No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Astoria Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

3537 12th Street, NW, Canton, OH 44708 · For profit - Corporation · 83 certified beds · (330) 455-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20242 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$190,519 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $190,519 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3120 Parkway St NW · (330) 493-9903 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2525 13th St NW · (330) 445-1087 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1136 Wertz Ave NW · (330) 452-9351 · Call to confirm hours
Park
527 Raff Rd NW · (330) 489-3015 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1330 Whipple Ave NW · (330) 478-3099

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms78.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.8%6.1%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.3%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%75.6%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.0%CMS range 39.5–74.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 7.7–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
63.1%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 66.0 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-03-11)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2022-03-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING SURVEY FINDINGS PERTAINS TO AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of weather information at www.timeanddate.com, review of the police report, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, resident representative interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and supervision to prevent the elopement of a severely cognitively impaired resident. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #12, who was severely cognitively impaired and high risk for wandering and elopement, exited the facility in the early morning hours on [DATE] and was found by a concerned citizen/Good Samaritan walking in the middle of the road approximately 0.55 miles away from the facility. The resident was dressed in a t-shirt, pajama pants and had no shoes on. Local weather temperatures were approximately 46 degrees Fahrenheit during this time. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews with staff and family, review of facility investigative information and review of the facility policies titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, and Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from incidents of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual physical and psychosocial harm beginning on 03/26/24 at approximately 3:00 P.M. when Resident #61 (a female resident), who was severely cognitively impaired was found naked in the facility spa room with Resident #4 (a male resident), who was dressed. On 03/26/24 at approximately 8:00 P.M. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #505 again found Resident #61 in the spa room with Resident #4. Resident #4 was observed with his pants down holding on to Resident #61's hip from behind as the resident was bent over. Resident #4 was observed making a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interviews with staff and family, review of a local Fire Department Patient Care Record, review of hospital records, review of facility investigation information, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure all residents received adequate and timely care and treatment to meet their total care needs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and subsequent actual harm/death beginning at 05/27/24 at approximately 4:30 A.M. when Resident #42, who was dependent on staff for transfers, incontinence care, management of insulin dependent diabetes and who was physically impaired due to Huntington's disease (an incurable neurological disorder that damages brain cells impacting movement, behavior and cognition) and a fall risk related to unstable medical condition, seizures, debility, weakness and tardive dyskinesia (a condition affecting the nervous system causing repetitive, involuntary movements) was found unresponsive in his room, absent of pulse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, review of a facility investigation, employee file review, manufacturer guideline review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 was transferred safely with a mechanical (Hoyer) sling lift resulting in a fall with major injury.Actual harm occurred on 09/11/25 when Resident #100, who was dependent on two staff members and the use of a mechanical sling lift with transfers, sustained a fall and a right hip fracture when being transferred from his bed to wheelchair with only the assistance of one staff member, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #50 and the Hoyer lift. During the transfer, the lift tipped, Resident #100 fell to the floor, was emergently transferred to hospital and admitted with a closed right hip fracture. The resident was discharged from the hospital and admitted to another facility. This affected one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of hospital records, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to timely identify a change in Resident #60's respiratory condition to ensure the resident was provided timely and adequate care. This affected one resident (#60) of three residents reviewed for death. Actual harm occurred beginning on [DATE] when the facility failed to adequately and timely treat respiratory complications exhibited by Resident #60, who was a Full Code (advance directives), non-verbal and had a tracheostomy, which included labored breathing, the resident testing positive for Coronavirus (COVID-19) and being treated with an antibiotic for pneumonia. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #500, who had not provided care to Resident #60 prior to [DATE], failed to notify Physician #511 regarding Resident #60's labored breathing as well as the resident having no secretions when suctioned. Resident #60 was found on [DATE] at 5:10 A.M. by LPN #500 with no vital signs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident representative interview, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely notification was provided to a resident representative following an accident. This affected one (Resident #67) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 03/21/23 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident, osteoarthritis to the left hip and benign prostate hypertrophy. Further review of Resident #67's medical record, including progress notes, revealed no documentation of any fall, accident, or incident on 03/10/26. A progress note on 03/16/26 indicated the resident's responsible party was updated on a [unspecified] prior incident and new interventions for fall prevention. Telephone interview with Resident #67's responsible party on 06/01/26 at 1:35 P.M. revealed on 03/10/26, the resident had a fall incident in the facility and the responsible party was not notified until several days after the incident occurred. On 06/02/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received adequate assistance with nail care. This affected one Resident (#62) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 67.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 05/20/25 and diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, contracture of bilateral knees, muscle wasting and atrophy, and stage three chronic kidney disease.Review of Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. Resident #62 was dependent on staff assistance for bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, transfers, and mobility.Observation on 06/01/26 at 10:01 A.M. revealed Resident #62's fingernails appeared long and had visible debris under the nails.Interview on 06/01/26 at 10:01 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for one resident (#57) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified eight residents with current pressure ulcers at the time of the annual survey. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA), metabolic encephalopathy, polyneuropathy and dementia.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had moderate cognitive impairment, required maximum assistance with activities of daily living and mobility, was frequently incontinent of bladder, occasionally incontinent of bowel, and reported occasional pain.Review of the care plan revised 05/20/26 revealed Resident #57 had actual skin integrity alterations including a left inner buttock pressure wound, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was free from a significant medication error. This affected one Resident (#43) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 67.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 04/22/26 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, essential hypertension, and chronic kidney disease.Review of a physician's order dated 04/22/26 revealed inject 1 milligram (mg) subcutaneously of Heparin Sodium (an injectable anticoagulant medication commonly used to prevent blood clots) 5000 unit per milliliter (Unit/mL) two times per day for prophylaxis. The order was discontinued on 04/24/26.Review of a physician's order dated 04/24/26 revealed inject 5000 units subcutaneously of Heparin Sodium 5000 Unit/mL two times per day related to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026 revealed the evening dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family representative interview, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records. This affected three residents (#2, #57, and #67) of seven residents reviewed for accuracy of records during the annual survey. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Telephone interview with Resident #67's responsible party on 06/01/26 at 1:35 P.M. revealed on 03/10/26 the resident had a fall incident in the facility. Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 03/21/23 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident, osteoarthritis to the left hip and benign prostate hypertrophy. Further review of the medical record including progress notes revealed no documentation of any fall or accident incident on 03/10/26. A progress note on 03/16/26 indicated the resident's responsible party was updated on prior incident and new interventions for fall prevention. On 06/02/25 at 3:50 P.M., an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain effective infection control standards during wound care. This affected one resident (#57) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified eight current residents with pressure ulcers at the time of the annual survey. The facility census was 67.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #57 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA), metabolic encephalopathy, polyneuropathy and dementia.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had moderate cognitive impairment, required maximum assistance with activities of daily living and mobility, was frequently incontinent of bladder, occasionally incontinent of bowel, and reported occasional pain.Review of the care plan dated 04/24/26 revealed Resident #57 was identified as being at risk for impaired skin integrity with new wounds and increased nutritional needs related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dressing changes for a resident's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line was changed on a routine ongoing basis. This affected one (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for care of a PICC line.Findings include:Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dressing changes for a resident's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line was changed on a routine ongoing basis. This affected one (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for care of a PICC line.Findings include:Review of Resident #6 ' s medical record revealed diagnoses including methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (bacteria that is resistant to many antibiotics), bacteremia (bacteria in the blood), and infection following a procedure/deep incisional surgical site. Upon admission, Resident #6 had an order for cefazolin sodium (antibiotic) two grams intravenously three times a day. An admission note dated 07/09/25 indicated Resident #6 had a double…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview with staff, the facility failed to maintain a clean sanitary kitchen area. This affected all residents in the facility except for the three residents (#5, #6, and #58) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Interview and observations of the kitchen with Dietary Manager #301 on 05/20/25 at 8:20 A.M. revealed the following sanitary concerns: a. Three trash cans which were dirty with a dark substance spilled down the sides of them. b. The bottom shelf of the steel table along the back wall was dirty with an orange substance soiled all over it. [NAME] #310, who was also present at the time of the observation, stated it was like that when she came in that day. c. The flour container had a measure cup in the flour. d. There were two black three-tiered carts what were visibly dirty with a buildup of several different spilled substances on them. e. The refrigerator had two packages of American cheese wrapped in aluminum foil with no date as to when it was opened and no expiration date. The cheese was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the closed medical record, interviews, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition for Resident #60. This affected one resident (Resident #60) of three reviewed for change in condition. Findings included: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, pneumonia, encephalopathy, protein-calorie malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, asthma, epilepsy, pacemaker status, transient ischemic attacks, tracheostomy, anxiety disorder, depression, acute kidney failure, adult failure to thrive, and diabetes. Resident #60 passed away at the hospital on [DATE]. Review of a plan of care dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was a full code. Interventions included (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) CPR to be initiated in the event of cardiac arrest and to notify the physician of a change in condition. Review of hospital discharge paperwork for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure the linens were free from stains. This affected one resident (Resident #39) and had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility who utilized the facility linens. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, schizoaffective disorder, personality disorder, lymphedema, paranoid personality, kidney disease, congestive heart failure, edema, hypertension, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had moderately impaired cognition and had no behaviors. On 05/20/25 at 3:00 P.M. an interview with Resident #39 revealed the washcloths and towels in the facility were stained and dingy. He stated they were not white at all and they want you to wash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff the facility failed to ensure transportation was set up for a postoperative appointment for Resident #52. This affected one resident (#52) of three reviewed for appointments. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cervical disc disorder, spinal stenosis, diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis of the hip, injury to the cauda equina, benign prostatic hyperplasia, sleep apnea, depression, asthma, anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, gout, fracture of the cervical vertebrae, fusion of the spine and fluid overload. Review of the hospital discharge paperwork provided to the facility dated 03/28/25 revealed Resident #52 had a post operative appointment with the surgeon on 04/07/25 at 9:30 A.M. Review of the physician's order dated 03/28/25 revealed Resident #52 had a post operative appointment with the surgeon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement individualized and effective pressure ulcer interventions timely. This affected one resident (Resident #42) out of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia of the left side after cerebrovascular disease, contractures of the left arm, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, pressure ulcers to the left and right heel, hypertensive retinopathy, insomnia, age related cataract, drusen of the left eye, and xerosis cutis. Review of the admission Braden Scale (pressure ulcer risk assessment) dated 04/11/25 revealed Resident #42 was at a high risk for the development of pressure injuries. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had an unstageable (full thickness tissue loss where the base of the ulcer was obscured by slough (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff the facility failed to set up a dental appointment as ordered for Resident #39. This affected one resident (#39) of three reviewed for appointments. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, schizoaffective disorder, personality disorder, lymphedema, paranoid personality, kidney disease, congestive heart failure, edema, hypertension, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had moderately impaired cognition and had no behaviors. Review of the nursing progress note dated 03/27/25 at 11:30 A.M. revealed Resident #39 notified the nurse his tooth fell out. Resident #39 did not complain of any pain associated with the area, however he was concerned because there was no blood. The physician was notified, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, interview with staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control measures during incontinence care for Resident #41. This affected one resident (Resident #41) of three reviewed for incontinence care. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the colon, duodenal ulcer, dementia, retention of urine, depression, chronic pain syndrome, gastritis, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Observation of incontinence care on 05/27/25 at 9:45 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #219 provided incontinence care to Resident #41. CNA #219 brought into the room, two washcloths and a bath towel to provide care to Resident #41. CNA #219 washed the perineal and rectal area of Resident #41 and got feces on the washcloth. CNA #219 continued to wash the perineal area with the same washcloth, but used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and manufacturer guidance review the facility failed to ensure distilled water was replaced as required to prevent infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment. This affected one out of one resident reviewed for the use of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) (A mechanical breathing device with a mask that is used to treat sleep apnea and other health conditions that affect breathing.). The facility census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, schizoeffective disorder, paranoid personality disorder, lymphedema, high cholesterol, anemia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, high blood pressure, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and depression, Review of Resident #40's physician order dated 01/29/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Two errors were made within 25 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of eight percent. This affected two (Residents #3 and #50) of three residents observed during medication administration. Facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #50 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including colitis with irritable bowel syndrome, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, fractured left ischium, quadriplegia, cervical disc myelopathy (Severe compression of the spinal cord.), gastroesophageal reflux disease, ovarian cysts, sacral pressure ulcer, sepsis, and rhabdomyolysis ( Disorder of skeletal muscle breakdown [necrosis] caused by muscle injury or myocyte membrane damage that leads to the release of myocyte contents into the bloodstream.) Resident #50's physician orders dated 02/01/25 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review and Center for Disease Control guidance for hand hygiene, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination of germs during Resident #3's and Resident #31's medication administration and failed to ensure staff disinfected the glucometer prior to obtaining Resident #3's and Resident #31's blood sugar. This affected two out of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, high cholesterol, anxiety , hypothyroidism, depression, gout and diabetes mellitus. Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including progressive neurological conditions, anemia, coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, and kidney disease. An observation on 02/11/25 at 7:22 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #65 administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #54's medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (Resident #54) of four residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, depression and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Resident #54's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #54's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/27/24 for hydrocodone/Tylenol (Percocet) 5-325 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for up to five days (discontinued 10/01/24). Review of Resident #54's Controlled Drug Record form revealed the resident was ordered Percocet narcotic pain medication every six hours up to five days with a total Percocet on the narcotic card of 19. One entry was documented by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of staff to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected one resident ( Resident #42) of three reviewed for staffing however it had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, dysphagia, gastrostomy, peptic ulcer disease, Huntington's disease, diabetes, epilepsy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, dyskinesia, hypothyroidism, malignant neoplasm of the thyroid, hypertension, metabolic encephalopathy, severe protein calorie malnutrition, kidney failure, and cystitis with hematuria. Resident #42 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and subsequently passed away on [DATE]. Review of the plan of care dated [DATE] and revised on [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was at risk for falls and potential injury related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect 58 residents that received meals from the facility. Two residents (Resident #3 and #5) were identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 05/21/24 at 2:15 P.M. with Dietary Manger (DM) #400 revealed underneath the sink the extra dish racks were stored on top of four old milk crates. When Dietary aide #402 pulled the dish racks and milk crates out many gnats flew out from under the sink. There were approximately five feet of missing tile along the baseboard for water damage, the drywall was crumbling, and water damaged with a large hole in the wall. The gnats were coming from the hole in the wall. An interview at this time with the Dietary Manger #400 confirmed there was a hole in a wall and there were many gnats. He was not sure how long the wall had been like that since he had just started a couple months ago. DM #400 verified finds at time of observation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility's investigation, interviews with staff and family, and review of facility policy, the facility failed implement their abuse policy to thoroughly investigate and report all allegations of resident-to-resident abuse. This affected two residents (#51, and #61) of five reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #61's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, history of falling, hypertension, hearing loss, dysthymic disorder, protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, depression, and anxiety. The resident was discharged to another facility on 04/05/24 at the request of her family. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 03/05/24 revealed Resident #61 had alterations in mood and behaviors related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the State Agency. This affected two resident (Resident #51, and #61) of five reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 60. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #61's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, history of falling, hypertension, hearing loss, dysthymic disorder, protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, depression, and anxiety. The resident was discharged to another facility on 04/05/24 at the request of her family. Review of the progress note dated 03/26/24 at 9:10 P.M. and authored by the DON revealed Resident #61 was in the bathroom with another resident (#61), both residents were noted with their pants down. They were immediately separated and placed on one-on-one (1:1) supervision with staff. The note indicated Resident #61 was assessed with no signs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility's investigation, interviews with staff and family, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate all allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected two residents (#51, and #61) of five reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #61's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, history of falling, hypertension, hearing loss, dysthymic disorder, protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, depression, and anxiety. The resident was discharged to another facility on 04/05/24 at the request of her family. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 03/05/24 revealed Resident #61 had alterations in mood and behaviors related to anxiety, depression and wandering.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63 had an adequate supply of narcotic medications to ensure a safe discharge until her post-discharge physician appointment. This affected one resident (Resident #63) of three residents reviewed for safe discharge. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, arthritis, history of transient ischemic attack, major depressive disorder, intervertebral disc degeneration, fibromyalgia, hypertension, restless leg syndrome, malignant neoplasm of ovary, insomnia, and migraines. She was discharged to home on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the April 2024 Physician's orders revealed Resident #63 had narcotic order for Adderall 10 milligrams every morning for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage letters and staff interview, the facility failed to inform the residents of the appeal agency and their phone number. This affected five (Resident #22, Resident #28, Resident #29, Resident #49, and Resident #62) of five residents reviewed for liability notices. The census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage letter revealed services were ended on 11/10/23. The letter did not contain the name and phone number of the agency to send an appeal. 2. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage letter revealed services were ended on 02/21/24. The letter did not contain the name and phone number of the agency to send an appeal. 3. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a full-time dietary manager to oversee daily kitchen operations. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents (except Residents #9, #54 and #212) who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the dietary staff schedules and punch detail for February 2024 through March 2024 revealed [NAME] #811 worked part-time, less than 35 hours per week. On 03/04/24 at 7:30 A.M., interview with [NAME] #810 revealed there was no dietary manager and that [NAME] #811 was overseeing kitchen operations. On 03/05/24 at 3:04 P.M., interview with Registered Dietitian (RD) #819 revealed she was part time at the facility and was only in the building for eight to ten hours per week, spending most of her time on clinical work. On 03/05/24 at 3:33 P.M., interview with Regional Quality Assurance Nurse #920 revealed [NAME] #811 was a Certified Dietary Manager and that [NAME] #811 had no interest in being a manager. On 03/06/24 at 2:57 P.M., interview with Regional Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the dietary schedules, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient competent staff to work in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents (except Residents #9, #54, and #212) who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the dietary staff punch detail revealed there was no morning dietary aide and no evening cook on 02/22/24; no dietary aide all day and no evening cook on 02/23/24; no morning dietary aide on 02/24/24; no morning dietary aide and no evening cook on 02/26/24; no morning dietary aide on 02/27/24; no morning dietary aide on 02/28/24; no evening cook on 03/01/24; no morning dietary aide on 03/02/24, and no morning dietary aide on 03/04/24. On 03/04/24 at 7:30 A.M., interview with [NAME] #810 revealed there was not enough dietary staff and staff from other departments had to help in the kitchen. On 03/05/24 at 10:48 A.M., observation of the resident activity occurring in the dining room revealed Activities Director #802 ended the activity early to assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store foods in a manner to prevent contamination, monitor sanitizer solution concentration, monitor dishwasher temperatures, and ensure staff working in the kitchen had their hair secured and covered. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents (except Residents #9, #54, and #212) who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: On 03/04/24 at 7:30 A.M., tour of the kitchen revealed there were 10 boxes of food stored on the floor in the walk in freezer, which was verified by [NAME] #810 at the time of observation. In the walk-in refrigerator, there was one bag of shredded cheese that was open to air and not sealed, one bag of shredded carrots that was open to air and not sealed, and one container of pasta salad that was open to air and not sealed, all of which were verified by [NAME] #810 at the time of observation. During the tour, Business Office Manager (BOM) #807 entered the kitchen with her hair unsecured. BOM #807 proceeded to walk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility to provide a dignified dining experience for residents. This affected three residents (#8, #19, and #38) observed during meals in the dining room. The facility census was 61. Findings include: On 03/04/24 at 1:00 P.M., observation of the dining room revealed Resident #19 was seated at a table with three other residents and Resident #19 was the only one without food at her table. Resident #19 asked staff repeatedly where her food was and stated she was hungry. Resident #8 was seated at a table with two other residents and Resident #8 was the only one without food at her table. Resident #8 repeatedly told staff she was hungry. Resident #38 was seated at a table with two other residents and Resident #38 was the only one without food at her table. On 03/04/24 at 1:00 P.M., interview with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #867 verified Residents #8, #19, and #38 were the only residents at their tables without food. STNA #867 stated facility staff distributed the trays as they were delivered to the units and it was not unusual some residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely notification to the state ombudsman of 30 day discharges for Resident #33 and Resident #41. This affected two residents of four reviewed for discharge notices. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical records revealed the Resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, fracture of the vertebrae (spine), lack of coordination, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Resident #33's Notice of 30-day Discharge for non-payment dated 02/09/24 indicated the Ohio Department of Health and Ombudsman were notified via postal mail. The proposed discharge date was 03/10/24. An interview on 03/06/23 at 2:42 P.M. with Business Office Manager #807 revealed the Notice of 30-day Discharge for Resident #33 was mailed via postal carrier on 02/09/24, however verified there was no evidence the notice was mailed on that date. An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #56 was provided adequate supervision to prevent an attempted elopement, and failed to investigate a fall and re-assess the resident to determine if current fall interventions remained appropriate to prevent future falls. This affected one (Resident #56) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Review of Resident #56's Wandering Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was low risk for wandering. Review of Resident #56's Elopement Risk Assessment form dated 01/26/24 revealed the resident was a low risk for elopement. Review of Resident #56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record and interview with the staff and resident, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had his fingernails trimmed and Resident #8 was shaved. This affected two residents ( Resident #5 and #8) of 12 residents who required assistance by staff for activities of daily living (ADLS). The facility census was 61. Finding included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included protein-calorie malnutrition, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, transient ischemic attack, ataxia, arthritis, epilepsy, spastic paraplegia, Huntington's disease, need for assistance with personal care, major depressive disorder, and aphasic. Review of the plan of care dated 08/10/22 with a revision date of 12/18/23 revealed Resident #5 had a self-care deficit, and ADL decline may be expected related to his disease process. Resident #8 required extensive to total assistance for most ADLs and he required staff assist for feeding. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #40 as ordered/care planned. This affected one resident (#40) of three residents reviewed for fall interventions. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, diabetes, anemia, shortness of breath, atrial fibrillation, dementia, and hypertension. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #40 had ordered (dated 11/28/22) for a Dycem to the recliner chair for safety (every day) and an order (dated 12/29/22) for a Dycem to be placed under the fitted sheet (every day). Review of the plan of care with a revision date of 09/28/23 revealed Resident #40 was at risk for falls and potential injury related to debilitation, weakness, dementia, impaired balance, and unsteady gait. Interventions included having her bed against…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for Resident #20 and Resident #53. This affected two residents (#20 and #53) observed during random observations. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to pain in right lower leg, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety disorder and spinal stenosis. Review of care plans dated 06/23/23 revealed Resident #20 was at risk for falls related to diagnoses. Interventions included but were not limited to call light within reach. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff for mobility, transfer, and toilet use. Observation on 10/02/23 at 9:41 A.M. revealed Resident #20 was lying in bed. Resident #20's call light was on the floor underneath the bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy the facility failed to ensure medication delivered from the pharmacy were locked in a secure location. This affected three residents (Resident #52, #319, and #468) who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile in the facility. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Observation on 03/16/22 at 9:20 A.M. revealed the door to the [NAME] unit communication center was open and inside on the counter was an open gray tote with medication which was delivered from the pharmacy. There were no staff members present. Interview on 03/16/22 at 9:25 A.M. Registered Nurse #565 verified the medications were not secured in a locked room. She stated she did not even know they were there because the midnight shift usually puts them away. Review of the medication in the delivery tote were as followed; four patches of scopolamine one milligrams (mg), 16 tablets of pantoprazole 40 mg, eight tablets of amitriptyline 50 mg, 24 tablets of cyclobenzaprine 10 mg, 24 tablets of gabapentin 400 mg, 24 tablets of gabapentin 600 mg, 16 tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were implemented for four of seven residents (Resident #471, #472, #473 and #475) in the facility that were presumed Covid-19 positive and infection control signs were not posted outside of all isolation rooms. The facility had no positive Covid-19 residents. The census was 70. Finding Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #471 revealed an admission date on 03/11/22. Review of the orders revealed droplet isolation orders per admission protocol for 10 days. Observation on 03/14/2022 at 8:06 A.M. of License Practical Nurse (LPN) #512 revealed LPN #512 entered Resident #471 to deliver breakfast tray, Resident #471 was on droplet precautions for new admission. LPN #512 was only wearing a surgical mask and goggles and not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). There were no isolation signs outside of Resident #471's room. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents or resident representatives received a written copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN). This affected two (Residents #22 and #38) of four residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for Resident #22 dated 02/23/22 revealed the resident's skilled services would end on 02/25/22. There was no signature by the resident or resident representative indicating they received and understood the notice. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for Resident #22 dated 02/23/22 revealed the resident would be responsible for paying for skilled nursing services, physical therapy, and occupational therapy. There was no signature by the resident or resident representative indicating they received and understood the notice. On 03/16/22 at 9:31 A.M., interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to trim and clean the fingernails for Resident #49 and failed to provide routine hand hygiene for Resident #46, both who required staff assistance for activities of daily living. This affected two residents (Resident #46 and #49) of three reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypoxemia, dementia without behaviors, personal history of COVID-19, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypothyroism, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left side, major depression, and anorexia. Review of the plan of care dated 07/12/21 revealed Resident #40 had hemiparesis related to a stroke. She needed assistance with activities of daily living due to her limitations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to implement supervision and smoking interventions for Resident #12 to smoke safely. This affected one of five residents identified as smokers in the facility (#6, #32, #47 and #56). The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, incomplete quadriplegia and a history of falls. Review of the comprehensive assessment (MDS 3.0) dated 12/25/21 indicated she was alert, oriented and independent in daily decision-making ability. Review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] indicated she smoked two to five cigarettes per day, liked to smoke in the evenings, able to light her own cigarette, required no adaptive equipment and the facility did not need to store her lighter and cigarettes. Review of the care plan dated 02/14/22 indicated Resident #12 was at risk for injury due to smoking. The interventions indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were dated upon opening to ensure they were used timely and failed to provide appropriate temperature controls for packed lunches for Resident #56. This had the potential to affect ten residents (Resident #42, Resident #19, Resident #8, Resident #223, Resident #14, Resident #48, Resident #54, Resident #65, Resident #44, and Resident #9) of ten residents that were ordered a Med Pass 2.0 nutritional supplement and one resident (Resident #56) of one resident who received a packed lunch for dialysis. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/21/19 at 10:10 A.M. of the two snack refrigerators, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #451 present, revealed there were six opened and undated 32 ounce Med Pass 2.0 nutritional supplement cartons. Interview with LPN #451 confirmed they were opened and undated. LPN #451 was unsure the facility policy on dating opened nutritional supplements. Review of the Med Pass 2.0 nutritional supplement manufacture guideline revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained related to the disposal of an insulin syringe for Resident #27. This affected one resident (Resident #27) and had the potential to affect 16 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #11, #23, #25, #27, #30, #34, #35, #42, #51, #55, #61 and #119) identified as receiving insulin injections. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Record review for Resident #27 revealed an initial admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke with residual paralysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hepatitis C, hypertension, dysphagia or trouble swallowing and insomnia. Resident #27 was not able to be interviewed due to the recent effects of a stroke and was reliant upon the staff for all of his care. The physician had orders written to obtain a glucose level or blood sugar four times a day, before each meal and at the hour of sleep. The nursing staff would administer insulin according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to issue Resident #64 and Resident #62 the proper notification of liability when skilled nursing services ended. This affected two residents (Resident #62 and Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findings include: 1. Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE] and received a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) on 12/05/18 that skilled services would end on 12/07/18. Resident #64 remained in the facility. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review revealed the facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted and Resident #64 did not receive a Skilled Nursing Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNABN). Interview on 03/20/19 at 1:34 P.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #100 revealed the facility does not issue residents an SNABN when Medicare Park A serviced ended if the resident remained in the facility under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #66, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living received timely and adequate nail care. This affected one resident (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, need for assistance with personal care, hemiplegia affected right dominant side, and osteoarthritis. Resident #66's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/22/19 revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired and the resident required supervision with personal hygiene. Resident #66's comprehensive care plan, revised 03/19/19 revealed the resident was at risk for decline activities of daily living function due to cognitive deficits. Resident #66 was admitted with long fingernails that were and are difficult to cut and he sees the podiatrist for cutting his fingernails. Interventions on the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #25 received the correct amount of fluids via a percutaneous gastronomy tube for nutrition/hydration according to physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #25) of seven residents identified to receive nutrition/hydration via gastrostomy tube. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis for admission of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the non-dominate left side. Additional diagnoses included respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, anemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dysphagia and slurred speech. Record review revealed Resident #25 had a percutaneous gastronomy (PEG) tube place in the abdomen for total nutritional needs following a stroke which left Resident #25 with the inability to take food or drink by mouth. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 received routine tracheostomy care. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, dependent on respirator ventilator status, edema, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and ventricular tachycardia. Resident #5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact and she received tracheostomy care. Resident #5's comprehensive care plan for ventilator dependence due to respiratory failure, revised [DATE], revealed the resident should receive routine tracheostomy change by respiratory care. No other information regarding tracheostomy care was included on the care plan. Review of Resident #5's physician orders from [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #44's medications were securely stored. This affected one resident (Resident #44) of 69 residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gangrene, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Resident #44's 60-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was moderately impaired. Observation on 03/18/19 at 10:58 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #101 revealed Resident #44 was lying in bed in his room and there was a cup of unidentified medications at his bedside table. LPN #101 removed the cup of medication from the resident's room. Interview with LPN #101 at this time revealed she administered his morning medications in the dining room. LPN #101 revealed there were eight medications in the cup, and after reviewing Resident #44's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory blood work was completed as ordered for Resident #5, Resident #9 and Resident #27. This affected three residents (Resident #5, #9 and #27) of nine residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The primary diagnosis for admission was malaise and fatigue. Additional diagnoses included osteoporosis, cardiac pacemaker, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, depression and acid reflux. Review of the physician orders, dated [DATE] revealed an active order for complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and a lipid panel to have been obtained every six months starting on [DATE]. Review of the hard charting and electronic medical record for Resident #9 was void of any evidence of the completed laboratory work as per the physician's orders. The facility had evidence of the most recent CBC and CMP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory results were reported to the physician timely for Resident #27 and Resident #5. This affected two residents (Resident #27 and #5) of nine residents whose laboratory results were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #27 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke with residual paralysis, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hepatitis C, hypertension, dysphagia or trouble swallowing and insomnia. Resident #27 was not able to be interviewed due to the recent effects of a stroke and was reliant upon the staff for all care. Review of the medical nutrition therapy note, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had a low prealbumin (lab frequently used to assess nutritional requirement in the diet) value at 12 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dl) (normal result range 16 to 45 mg/dl) and requested a nutritional supplement be provided twice a day and requested repeat prealbumin in a week to assess success.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #44's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was accurate. This affected one resident (Resident #44) of 18 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the faciliy on 10/22/18 with diagnoses including gangrene, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Resident #44's 60-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #44's March 2019 MAR revealed his medications were documented as administered on the evening of 03/17/19. Observation on 03/18/19 at 10:58 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #101 revealed Resident #44 was lying in bed in his room and there was a cup of unidentified medications at his bedside table. LPN #101 removed the cup of medication from the resident's room. Interview with LPN #101 at this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$190,519 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-11-05
  • $15,940 — penalty dated 2025-10-20
  • $59,833 — penalty dated 2025-06-04
  • $88,061 — penalty dated 2024-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MICHAEL SLYK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SLYK, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 05/10/2009
MSTC DEVELOPMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
D'AMICO, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/18/2018
RYDER, GWYNNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2025
CHESNEY, TIMOTHYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025
JILLTIN OF MEYERS LAKE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
COLEMAN, JESSICAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
JONES, ELIZABETHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 4%Other / private 26%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$12,009per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$380per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366391. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next