Shelby Pointe

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 43.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-01-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. The census was 43. Findings include: An environmental tour was conducted on 12/31/24 between 12:55 P.M. and 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator. Observation of the exterior of the facility revealed the second window from the furthest east point of the building on the north side of the East Hall revealed the window screen was off its track and laying propped up against the building in an unsecured manner. Observation of the interior of the facility revealed the light ballast cover on the East Hall right before the egress exit revealed it contained dirt, debris, various dead bugs, and was partially cracked. Continued observation of Resident #23 and Resident #33's bedroom revealed missing molding around the boarders of the wall air conditioning and heating unit with deteriorating and eroding sheetrock from the edges and also gaps between the interior wall and exterior wall. Observation of Resident #25 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of investigations, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as ordered and care planned, failed to ensure falls were properly investigated, and failed to ensure interventions to prevent future falls were appropriate to the nature of the incident. This affected one (#8) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 07/08/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic respiratory failure, major depressive disorder, other generalized epilepsy, cachexia, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and had two or more falls since admission. Review of the physician order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor a resident's targeted behaviors as ordered. This affected one (#3) of two residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/08/24 and diagnoses including cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety, dysphagia, unspecified mood disorder, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 08/09/24 revealed an order to monitor daily behaviors. Review of Resident #3's plan of care dated 08/23/24 revealed the resident required the use of psychotropic medications with potential for adverse reactions related to adjustment disorder with depressed mood, anxiety, decline in health status,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident met established criteria for use of an antibiotic medication prior to administration. This affected one (#8) of one residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTIs). The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 07/08/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic respiratory failure, major depressive disorder, other generalized epilepsy, cachexia, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #8's urinalysis collected on 12/10/24, and with results obtained on 12/11/24, revealed the urine was abnormal in color and clarity, with urobilinogen, nitrite, leukocyte esterase, bacteria, and calcium oxalate crystals noted.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0914 — isolated
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain total visual privacy for residents. This affected two (#33 and #39) of 38 residents residing in semi-private rooms in the facility. The census was 43. Findings include: 1. Observation of resident rooms on 12/31/24 between 12:55 P.M. and 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed there was no privacy curtain around Resident #39's bed to ensure total visual privacy. Further observation revealed Resident #39 shared the room with Resident #11. 2. Observation of resident rooms on 12/31/24 between 12:55 P.M. and 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed there was no privacy curtain around Resident #33's bed to ensure total visual privacy. Further observation revealed Resident #33 shared the room with Resident #23. Interview on 12/31/24 at approximately 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator verified Resident #33 and Resident #39's beds did not have curtains around them to ensure total visual privacy.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and contractor interviews, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dishwasher was functioning properly to sanitize the dishes and utensils. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents who the facility identified as receiving meals from the facility. The facility also failed to handle, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This affected seven residents (#4, #5, #8, #12, #14, #21 and #26) who the facility identified as receiving mechanical soft diets. The facility census was 38. Findings include: 1) Observation of the low temperature dishwasher on 10/10/23 at 8:47 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #351, revealed DM #351 attempted to get a reading of the sanitizer on the test strips and the strips did not register any parts per million (ppm) to ensure concentration of the sanitizer was correct. DM #351 indicated the dishwasher should be registering at 50 PPM on the test strips for proper sanitation. DM #351 verified the findings at time of observation. Observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for residents. This affected four residents (#02, #30, #14, and #15) of 38 residents reviewed for call light placement. Findings Include: 1) Record review for Resident #02 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizophrenia, and personality disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 07/21/23 for Resident #02, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff member for mobility, transfer, and toilet use. Observation and interview of Resident #02 on 10/10/23 at 9:25 A.M., revealed the resident was lying in bed and his call light was lying on the floor under the bed. Resident #02 stated that she used the call light when she could find it. The call light was noted to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0800 — pattern
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to serve food at the proper portion size to meet the resident's nutritional needs. This affected seven residents (#4, #5, #8, #12, #14, #21 and #26) who the facility identified as receiving mechanical soft diets. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Observation of tray line on 10/12/23 at 11:45 A.M. revealed [NAME] #342 was scooping up the cold chicken salad into her gloved hand and placing the chicken salad on the lettuce situated on the plates. Interview with [NAME] #342 at the same time indicated she did not know the correct portion size for the chicken salad because the daily spreadsheet was in Dietary Manager (DM) #351's office. [NAME] #342 verified she was using her gloved hand to scoop out the chicken salad and plate it. Interview with DM #351 on 10/12/23 at 11:50 A.M. revealed the daily spreadsheet was in his office. DM #351 verified the mechanical soft diets should have received four ounces of cold chicken salad. DM #351 verified [NAME] #342 was plating the mechanical soft foods with her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) when a resident received a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. This affected one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Record review for Resident #27, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included other psychoactive substance abuse and alcohol abuse. Further review of the medical record revealed a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder which was added for Resident #27 on 11/16/21. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 07/01/23 for Resident #27, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others. Review of the electronic and paper medical records for Resident #27 revealed no evidence a new PASARR was completed when the resident received a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's equipment was clean and in good repair. This affected three residents (#07, #08 and #30) of the 38 residents observed during the initial screening process. The census was 38. Finds Included: 1) Observation of Resident #08 on 10/10/23 at 11:08 A.M. revealed the resident's wheelchair was dirty with grime and crumbs around the wheels, foot pedals, and seat cushion. Interview with Resident #8 at the same time, revealed his wheelchair had never been cleaned and it would be nice if it was clean. 2) Observation of Resident #07 on 10/10/23 at 11:29 A.M. revealed the resident wheelchair was dirty with dried food, liquid and grime on wheelchair wheels, foot pedals and the arm rests and the left arm rest was torn. Interview with Resident #7 at the same time, revealed her wheelchair had not been cleaned for a long time. 3) Observation of Resident #30 on 10/12/23 at 8:10 A.M. revealed the resident's wheelchair was dirty with dried food and covered in grime on wheels, cushion, and the wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAG HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $340K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH