natural teeth. Interview and observation on 08/25/19 at 9:46 A.M. revealed Resident #11 stated he has had a broken tooth for a couple years. Observation of the resident's mouth revealed Resident #11's top left tooth was broken. Interview on 08/26/19 at 3:15 P.M. with MDS Coordinator #196 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, family interview, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to assess and monitor Resident's #40's ongoing scab to his nose. This affected one (#40) of one resident reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Record review for Resident #40 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anemia, dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/06/19, revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #40's skin assessments from 04/18/19 through 08/25/19 revealed no evidence of Resident #40's scab or picking at his scab. Observations on 08/25/19 at 1:28 P.M., 08/26/19 at 8:12 A.M., 08/26/19 at 10:09 A.M., 08/26/19 at 11:37 A.M., 08/26/19 at 2:30 P.M., and 08/27/19 at 11:09 A.M. revealed a pea-sized brown scab on the tip of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to re-assess Resident #36's pain after the discontinuation of a pain relieving medicated patch. This affected one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility identified 30 residents on a pain management program. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed a admission date of 09/18/18. Diagnoses included osteoporosis, difficulty walking, altered mental status, testicular pain and kidney stones. Review of the care plan, dated 06/05/19, revealed the resident had chronic neck pain with interventions to monitor, record and report complaints of pain and notify the physician if interventions were unsuccessful or if there was a significant change from the residents past experience of pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/25/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition and he had frequent pain. The MDS assessment, dated 08/19/19, revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintain infection control after personal care for three residents. This affected three (#40, #52 and #120) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility identified three residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/08/09 and the diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for indwelling urinary catheter care every shift. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/06/19, revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter. The resident's care revealed the indwelling catheter was in place due to diagnoses of obstructive uropathy with interventions for catheter care every shift per orders. An observation on 08/26/19 from 1:15 P.M. through 1:30 P.M. of perineal care and catheter care for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-08-28 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily staff postings were updated each day. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 08/25/19 at 2:37 P.M. revealed the daily staff posting was dated 08/23/19. Interview with Director of Nursing on 08/25/19 at 2:37 P.M. verified the daily staff posting was dated 08/23/19. During the interview, the DON stated that the daily staff postings for Saturday and Sunday were completed on Monday due to the individual responsible for updating them not working on the weekends Observation on 08/27/19 at 9:47 A.M. revealed the daily staff posting was dated 08/26/19. Interview with Assistant Director of Nursing #200 on 08/27/19 at 9:47 A.M. verified the daily staff posting was dated 08/26/19.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$130,240 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $130,240 — penalty dated 2024-04-15
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-18 for 60 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JAG HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.3 | -2.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COOLEY, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 11/01/2024 |
| GRIFFITHS, JAMES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| JAG HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| MANSFIELD MEMORIAL HOMES, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| CHAWLA, AJAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| ROMERO, ZALLACA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| TREMMEL, MARTIN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/11/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365118. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.